124,937 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Collective excitations in the superdeformed well
Collective excitations are commonplace features in nuclei at normal deformation. It has been suggested that both in the A\sim 190 and 150 superdeformed (SD) nuclei, collective vibrational states might occur in the same excitation energy range as quasi-particle and single-particle excitations. In particular, the large deformation associated with SD nuclei brings together orbitals from many spherical shells and leads to the close proximity of states with opposite parity, favouring octupole shape vibrations. However, to date, \sim 200 SD bands have been reported in more than 50 nuclei and in most cases, the excited SD bands have been interpreted as single or quasi-particle excitations. Only in very few cases, has the collective excitation scenario been suggested. Where are the collective states in SD nuclei? The question is particularly relevant in even--even A=190 nuclei in which SD states are observed at lower rotational frequency and hence the additional influence of the pair gap makes the collective excitations more competitive with quasi-particle excitations.F. Hannachi, A. Korichi, A.N. Wilson, A. Lopez-Martens, M. Rejmund, C. Schueck, Ch. Vieu, G. Chmel, A. Goergen, H. Huebel, D. Rossbach, S. Schoenwasser, M. Bergstroem, B.M. Nyako, J. Timar, D. Bazzacco, S. Lunardi, C. Rossi-Alvarez, P. Bednarczyk, N. Kintz, S. Naguleswaran, A. Astier, D.M. Cullen, J.F. Sharpey-Schafer, T. Lauritsen, R. Wadsworthhttp://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol32/abs/v32p1083.ht
Proposal of an abridged procedure to manage Cadastral maps in an open GIS package
Cadastral cartography, born after unification of Italy in 1870, is an important source of large scale geographic
information.
Cadastral maps represent the result of the largest scale survey of on the whole national territory. Because of
their large scale, their creation is extremely expensive and the updating of the cadastre claim considerable
funds from the state budgets. That’s why the coordinate system, the geodetic basis of a cadastral work, is
rarely changed.
Even if Gauss-Boaga grid system based on ROMA40 datum was introduced and applied at some smaller
parts of the country, the cartographic coordinates manly used in the cadastral maps are based on CassiniSoldner
projection and cadastral datum Bessel-Genova; Bessel_Monte Mario and Bessel Castanea delle
Furie.
In the Cassini-Soldner projection, the whole Italian territory is subdivided in 31 major ("grandi origini") and
more than 800 local ("piccole origini") cadastral systems.
Nowadays, it is fundamental the implementation of a fast and free procedure for the updating of cadastral
maps from Italian cadastral datum to modern WGS84.
The two main goals of this paper are: the identification of a suitable set of points with coordinates known in
both datums and the computation of Abridging Molodensky parameters from Cassini-Soldner cadastral
datum to WGS84. The test area selected is the district of Rome called “Città metropolitana di Roma
Capitale” .
The data set of points suitable for the least-square estimation is extracted from the information available on
the website www.globogis.it/fiduciali.it.
The "globogis" database includes a selection of trigonometric points, with coordinates expressed in the
WGS84 datum, and a selection of cadastral points ("punti fiduciali") with coordinates expressed in the
Bessel-Genova 1902 datum. The whole database is analysed in order to provide the correct association
between cadastral and trigonometric points.
Known the dataset of points, the Abridging Molodensky parameters are estimated with a least square
principle using a specific package developed by Prof. Timar.
The estimated parameters are implemented and tested in the open source software QGIS. The accuracy of
Abridging Molodensky parameters is tested using an independent set of point with respect to the estimation
points
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology
To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe
Dr. Edwin Wright Collection: Author Unknown
Notes - The author relates several short stories about his neighbours including Alex McDonell, homesteading and life around Meanook and Athabasca (1 page
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B0→K∗0γ )/B(B0s→φγ ) and the directCP asymmetry inB 0→K∗0γ
The ratio of branching fractions of the radiative B decays B0→K⁎0γ and B0s→ϕγ has been measured using an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb−1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s√=7TeV. The value obtained is
B(B0→K⁎0γ)B(B0s→ϕγ)=1.23±0.06(stat.)±0.04(syst.)±0.10(fs/fd),
where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the experimental systematic uncertainty and the third is associated with the ratio of fragmentation fractions fs/fd. Using the world average value for B(B0→K⁎0γ), the branching fraction B(B0s→ϕγ) is measured to be (3.5±0.4)×10−5.
The direct CP asymmetry in B0→K⁎0γ decays has also been measured with the same data and found to be
ACP(B0→K⁎0γ)=(0.8±1.7(stat.)±0.9(syst.))%.
Both measurements are the most precise to date and are in agreement with the previous experimental results and theoretical expectations
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
This thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
- …
