196,670 research outputs found
HERMENEUTIKA OTENTISITAS HADIS M. MUSTOFA AZAMI
No full textThis article discusses Azami criticism to Ignaz Gholziher and Joseph Schacht. The author tries to integrate the relations of hermeneutics as a solution to solve the issues of Hadith authenticity, and its interconnected to psychology, that Azami position when criticizing the Orientalists, Joseph Schacht, based on the flow of his thought of isnaad. Then in reviewing hermeneutics, in general there are three dominant element is the relationship between (author), Text (text) and readers (reader). So the results of this analysis, the author is orientalist, Joseph Schacht Ignaz Goldziher. The Text is orientalist books, thoughts, opinions or their theories, in this case Joseph Schacht. The reader is referred Azami. The discovery of the authors that position Azami criticism included are the internal and external criticism, namely external criticism Azami focus lies in criticism of the Orientalists, he criticized Joseph from isnaad. And internal criticism, plays on historiography, he criticized the use of sciences related to hadith, such as ‘Ilm Tadwin al-Hadith, ‘Ilm Rijal al-Hadith, ‘Ilm Jarh wa ta\u27dil, Ulum al-Hadith, ‘Ilm al-Fiqh.Dalam tulisan ini dikaji Kritik Azami terhadap kedua orientalis yaitu Ignaz Gholziher dan Joseph Schacht. Penulis mencoba mengintegrasikan bagaimana hubungan hermeneutika sebagai solusi untuk memecahkan isu-isu otentisitas Hadis, dan aplikasi interkoneksinya seperti ilmu psikologi, bahwa posisi Azami ketika mengkritik terhadap orientalis yaitu Joseph, ia melihat berdasarkan alur pemikiran isnadnya. Kemudian dalam mengkaji hermeneutika, secara garis besar ada tiga unsur yang dominan yaitu hubungan antara (author), teks (text) dan pembaca (reader). Maka hasil dari analisis ini, author adalah orientalis yaitu Joseph Schacht, Ignaz Goldziher yang mana textnya adalah buku-buku orientalis, pemikiran, pendapat atau teori orientalis dalam hal ini Joseph Schacht, yang dimaksud reader adalah Azami. Penemuan penulis bahwa posisi kritik Azami termasuk berada dalam kritik internal dan eksternal, yaitu fokus kritik eksternal Azami terletak pada kritik terhadap orientalis, ia mengkritik Joseph dari isnadnya. Dan kritik internal, berposisi pada historiografi, ia mengkritik menggunakan ilmu-ilmu yang berkaitan dengan hadis, seperti ilmu tadwin al-hadis, ilmu rijalul hadis, ilmu jar wata’dil, Ilmu Hadis, ilmu Fiqih
Historisitas hadis menurut M. Mustafa azami
No full textProblematika kesejahteraan hadis masih tetap manjadi isu utama dalam pengkajian hadis modern. urgensitas pengkajian historisitas hadis akan mengungkap sejauh mana koetentikan hadis dapat di pertanggung jawabkan secara ilmiah. azami telah merespon pandangan yang mengkrititsi kesejarahan hadis. bukan hanya kalangan orientasi semata yang mendapat kritik dari azami, termasuk ulama sekaliber al-asqalani dan al-baghdadi juga mendapat sorotan
Historitas Hadis Dalam Kacamata M. Mustafa Azami
No full textProblematika kesejarahan hadis masih tetap menjadi isu utama dalam pengkajian hadis modern. Urgensitas pengkajian historisitas hadis akan mengungkap sejauhmana keotentikan hadis dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara ilmiah. Berbagai pandangan yang ada dan berkembang dewasa ini perlu mendapat tanggapan serius, sebab di dalamnya ada pandangan yang tidak sesuai secara fakta historis-empiris. Problem utama tulisan ini menyangkut sejauhmana argumentasi pemikiran kesejarahan hadis benar-benar dapat diterima secara ilmiah. Sementara pendekatan yang dipakai lebih bersifat historis, dengan mengacu pada model sejarah pemikiran. Azami mencoba memberikan kritik dan pelurusan atas beberapa pandangan yang mencoba mendistorsi kesejarahan hadis. Bukan hanya kalangan orientalis semata yang mendapat kritik dari Azami, termasuk ulama sekaliber al-Asqalani dan al-Baghdadi juga mendapat sorotan. Ungkapan kodifikasi hadis seringkali diasumsikan semua proses penulisan hadis sejak masa awal. Sementara dalam lintasan sejarah kodifikasi hadis baru ada masa az-Zuhri. Azami menjelaskan bahwa penulisan (kitabah) hadis berbeda dengan kodifikasi (tadwin) hadis. The most interesting modern hadith study nowdays is historical problem of hadith. Because it will verify original or genuine hadith truely and scientifically. Many though must be respondsed seriously, nevertheless, it could not have based on the contex historically and empirically. Because some of distortion in historical hadith, Azami gives critical thought not only to orientalist thought but also to the popular scholar Asqalani and Albagdadi. In Azami's thought differenciated between kitabah of hadith and tadwin of hadith
Historisitas Hadis Menurut M. Mustafa Azami
No full textThe historicity of hadith is still debated in modern hadith studies. The discussion of the historicity of hadith will demonstrate how far the authenticity of hadith can be upheld academically. Azami has responded to the views which question the historicity of hadith. He criticizes not only the Orientalists but also Muslims such as al-Asqalani and al-Baghdadi. Therefore, this paper will analyze the historicity of hadith according to Azami.
