58,294 research outputs found
Harbinger, 1983
No full textHarbinger is a student-edited and designed magazine published each spring since 1980.TABLE OF CONTENTS: CARMEN MARTI – Patchwork, After the Rain, Beat; TERI DIANNE CIACCHI – Waxing Glorious, Coming Out for Air; DOREN MELIUS – Photograph; AMY KNOX BROWN – Elements, Limitations; LYNDON JENSEN – Chicago Dance; JANE EPPERSON – Photograph; AMY WILSON – Fireflies, Deer Season, The Mall; RUBY SPRANG – Pen and Ink; CAROLYN KELLEHER – Nickelodeon, Guises; MARIE KLEIN – Photograph; SHARON O’NEIL – Where the Shoe Ends, Preparations, Twelfth Night; NORA B. INFANTE – Your Book of Song, Braided Cycle, No Sacrifice as Such; JANICE OLSON – Photograph; JOHNAJ. RAMOS – Rounding Corners, Self-Satisfaction, Woman’s Best Friend; JO ANN M. BUSH – Photograph; MARIANNE TURKALJ BOST – Preparation; ROBIN L. LARSON – The Delivery, The Black Slate, Fall; DEDRA BENSON – Photograph; JOANNA MCKEE – The Private; COLLEEN BEVINS –Photograph; PENNEY LUTHI – Special Moments; BARBARA THOMAS – Best Laid Plans; TRACI LA ROSE – Photograph
Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B0→K∗0γ )/B(B0s→φγ ) and the directCP asymmetry inB 0→K∗0γ
No full textThe ratio of branching fractions of the radiative B decays B0→K⁎0γ and B0s→ϕγ has been measured using an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb−1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s√=7TeV. The value obtained is
B(B0→K⁎0γ)B(B0s→ϕγ)=1.23±0.06(stat.)±0.04(syst.)±0.10(fs/fd),
where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the experimental systematic uncertainty and the third is associated with the ratio of fragmentation fractions fs/fd. Using the world average value for B(B0→K⁎0γ), the branching fraction B(B0s→ϕγ) is measured to be (3.5±0.4)×10−5.
The direct CP asymmetry in B0→K⁎0γ decays has also been measured with the same data and found to be
ACP(B0→K⁎0γ)=(0.8±1.7(stat.)±0.9(syst.))%.
Both measurements are the most precise to date and are in agreement with the previous experimental results and theoretical expectations
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
D-2910a: 142 North Crocket Avenue, Logan, Utah, H. B. Nielsen/Hyrum Grant Stephens/Minna M. Lovett/ O.J. and E. Williams residence
No full textD-2910a: 142 North Crocket Avenue, Logan, Utah, H. B. Nielsen/Hyrum Grant Stephens/Minna M. Lovett/ O.J. and E. Williams residenc
Search for exclusive b → u transitions in hadronic decays of B mesons involving Ds+ and Ds*+ mesons
No full textcomplete author list:
Alexander J.; Bebek C.; Berkelman K.; Bloom K.; Browder T.; Cassel D.; Cho H.; Coffman D.; Drell P.; Ehrlich R.; Garcia-Sciveres M.; Geiser B.; Gittelman B.; Gray S.; Hartill D.; Heltsley B.; Jones C.; Jones S.; Kandaswamy J.; Katayama N.; Kim P.; Kreinick D.; Ludwig G.; Masui J.; Mevissen J.; Mistry N.; Ng C.; Nordberg E.; Patterson J.; Peterson D.; Riley D.; Salman S.; Sapper M.; Würthwein F.; Avery P.; Freyberger A.; Rodriguez J.; Stephens R.; Yelton J.; Cinabro D.; Henderson S.; Kinoshita K.; Liu T.; Saulnier M.; Wilson R.; Yamamoto H.; Bergfeld T.; Eisenstein B.; Gollin G.; Ong B.; Palmer M.; Selen M.; Thaler J.; Sadoff A.; Ammar R.; Ball S.; Baringer P.; Bean A.; Besson D.; Coppage D.; Copty N.; Davis R.; Hancock N.; Kelly M.; Kwak N.; Lam H.; Kubota Y.; Lattery M.; Nelson J.; Patton S.; Perticone D.; Poling R.; Savinov V.; Schrenk S.; Wang R.; Alam M.; Kim I.; Nemati B.; O'Neill J.; Severini H.; Sun C.; Zoeller M.; Crawford G.; Daubenmier C.; Fulton R.; Fujino D.; Gan K.; Honscheid K.; Kagan H.; Kass R.; Lee J.; Malchow R.; Morrow F.; Skovpen Y.; Sung M.; White C.; Butler F.; Fu X.; Kalbfleisch G.; Ross W.; Skubic P.; Snow J.; Wang P.; Wood M.; Brown D.; Fast J.; McIlwain R.; Miao T.; Miller D.; Modesitt M.; Payne D.; Shibata E.; Shipsey I.; Wang P.; Battle M.; Ernst J.; Kwon Y.; Roberts S.; Thorndike E.; Wang C.; Dominick J.; Lambrecht M.; Sanghera S.; Shelkov V.; Skwarnicki T.; Stroynowski R.; Volobouev I.; Wei G.; Zadorozhny P.; Artuso M.; He D.; Goldberg M.; Horwitz N.; Kennett R.; Mountain R.; Moneti G.; Muheim F.; Mukhin Y.; Playfer S.; Rozen Y.; Stone S.; Thulasidas M.; Vasseur G.; Zhu G.; Bartelt J.; Csorna S.; Egyed Z.; Jain V.; Akerib D.; Barish B.; Chadha M.; Chan S.; Cowen D.; Eigen G.; Miller J.; O'Grady C.; Urheim J.; Weinstein A.; Acosta D.; Athanas M.; Masek G.; Paar H.; Gronberg J.; Kutschke R.; Menary S.; Morrison R.; Nakanishi S.; Nelson H.; Nelson T.; Richman J.; Ryd A.; Tajima H.; Schmidt D.; Sperka D.; Witherell M.; Procario M.; Yang S.; Balest R.; Cho K.; Daoudi M.; Ford W.; Johnson D.; Lingel K.; Lohner M.; Rankin P.; Smith J.; Alexander J.; Alexander J.P
