7 research outputs found
KONSEP PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN MENURUT K.H ABDULLAH SYUKRI ZARKASYI DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI PENGEMBANGAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI INDONESIA
No full textABSTRACT
Imam Qodari, 2023. The Concept of Islamic Boarding School Education According to K.H Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi and its Relevance for the Development of Islamic Education in Indonesia. Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo Postgraduate thesis. Advisor (1) Dr. Happy Susanto, MA, Supervisor (2) D. Muh. Tajab, M. Pd.I.
The aims of this thesis is to analyze the concept of Islamic boarding school education according to K.H Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi and its relevance for the development of Islamic education in Indonesia.
This research uses Library Research. The data in the study were taken from written materials in the form of books, journals or others related to the discussion. In this research, the data source comes from the work of K.H. Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi and other sources related to research will be examined. Sources of data in library research consisting of primary data and secondary data will be collected. As for the data collection technique, the author uses documentary techniques in data collection. To classify the data, it begins with collecting various references related to K.H Adullah Syukri Zarkasyi in the form of books, texts, manuscripts, documentation, journals and so on. The author will take the writing data source through several stages, namely, First, the author reads. Second, the author reads and analyzes. And level third the writer enters the stage of data reduction, data classification so that the writer can formulate a research direction map to describe and draw conclusions. Then in analyzing the data the authors use descriptive analysis techniques, comparative analysis, hermeneutical analysis, historical analysis and Content Analysis.
The research results show thateducation initiated by K.H Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi is based on the values and philosophy of life at Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor which are summarized in the Five Souls. The Five Souls are the five things that become the philosophy of life for PMDG members in carrying out education and teaching. The Five Souls consist of Sincerity, Simplicity, Independence, Ukhuwah Islamiyah, and Freedom. According to K.H Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi, Education is everything that we see, hear, and feel. The meaning is that everything we do in Islamic boarding schools has educational value.
As for its relevance to Islamic education in Indonesia, thatK.H Abdullah Syukri Zarkasyi's educational concept has an important influence on the development of Islamic education in Indonesia. The development of the pesantren institution led by him into a rapidly growing Islamic boarding school is proof that the concept and system of Islamic boarding school education brought by him can be accepted and well regarded by the people of Indonesia..
Keywords: Education, Boarding School, Boarding School Renewal
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries
No full textLa atención médica no puede lograr emisiones netas de carbono cero sin abordar los quirófanos. El objetivo de este estudio fue priorizar intervenciones viables para reducir el impacto ambiental de los quirófanos.
Métodos: Este estudio adoptó una metodología de copriorización de consenso Delphi de cuatro fases. En la fase 1, se utilizó una revisión sistemática de las intervenciones publicadas y una consulta global de profesionales de la salud perioperatoria para hacer una lista larga de las intervenciones. En la fase 2, el análisis temático iterativo consolidó intervenciones comparables en una lista corta. En la fase 3, se priorizó conjuntamente la lista corta en función de las opiniones de los pacientes y de los médicos sobre la aceptabilidad, la viabilidad y la seguridad. En la fase 4, se presentaron listas clasificadas de intervenciones según su relevancia para los países de ingresos altos y los países de ingresos medianos bajos.
Resultados: En la fase 1, se identificaron 43 intervenciones que tuvieron una baja aceptación en la práctica según 3042 profesionales a nivel mundial. En la fase 2, se generó una lista corta de 15 dominios de intervención. En la fase 3, las intervenciones se consideraron aceptables para más del 90 por ciento de los pacientes, excepto la reducción de la anestesia general (84 por ciento) y la reesterilización de consumibles de "un solo uso" (86 por ciento). En la fase 4, las tres intervenciones principales preseleccionadas para los países de altos ingresos fueron: introducir el reciclaje; reducir el uso de gases anestésicos; y procesamiento adecuado de residuos clínicos. En la fase 4, las tres intervenciones preseleccionadas principales para los países de ingresos medianos bajos fueron: la introducción de dispositivos quirúrgicos reutilizables; reducir el uso de consumibles; y reducir el uso de anestesia general.
Conclusión: Este es un paso hacia entornos operativos ambientalmente sostenibles con intervenciones viables aplicables tanto a países de ingresos altos como a países de ingresos medianos bajos.Background: Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods: This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was coprioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. Results: In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion: This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.2,1089,6Q1Q1SCIE11,
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries.
No full textReducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries
No full textBackground: Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods: This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. Results: In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion: This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries
No full textAbstract
Background
Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.
Methods
This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries.
Results
In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.
Conclusion
This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries
No full textAbstract
Background
Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.
Methods
This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries.
Results
In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.
Conclusion
This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries
No full textAbstract
Background
Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.
Methods
This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries.
Results
In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.
Conclusion
This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries
