728 research outputs found
E-enterprise : business models, architecture, and components / Faisal Hoque.
No full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. [265]-271) and index.xx, 284 pages ;E-commerce is still a volatile industry, but each day a new enterprise pops up promising to be the next big thing. The real challenge is to understand what is involved in using the Internet as a means to building a successful business. Rather than coming up with marketing hooks and product innovations, e-Enterprise: Business Models, Architecture, and Components demystifies e-commerce and describes how a business should determine its own future by taking the next step and becoming an agile 'e-enterprise'. Faisal Hoque introduces the concept of high-level abstraction of business processes and application functionality that result in reusable business and technology components. He provides a methodology that is critical for all business leaders and technologists trying to build an enterprise on the internet
Idols, Commodities and Islam, by Faisal Devji
No full textIdols, Commodities and Islam. Conference given by Faisal Devji, held at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 7 May 2019. Faisal Devji is professor of history at the university of Oxford. and Zaheer Kazmi, He is the author of Landscapes of the Jihad: Militancy, Morality, Modernity (Hurst, 2005), The Terrorist in Search of Humanity: Militant Islam and Global Politics (Hurst, 2009), The Impossible India: Gandhi and the Temptation of Violence (Harvard Universit..
Correction to: Thermal decomposition of rice husk: a comprehensive artificial intelligence predictive model
Full text linkUnfortunately, in the original publication of the article the third author name was misspelled as
Faisal Abnisal. The corrected author name should read as “Faisal Abnisa”. The affiliation of
third author was incorrectly published. The corrected affiliation is given below
Beyond Europe: Perspectives on Minorities, Religions & Secular States. Conversation with Faisal Devji
No full textFaisal Devji is professor of history at the university of Oxford. He is the author of Landscapes of the Jihad: Militancy, Morality, Modernity (Hurst, 2005), The Terrorist in Search of Humanity: Militant Islam and Global Politics (Hurst, 2009), The Impossible India: Gandhi and the Temptation of Violence (Harvard University Press, 2012) and Muslim Zion: Pakistan as a Political Idea (Harvard University Press, 2013). He has coedited Islam after Liberalism (with Zaheer Kazmi, Oxford University Pre..
Iqbal and the Cosmopolitan Horizon of Muslim Societies, by Faisal Devji
No full textFaisal Devji is Historian, Reader in Indian History at St. Antony's College, University of Oxford. He is the author of four books, Landscapes of the Jihad: Militancy, Morality, Modernity (Hurst, 2005), The Terrorist in Search of Humanity: Militant Islam and Global Politics (Hurst, 2009), The Impossible India: Gandhi and the Temptation of Violence (Harvard University Press, 2012) and Muslim Zion: Pakistan as a Political Idea (Harvard University Press, 2013). On Muhammad Iqbal (1877-1938) and t..
Essays on the post-9/11 labor markets for "Muslims" in the West --: evidence from the US and the UK
No full textTheories of both statistical and prejudiced discrimination predict adverse effects of terrorist events on workers who are demographically similar to terrorists. Using a difference-in-differences framework, this paper assesses the impact of the 9/11 attacks in the US and of the July 2005 bombings in Britain.
In the US, the outcomes worsened for those with nativity profiles closer to the terrorists'. The author finds a relative decrease in employment of very young (ages 16 to 25) target-group men associated with 9/11 in the US. A similar decrease in employment of these very young "Muslims" living in the UK is also found after 9/11 and again after the bombings in London in July 2005.Ph.D.Includes bibliographical references
INDIVIDUALISME FAISAL TEHRANI DALAM KEPENGARANGAN BERDASARKAN NOVEL-NOVEL TERPILIH
Full text linkFaisal Tehrani antara pengarang generasi baharu yang prolifik dan aktif berkarya sehingga kini. Karya-karya yang dihasilkannya menunjukkan kelainan tersendiri dari aspek tekstual dan kontekstual seiring dengan perubahan aliran, tema, persoalan dan pemikiran yang menjadi pegangan dalam menghasilkan karyanya. Sehubungan dengan itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pembinaan jati diri beliau dalam novel-novel terpilihnya. Sepanjang berkarya, beliau menghasilkan novel remaja dan novel dewasa bagi menyampaikan pemikiran, persoalan, permasalahan, mesej dan sebagainya dengan berkesan. Sebanyak lima buah novel akan ditelusuri, iaitu Perempuan Politikus Melayu, 1515, 1511H[Kombat], SsPJ, Tunggu Teduh Dulu dan Bahlut. Kajian ini menggunakan metodologi kualitatif yang melibatkan pembacaan rapi dan pentafsiran sumber bertulis. Bagi menganalisis pembinaan jati diri, Teori Teksdealisme digunakan sebagai landasan kajian. Dalam Teori Teksdealisme telah mengemukakan prinsip individualisme atau keperibadian untuk mengesan keupayaan seseorang pengarang untuk membina jati diri atau keperibadiannya. Bagi mengesan pembinaan individualisme tersebut, prinsip ini telah mengemukakan empat unsur yang diterokai, iaitu subjektiviti, stail individu, reka cipta individu dan tindakan individu. Semua unsur tersebut dianalisis secara tekstual dan konstektual berdasarkan tujuan dan persoalan kajian yang ditetapkan. Kajian mendapati bahawa Faisal Tehrani berusaha untuk membina dan menampilkan jati diri kepengarangannya melalui subjektiviti, stail individu, reka cipta individu dan tindakan individu. Keupayaan membina individualisme ini akan mengukuhkan kedudukan serta ketokohan beliau sebagai pengarang yang memiliki ciri-ciri keunggulan kerana mempunyai ideologi, kreativiti, sensitiviti dan matlamat tersendiri dalam menghasilkan novel-novelnya.
