1,720,960 research outputs found
Anatolian linguistic influences in Early Greek (1500-800 BC)?
No full textOreshko Rostislav. Anatolian linguistic influences in Early Greek (1500-800 BC)? [Электронный ресурс] : critical observations against sociolinguistic and areal background / Rostislav Oreshko// Вестник РГГУ. Серия "Филология. Вопросы языкового родства". - 2018. - № 2 (16). - С. 93-118
Anatolian linguistic influences in Early Greek (1500-800 BC)?
No full textOreshko Rostislav. Anatolian linguistic influences in Early Greek (1500-800 BC)? [Электронный ресурс] : critical observations against sociolinguistic and areal background / Rostislav Oreshko// Вестник РГГУ. Серия "Филология. Вопросы языкового родства". - 2018. - № 2 (16). - С. 93-118
Observations on the Xanthos Trilingual
Get PDFInternational audienceThe paper offers a new analysis of the passage of the Xanthos trilingual containing a detailed description of the military exploits of the author of the inscription (TL 44a, 41-55). The first part (§ §1-2) discusses the overall structure of the passage and the meaning of the key term of the text, hãtahe, for which an interpretation 'victory' (gen. sg.) is proposed. The subsequent paragraphs discuss separate words and particularities of the syntax of the passage. The new proposals include, among others: tupelija-'script, writing(s)', tupa 'images, reliefs', axa-'deed, exploit', ahata-'foundation, platform' (§3); hẽmen-'shooting, hunting' (§3); terñ 'when' (adverb with temporal function) (§4); zẽmtija 'formidable' (§5); nele 'acropolis' (§5); ese … tebe-/taba-'join with' (§6); tarbi = trbbi 'against' (§7); hbãt-'hoplite' (§8); uwe 'day' (§8). The most important historical implications of the new analysis concern Trbbẽnimi and Xerẽi, who are argued to be allies (not enemies) of the author, as well as Herikle, who is identified as a governor (sehaxlaza-) of Kaunos, connected with the Persian king. The resulting translation of the text is proposed in §11
Ethnic Groups and Language Contact in Lycia (I): the 'Maritime Interface'
No full textInternational audienceThe paper offers an overview of the ethnolinguistic and sociolinguistic contact in Lycia in the Late Bronze and the Early Iron Age (ca. 1400-330 BC) resulting from the sea-borne connections of the region. Following a brief sketch of the Lycian geography and definition of its 'ethnocultural interfaces' (§1), the discussion concentrates in turn on the southern coasts of Caria and Rhodos, also touching upon the question of the ethnic names of the Lycians, Lukkā/Λύκιοι and Trmmile/i (§2), Pamphylia (§3), Rough Cilicia (§4), the Levant (§5) and the Aegean (§6). The section on the Aegean offers a revision of the evidence on Greek-Lycian contacts and suggests a new explanatory scenario accounting for the paradoxical situation where an insignificant number of lexical borrowings contrasts with evidence for a deep structural influence of Greek on Lycian
Ahhiyawa and Danu(na): Greek ethnic groups in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Light of Old and New Hieroglyphic-Luwian Evidence
No full textThe topic of the present contribution is two ethnic terms of likely Aegean origin specified in the title, which appear, in different guises, in written sources of the late 2nd and early 1st millennium BC across the entire Eastern Mediterranean, from Egypt in the South to the Levant to Cilicia in the North (besides the Aegean itself). My discussion of them will be, however, not quite the same. As for the first one, Ahhiyawa or Hiyawa, I will summarize the recent discussion revolving around recognition of this name in the Hieroglyphic-Luwian inscription KARATEPE, adding some details and placing it in a more general historical context. The second and central part of the paper will concern Danu(na), in which a full linguistic reassessment of this term and a revision of different sources which mention it will be offered. The third part will discuss the distinction between the two terms, also touching upon the problem of ethnolinguistic boundaries in Late Bronze Age Greece
Studies in hieroglyphic Luwian towards a philological and historical reinterpretation of SÜDBURG inscription
No full textAhhiyawa - Danu(na). Aegean ethnic groups in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Light of Old and New Hieroglyphic-Luwian Evidence
No full textThe paper is written as a part of project ‘The Trojan Catalogue (Hom. Il. 2.816-877) and the Peoples of western Anatolia in the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. A Study of the Homeric Text in the Light of Hittite Sources and Classical Geographical Tradition’ (2015/19/P/HS3/04161), which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 665778 with the National Science Centre, Poland.The topic of the present contribution is two ethnic terms of likely Aegean origin specified in the title, which appear, in different guises, in written sources of the late 2nd and early 1st millennium BC across the entire Eastern Mediterranean, from Egypt in the South to the Levant to Cilicia in the North (besides the Aegean itself). 1 My discussion of them will be, however, not quite the same. As for the first one, Ahhiyawa or Hiyawa, I will summarize the recent discussion revolving around recognition of this name in the Hieroglyphic-Luwian inscription KARATEPE, adding some details and placing it in a more general historical context. The second and central part of the paper will concern Danu(na), in which a full linguistic reassessment of this term and a revision of different sources which mention it will be offered. The third part will discuss the distinction between the two terms, also touching upon the problem of ethnolinguistic boundaries in Late Bronze Age Greece.Narodowe Centrum Nauki / National Science Centr
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
