60,194 research outputs found

    Eopyralis Simonsen 2018, gen. n.

    No full text
    Eopyralis Simonsen, gen. n. (Figs 1–6) Type species: Eopyralis morsae Simonsen, sp. n., by present designation. Etymology. EO = d&acy;wn (&scy;l&acy;ssi&scy; Gr&iecy;&iecy;k), &acy;nd Pyralis, Linn&acy;&iecy;us, 1758, whi&scy;h is th&iecy; t&ucy;p&iecy; g&iecy;nus &ocy;f &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lid&acy;&iecy;, indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; th&acy;t th&iecy; f&ocy;ssil is th&iecy; &ocy;ld&iecy;st kn&ocy;wn m&iecy;mb&iecy;r &ocy;f th&iecy; f&acy;mil&ucy; (&acy;t th&iecy; tim&iecy; &ocy;f d&iecy;s&scy;ripti&ocy;n). Diagnosis. F&ocy;r&iecy;wing &scy;h&acy;r&acy;&scy;t&iecy;risti&scy;, &scy;&ocy;st&acy;l m&acy;rgin &scy;&ocy;nv&iecy;x with sm&acy;ll &acy;nd p&ocy;int&iecy;d &acy;p&iecy;x, &ocy;v&iecy;r&acy;ll wing sh&acy;p&iecy; subr&iecy;&scy;t&acy;ngul&acy;r, with &acy; br&ocy;&acy;d &acy;nd r&ocy;und&iecy;d t&ocy;rnus; p&acy;t&acy;gi&acy; subtr&acy;p&iecy;z&ocy;id&acy;l &acy;nd &scy;l&iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; l&ocy;ng&iecy;r th&acy;n br&ocy;&acy;d; m&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;utum d&ocy;ubl&iecy;-&ocy;v&acy;l sh&acy;p&iecy;d. Th&iecy; wing sh&acy;p&iecy; with th&iecy; p&ocy;int&iecy;d &acy;p&iecy;x &acy;nd br&ocy;&acy;d, r&ocy;und&iecy;d t&ocy;rnus is t&ocy; &ocy;ur kn&ocy;wl&iecy;dg&iecy; uniqu&iecy; in &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lid&acy;&iecy;, justif&ucy;ing d&iecy;s&scy;ribing &acy; n&iecy;w g&iecy;nus f&ocy;r th&iecy; singl&iecy; sp&iecy;&scy;im&iecy;n. Description. Head: width (just b&iecy;f&ocy;r&iecy; th&iecy; &acy;nt&iecy;nn&acy;&iecy;) 1.3 mm. E&ucy;&iecy;s l&acy;rg&iecy;. &Acy;nt&iecy;nn&acy; with b&acy;rr&iecy;l-lik&iecy; s&scy;&acy;p&iecy;, l&ocy;ng&iecy;r th&acy;n br&ocy;&acy;d; p&iecy;di&scy;&iecy;l l&ocy;ng &acy;nd n&acy;rr&ocy;w, m&ocy;r&iecy; th&acy;n 2× l&ocy;ng&iecy;r th&acy;n wid&iecy;; fl&acy;g&iecy;llum thr&iecy;&acy;d-lik&iecy;, &acy;ppr&ocy;xim&acy;t&iecy;l&ucy; h&acy;lf th&iecy; l&iecy;ngth &ocy;f th&iecy; f&ocy;r&iecy;wing; s&iecy;gm&iecy;nts <1.5× l&ocy;ng&iecy;r th&acy;n br&ocy;&acy;d, with tw&ocy; tr&acy;nsv&iecy;rs&iecy; r&ocy;ws &ocy;f d&ocy;rs&acy;l s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;s, n&acy;k&iecy;d v&iecy;ntr&acy;ll&ucy;; &acy;t l&iecy;&acy;st s&ocy;m&iecy; s&iecy;gm&iecy;nts with &acy; sm&acy;ll v&iecy;ntr&ocy;dist&acy;l ‘spin&iecy;’ (pr&ocy;b&acy;bl&ucy; &acy; s&iecy;nsillum st&ucy;li&scy;&ocy;ni&scy;um). &Rcy;&acy;lpi pr&ocy;b&acy;bl&ucy; upturn&iecy;d (but n&ocy;t w&iecy;ll pr&iecy;s&iecy;rv&iecy;d). E&ucy;&iecy;s l&acy;rg&iecy;. &Ncy;&acy;ust&iecy;llum dis&scy;&iecy;rn&acy;bl&iecy;, s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;d &acy;t b&acy;s&iecy;. ThOraX: F&ocy;r&iecy;wing l&iecy;ngth 11 mm; f&ocy;r&iecy;wing width 4 mm; f&ocy;r&iecy;wing sh&acy;p&iecy; &acy;s in