Faisal Tehrani is among the new generation of prolific and active authors today. His works show distinct uniqueness in the textual and contextual aspects in terms of the changes in the flow, themes, problems and thoughts that come into being in producing his works. Accordingly, this study aims to analyze the development of his identity in his selected novels. Throughout his creative production, he has produced various teen and mature novels to effectively communicate his ideas, questions, problems, messages, etc. A total of five novels was studied, namely Perempuan Politikus Melayu, 1515, 1511H [Kombat], SsPJ, Tunggu Teduh Dulu and Bahlut. This study will apply a qualitative methodology involving intensive reading and interpretation of written sources. To analyze the development of identity, the texdialism theory will be used as the basis of the study. The Texdialism Theory puts forward the principles of individualism or individuality to detect the ability of an author to build his identity or personality. To track the construction of the individualism, this approach presented four exploratory elements, namely subjectivity, individual style, individual inventor and individual action. All of these elements will be analysed textually and consistently based on the objectives and questions of the study. The study found that Faisal Tehrani sought to build and display his identity through subjectivity, individual styles, individual inventions and individual actions. The ability to build this individualism will reinforce his position as an author who has the characteristics of excellence because of his ideology, creativity, sensitivity and purpose in producing his novels
ANTIELITISME KEBUDAYAAN DALAM NOVEL PUYA KE PUYA KARYA FAISAL ODDANG
Full text linkABSTRAK
Ngesti Wahyuni, Antielitisme Kebudayaan Dalam Novel Puya Ke Puya Karya Faisal Oddang. Skripsi, Jakarta: Program Studi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 2020.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan konstruksi antielitisme budaya dalam upacara pemakaman adat Toraja di novel Puya Ke Puya. Selain itu, untuk mendeskripsikan kontradiksi antielitisme budaya yang terjadi di novel Puya Ke Puya dan untuk mendeskripsikan implikasi antielitisme budaya dan kritik sosial untuk karya sastra pada novel Puya Ke Puya.
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian hermeneutika. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis wacana kritis dari Teun A. Van Dijk. Subjek penelitian berupa novel Puya Ke Puya karya Faisal Oddang yang berfokus pada teks-teks yang merepresentasikan konstruksi dan kontradiksi antielitisme budaya yang dilakukan oleh tokoh pada pemakaman adat Toraja. Penulis juga melakukan wawancara kepada informan orang Toraja sebagai triangulasi data. Penulis menganalisis dan mengolah teks yang terdapat di dalam novel Puya Ke Puya dengan konsep kebudayaan pada masa lalu, masa kini dan masa depan yang berangkat dari pemikiran Raymond Williams serta dikaitkan dengan antielitisme budaya.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada novel Puya Ke Puya ini terjadinya konflik keluarga dalam memutuskan perihal upacara pemakaman adat rambu solo. Konstruksi antielitisme budaya yang dideskripsikan pada novel ini terdapat enam hal yaitu keturunan, kualitas intrinsik, kecerdasan tokoh, kekayaan, pengalaman dan otoritas. Adanya kontradiksi antielitisme budaya terkait dengan pemikiran dua hal yang bertentangan dapat dilihat dari hubungan antar tokoh utama dengan tokoh lainnya berkaitan pada keputusan pelaksanaan upacara rambu solo. Relevansi budaya lokal Toraja dengan perkembangan zaman di novel Puya Ke Puya bahwa era yang semakin modern mengubah pola pikirnya dalam memutuskan untuk melaksanakan adat kepercayaan atau adanya kreativitas baru dalam kebudayaan itu sendiri.
