1,720,958 research outputs found
Pertanggung Jawaban Pribadi Dan Jabatan Dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara
The modern state is the personification of the legal system so that almost all countries in the world claim to be a state of law. However, the paradigm of the rule of law idea has shifted to the concept of a welfare state. This is because to carry out a government with increasingly complex needs of society is not sufficient only by referring to the legislative delegation or implementing laws. It is in this framework that the government is then given the authority to act on its own initiative in solving problems faced by society in the form of discretion. The problem is how to be accountable when the authority essentially contains responsibility consequences, the problem that arises next is that every government administration is always carried out by two entities, namely positions (government) and officials (people) as individuals who carry out government affairs. This paper finds that if there is an element of administrative error that causes loss to citizens, the responsibility and accountability will be borne by the person of the perpetrator of the maladministration, both administratively and even turning into a criminal responsibility.Negara modern adalah personifikasi tata hukum sehingga hampir seluruh negara di dunia mengklaim diri sebagai negara hukum. Namun paradigma gagasan negara hukum telah bergeser kepada konsep negara kesejahteraan. Sebab untuk menyelenggarakan pemerintahan di ruang publik yang semakin kompleks tidak cukup hanya dengan berpedoman pada delegasi undang-undang atau melaksanakan undang-undang. Dalam kerangka inilah kemudian kepada pemerintah diberikan wewenang bertindak dengan inisiatif sendiri dalam menyelesaikan persoalan-persoalan yang dihadapi masyarakat berupa diskresi. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawabannya ketika wewenang pada hakikatnya mengandung konsekuensi pertanggungjawaban, problematika yang muncul berikutnya adalah setiap penyelenggaraan pemerintahan selalu dilakukan dua entitas, yaitu jabatan (pemerintah) dan pejabat (orang) sebagai pribadi yang menjalankan urusan pemerintahan. Tulisan ini menemukan jika terdapat unsur kesalahan administrasi yang menyebabkan kerugian warga negara, tanggung jawab dan tanggung gugatnya dibebankan pada pribadi pelaku tindakan maladministrasi tersebut, baik secara administratif bahkan bisa berubah menjadi tanggung jawab pidana
Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
General elections in Indonesia have shifted a lot motivated by efforts to seek their ideal form. The last time, elections were held simultaneously by combining the five types of elections stipulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution. The various complexities and challenges of the 2019 election should be evaluated. Elections basically have two main objectives, 1) to produce a government that represents every element in society; 2) create a government that is able to govern well. This paper discusses about the complexity and challenges of the 2019 simultaneous election and how the ideal election timing is designed. This research uses normative legal research methods (legal research) with two approaches: normative approach and conceptual approach. This study resulted, first, there were technical complications in the 2019 Concurrent Election, namely the workload of the organizers, especially the KPPS; a significant increase in the election budget; and voter confusion due to too many types of elections which implicated too many candidate lists. Second, the Constitutional Court has determined six electoral models as well as constitutional ones, and this can be considered as judicial law politics. Lawmakers must immediately act on the Constitutional Court\u27s decision by amending the electoral law which adopts one of the simultaneous election models
Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law dalam Pemindahan Ibukota Negara
Omnibus lLaw menjadi perdebatan di masyarakat karena dianggap sebagai alat untuk memangkas secara instan ruwetnya regulasi di Indonesia. Keruwetan ini menjadi penyebab lambatnya negara menggapai kesejahteraan. Bahkan ditahun 2020, dengan 8.451 peraturan pusat dan 15.965 peraturan daerah belum mampu mendongkrak posisi Indonesia menjadi negara maju. Sebaliknya, banyaknya regulasi membuat pemerintah sulit melakukan akselerasi pengambilan kebijakan karena rumitnya regulasi dari pusat hingga daerah. Harmonisasi dan simplifikasi regulasi yang dilakukan masih belum mampu mengatasi masalah ini. Oleh karena itu, penyederhaan regulasi melalui omnibus law dipandang sebagai cara paling tepat untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini. Penelitian ini berfokus untuk menjawab (a) legal historis penataan regulasi di Indonesia; (b) upaya meningkatkan kualitas regulasi di Indonesia; (c) konseptualisasi omnibus law pemindahan ibukota negara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui, memahami, dan menganalisa legal historis penataan regulasi di Indonesia, upaya meningkatkan kualitas regulasi di Indonesia, dan merumuskan konseptualisasi omnibus law pemindahan ibukota negara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan undang-undang, konsep, dan sejarah. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dalam pemindahan ibukota negara harus ada  harmonisasi puluhan undang-undang hingga peraturan daerah ke dalam undang-undang ibukota negara. Penggunaan omnibus law dalam pemindahan ibukota negara merupakan pilihan yang relevan dalam menyederhanakan regulasi untuk menunjang kebijakan pemindahan ibukota negara
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