Roeseliana azami
No full textRoeseliana azami (Finot, 1892) Figs. 1b, 3d, 5e, 5f, 7e, 8c, 11, 23h Finot, 1892. Bull. Soc. entomol. Fr., 61: xxxv (Platycleis azami); type locality and depository: France, between Cogolin and La Foux, Var (MNHN, Paris). Material examined. France, Var VI.1888, Azam (1♁, 1♀ syntypes) (MNCN); France, Var, Azam (1♁, 1♀) (NMW); France, Crau, Bouches du Rhone VI.1967, M. Descamps (1♁, 1♀) (MCR, coll. P. Fontana); France, Cogolin 14.IX.1906 (1♁, 1♀) (NMP); France, La Foux, Var, Delmas (1♁, 1♀) (MSNG); France, Gard, Le Cailar 5.VI.1993, A. Foucart (2♁, 3♀); France, between St. Gilles and Arles 5.VII.1987, Ponel (1♁) (CBGP); France, Lattes (Montpellier) 23.VI.2019, B. Nabkolz (2♁) (BMPC). Remarks. R. azami is characterized by the incision of the female subgenital plate. Nadig (1961), Harz (1969) and Massa et al. (2012) considered R. azami the nominate subspecies with minor as other subspecies, while Ĝtz (1969) moved it to subspecies of R. fedtschenkoi, Defaut (1999, 2001) followed Ĝtz’s opinion, Puissant & Voisin (1999), Voisin (2003) and Massa & Fontana (2011) considered it as a valid species. Male titillators have only few large spines in their half apical apex and their tip is less curved and stouter than that of R. azami minor and R. brunneri (Figs. 5e, 5f), the supragenital plate and the cerci of the male and the subgenital plate of the female are reported in Figs. 7e and 8c. The 10 th tergite of the male has a very long, broad and triangular processes (in R. brunneri processes are very large and separated by a wide incision), tooth of cerci short, rounded and placed in the last fourth (as in R. brunneri; in R. roeselii they are longer, placed in the last third and are more pointed); titillators of R. azami are similar to those of R. brunneri (folded as a hook), while those of R. roeselii show a very different shape (straight with apical spines) (cf. Fig. 5); in addition, the female subgenital plate of R. azami is as large as long, incised for half the length and its lobes are rounded (similarly to that of R. brunneri), while that of R. roeselii is laterally enlarged and its lobes are pointed (cf. also Massa & Fontana 2011). Fully-winged specimens are unknown. See also Tables 2 and 4. Distribution. Region du Var (Mediterranean France). Bardiani & Buzzetti (2010) recorded it from Liguria, but see below R. azami minor.Published as part of Massa, Bruno, Tagliavia, Marcello, Buzzetti, Filippo Maria, Fontana, Paolo, Carotti, Giovanni, Bardiani, Marco, Leandri, Fausto, Scherini, Roberto & Verde, Gabriella Lo, 2023, A taxonomic revision of the Palaearctic genus Roeseliana (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae: Platycleidini): a case of ongoing Mediterranean speciation, pp. 351-400 in Zootaxa 5270 (3) on pages 363-364, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5270.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/785988
PEEREVIEWER HISTORISITAS HADITS DALAM KACAMATAN M MUSTAFA AZAMI AHMAD
No full textProblematika kesejarahan hadis masih tetap menjadi isu utama dalam pengkajian hadis modern. Urgensitas pengkajian historisitas hadis akan mengungkap sejauhmana keotentikan hadis dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara ilmiah. Berbagai pandangan yang ada dan berkembang dewasa ini perlu mendapat tanggapan serius, sebab di dalamnya ada pandangan yang tidak sesuai secara fakta historis-empiris. Problem utama tulisan ini menyangkut sejauhmana argumentasi pemikiran kesejarahan hadis benar-benar dapat diterima secara ilmiah. Sementara pendekatan yang dipakai lebih bersifat historis, dengan mengacu pada model sejarah pemikiran. Azami mencoba memberikan kritik dan pelurusan atas beberapa pandangan yang mencoba mendistorsi kesejarahan hadis. Bukan hanya kalangan orientalis semata yang mendapat kritik dari Azami, termasuk ulama sekaliber al-Asqalani dan al-Baghdadi juga mendapat sorotan. Ungkapan kodifikasi hadis seringkali diasumsikan semua proses penulisan hadis sejak masa awal. Sementara dalam lintasan sejarah kodifikasi hadis baru ada masa az-Zuhri. Azami menjelaskan bahwa penulisan (kitabah) hadis berbeda dengan kodifikasi (tadwin) hadis.