Kata Kunci : Budaya Toraja, Antielitisme, Rambu Solo, Stratifikasi Sosial.
ABSTRACT
Ngesti Wahyuni, Cultural Antielitism in Faisal Oddang's Puya Ke Puya Novel. Thesis, Jakarta: Sociology Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences, Jakarta State University, 2020.
This study aims to describe the construction of cultural anti-literacy in Toraja traditional funeral ceremonies in Puya Ke Puya. In addition, to describe the contradictions of cultural anti-literacy that occur in Puya Ke Puya's novels and to describe the implications of cultural anti-literacy and social criticism for literary works in Puya Ke Puya's novels. This study uses a qualitative approach with the type of hermeneutic research. The data analysis technique used in this study used critical discourse analysis techniques from Teun A. Van Dijk. The research subject is the novel Puya Ke Puya by Faisal Oddang which focuses on texts that represent the construction and contradictions of cultural anti-literacy carried out by figures in Toraja traditional burials. The author also conducted interviews with Toraja informants as data triangulation. The author analyzes and processes the texts contained in the novel Puya Ke Puya with the concept of culture in the past, present and future, which departs from the thoughts of Raymond Williams and is associated with cultural antielitism.
The results showed that in this Puya Ke Puya novel there was a family conflict in deciding about the rambu solo funeral ceremony. The construction of cultural antielitism described in this novel contains six things, namely heredity, intrinsic quality, character intelligence, wealth, experience and authority. The contradiction of cultural antielitism related to the idea of two opposing things can be seen from the relationship between the main character and other figures regarding the decision to carry out the solo sign ceremony. The relevance of Torajan local culture with the times in Puya Ke Puya's novel is that an increasingly modern era changes its mindset in deciding to carry out traditional beliefs or the presence of new creativity in the culture itself.
Keywords : Toraja Culture, Antielitism, Rambu Solo, Social Stratificatio
Analisis Yuridis Atas Permohonan Ada atau Tidaknya Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan Terhadap Proses Peradilan Pidana Korupsi
No full textThe development of its administrative HR law between State and criminal law entered into a "gray area" giving rise to debate ebelitas among legal experts. How not to, a decision State officials well in order "beleid" nor "diskresi" became the arena of academic studies for was made the base an pemidanaan justification or denial, but on the other hand diskresi without based on legislation give rise to an abuse of authority. Administrative law occupies a dominant position in the handling of criminal acts of corruption, either preventive or repressive. From the side of the repressive, legal administration very dominant because of the criminal offence of corruption is only likely to occur in the context of the country's losses. By the existence of article 20 and article 21 of ACT No. 30 of 2014 about government administration, opening up space for the internal auditing of the Government Apparatus (APIP) to supervise the prohibition of abuse of authority and PTUN to check and decide adaatau there are no elements of abuse of authority, as may be made by the Court of abusing authority in testing TIPIKOR article 3 of ACT PTPK. This condition will affect the critical interface authorities prosecute. The research method used is the method of normative legal research conducted through the study of legislation and the relevant legal materials assisted with gathering information-related information. Data collected with the study of librarianship and analysis done qualitatively. The results showed that according to the theory of the point of tangent equation, there are administrative law and criminal law related to abuse of authority, including the use of the term Equation 1) 2) Equation, Equation 3) understanding the subject of the norm i.e. Government officials, 4) equation of norgeddrag, i.e. the forbidden deeds (verbod). The close relationship of law and the administration of criminal law that raises the legal experts among the pros cons when APIP inspection results and/or Verdict PTUN stating there are no elements of abuse of authority committed government officials, whether binding the process of criminal justice. Some experts argued the abuse of authority committed should be solved first in administration through PTUN before Court Tipikor check and put on trial. Meanwhile, other legal experts have different opinions that the Government officials are convicted could do if the deed Tipikor against criminal law, which preceded and followed the evil inner attitude (mensrea) and result in the loss finances of the State, but in addition to the second opinion there is