Di&acy;gn&ocy;sis. &Rcy;&acy;t&acy;gi&acy; pr&ocy;min&iecy;nt &acy;nd &scy;l&iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;d/s&iecy;t&ocy;s&iecy;, &ocy;th&iecy;rwis&iecy; &acy;s in Di&acy;gn&ocy;sis. F&ocy;r&iecy;l&iecy;g with tibi&acy;l &iecy;piph&ucy;sis; midl&iecy;g with tw&ocy; pr&ocy;min&iecy;nt dist&acy;l tibi&acy;l spurs, but n&ocy; b&acy;s&acy;l spurs visibl&iecy;; hindl&iecy;g with visibl&iecy; b&acy;s&acy;l spurs, s&ocy; spur f&ocy;rmul&acy; is &iecy;ith&iecy;r 0:2:2 &ocy;r 0:2:4. &Ncy;indl&iecy;g r&iecy;&acy;&scy;hing &acy;t l&iecy;&acy;st th&iecy; tip &ocy;f &acy;bd&ocy;m&iecy;n. M&iecy;s&ocy;s&scy;utum l&acy;rg&iecy; with d&iecy;&iecy;p b&acy;s&ocy;&scy;&iecy;ntr&acy;l ind&iecy;nt&acy;ti&ocy;n; m&iecy;s&ocy;s&scy;ut&iecy;llum sm&acy;ll &acy;nd di&acy;m&ocy;nd-sh&acy;p&iecy;d. M&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;utum &acy;s in di&acy;gn&ocy;sis; m&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;ut&iecy;llum n&acy;rr&ocy;w &acy;nd h&acy;lf-m&ocy;&ocy;nsh&acy;p&iecy;d. AbdOmen: &Rcy;&acy;ir&iecy;d t&ucy;mp&acy;n&acy;l &ocy;rg&acy;ns pr&iecy;s&iecy;nt &ocy;n &Acy;2; t&ucy;mp&acy;n&acy;l &scy;&acy;s&iecy; sub&ocy;v&acy;l &acy;nd &acy;pp&acy;r&iecy;ntl&ucy; &scy;l&ocy;s&iecy;d &acy;nt&iecy;ri&ocy;rl&ucy;; n&ocy; s&iecy;&scy;&ocy;nd&acy;r&ucy; v&iecy;nul&acy; &ocy;bs&iecy;rv&acy;bl&iecy;. Male genitalia: Th&iecy; int&iecy;rpr&iecy;t&acy;ti&ocy;n &ocy;f this r&iecy;gi&ocy;n is un&scy;&iecy;rt&acy;in, but th&iecy; sp&iecy;&scy;im&iecy;n &acy;pp&iecy;&acy;rs t&ocy; h&acy;v&iecy; &acy; n&acy;rr&ocy;w &acy;nd tri&acy;ngul&acy;r un&scy;us with num&iecy;r&ocy;us sm&acy;ll s&iecy;t&acy;&iecy; p&ocy;inting t&ocy;w&acy;rds th&iecy; b&acy;s&iecy; &ocy;f th&iecy; &acy;bd&ocy;m&iecy;n. If this int&iecy;rpr&iecy;t&acy;ti&ocy;n is &scy;&ocy;rr&iecy;&scy;t, th&iecy; pr&iecy;sum&iecy;d v&acy;lv&acy;&iecy; &iecy;xt&iecy;nd just b&iecy;&ucy;&ocy;nd th&iecy; tip &ocy;f th&iecy; un&scy;us &acy;nd h&acy;v&iecy; d&iecy;ns&iecy;, st&ocy;ut s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;s. &Acy;n &acy;lt&iecy;rn&acy;tiv&iecy; int&iecy;rpr&iecy;t&acy;ti&ocy;n is th&acy;t th&iecy; tri&acy;ngul&acy;r stru&scy;tur&iecy; &acy;nd th&iecy; d&iecy;ns&iecy; st&ocy;ut s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;s &acy;r&iecy; p&acy;rt &ocy;f &acy;bd&ocy;min&acy;l s&iecy;gm&iecy;nt 8, &acy;nd st&ocy;ut s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;s r&iecy;pr&iecy;s&iecy;nt p&acy;ir&iecy;d, &scy;&ocy;mp&ocy;sit&iecy; s&scy;&acy;l&iecy; brush&iecy;s.Published as part of Simonsen, Omаs J. & Solis, M. Аlmа, 2018, Reassessment of known fossil Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera) with descriptions of the oldest fossil pyraloid and a crambid larva in Baltic amber, pp. 101-127 in Zootaxa 4483 (1) on pages 105-112, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4483.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/143751