The most interesting modern hadith study nowdays is historical problem of hadith. Because it will verify original or genuine hadith truely and scientifically. Many though must be respondsed seriously, nevertheless, it could not have based on the contex historically and empirically. Because some of distortion in historical hadith, Azami gives critical thought not only to orientalist thought but also to the popular scholar Asqalani and Albagdadi. In Azami’s thought differenciated between kitabah of hadith and tadwin of hadith
PEMBELAAN MUHAMMAD MUSTHOFA AZAMI DALAM PENULISAN HADIS QABLA TADWIN
No full textAbstrakPerbincangan seputar penulisan Hadis selalu menjadi hal yang menarik. Hal ini disebabkan adanya pandangan bahwa Hadis terlambat ditulis 1 abad lamanya pasca wafatnya Nabi. Ulama berpendapat bahwa pasca wafatnya Nabi sampai akhir abad 1 Hijriyah, Hadis hanya diriwayatkan secara lisan dari hafalan-hafalan. Kondisi demikian tentu sangat tidak menguntungkan bagi Hadis, sebab tanpa ada penulisan yang disiplin sebagaimana al-Qur’an, keotentikan Hadis menjadi sangat dipertanyakan. Di abad Modern ini, muncul ulama bernama M. Musthofa Azami. Ia melakukan penelitian yang mendalam seputar sejarah penulisan Hadis. Hasil penelitiannya, telah merubah pandangan sementara ulama yang menyatakan Hadis tidak tertulis 1 abad lamanya. Azami berkesimpulan, bahwa penulisan Hadis sebenarnya telah dimulai sejak jaman Nabi, dan terus berkembang sampai pada puncak keemasannya yakni abad 2 Hijriyah. Demikian ini karena banyaknya bukti kuat tentang hal tersebut. Bukti-bukti tersebut Azami jadikan argumen untuk mengkritisi pandangan ulama serta menyanggah tuduhan-tuduhan negatif yang dilakukan orientalis Barat terhadap Hadis NabiKata Kunci : M.M. Azami, Penulisan Hadis, Qabla Tadwi
Roeseliana azami subsp. minor Nadig 1961
No full text<i>Roeseliana azami minor</i> Nadig, 1961 <p>Figs. 2a, 2c, 2e, 2f, 3b, 3c, 5c, 5d, 5h, 5g, 5l, 7b, 7c, 7d, 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, 11, 22e, 22f, 22g, 23e, 23f, 24e, 24f</p> <p> Nadig, 1961. Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Gesellsch, 34: 286 (<i>Roeseliana azami minor</i>); type locality and depository: Switzerland, Ticino, Piano Scairolo (MHNG, Geneva).</p> <p> <b>Material examined</b>. Switzerland, Ticino, Piano Scairolo (holotypus ♁) (MHNG); Italy, Lombardy, Adda river, South Olginate 14.VII.1960, A. Nadig (1♁, 1♀) (MfN); same data (1♁, 1♀) (NMP); Italy, Piedmont, Biella, Zumaglia (Ponte Rio) 10–16.VIII.1973, F. Capra (12♁, 24♀); Italy, Lombardy, Crema 11–12.VIII.1954, F. Capra & B. Baccetti (2♁, 2♀); Italy, Lombardy, surr. Pavia 5.VIII.1954, G. Domenichini (1♁); Italy, Lombardy, San Donato (Lodi) 21.VII.1950, G. Domenichini (1♁, 3♀); Italy, Lombardy, surr. Milano 1948, G. Domenichini (1♀); Italy, Lombardy, Arcisate (Varese) IX.1955, D. Guiglia (1♁, 1♀) (MSNG); Switzerland, Ticino Valley, Piano Scairolo 16.VI.1960, A Nadig (1♁, 1♀ paratypes); Italy, Piedmont, Leinì (Torino) IX.1972, G. Osella (2♀); Italy, Piedmont, Lombardore (Torino) 15.VIII.1970, G. Osella (1♀); Italy, Piedmont, Foglizzo (Torino) 28.VIII.1958 (1♀); Italy, Lombardy, Chignola Po, S. Colombano al Lambro (Lodi) 26.VII.1992 (1♁, 1♀) (MCR, coll. P. Fontana); Italy, Piedmont, Druento Gagliassotto (Torino) 18.VI.2009, P. Savoldelli & C. Segreto (1♁, 2♀); Italy, Piedmont, Pessinetto (Torino) 12.VII.2007, P. Savoldelli (1♀ holopterous) (PSPC); Italy, Lombardy, Ticino River, Linarolo, Ponte della Becca (Pavia) 16.VIII.2011, P. Fontana & P. Tirello (1♁, 3♀); same data 10.VIII.2016, R. Scherini (2♁, 3♀, of which 1 holopterous); Italy, Lombardy, Linarolo, Ospedaletto (Pavia) 9.VIII.2016, R. Scherini (3♁, 1♀) (BMPC); Italy, Lombardy, Torricella del Pizzo, Argine Maestro (Cremona) 3.VI.2020, F. Leandri (2♁, 1♁ holopterous, 1♀); Italy, Lombardy, San Daniele Po (Cremona) 15.VI.2020, F. Leandri (1♀); Italy, Lombardy, Motta Baluffi (Cremona) 5.VI.2020, F. Leandri (1♁); Italy, Lombardy, Castel Nuovo Bocca d’Adda, Golena del Po 5.VI.2019, F. Leandri (1♁, 1♀); Italy, Lombardy, Milan Baggio, Cava Ongari 23.VI.2020, F. Leandri (1♀); Italy, Lombardy, Gussola, Golena del Po (Cremona) 7.VIII.2021, F. Leandri (1♁) (coll. Leandri); Italy, Lombardy, Casanova del Morbasco (Cremona), 18.VI.2011, M. Bardiani (1♀) (coll. Bardiani); Italy, Lombardy, Rivalta sul Mincio, Rodigo (Mantova) 5.VIII.2021, M. Bardiani (1♁) (coll. Bardiani); Italy, Lombardy, Bosco Fontana, Marmirolo (Mantova) 26.VII.2019 (1♀), 2.VIII.2019 (1♁), 15.VI.2021 (1♁), M. Bardiani (CNBFVR); Italy, Lombardy, Riserva Naturale Le Bine, Acquanegra sul Chiese, 25.VI.2020, M. Bardiani & F. Leandri (1♁) (coll. Bardiani); Italy, Lombardy, Acquanegra sul Chiese, Valli di Mosio (Mantova) 10.VII.2020, M. Bardiani (1♁) (coll. Bardiani); Italy, Lombardy, Marcaria, Riserva Naturale Torbiere di Marcaria (Mantova) 17.VIII.2019, M. Bardiani (1♀ photographed), 23.VII.2020, M. Bardiani (1♁, 1♀ photographed); Italy, Lombardy, Marcaria, San Michele in Bosco (Mantova) 12.VI.2020, M. Bardiani (1♀) (coll. Bardiani); Italy, Piedmont, Verbano-Cusio-Ossola, Trontano, bivacco Alpe Mottac (1665m) 9.VIII.2022, M. Bardiani (1♁, 1♁ holopterous, 1♀); Italy, Piedmont, Santa Maria Maggiore, Alpe Vald di sopra (1385m) 10.VIII.2022, M. Bardiani (1♀); Italy, Piedmont, Verbano-Cusio-Ossola, Trontano, bivacco Alpe in La Piana (960 m) 8.VIII.2022, M. Bardiani (1♁); Italy, Liguria, Lago Agoraie di Mezzo, turbary, 1327 m, 20.VIII.2008, M. Bardiani, P. Cornacchia, P. Dallatana, S. Hardersen, G. Nardi (1♁) (CNBFVR); Italy, Lombardy, Chignola Po, S. Colombano al Lambro (Lodi) 27.VIII.1992 (3♀); Italy, Piedmont, Biella, Zumaglia 16.VIII.1963, F. Capra (1♁, 1♀) (MSNM); Italy, Lombardy, Passo Penice, between provinces of Pavia and Piacenza, 1150 m, 19.VIII.2017 (1♁, 1♀ photographed by R. Scherini); Italy, Lombardy, Motta Visconti (Milan) 7.VII.2018 (1♁, 1♀ photographed by R. Scherini); Italy, Lombardy, Riserva naturale Le Bine, Acquanegra sul Chiese (Mantova), 30 m s.l.m. 13.VI.2021 (7♁, 5♀), E. Rivalta (coll. E. Rivalta, Bologna).</p> <p> <b>Material examined from previous unknown populations</b>. Italy, Tuscany, Lake Accesa (Massa Marittima) 6.VIII.2014, P. Fontana (2♁); same data 7.VII.2016, P. Fontana (12♁, 2♀) (BMPC). Italy, Marche, Serravalle Di Chienti, P.no Colfiorito (Macerata) (758 m) 14–18.VIII.2009, G. Carotti (4♁, 6♀, of which 1 holopterous) (1♁, 1♀ in MCR, coll. F. Buzzetti, others in GCPC); Italy, Marche, Sefro (Macerata), Piano Montelago, Fonte Vino (900 m) 19–20.VII.2009, G. Carotti (3♁, 2♀) (GCPC); Italy, Emilia Romagna, Mirandola, loc. Mortizzuolo 10– 12.VI.2019 and 23.VI.2019, B. Massa, D. Campobello, M. Esposito (2♁, 1♁ holopterous, 1♀) (BMPC).</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>. <i>R. azami minor</i> and <i>R. azami</i> are characterized by cut female subgenital plate. Nadig (1961) described it as subspecies of <i>R. azami</i>, followed by Harz (1969), Fontana <i>et al.</i> (2002), Coray (2004) and Massa <i>et al.