another legal experts who argued that there are no conflicts of norms, because good PTUN nor the District Court (Criminal/Tipikor) runs the function of each. Parameter test of legality PTUN decisions and/or actions of government officials is legislation (written) and the General principles of good governance/AUPB (not written), while Court TIPIKOR based solely on regulation in writing only. In administrative law distinguished between personal responsibility and position responsibilities. Responsibilities of the position with regard to the legality of the (validity) or defects regarding the juridical authority, procedures, and the substances while personal responsibility with regards to the functionaries or approach the approach behavior, maladministrasi. Criminal responsibility is personal responsibility in the context of losses of State accompanied by malicious intent to benefit yourself.Perkembangan antara hukum adminitrasi Negara dan hukum pidana memasuki “gray area” sehingga menimbulkan debat ebelitas dikalangan ahli hukum. Betapa tidak, keputusan pejabat Negara baik dalam rangka “beleid” maupun “diskresi” menjadi ajang kajian akademis untuk dijadikan alas an penolakan maupun justifikasi pemidanaan, namun disisi lain diskresi tanpa berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan menimbulkan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Hukum administrasi menempati posisi dominan dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, baik preventif maupun represif. Dari sisi represif, hukum administrasi sangat dominan karena tindak pidana korupsi hanya mungkin terjadi dalam konteks kerugian negara. Dengan adanya Pasal 20 dan Pasal 21 UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, membuka ruang bagi Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) untuk melakukan pengawasan larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang dan PTUN untuk memeriksa dan memutuskan adaatau tidak ada unsure penyalahgunaan wewenang, sebagaimana juga dapat dilakukan oleh Pengadilan TIPIKOR menguji menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam Pasal 3 UU PTPK. Kondisi ini akan mempengaruhi persinggungan kewenangan mengadili. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan melalui kajian terhadap perundang-undangan dan bahan hukum yang relevan dibantu dengan mengumpulkan informasi-informasi terkait. Data dikumpulkan dengan studi kepustakaan dan analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa menurut teori titik singgung, terdapat persamaan Hukum Administrasi dan Hukum Pidana terkait penyalahgunaan wewenang, meliputi 1) Persamaan penggunaan istilah 2) Persamaan pengertian, 3) Persamaan subjek norma yaitu pejabat pemerintahan, 4) Persamaan norgeddrag, yaitu perbuatan terlarang (verbod). Hubungan erat hukum administrasi dan hukum pidana tersebut menimbulkan pro kontra diantara pakar hukum apabila hasil pemeriksaan APIP dan/atau Putusan PTUN menyatakan tidak ada unsure penyalahgunaan wewenang yang dilakukan pejabat pemerintahan, apakah mengikat proses peradilan pidana. Sebagian pakar berpendapat penyalahgunaan wewenang yang dilakukan seharusnya dapat diselesaikan terlebih dahulu secara administrasi melalui PTUN sebelum Pengadilan Tipikor memeriksa dan mengadilinya. Sementara itu pakar hukum lainnya mempunyai pendapat yang berbeda bahwa pejabat pemerintahan dapat dipidana melakukan Tipikor apabila terjadi perbuatan melawan hukum pidana, yang didahului dan diikuti sikap batin jahat (mensrea) dan mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan negara, akan tetapi selain kedua pendapat tersebut ada pakar hukum lain yang berpendapat bahwa tidak ada konflik norma, karena baik PTUN maupun Pengadilan Negeri (Pidana/Tipikor) menjalankan fungsinya masing-masing. Parameter PTUN menguji legalitas keputusan dan/atau tindakan pejabat pemerintahan adalah peraturan perundang-undangan (tertulis) dan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik/AUPB (tidak tertulis), sedangkan Pengadilan TIPIKOR hanya berdasarkan peraturan tertulis saja. Dalam hukum administrasi dibedakan antara tanggungjawab jabatan dan tanggungjawab pribadi. Tanggungjawab jabatan berkenaan dengan legalitas (keabsahan) atau cacat yuridis menyangkut wewenang, prosedur, dan substansi sedangkan tanggungjawab pribadi berkaitan dengan pendekatan fungsionaris atau pendekatan prilaku, maladministrasi. Tanggungjawab pidana adalah tanggungjawab pribadi dalam konteks kerugian Negara disertai niat jahat untuk menguntungkan diri sendiri.Tesis Magiste
Author highlights social media’s dominant role in today’s world at book launch
No full textThis article covers the launching of Dr Aasim Sajjad Akhtar’s book ‘The Struggle for Hegemony in Pakistan: Fear, Desire and Revolutionary Horizons’ at IBA City camus. IBA Executive Director Dr S Akbar Zaidi, visiting faculty at IBA Abira Ashfaq, and lawyer Faisal Siddiqui, and the author all talked at the book launching panel discussion
- …
