283 research outputs found
IMAM AL-BUKHARI DAN LAFAL AL-QUR’AN
No full textImam Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari is the author of the hadith book: al-Jâmi’ al-Shahîh, which is collecting the hadiths of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and agreed by all Islamic scholars from its day to the present as the most valid and authentic reference book of the Muslims after al-Qur’an. Despite the prestigious position of the book and its author, al-Bukhari apparently got a big test and slanderahead his death. This was because of his thought of Qur’anic words. Al-Bukhari actually just said that word (reading) of al-Qur’an is including human actions, and human being and his deeds are created by God. This word was then concluded logically that Al-Bukhari stated al-Quran readings is creature by God. Sunni scholars, broadly divided into two schools of thought in questioning al-Quran words. Imam Ahmad, experts at hadith and the Hanabilah equated it’s verdict with the opinion of the Qur’an is creature. Meanwhile, al-Bukhari, Thabari, the sunni theologist, and some experts at hadis linked it with af’âlu al-’ibâd.<br /
Ailal Rashid\u27s Critical Contribution to Sahih Al-Bukhari in the book of Sahih Al-Bukhari Nihayah Usturah
No full textThis study aims to reaffirm that in the hadith literature, all scholars declare that Sahih al-Bukhari is the most authentic book after the Qur’an. Likewise, Ulamas have also praised the intellectuality of Imam Bukhari and Sahih al-Bukhari with its perfection in re-recording the words of the Prophet, both in terms of the sanad and matan. The high reputation of Sahih al-Bukhari seems to be under debate among scholars after many thinkers criticized Sahih al-Bukhari. One of the critics is Rashid Ailal who wrote Sahih al-Bukhari Nihayah Usturah. This study used a text analysis approach, namely reading people’s thoughts through the text, which was then concluded and interpreted as research findings. The method of this study was library research, namely collecting data from books, notes, and related research reports. This study shows that Rashid Ailal’s criticism of Imam Bukhari is that Imam Bukhari is just an ordinary human being who can be right and wrong. Furthermore, according to Rasyid Ailal, the codification of hadith and the instrument of ulum al-hadith which have been used as a means of selecting hadith transmitters are a tragedy. The method is not suitable to serve as the legitimacy of hadith. According to Rashid Ailal, Sahih al-Bukhari is a book of tales. He added that Imam Bukhari is a person who is majruh (flawed), and matruk al-hadith (the transmission of the hadiths is not valid) because the transmission is only based on assumptions. In Rasyid Ailal’s opinion, the existence of the author of Sahih al-Bukhari is still majhul (unknown), so the existence and credibility of Sahih al-Bukhari are questioned
Kanonisasi Jonathan Brown Atas Shahih Al-Bukhari
No full textShahih Bukhari is one of hadith collections endowed a high authority by consensus for muslim. The consensus is not simply acknowledged by hadis scholars, but by also scholars in varied legal schools. In additions to its standard of hadith authenticity become a convention measure to evaluate other hadith that there is not in Shahih Bukhari. It is Jonathan Brown that has researched how process of canonization of Shahih Bukhari collection. In his research, Brown showed that Shahih Bukhari canon (convention measure of hadith authenticity) was established by long process time. Part of its processes is efforts to study critically the collection to discover its measure of hadith authenticity that al-Bukhari, as the author employed it and then to apply the measure to the hadith else. In the other hand, the notion of consensus (ijma’) used in legal scholars discourse of varied schools also played the impor- tant role to result authority of the collection. The authority of the collection also was supported by scholars declara- tion continously from generation to generation. Some of them are Abu Ishaq al-Isfarayani, Abu Nashr al-Wa’iliy and al-Juwaini