</i> (2012). Others (Ĝtz 1969, Canestrelli 1981, Nadig 1987, Coray & Thorens 2001, Roesti & Keist 2009) have considered it a subspecies of <i>R. fedtschenkoi</i>, while differences are evident in the comparative descriptions of both taxa. More recently, Iorio <i>et al.</i> (2019) listed it as a valid species.</p> <p> This taxon is brachypterous, but some rare fully-winged males and females may be found (Table 2). Male titillators are similar to those of <i>R. azami</i>, but they appear slender and more curved; the female subgenital plate differs very little from that of <i>R. azami</i>. In addition, biometrical differences allow to separate it from <i>R. azami</i> (see paragraph on biometrics).</p> <p> <b>Distribution</b>. Domenichini (1955) recorded ‘ <i>Metrioptera azami</i> ’ (certainly referring to <i>R. azami minor</i>) in aquatic meadows between Sesia and Oglio rivers (Lombardy, Italy) and considered it widespread in Lombardy and Piedmont. In addition, he wrote that the specimens of <i>M. roeselii</i> quoted by Griffini (1893) from Paludi di Stura, Avigliana, Boves and Torino had also to be referred to ‘ <i>Metrioptera azami</i> ’ (see also Galvagni 2001); records of <i>Platycleis roeselii</i> by Bezzi (1891) from Pavia certainly have to be referred to <i>R. azami minor</i>. Ĝtz (1969) pointed out that this taxon lives in valleys with rivers. Nadig (1961, 1987, 1991) recorded it from Piedmont and Lombardy (Italy). Some Piedmont and Lombardy localities are reported by Fontana <i>et al.</i> (2002). Bardiani & Buzzetti (2010) recorded <i>R. azami</i> from Liguria, but likely it belongs to <i>R. azami minor</i>; indeed, some findings from Liguria, Piedmont and Aosta Valley are reported by Sindaco <i>et al.</i> (2012). Its habitats are humid zones as well uncultivated meadows. See also Tables 2 and 4.</p> <p> <b>Remarks on Italian populations from Northern Italy, Marche and Tuscany</b>. These populations show some morphological and biometrical differences from each other, but very probably other populations live in intermediate regions.</p> <p> <b>Northern Italy population (Lombardy, Piedmont and Emilia Romagna)</b>. Males of this population have only small spines at the apex of titillators and the female subgenital plate is similar to that of <i>R. brunneri</i>. The locality where this population was found lies ca. 100 kms far from the nearest site of <i>R. brunneri</i>, 214 from that of <i>Roeseliana</i> of Tuscany, 242 from that of <i>Roeseliana</i> of Marche, and ca. 50 from Lombardy known sites of <i>R. azami minor</i>.</p> <p> <b>Marche population</b>. Like the case of the population of Tuscany, that of Marche has male titillators similar to those of <i>R. brunneri</i> (but with more numerous spines), while the female subgenital plate is very similar to that of <i>R. azami minor</i>. Only one fully-winged female has been found to the present. Also, biometrics show differences of this population from the above cited taxa. Localities where this taxon was found are ca. 230 kms far from the nearest site of <i>R. brunneri</i>, 160 from that of <i>Roeseliana</i> of Tuscany, and ca. 290 from sites of <i>R. azami minor</i> of Lombardy.</p> <p> <b>Tuscany population</b>. Male titillators have spines from their base to the apex, similarly to <i>R. brunneri</i>, but the female subgenital plate is similar to that of <i>R. azami minor</i>. Biometrics show some differences from other populations, very probably depending on their isolation. Actually, the Tuscany population is known only from Lake Accesa, ca. 160 kms from the site of <i>Roeseliana</i> in Marche region, and ca. 230 kms from the nearest site of <i>R. azami minor</i> of Lombardy.