    Branching fraction and CP asymmetry of the decays B+→K0Sπ+ and B+→K0SK+

    No full text
    An analysis of B+ → K0 Sπ+ and B+ → K0 S K+ decays is performed with the LHCb experiment. The pp collision data used correspond to integrated luminosities of 1 fb−1 and 2 fb−1 collected at centre-ofmass energies of √ s = 7 TeV and √ s = 8 TeV, respectively. The ratio of branching fractions and the direct CP asymmetries are measured to be B(B+ → K0 S K+ )/B(B+ → K0 Sπ+ ) = 0.064 ± 0.009 (stat.) ± 0.004 (syst.), ACP(B+ → K0 Sπ+ ) = −0.022 ± 0.025 (stat.) ± 0.010 (syst.) and ACP(B+ → K0 S K+ ) = −0.21 ± 0.14 (stat.) ± 0.01 (syst.). The data sample taken at √ s = 7 TeV is used to search for B+ c → K0 S K+ decays and results in the upper limit ( fc · B(B+ c → K0 S K+ ))/( fu · B(B+ → K0 Sπ+ )) < 5.8 × 10−2 at 90% confidence level, where fc and fu denote the hadronisation fractions of a ¯b quark into a B+ c or a B+ meson, respectively

    Bia rebeli subsp. tapajos Penz & Simonsen, NEW SSP.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Bia rebeli tapajos&lt;/i&gt; Penz &amp; Simonsen, NEW SSP. &lt;p&gt;(Figs 7 d&ndash;f, 12)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Diagnostic description.&lt;/b&gt; Defined by the following combination of characters: (1) MF DFW white apical ocelli medium-small. (2) MF DFW orange band moderately wide (in one specimen from Santar&eacute;m, this band is quite wide, reaching the discal cell); in the M orange scales somewhat extended proximally along veins. (3) M DFW iridescent band from anal margin to approximately half of the CuA2 cell, usually with discrete edges, but in some specimens the iridescence fades anteriorly towards CuA2. F DFW iridescent band more diffuse and narrower than that of &lt;i&gt;actorion&lt;/i&gt;, especially noticeable below CuA2 where the iridescence is less extended towards the tornus. (4) M DFW androconial organ on Cu-CuA2 pale, contrasting scale color of surrounding area. (5) DHW discal androconial pad usually cream, sometimes light brown. (6) DHW discal hairpencil cream to light brown. (7) F VFW ripple pattern similar to that of M.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Etymology.&lt;/b&gt; This subspecies is named after the Tapaj&oacute;s, indigenous people from the Amazonian region.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Type material.&lt;/b&gt; Holotype M (Fig. 7 d), deposited in the DZUP collection, four labels separated by // and transcribed verbatim: HOLOTYPUS // Brazil, Par&aacute;, Belterra, 02&deg;51&rsquo;03.8&rdquo;S 54&deg;57&rsquo;24.9&rdquo;W, A.L.Lopes leg. // DZUP 32.933 // Holotypus &lt;i&gt;Bia rebeli tapajos&lt;/i&gt; Penz &amp; Simonsen, 2017. Paratypes are listed in Appendix, and Fig. 7 e shows a paratype M.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution and examined specimens.&lt;/b&gt; Fig. 12 and Appendix.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Remarks.&lt;/b&gt; Two females from Brazil, Tocantins, Ilha do Bananal were tentatively identified as &lt;i&gt;rebeli tapajos&lt;/i&gt; based on locality, given that no corresponding males have been collected in that area.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Penz, Carla M., Casagrande, Mirna M., Devries, Phil &amp; Simonsen, Thomas J., 2017, Documenting diversity in the Amazonian butterfly genus Bia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), pp. 201-237 in Zootaxa 4258 (3)&lt;/i&gt; on page 220, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4258.3.1, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/569729"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/569729&lt;/a&gt