METODOLOGI KRITIK HADIS: Studi atas Pemikiran Ali Mustafa Yaqub
No full textPenelitian ini berjudul Metodologi Kritik Hadis yang secara khusus membahas pemikiran Ali Mustafa Yaqub. Latar belakang pemilihan objek ini adalah usaha untuk menemukan ciri khas kajian hadis di Indonesia yang bercorak ke Indonesiaan, karena selama ini penelitian tentang kritik hadis selalu diarahkan pada pemikir hadis Timur Tengah. Sejumlah pertanyaan metodologis tentang kelayakan tokoh yang diangkat dalam penelitian dan pemikiran yang ditawarkan, merupakan dua pertanyaan yang harus dijawab terlebih dahulu. Jawaban terhadap pertanyaan pertama, tokoh ini sudah layak diangkat dalam penelitian. Sedangkan pemikiran yang ditawarkan tidak ada pemikiran baru terutama dari sisi metodologi. Namun dari segi pemikiran- yang berasal dari kajian yang dilakukannya banyak memunculkan sejumlah problem untuk pemikiran ulang karena berhubungan dengan metodologi yang digunakan Ali Mustafa Yaqub. Rumusan masalahnya adalah bagaimana prinsip dasar kritik hadis Ali Mustafa Yaqub dan bagaimana pengaruh kesarjanaan Muhammad Mustafa al A'zami pada Ali Mustafa Yaqub serta imp. kasihnya terhadap metodologi kritik hadis. Berkaitan dengan metode penelitian terdapat dua metode yakni metode pengumpulan data dan metode analisa data. Data primer berupa pemikiran Ali Mustafa Yaqub diperoleh lewat berbagai tulisannya dalam sejumlah buku sebagai sumber primer. Sedang data skunder prioritas diperoleh dalam berbagai tulisan yang ditulis ilmuwan Indonesia atau bukan. Metode interpretasi data menggunakan metode induksi yakni memadukan data dari tulisan Ali Mustafa Yaqub dan tulisan lain agar data-data tersebut berinteraksi satu sama lain. Peran penulis adalah subjektit-partisipatif-aktif Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kritik Ali Mustafa Yaqub pada sejumlah pengkaji hadis karena sebagai pembelaan terhadap hadis-hadis Sahil Bukhari dan Sugih Mnelim Rumusan metodolooi kritik hadis Ali Mustafa Yaqub tidak jauhberbeda dengan metodologi kritik hadis yang telah ada ditambah dengan pendekatan rasio dan sains yang telah disepakati para ahli. Unsur terpenting metodologi kritik hadis adalah validitas kesahihan hadis yang menurut Ali Mustafa Yaqub berarti kesesuaian antara proses dan prosedur sebagai perangkat praksis metode kesahihan hadis Nabi tanpa melupakan unsur kemanusiaan seperti salah dan lupa. Pendekatan dan metode tersebut, kedudukannya lebih tinggi dari pada metode kritik sejarah Sedangkan hubungan Ali Mustafa Yaqub dan Muhammad Mustafa al A'zami ditemukan bahwa Ali Mustafa Yaqub banyak mengadopsi pemikiran Muhammad Mustafa al-A'zami sehingga sulit untuk mengatakan Ali Mustafa Yaqub betul-betul independen dari Muhammad Mustafa al-A'zami, meskipun demikian terdapat pergeseran pemikiran yakni Ali Mustafa Yaqub menerima pendekatan rasio dan sains yang ditolak Muhammad Mustafa al-A'zami. Temuan lainnya adalah pemikiran hadis Ali Mustafa Yaqub lebih tepat bila diletakkan dalam paradigma ilmiah yang dialogis bukan paradigma kebenaran
An Islamic perspective of industrial relations: the case of Pakistan
No full textThe aim of this paper is to describe an Islamic perspective of industrial relations (IR). Based on a review of literature on IR in Islam including a reading of the principal sources of Islam (the Qur'an and the Hadith), the paper identifies two divergent ethical approaches to IR: a pro-equality (neutral) approach and a pro-social justice (affirmative) approach. In its second half, the paper offers a case study of IR in Pakistan. The study suggests that the two divergent Islamic approaches to IR may be seen as having ambiguous implications for labor laws and trade unions in Pakistan (and possibly other Muslim majority countries).Islam, Pakistan, Industrial Relations