Evidence for the decay B0→J/ψω and measurement of the relative branching fractions of meson decays to J/ψη and J/ψη′
No full textFirst evidence of the B 0 → J / ψ ω decay is found and the B s 0 → J / ψ η and B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ decays are studied using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 7 TeV. The branching fractions of these decays are measured relative to that of the B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0 decay:frac(B (B 0 → J / ψ ω), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 0.89 ± 0.19 (stat) - 0.13 + 0.07 (syst),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 14.0 ± 1.2 (stat) - 1.5 + 1.1 (syst) - 1.0 + 1.1 (frac(f d, f s)),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 12.7 ± 1.1 (stat) - 1.3 + 0.5 (syst) - 0.9 + 1.0 (frac(f d, f s)), where the last uncertainty is due to the knowledge of f d / f s, the ratio of b-quark hadronization factors that accounts for the different production rate of B 0 and B s 0 mesons. The ratio of the branching fractions of B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ and B s 0 → J / ψ η decays is measured to befrac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B s 0 → J / ψ η)) = 0.90 ± 0.09 (stat) - 0.02 + 0.06 (syst)
Business Papers (MS 80-0003)
No full textDeed from Lewis W. Stephens and M. L. Stephens to J. T. Davis conveying land part of the Joseph Moreland survey
Measurement of b-hadron masses
No full textMeasurements of b-hadron masses are performed with the exclusive decay modes B +→J/ψK +, B 0→J/ψK +, B0→J/ψKS0, Bs0→J/ψφ and Λb0→J/ψΛ using an integrated luminosity of 35pb -1 collected in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV by the LHCb experiment. The momentum scale is calibrated with J/ψ→μ +μ - decays and verified to be known to a relative precision of 2 ×10 -4 using other two-body decays. The results are more precise than previous measurements, particularly in the case of the Bs0 and Λb0 masses
Brittle tectonic evolution and paleostress field reconstruction in the southwestern part of the Fennoscandian Shield, Forsmark, Sweden
No full textSix hundred fault slip data have provided robust paleostress fields within an approximately 35 km3 volume of Paleoproterozoic (1.9 Ga) rocks in the southwestern Fennoscandian Shield, Forsmark, Sweden. These rocks were affected by penetrative ductile strain from 1.87 to 1.86 Ga, folding, ductile strain along discrete zones around 1.8 Ga, and semibrittle or brittle deformation around and after 1.8 Ga. Compatible paleostress fields have been identified using site-by-site and merged data sets from outcrops and oriented drill cores. Transpressive deformation with a regional NNW-SSE 1 axis, associated with clockwise stress deviation inside a tectonic lens, resulted in dextral slip along regionally significant, steep WNW-ESE and NW-SE deformation zones. The semibrittle and most of the brittle structures, including specifically the epidote-bearing fractures, were established during this oldest regime around 1.8 Ga (latest Svecokarelian). A younger paleostress field with a NE-SW 1 axis, which was also transpressive in character, is inferred to have been active at 1.7-1.6 Ga. The best defined paleostress field is transpressive in character with a WNW-ESE 1 axis that resulted in sinistral reactivation along the WNW-ESE and NW-SE zones. The main set of laumontite-stepped faults developed at this stage at 1.1-0.9 Ga (Sveconorwegian). It is impossible to exclude fully the influence of reactivation during even younger Phanerozoic tectonic events. Subordinate extensional paleostress fields were related either to the latest Svecokarelian and Sveconorwegian transpressive regimes, due to 1 and 2 stress permutations, or to regional extensional tectonic regimes during the Meso- or Neoproterozoic or later during the Permo-Carboniferous and/or Mesozoic. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union
- …
