162,075 research outputs found
J. Sommet, P. Valadier et a., Conflits et réconciliation.
No full textThils Gustave. J. Sommet, P. Valadier et a., Conflits et réconciliation.. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 22ᵉ année, fasc. 4, 1991. p. 547
Valadier-like Formulas for the Supremum Function I
No full textWe generalize and improve the original characterization given by M. Valadier [Sous-différentiels d'une borne supérieure et d'une somme continue de fonctions convexes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. A-B Math. 268 (1969) 39--42; Theorem 1] of the subdifferential of the pointwise supremum of convex functions, involving the subdifferentials of the data functions at nearby points. We remove the continuity assumption made in that work and obtain a general formula for such a subdifferential. In particular, when the supremum is continuous at some point of its domain, but not necessarily at the reference point, we get a simpler version which gives rise to the Valadier formula. Our starting result is the characterization given by A. Hantoute, M. A. López and C. Zalinescu [Subdifferential calculus rules in convex analysis: a unifying approach via pointwise supremum functions, SIAM J. Optim. 19 (2008) 863--882; Theorem 4], which uses the ε-subdifferential at the reference point.Research of the first and the second authors is supported by CONICYT grants, Fondecyt no. 1150909 and 1151003, Basal PFB-03 and Basal FB003. Research of the second and third author supported by MINECO of Spain and FEDER of EU, grant MTM2014-59179-C2-1-P. Research of the third author is also partially supported by the Australian Research Council: Project DP160100854
[Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author #1]
No full textReport to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author. The report contains a list of officers who gave depositions to the United States Attorney
[Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author #2]
No full textReport to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author. The report contains a list of officers who gave depositions to the United States Attorney
Valadier-like Formulas for the Supremum Function. II: The Compactly Indexed Case
No full textContinuing part I of this article of the same authors [Valadier-like formulas for the supremum function I, J. Convex Analysis 25(4) (2018) 1253--1278], we focus now on the compactly indexed case. We assume that the index set is compact and that the data functions are upper semicontinuous with respect to the index variable (actually, this assumption will only affect the set of ε-active indices at the reference point). As in the previous work, we do not require any continuity assumption with respect to the decision variable. The current compact setting gives rise to more explicit formulas, which only involve subdifferentials at the reference point of active data functions. Other formulas are derived under weak continuity assumptions. These formulas reduce to the characterization given by M. Valadier [Sous-différentiels d'une borne supérieure et d'une somme continue de fonctions convexes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. A-B Math. 268 (1969) 39--42; Theorem 2] when the supremum function is continuous.Research of the first and the second authors is supported by CONICYT grants, Fondecyt no. 1150909 and 1151003, and Basal PFB-03. Research of the second and third authors is supported by MINECO of Spain and FEDER of EU, grant MTM2014-59179-C2-1-P. Research of the third author is also supported by the Australian Research Council, Project DP160100854
Murder on the mountain: author talk with Peter J. Wosh
No full textAuthor talk by Peter J. Wosh on May 5th, 2022, on his book, "Murder on the Mountain: crime, passion, and punishment in gilded age New Jersey.
Adolphe Gesché & Paul Scolas (éd.), Et si Dieu n'existait pas ? Avec la collab. de M. Balmary, A. Gesché, Fr. Mies, J. Scheuer, P. Scolas, P. Valadier, L. Van Campenhoudt et B. Van Meenen. 2001
No full textBoné Édouard. Adolphe Gesché & Paul Scolas (éd.), Et si Dieu n'existait pas ? Avec la collab. de M. Balmary, A. Gesché, Fr. Mies, J. Scheuer, P. Scolas, P. Valadier, L. Van Campenhoudt et B. Van Meenen. 2001. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 34ᵉ année, fasc. 2, 2003. pp. 249-250
Mr. Melvin J. Collier, RWWL AUC, June 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Mr. Melvin J. Collier. Mr. Collier talks about his book, "From Mississippi to Africa: A Journey of Discovery". Daniel Le, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
A Tripartite Post-Recession Rebalancing
No full textIn this latest Advance & Rutgers Report, entitled “A Tripartite Post-Recession Rebalancing,” Dean James W. Hughes and Professor Joseph J. Seneca deliver an incisive assessment of the current market conditions and obstacles in the path of our economic recovery. They offer a statistical cautionary tale that the private and public sector need to hear and acknowledge in order for the economy to make continued progress.This report was published as Issue Paper Number 7, November 2011, in Advance & Rutgers Report
Evidence for the decay B0→J/ψω and measurement of the relative branching fractions of meson decays to J/ψη and J/ψη′
No full textFirst evidence of the B 0 → J / ψ ω decay is found and the B s 0 → J / ψ η and B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ decays are studied using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 7 TeV. The branching fractions of these decays are measured relative to that of the B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0 decay:frac(B (B 0 → J / ψ ω), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 0.89 ± 0.19 (stat) - 0.13 + 0.07 (syst),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 14.0 ± 1.2 (stat) - 1.5 + 1.1 (syst) - 1.0 + 1.1 (frac(f d, f s)),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 12.7 ± 1.1 (stat) - 1.3 + 0.5 (syst) - 0.9 + 1.0 (frac(f d, f s)), where the last uncertainty is due to the knowledge of f d / f s, the ratio of b-quark hadronization factors that accounts for the different production rate of B 0 and B s 0 mesons. The ratio of the branching fractions of B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ and B s 0 → J / ψ η decays is measured to befrac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B s 0 → J / ψ η)) = 0.90 ± 0.09 (stat) - 0.02 + 0.06 (syst)
- …