Bukhari-Zühlî friction in the context of Mihnah
No full textİnsanoğlu yaratılış itibari ile farklı düşüncelere meyyal bir fıtrata sahiptir. Bunun sonucunda tarih boyunca kişiler, toplumlar ve devletlerarasında fikir ayrılıkları her daim süregelmiştir. Bu hususa, İslâmî çerçevede (akaide dair meseleler kapsamın dışında tutulmak kaydıyla) tefrika olarak değil de hikmet nazarıyla bakılmalıdır. Dinin aslından olmayan meselelerde yaşanan fikir ayrılıkları, gücü elinde bulunduran kimselerin anlayışına ters düştüğünde, çatışma durumunun ortaya çıkması kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Tarih, bu kapsamda gerçekleşen birçok olaya şahitlik etmiştir. Bunlardan birisi de tarih sahnesine kara bir leke olarak adını yazdıran mihne hâdisesidir. Mihne; gücü elinde bulunduran kesimin; baskı, şiddet ve işkence uygulayarak üstün gelmeye çalıştığı ve bu doğrultuda birçok âlimin maddi ve manevi yönden yaptırıma uğratıldığı bir süreç olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Mihne Bağlamında Buhârî-Zühlî Sürtüşmesi isimli çalışmamızda amacımız; genel olarak Kelâm ve Mezhepler Tarihi çerçevesinde ele alınan mihne hâdisesini, Hadis perspektifinden bakarak Buhârî-Zühlî arasında yaşanan sürtüşme ile tesirlerini ortaya koymaktık. Bu bağlamda mihnenin ne olduğuna, arka planında yer alan sebeplerine, hadis âlimleri üzerindeki olumsuz tesirlerine ve mihne hâdisesinin sonuçlarına değindik. Bu çalışmamızda mihne hâdisesini hem tarihsel, hem de sosyolojik açıdan ele alarak, Buhârî-Zühlî sürtüşmesini kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almaya çalıştık. Yukarıda ifade edilen konular ele alındıktan sonra pratikte Buhârî'ye olan yansımalarına değinerek çalışmamızı sonlandırdık. Bu çalışmamızda, betimleme yöntemini kullandık. Erken dönem klasik kaynaklardan başlamak sûretiyle mihnenin; sebepleri, sonuçları ve tesirlerini bütün yönleriyle ele almaya çalıştık. Mihneyi çeşitli kaynaklardan yararlanarak araştırmaya gayret ettik. Buna yönelik öncelikle kaynak taraması yaptık, kaynaklarda konuların ele alınış biçimini belirledikten sonra farklı görüşleri birbiriyle karşılaştırdık. Bu kapsamda tutarlı olan görüşleri serdettik. Mihne hâdisesi sona erdikten sonra zuhûr eden Buhârî-Zühlî sürtüşmesi, her ne kadar mihne son bulmuş olsa da tesirlerinin devam ettiğinin en açık göstergesidir. Bu husus, tarihî süreç içerisinde cereyan eden hâdiselerin bir oldu-bitti şeklinde değil de birbirini etkileyen olaylar silsilesi olarak karşımıza çıktığını göstermektedir. Her ne kadar mihne son bulsa da tesirlerinin, tarihi yeni hâdiselerin zuhûruna sebep olduğunu ifade etmek mümkündür. Sonuç itibariyle; çeşitli amaçlarla tarih sahnesine sürülen halku'l-Kur'ân fikri, başta Mu'tezile ve Ehl-i re'yemensup kimi kesim tarafından desteklenirken, Ehl-i hadîse mensup kimselerce kabul edilmemiştir. Abbâsî döneminde devlet politikası haline getirilen halku'l-Kur'ân fikri; muhâlefeti temsil eden Ehl-i hadîs mensuplarına baskı ve şiddet kullanılarak benimsetilme yoluna gidilmiştir. Bu yol; halifenin gözüne girmek isteyen, devlet kademesinde iyi bir yere gelmek ya da konumunu korumak isteyen kimselerle birlikte bu düşünceyi gerçekten kabul edip kendilerince samimi savunuculuğunu üstlenen Mu'tezile tarafından yürütülmüştür. Süreç içerisinde gücü de muhâlefeti de temsil eden kesim zarar görmekten kendilerini koruyamamıştır. En büyük zararı ise yürütülen mihne politikasında halku'l-Kur'ân fikrine muhâlefetiyle Ehl-i hadîs görmüştür. Mihne karşıtı