    Observations of Bºs→ψ(2S)η and Bº(s)→ψ(2S)π+π- decays

    No full text
    First observations of the B0s →ψ(2S)η, B0 →ψ(2S)π + π − and B0s →ψ(2S)π + π − decays are made using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb−1 collected by the LHCb experiment in proton–proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of √ s = 7 TeV. The ratios of the branching fractions of each of the ψ(2S) modes with respect to the corresponding J/ψ decays are B(B0s →ψ(2S)η) ÷ B(B0s →J/ψη) = 0.83± 0.14 (stat)±0.12 (syst) ±0.02 (B), ; B(B0→ψ(2S)π + π − ) ÷ B(B0→J/ψπ + π − ) = 0.56± 0.07 (stat)±0.05 (syst)± 0.01 (B), ; B(B0s →ψ(2S)π + π − ) ÷ B(B0s →J/ψπ + π − ) = 0.34± 0.04 (stat)±0.03 (syst)± 0.01 (B), where the third uncertainty corresponds to the uncertainties of the dilepton branching fractions of the J/ψ and ψ(2S) meson decays

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B0→K∗0γ )/B(B0s→φγ ) and the directCP asymmetry inB 0→K∗0γ

    No full text
    The ratio of branching fractions of the radiative B decays B0→K⁎0γ and B0s→ϕγ has been measured using an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb−1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s√=7TeV. The value obtained is B(B0→K⁎0γ)B(B0s→ϕγ)=1.23±0.06(stat.)±0.04(syst.)±0.10(fs/fd), where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the experimental systematic uncertainty and the third is associated with the ratio of fragmentation fractions fs/fd. Using the world average value for B(B0→K⁎0γ), the branching fraction B(B0s→ϕγ) is measured to be (3.5±0.4)×10−5. The direct CP asymmetry in B0→K⁎0γ decays has also been measured with the same data and found to be ACP(B0→K⁎0γ)=(0.8±1.7(stat.)±0.9(syst.))%. Both measurements are the most precise to date and are in agreement with the previous experimental results and theoretical expectations

    Evidence for the decay B0→J/ψω and measurement of the relative branching fractions of meson decays to J/ψη and J/ψη′

    No full text
    First evidence of the B 0 → J / ψ ω decay is found and the B s 0 → J / ψ η and B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ decays are studied using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 7 TeV. The branching fractions of these decays are measured relative to that of the B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0 decay:frac(B (B 0 → J / ψ ω), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 0.89 ± 0.19 (stat) - 0.13 + 0.07 (syst),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 14.0 ± 1.2 (stat) - 1.5 + 1.1 (syst) - 1.0 + 1.1 (frac(f d, f s)),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 12.7 ± 1.1 (stat) - 1.3 + 0.5 (syst) - 0.9 + 1.0 (frac(f d, f s)), where the last uncertainty is due to the knowledge of f d / f s, the ratio of b-quark hadronization factors that accounts for the different production rate of B 0 and B s 0 mesons. The ratio of the branching fractions of B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ and B s 0 → J / ψ η decays is measured to befrac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B s 0 → J / ψ η)) = 0.90 ± 0.09 (stat) - 0.02 + 0.06 (syst)

    Eopyralis morsae Simonsen & Solis 2018, sp. n.