</p>Published as part of <i>Massa, Bruno, Tagliavia, Marcello, Buzzetti, Filippo Maria, Fontana, Paolo, Carotti, Giovanni, Bardiani, Marco, Leandri, Fausto, Scherini, Roberto & Verde, Gabriella Lo, 2023, A taxonomic revision of the Palaearctic genus Roeseliana (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae: Platycleidini): a case of ongoing Mediterranean speciation, pp. 351-400 in Zootaxa 5270 (3)</i> on pages 364-365, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5270.3.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7859886">http://zenodo.org/record/7859886</a>
Roeseliana azami
No full text1.11 <i>Roeseliana azami</i> (Finot, 1892) <p>Ch: SEU; ERL: DD; P*; %C: 2.88; ER: 1075-1415 m; Ph: VIII-IX</p> <p> This <i>taxon</i>, ascribed to the ssp. <i>minor</i>, proved to occur only in relatively fresh montane meadows at low elevations in the Po Valley, preferring areas with well-developed vegetation.</p>Published as part of <i>Giuliano, Davide, 2022, Orthopteran diversity and distribution in the Monviso Natural Park (Western Italian Alps) (Orthoptera), pp. 45-64 in Fragmenta entomologica 54 (1)</i> on page 51, DOI: 10.13133/2284-4880/536, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8148149">http://zenodo.org/record/8148149</a>
Metrioptera (Bicolorana) bicolor (Philippi, 1830), espèce nouvelle pour les Pyrénées-Orientales, son macroptérisme, comparaison avec M. (Roeseliana) azami (Finot, 1892) (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)
No full textMetrioptera (Bicolorana) bicolor(Philippi, 1830), new species for the department of the Pyrénées-Orientales (France), its macropterism, comparison with Metrioptera (Roeseliana) azami (Finot, 1892) (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Two male specimens of the Two-coloured Bush-cricket Metrioptera bicolor were captured at high altitude near Prats-de-Mollo, in the Vallespir valley, southern France, at the end of summer 1998. M. bicolor is new for the department of Pyrénées-Orientales and for the south of the region of the Languedoc-Roussillon ; it is very rare in the Pyrenees generally speaking. Moreover, this two specimens belong to the very rare macropterous form sieboldi Fischer. At this occasion, it appeared useful to precise the differences which separate M. bicolor from M. azami, the coloration of which is more variable than usually indicated in determination works.Deux individus mâles de Metrioptera bicolor ont été capturés en altitude dans le Vallespir, sur la commune de Prats-de-Mollo à la fin de l'été 1998. Cette espèce est nouvelle pour le département des Pyrénées-Orientales et le sud de la région Languedoc-Roussillon. De plus, ces deux mâles appartenaient à la très rare forme macroptère sieboldi Fischer. A cette occasion, il est apparu utile de préciser les différences qui séparent cette espèce de M. azami, dont la coloration est plus variable qu'il n'est indiqué dans les faunes usuelles.Puissant Stéphane, Voisin Jean-François. Metrioptera (Bicolorana) bicolor (Philippi, 1830), espèce nouvelle pour les Pyrénées-Orientales, son macroptérisme, comparaison avec M. (Roeseliana) azami (Finot, 1892) (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). In: Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, volume 104 (3), août 1999. pp. 263-266
- …