süreçte halku'l-Kur'ân fikri, ikili çekişmelerde karalama ve yıpratma amaçlı kullanılarak tesirini devam ettirmiştir. Bu hususta tezimizin ana konusunu oluşturan Buhârî-Zühlî sürtüşmesi dikkat çekmektedir. Buhârî'nin; halku'l-Kur'ân meselesine Ehl-i hadîsin düşüncesine ters düşen yeni bir yaklaşım getirmesi, kendisinin olumsuz ithamlara mâruz kalmasına ve ömrünün sonlarında hem psikolojik hem de sosyolojik açıdan çeşitli sıkıntılar yaşamasına sebebiyet vermiştir. Ömrünün sonlarında yaşamış olduğu bu sıkıntılı süreç Buhârî'nin mihnesini açıkça gözler önüne sermektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Mihne, halku'l-Kur'ân, Buhârî, Zühlî, SürtüşmeHuman beings have a fitrata that is prone to different ideas in terms of creation. Consequently, differences of opinion between societies and states have always persisted throughout history. This situation should be looked at in the Islamic context (provided that matters related to the al-Qeada are excluded) not as a frill, but in terms of wisdom. Unfortunately, when disagreements on issues that are not the originals of religion contradict the understanding of those who hold power, it is inevitable that the situation of conflict will arise. History has witnessed many events in this context. One of them is the mihne incident, which made its name as a black stain on the history scene. Resembling the inquisition courts in the West, the mihne incident is a process in which the people in power try to prevail by applying oppression, violence and torture, and in this direction, many scholars are subjected to financial and spiritual sanctions. İt is coming out. In our study called Bukhari-Zuhli friction in the context of mihne, our aim is; we will try to demonstrate the effects of the mihne incident, which is generally discussed within the framework of the history of sects, through friction between Bukhari and Zuhli from the perspective of hadith. In this context, we will discuss what the mihne is, the reasons behind it, the negative effects on hadith scholars, and the consequences of the mihne incident. In this study, we will try to examine the mihne incident both historically and sociologically and to examine its reflection on the Bukhari-Zuhli fricition in a comprehensive manner. After the above mentioned issues are addressed, we will end this work by considering the reflections on Bukhari in pratice. In our study called Bukhari-Zuhli Friction in the Context of mihne, the method of depiction will be used. Starting from the classicial sources of the early period, the mihne; all aspects of the causes, consequences and effect will be discussed. The mihne will be investigated using various sources. For this purpose, the source will be scanned first. After determining the way the topics are addressed in the sources, different opinions will be compared. In this context, consistent opinions willl be tried to be expressed. We will try to evaluate the Bukhari-Zuhli frictions in this context by scanning the titles in the data obtained about the mihne. The Bukhari-Zuhli friction that occurred some time after the end of the mihne is the most obvious indication that its effects continue, even though it has come to an end to the mihne. This situation shows that the events that took place in the historical procces came not as a done and rather as a series of events affecting each other. Although the mihne is over, it is obvious that its effects have conceived new historial events. Consequently, the idea of halku'l Quran, which was driven to the stage of history for various purposes, was initially supported by Mu'tezile and Ahl-i Rey, but was not accepted by members of Ahl-i Hadise. Halku'l-Qur'an idea adopted by the state administration of the period; members of Ahl-i Hadis, who represent the