648 research outputs found
Commencement 2010: Senior Day author Khaled Hosseini
No full textIncludes descriptive metadata provided by producer in MP4 file: "Video @ Vanderbilt - Videos - Commencement 2010: Senior Day author Khaled Hosseini." By Vanderbilt University.Excerpts of commencement speach of Khaled Hosseini, author of the bestsellers The Kite Runner and A Thousand Splendid Suns. Hosseini spoke May 13 in a packed Memorial Gymnasium to 2010 graduates, their friends and family members.
“I ask you to seek out people in your community in need – to try not just to understand them, but to help them,” Hosseini said
Alumni author Khaled Hosseini
No full textColor portrait of alumnus author Khaled Hosseini sitting on the Mayer Theatre stage
Patriarchal Culture in Merari Siregar’s Azab dan Sengsara and Khaled Hosseini’s a Thousand Splendid Suns: A Comparative Literature Analysis
No full textThis thesis entitled Patriarchal Culture in Merari Siregar’s Azab dan Sengsara and Khaled Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns: A Comparative Literature Analysis. This thesis analyzes the comparative literature of Patriarchal Culture in two novels that come from different countries, South Asia and Indonesia. They are Azab dan Sengsara by Merari Siregar from Indonesia and A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini from Afganistan. The objective of the study is to portray the patriarchal culture in Azab dan Sengsara and A Thousand Splendid Suns novels, to explain the women response to patriarchal culture in both novels, and to describe the similiarities and differences of patriarchal culture in both novels. This thesis uses theory of comparative literature of Giffod (1995) and theory patriarchal culture of Millet (1969). The research method used in this thesis is qualitative method based on library research. As the reason, the existence of patriarchal culture in Azab dan Sengsara and A thousand Splendid Suns portrayed as the leader of decision maker and limit the women’s indeprendence,as the respect of family and culture’s regulation, and as a means of oppression and sexual abuse object for woman (victim). The responses of women toward patriarchal culture in novels contain of women oppose the existence of patriarchal culture and some of them just accept their conditions. The similarities of both novels include linear’s plot, a strong woman’s character, third person of point of view, theme when the position of man is the higher than woman and also about patriachal culture in motif. The differences of both novels include in setting of place and time where Azab and Sengsara comes from Sipirok, Indonesia around 1927’s and A Thousand Splendid Suns comes from Afghanistan around 1970’s. It shows that the discrimination of gender still happened around of us nowadays.Skripsi ini berjudul Patriarchal Culture in Merari Siregar’s Azab dan Sengsara and Khaled Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns: A Comparative Literature Analysis. Skripsi ini menganalisis tentang perbandingan sastra dalam budaya Patriarki pada dua novel yang berasal dari negara, yang berbeda yaitu Asia Selatan dan Indonesia. Novel tersebut adalah Azab dan Sengsara oleh Merari Siregar yang berasal dari Indonesia dan A Thousand Splendid Suns oleh Khaled Hosseini yang berasal dari Afganistan. Tujuan skripsi ini adalah untuk menggambarkan tentang budaya patriarki dalam novel Azab dan Sengsara dan A Thousand Splendid Suns, untuk menjelaskan tanggapan perempuan terhadap budaya patriarki di kedua novel tersebut, dan menggambarkan persamaan dan perbedaan budaya patriarki di kedua novel tersebut. Skripsi ini menggunakan teori perbandingan sastra oleh Giffod (1995) dan teori budaya patriarki oleh Millet (1969). Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam skripsi ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan menggunakan penelitian perpustakaan. Sebagai hasil, keberadaan budaya patriarki di dalam novel Azab dan Sengsara dan A Thousand Splendid Sunstergambar sebagai pemimpin pengambil keputusan dan membatasi kebebasan perempuan, sebagai penghormatan terhadap peraturan keluarga dan budaya, dan sebagai alat penindasan dan pelecehan seksual terhadap wanita (korban). Tanggapan wanita terhadap budaya patriarki di dalam kedua novel terdiri atas para wanita menentang keberadaan budaya patriarki dan beberapa di antaranya hanya menerima kondisi mereka. Persamaan kedua novel tersebut di dalam unsur sastraterdapat dalam plot linier, karakter wanita yang kuat, sudut pandang orang ketiga, tema ketika posisi pria lebih tinggi dari wanita dan juga motif tentang budaya patriarki. Perbedaan kedua novel tersebut mencakup pada setting tempat dan waktu dimana Azab dan Sengsara berasal dari Sipirok, Indonesia sekitar tahun 1927 dan A Thousand Splendid Suns berasal dari Afghanistan sekitar tahun 1970an. Ini menunjukkan bahwa diskriminasi jenis kelamin masih terjadi di sekitar kita saat ini.Skripsi Sarjan