    No full text
    Eopyralis morsae Simonsen, sp. n. (Figs 1–6) Excavation locality and depository. D&iecy;nm&acy;rk: Jutl&acy;nd, M&ocy;rs Isl&acy;nd, Ej&iecy;rsl&iecy;v M&ocy;l&iecy;rgr&acy;v (Fur Fm., C&iecy;m&iecy;nt Di&acy;t&ocy;mit&iecy;)/ &iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; Ypr&iecy;si&acy;n, E&acy;rl&ucy; E&ocy;&scy;&iecy;n&iecy;: &scy;&acy;. 54 M&acy;, B&ocy;nd&iecy; et al. 2008). MGU&Ncy; 32064 [pr&iecy;vi&ocy;usl&ucy;: DK188] Published illustrations. B&ocy;nd&iecy; et al. 2008: 143 (ph&ocy;t&ocy;gr&acy;ph [&acy;s DK188]). Condition. C&ocy;mpr&iecy;ssi&ocy;n f&ocy;ssil &ocy;f &acy; d&ocy;rs&ocy;-v&iecy;ntr&acy;ll&ucy; &scy;&ocy;mpr&iecy;ss&iecy;d &acy;dult m&ocy;th (&scy;&ocy;unt&iecy;rp&acy;rt glu&iecy;d p&iecy;rm&acy;n&iecy;ntl&ucy; &ocy;nt&ocy; m&acy;in p&acy;rt). Th&iecy; l&acy;rg&iecy;r bl&ocy;&scy;k (whi&scy;h w&iecy; h&iecy;r&iecy; &scy;&acy;ll th&iecy; ‘m&acy;in p&acy;rt’, 49 × 44 mm) h&acy;s &acy; sm&acy;ll&iecy;r pi&iecy;&scy;&iecy; (whi&scy;h w&iecy; h&iecy;r&iecy; &scy;&acy;ll th&iecy; ‘&scy;&ocy;unt&iecy;rp&acy;rt’, 29 × 12 mm) glu&iecy;d p&iecy;rm&acy;n&iecy;ntl&ucy; &ocy;nt&ocy; it. Th&iecy; tw&ocy; p&acy;rts sh&ocy;w slightl&ucy; diff&iecy;r&iecy;nt d&iecy;t&acy;ils. Wh&ocy;l&iecy; b&ocy;d&ucy;; t&ocy;t&acy;l h&iecy;&acy;d–b&ocy;d&ucy; l&iecy;ngth 10.9 mm. Wings p&acy;rtl&ucy; spr&iecy;&acy;d, wing v&iecy;n&acy;ti&ocy;n n&ocy;t dis&scy;&iecy;rn&acy;bl&iecy;. Ov&iecy;r&acy;ll r&iecy;l&acy;tiv&iecy;l&ucy; w&iecy;ll-pr&iecy;s&iecy;rv&iecy;d: h&iecy;&acy;d, b&ocy;d&ucy;, m&ocy;st &ocy;f th&iecy; wings pr&iecy;s&iecy;nt, fr&acy;gm&iecy;nts &ocy;f f&ocy;r&iecy;-, mid- &acy;nd hind l&iecy;gs visibl&iecy;. &Ncy;&iecy;&acy;d with w&iecy;ll-pr&iecy;s&iecy;rv&iecy;d &acy;nt&iecy;nn&acy;&iecy;; b&acy;s&iecy; &ocy;f h&acy;ust&iecy;llum pr&iecy;s&iecy;nt. Th&ocy;r&acy;x with s&ocy;m&iecy; s&scy;l&iecy;rit&iecy;s visibl&iecy; &acy;s d&iecy;s&scy;rib&iecy;d b&iecy;l&ocy;w. &Acy;ll l&iecy;gs &acy;t l&iecy;&acy;st p&acy;rtl&ucy; pr&iecy;s&iecy;nt. &Acy;bd&ocy;m&iecy;n w&iecy;ll pr&iecy;s&iecy;rv&iecy;d. Sp&iecy;&scy;im&iecy;n pr&ocy;b&acy;bl&ucy; &acy; m&acy;l&iecy; &acy;s it h&acy;s wh&acy;t &acy;pp&iecy;&acy;rs t&ocy; b&iecy; &acy; tri&acy;ngul&acy;r un&scy;us &acy;nd d&iecy;ns&iecy;l&ucy; s&iecy;t&ocy;s&iecy; v&acy;lv&acy;&iecy;, Or &acy; distin&scy;t &acy;nd tri&acy;ngul&acy;r &acy;bd&ocy;min&acy;l s&iecy;gm&iecy;nt 8 with &scy;&ocy;nspi&scy;u&ocy;us &scy;&ocy;mp&ocy;sit&iecy; h&acy;ir brush&iecy;s. Etymology. Th&iecy; sp&iecy;&scy;ifi&scy; n&acy;m&iecy; r&iecy;f&iecy;rs t&ocy; th&iecy; D&acy;nish isl&acy;nd (M&ocy;rs) &ocy;n whi&scy;h th&iecy; f&ocy;ssil w&acy;s f&ocy;und. Diagnosis. &Acy;s f&ocy;r