opposition, were adopted by force, coercion and violence. The path was carried out by those who wanted to get in the eye of the caliph, who sucked him up and wanted to come to a good place at the state level or to maintain their position. In the process, those who represented both power and opposition were unable to protect themselves from damage. The greatest damage was to Mu'tezile, a member of the Idea of the halku'l Quran, as the mihne policy changed. This incident continued to be used for smear and attrition in bilateral disputes. In this regard, the Buhar-Zühli friction, which forms the main subject of our thesis, draws attention. This troubled process which he experienced at the end of his life clearly exposed Bukhari's mihnah. Buhari's new approach to the issue of people-Qur'an, contrary to the idea of the People of Hadith, caused him to experience negative psycological and sociological problems at the end of his life. Keywords: Mihnah, halku'l-Qur'an, Bukhari, Zühlî, Frictio
Critical Studies to the Authority of Shahih Al-Bukhari as Source of Islamic Law
No full textThis research analyzes about the authority of the hadiths in the Shahih al-Bukhari as the main source of determining Islamic law after the Qur'an. This research is intended to answer the following question, "How can the authority of the Shahih al-Bukhari be viewed from the perspective of historical, qaidah fiqh, and modern science?" This research is a library research which uses content analysis as a method of analyzing the data obtained. In addition, this study also uses comparative analysis to answer the problem of the authority of the hadith in Shahih al-Bukhari when viewed from the perspective of qaidah fiqh. The results of this study are: First, the book of Shahih al-Bukhari is known as the book of hadith with the highest level of validity if it compared to other hadith books. However, as a human work result, the book of Shahih al-Bukhari did not escape from various praise and criticism by its readers. Among the criticisms made by the hadith scholars, there were things that the author did not agree with regarding al-Bukhari's closeness to the kings/chaliphs of the Islamic daulah at the time. On the other hand, the author argues that al-Bukhari is in an opposite position to the religious understanding held by the kings. However, on the other hand, the writer also indicated that the compilation of the book Shahih al-Bukhari was a work that could not be separated from the influence of the political atmosphere at that time. Second, in the book Shahih al-Bukhari there are hadiths whose it's redaction contradicts with a higher text - namely the text of the Qur'an - and modern science, therefore a re-research on the authenticity of these hadiths should be done. Third, as a result of al-Bukhari's ijtihad in the field of authenticity of hadith as well as in the field of fiqh, the book of Shahih al-Bukhari should be treated equally with the books written by other imams as long as the hadiths contained in the other books are recognized as hadiths from the Holy Prophet
The scientific characteristics of Bukhari and his status in the al-Jarh al-Ta'dil
No full textHicrî üçüncü asırda yaşayıp el-Câmi'u's-Sahîh adlı eseriyle hadis tarihine ismini yazdıran İmâm Buhârî, diğer taraftan da et-Târîhu'l-Kebîr, et-Târîhu'l-Evsat ve ed-Duafâu's-Sagîr adlı eserleriyle de ricâl ve cerh-ta'dîl ilminde önemli bir yer edinmiştir. Buhârî ricâl değerlendirmeleriyle cerh-ta'dîl ilminde otorite kabul edilmiş, daha sonra bu alanda eser kaleme alan münekkitler ondan nakilde bulunmuşlardır. Bu çalışma Buhârî'nin ilmî şahsiyeti ve Buhârî dönemine kadar cerh-ta'dîl ilminin doğuşu ve gelişimi ile onun söz konusu ilimdeki yerini ele almaktadır.Bukhari, who lived in the 3rd century A.H. and was an important scholar in hadithology with his work al-Jami al-sahih, has a significant status for the identification and verifica- tion method of the hadiths and hadiths narrators with his such books as al- Tarikh al- Kabir and al-Dhuafa al-Saghir. As Bukhari was regarded as an authority in the identifica- tion and verification of hadiths, he has been shown as a reference by the Islamic critics since then. This study is about the scientific characteristics of Bukhari, and the verifica- tion method of hadiths before and after him