Hosseini, Khaled
No full textOCTOBER 13 -- Bestselling author Khaled Hosseini visited Elon University on Tuesday as the keynote speaker for Fall Convocation, and during his time on stage, the Afghan native implored students to travel the world in the coming years to better understand how events around the globe impact their lives at home
Konstruksi Otoritarianisme Hukum Islam Menurut Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl
No full textQuran was sent down for the humanity, its consequently guiding to drive justice, dignity and a mercy of the universe. This paper tried to discribe of the triangle of text, reader and author in islamic legal opinion. The cource strictly to differ where are authoritative and authoritarian in the same time. Here is Khaled Khaled as a prominent moslem thinker standing consistantly in front line againts wahabism on its fatawa or islamic legal opinions. Khaled offers methodology of how to interpret of the meaning of the law texts, it is hermeneutic. The characteristics of this kind of methodology is that there is closed relation to the author, text, context, and interpreting of reader. So, the meaning of Islamic law texts can be classified into two categories, authoritarianism and authoritative meaning
Understanding Education of Authoritative Islamic Law Perspective Khaled Abou el Fadl
No full textProblems with Gender-biased Islamic law education and authoritarianism in the United States have invited the anxiety of prominent Muslim intellectual, Khaled Abou El Fadl. In his book on the Speaking in God's Name, Khaled revealed a crucial hermeneutic problem related to the relation of text (text), author (reader). Khaled also revealed the problem of abuse of "authority" in Islamic law that surfaced and was unavoidable among individuals and groups. Evidently, there are a number of religious fatwas not speaking "about God", but acting and speaking "in the name of God". The focus of this paper further discusses what are the hermeneutical problems in Islamic law education discussed by Khaled Abou El Fadl, and what is meant by the issue of authority and abuse, the relation of text-author-reader, and authoritarianism and its implications in the study of Islamic law. Then what are the mechanisms and methods for formulating the right Islamic fatwa
Pemikiran Hermeneutika Khaled M. Abou El Fadl: Dari Fikih Otoriter Ke Fikih Otoritatif
No full textArtikel ini merupakan analisis buku yang ditulis Khaled M. Abou el-Fadl berjudul Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic law, Authority and Women, yang mencoba memaparkan pemikiran Khaled M. Abou El Fadl yang mengusung teori otoritas dengan menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutika sebagai pisau analisis dalam menyikapi persoalan hukum Islam yang berkembang selama ini yang masih dianggap diskriminatif, dalam istilah Khaled M. Abou El Fadl disebut sebagai otoritarianisme interpretasi. Hermeneutika yang Khaled M. Abou El Fadl kembangkan berorientasi pada otoritas penafsiran sebuah teks dengan menegosiasikan teks, pengarang dan pembaca dengan memperhatikan tiga hal, yaitu; kompetensi (autentisitas), penetapan makna, dan perwakilan. Tiga pokok persoalan inilah menurut Khaled M. Abou El Fadl, memainkan peranan penting dalam membentuk pemegang otoritas dalam dikursus keislaman. This article is an analysis of the book written by Khaled M. Abou el-Fadl entitled Speaking in God's Name: Islamic law, Authority and Women, which tries to explain the thoughts of Khaled M. Abou El Fadl who carries the theory of authority by using a hermeneutic approach as an analytical knife in addressing The problems of Islamic law that have developed so far are still considered discriminatory, in Khaled M. Abou El Fadl's terms referred to as interpretation authoritarianism. The hermeneutics that Khaled M. Abou El Fadl developed is oriented towards the authority of the interpretation of a text by negotiating the text, the author and the reader by paying attention to three things, namely; competence (authenticity), determination of meaning, and representation. According to Khaled M. Abou El Fadl, these three main issues play an important role in shaping the authority holders in Islamic discourse
Perspektif Khaled Abou el-Fadl dalam Membendung Otoritarianisme Tafsir Keagamaan melalui Hermeneutika Negosiatif
No full textLeading authoritarianism on religious interpretation which is almost practiced by religious organizations or religious groups, in the name of God, is one of Khaled Abou El-Fadl’s academic questions. By using hermeneutical method, Khaled attempts to reconstruct contemporary despotism and authoritarianism in the field of religious interpretation. The main focus of Khaled’s idea is that authority in Islamic law is different from authoritarianism. It is to avoid tyranny within authoritative interpretation. Khaled offers a negotiative hermeneutics which notices that meaning is an interactive result between the author, text and reader. The negotiative hermeneutics a la Khaled tries to connect the limitless opening of the text and the arbitrary closing of the text. This method suggests the dialog between traditions, communities of interpreters, scientific disciplines, and civilizations. The result of this concept is that to counter religious authoritarianism, exclusivism, puritanism, and anarchy. This article aims for looking Khaled Abou El-Fadl’s way of thinking in relation with religious interpretation which is almost used by religious organization or group. The main frame of this paper is to look on how hermeneutical method proposed by Khaled gives a new innovation in seeing the development of Islamic studie
Perspektif Khaled Abou el-Fadl dalam Membendung Otoritarianisme Tafsir Keagamaan melalui Hermeneutika Negosiatif
No full textLeading authoritarianism on religious interpretation which is almost practiced by religious organizations or religious groups, in the name of God, is one of Khaled Abou El-Fadl’s academic questions. By using hermeneutical method, Khaled attempts to reconstruct contemporary despotism and authoritarianism in the field of religious interpretation. The main focus of Khaled’s idea is that authority in Islamic law is different from authoritarianism. It is to avoid tyranny within authoritative interpretation. Khaled offers a negotiative hermeneutics which notices that meaning is an interactive result between the author, text and reader. The negotiative hermeneutics a la Khaled tries to connect the limitless opening of the text and the arbitrary closing of the text. This method suggests the dialog between traditions, communities of interpreters, scientific disciplines, and civilizations. The result of this concept is that to counter religious authoritarianism, exclusivism, puritanism, and anarchy. This article aims for looking Khaled Abou El-Fadl’s way of thinking in relation with religious interpretation which is almost used by religious organization or group. The main frame of this paper is to look on how hermeneutical method proposed by Khaled gives a new innovation in seeing the development of Islamic studie
Khaled Abou El Fadl’s perspective on hadith hermeneutics
No full textThis article discusses the method of hadith hermeneutics according to Khaled M. Abou El Fadl. El Fadl's academic concern is related to the authoritarianism of fatwas issued by several ulama and fatwa institutions. These fatwas are considered authoritarian and discriminatory towards women, seem rigid, and can’t adapt to the times. This authoritarianism phenomenon appears due to methodological errors in understanding legal texts, and the absence of negotiations between the text, the author, and the reader, each of whom has problems. Therefore, Khaled offers a hermeneutic method that consists of three things: text competence, meaning determination, and the concept of representation in Islam. If these three elements are met, then the fatwas of Islamic law produced by the ulama are authoritative, authoritarian, and discriminatory
- …