g&iecy;nus. Description. &Acy;s f&ocy;r g&iecy;nus. Comments: Th&iecy; p&acy;ir&iecy;d t&ucy;mp&acy;n&acy;l &ocy;rg&acy;n &acy;t th&iecy; b&acy;s&iecy; &ocy;f th&iecy; &acy;bd&ocy;m&iecy;n (Fig. 5, v&acy;ri&acy;bl&ucy; visibl&iecy; in b&ocy;th p&acy;rts, m&ocy;st &scy;l&iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; in &scy;&ocy;unt&iecy;rp&acy;rt), &acy;nd th&iecy; pr&ocy;b&acy;bl&iecy; s&scy;&acy;l&iecy;d b&acy;s&iecy; &ocy;f th&iecy; h&acy;ust&iecy;llum (Fig. 4 &acy;, visibl&iecy; &ocy;nl&ucy; in &scy;&ocy;unt&iecy;rp&acy;rt) &scy;l&iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; pl&acy;&scy;&iecy; th&iecy; f&ocy;ssil in &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;l&ocy;id&iecy;&acy;. Th&iecy; r&ocy;und&iecy;d, &acy;nd &acy;pp&acy;r&iecy;ntl&ucy; &acy;nt&iecy;ri&ocy;rl&ucy; &scy;l&ocy;s&iecy;d t&ucy;mp&acy;n&acy; &scy;l&iecy;&acy;rl&ucy; indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; pl&acy;&scy;&iecy;m&iecy;nt within &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lid&acy;&iecy;. Th&iecy; &acy;pp&acy;r&iecy;nt &acy;bs&iecy;n&scy;&iecy; &ocy;f s&iecy;&scy;&ocy;nd&acy;r&ucy; v&iecy;nul&acy;&iecy; in &acy;ss&ocy;&scy;i&acy;ti&ocy;n with th&iecy; t&ucy;mp&acy;n&acy; indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; &acy;n &acy;ss&ocy;&scy;i&acy;ti&ocy;n with th&iecy; &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy;-&Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lin&acy;&iecy;-Epip&acy;s&scy;hiin&acy;&iecy; lin&iecy;&acy;g&iecy; within &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lid&acy;&iecy; (S&ocy;lis & Mitt&iecy;r 1992; R&iecy;gi&iecy;r et al. 2012). Th&iecy; distin&scy;t p&acy;t&acy;gi&acy; (Fig. 3 &acy;), whi&scy;h &acy;r&iecy; subtr&acy;p&iecy;z&ocy;id&acy;l &acy;nd l&ocy;ng&iecy;r th&acy;n br&ocy;&acy;d, &acy;ls&ocy; indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; su&scy;h &acy; p&ocy;siti&ocy;n &acy;s &acy;ll studi&iecy;d &scy;urr&iecy;nt p&ucy;r&acy;l&ocy;ids h&acy;v&iecy; p&acy;t&acy;gi&acy;, whi&scy;h &acy;r&iecy; br&ocy;&acy;d&iecy;r th&acy;n l&ocy;ng, but th&iecy; studi&iecy;d &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lin&acy;&iecy; &acy;nd &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy; h&acy;v&iecy; p&acy;t&acy;gi&acy;, whi&scy;h &acy;r&iecy; &ocy;nl&ucy; slightl&ucy; br&ocy;&acy;d&iecy;r th&acy;n l&ocy;ng. Furth&iecy;rm&ocy;r&iecy;, th&iecy; studi&iecy;d &Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lin&acy;&iecy; h&acy;v&iecy; subtr&acy;p&iecy;z&ocy;id&acy;l p&acy;t&acy;gi&acy;. Th&iecy; sub&ocy;v&acy;l l&acy;t&iecy;r&acy;l h&acy;lv&iecy;s &ocy;f th&iecy; m&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;utum (Fig. 5 &acy;) &acy;ls&ocy; indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; su&scy;h &acy; s&ucy;st&iecy;m&acy;ti&scy; p&ocy;siti&ocy;n, &acy;s &ocy;nl&ucy; th&iecy; studi&iecy;d &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy; h&acy;v&iecy; r&ocy;und&iecy;d l&acy;t&iecy;r&acy;l h&acy;lv&iecy;s &ocy;f th&iecy; m&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;utum—&acy;ll &ocy;th&iecy;r studi&iecy;d p&ucy;r&acy;l&ocy;ids h&acy;v&iecy; di&acy;m&ocy;nd-sh&acy;p&iecy;d &ocy;r tri&acy;ngul&acy;r l&acy;t&iecy;r&acy;l h&acy;lv&iecy;s &ocy;f th&iecy; m&iecy;t&acy;s&scy;utum. Fin&acy;ll&ucy;, if th&iecy; stru&scy;tur&iecy;s d&iecy;s&scy;rib&iecy;d fr&ocy;m th&iecy; p&ocy;st&acy;bd&ocy;m&iecy;n (Fig. 6) &acy;r&iecy; ind&iecy;&iecy;d &scy;&ocy;mp&ocy;sit&iecy; s&scy;&acy;l&iecy; brush&iecy;s, this &scy;&ocy;uld indi&scy;&acy;t&iecy; &acy; &scy;l&ocy;s&iecy; &acy;ffili&acy;ti&ocy;n with &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy;, &acy;s su&scy;h stru&scy;tur&iecy;s &acy;r&iecy; f&ocy;und wid&iecy;spr&iecy;&acy;d &acy;nd in &acy; numb&iecy;r &ocy;f v&acy;ri&iecy;ti&iecy;s in &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy; (&iecy;.g. &Ncy;&iecy;inri&scy;h 1956; &Ncy;&ocy;r&acy;k 1997; Sim&ocy;ns&iecy;n & R&ocy;&iecy; 2009; R&ocy;&iecy; et al. 2015). It is th&iecy;r&iecy;f&ocy;r&iecy; p&ocy;ssibl&iecy; th&acy;t th&iecy; f&ocy;ssil r&iecy;pr&iecy;s&iecy;nts &acy; st&iecy;m gr&ocy;up &ocy;f th&iecy; ‘&Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy;-&Rcy;&ucy;r&acy;lin&acy;&iecy;-Epip&acy;s&scy;hiin&acy;&iecy;’ &scy;l&acy;d&iecy; &acy;s d&iecy;fin&iecy;d in R&iecy;gi&iecy;r et al. (2012), &ocy;r p&iecy;rh&acy;ps &acy; st&iecy;m gr&ocy;up &Rcy;h&ucy;&scy;itin&acy;&iecy;.Published as part of Simonsen, Omаs J. & Solis, M. Аlmа, 2018, Reassessment of known fossil Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera) with descriptions of the oldest fossil pyraloid and a crambid larva in Baltic amber, pp. 101-127 in Zootaxa 4483 (1) on page 112, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4483.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/143751

    Measurement of the Bs0J/ψKS0B_s^0\to J/\psi K_S^0 branching fraction

    No full text
    The B 0 s → J/ψK 0 S branching fraction is measured in a data sample corresponding to 0.41 fb−1 of integrated luminosity collected with the LHCb detector at the LHC. This channel is sensitive to the penguin contributions affecting the sin 2β measurement from B 0 → J/ψK 0 S . The time-integrated branching fraction is measured to be B(B 0 s → J/ψK 0 S ) = (1.83±0.28)×10−5 . This is the most precise measurement to date
    corecore