The Sahıhayn Perception on Andalucia Transmitting Prophetic Traditions and Comparison of East Islamic World
No full textSahih of the al‐Bukhari and Muslim on hadith science is one of the most
important works. Both books are named in the form of Sahîhayn because of
the adoption of sahih hadiths. Sahîhayn, has written to propitiate the Muslims
from periods. Some of them even if they have made assessments of the direction
which one is better. At this point, the different opinions in the world of
Islam has occurred. Eastern Islamic world and against the different approaches
Sahîhayn exhibited in Andalusia. The eastern approach to the Muslim
world at the same rate in both works are introduced, on the hadith of
Muslim Andalusia preferred method Sahîh movement. The fifth and sixth centuries,
Muslim scholars of the Islamic Andalusia Sahîh by reference to the value
of Bukhari gave to the fore while. Sahîhayn understanding of al‐Andalus is
basically a comparison of health. They did not evaluate in this direction on
the two works. Andalusia scholars prefer Sahih Muslim completely methodical
reason.Buhârî ve Müslim’in Sahîh’i, hadis ilminde en önemli eserlerinin başında
gelmektedir. Her iki eserdeki hadislerin sahîh kabul edilmesi hasebiyle
Sahîhayn şeklinde isimlendirilmiştir. Sahîhayn, yazıldıkları dönemlerden itibaren
Müslümanların teveccühünü kazanmıştır. Hatta bazıları onlar arasında
bile hangisinin daha iyi olduğu yönde değerlendirmeler yapmışlardır. İslâm
dünyasında bu noktada farklı kanaatler izhar edilmiştir. Doğu İslâm dünyası
ile Endülüs’te Sahîhayn’a karşı farklı yaklaşımlar sergilenmiştir. Doğu İslâm
dünyasında her iki esere aynı oranda bir yaklaşım ortaya konulurken, Endülüs’te
Müslim’in hadisler ile ilgili metodundan hareketle Sahîh’ini tercih etmişlerdir.
Hicri beşinci ve altıncı asır Endülüs âlimleri Müslim’in Sahîh’ini ön
plana çıkarırken Buhârî’ye de atıflar yaparak değer vermişlerdir. Endülüs’teki
Sahîhayn anlayışı temelde sıhhat kıyaslaması değildir. Onlar her iki eser hakkında
bu yönde bir değerlendirme yapmamışlardır. Endülüslü âlimlerin Müslim’in
Sahîh’ini öncelemelerinin sebebi tamamen metodik boyuttadır
Pandangan Mustafa Mahmud Terhadap Hadis Syafa’at
No full textAbstract:
The renewal discourse about Islamic opinion is always interesting to discuss. Many Moslem scholars give critical opinion about the reaction of knowing and understanding about Islam especially about as-sunah as a law Islamic base. The reaction is there are many people receive and there are many people refuse the exsistent of as-sunnah as a law Islamic base. One of person who refuse as-sunnah as a law Islamic base is Mustafa Mahmud. The controversial opinion becomes serious discussion both in seminar and scientific written. According to Mustofa Mahmud, all hadits are doubt not only in the exsistent but also in syafa’at hadits. They are all false although they are written by Al-Bukhari. Syafa’at hadits is often connected with refusal hadits community (refusal as-sunnah) that is placed in Mesir. This research uses analysis descriptive method that contains critical analysis inside to Mustofa Mahmud’s facing in syafa’at hadits. This research produces a critical opinion and measurement to Mustafa Mahmud’s facing about syafaat hadits.
 
- …
