1,740,541 research outputs found
Odsúdenia z roku 1277 a filozofia Jána Dunsa Scota : problém individuácie a slobodnej vôle
No full textOdsúdenia z roku 1277 predstavovali zásah do vedeckého výskumu mnohých scholastických autorov. Duns Scotus tvoril po roku 1277. Cieľom tohto príspevku je preto identifikovať filozofické motívy, v ktorých sa filozofia Dunsa Scota a Odsúdení z roku 1277 prelínajú, a preskúmať, či Scotovo myslenie bolo pod priamym vplyvom Odsúdení, alebo nie. Autor príspevku tvrdí, že hlavná príčina Scotovej filozofie je v samotnej františkánskej tradícii a že vplyv Odsúdení z roku 1277 bol na Scotovo myslenie nepodstatný.Condemnation of 1277 was an intervention in the scientific research of many scholastic authors. Duns Scotus worked after 1277. The aim of this paper is to identify the philosophical motives in which the philosophy of Duns Scotus and Condemnation of 1277 overlap, and to examine if Scotus' thinking was under a direct influence of the Condemnation. The author of this paper maintains that the main motivation for Scotus' philosophy was the Franciscan tradition, and that the influence of Condemnation of 1277 was not significant
The Effects of the Condemnation of 1277
Get PDFThere are three primary stances regarding the relationship between science and the church in the middle ages. Concerning the condemnation of 1277, Pierre Duhem argues that (A) 1277 marks “the birth of modern science.” Edward Grant and Richard Dales, among others, argue that (B) 1277 led to an “intellectual climate.” Conversely, a wide-ranging group of scholars beginning in the seventeenth century (including Condorcet, and Voltaire) have endorsed a “warfare thesis,” claiming that (C) the church is responsible for the “dismal state of medieval science.” I shall argue that A, B and C all prove to be inadequate. In the tradition of Locke and Hume, the criterion by which the arguments are adjudicated shall be the evidence found in primary sources. After all, “A wise man…proportions his belief to the evidence.” In the spirit of Duhem’s original thesis, I shall narrow the focus to the effects of the condemnation of 1277 in Paris. (first paragraph
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
(Table 3) U-Th-Pb analyses of zircons from ODP sample 210-1277-9R-7,50-53
No full text(Table 3) U-Th-Pb analyses of zircons from ODP sample 210-1277-9R-7,50-5
53. Akamatsu Norimura (1277-1350)
No full textIwao Seiichi, Sakamato Tarō, Hōgetsu Keigo, Yoshikawa Itsuji, Kobayashi Tadashi, Bonmarchand Georges, Kanazawa Shizue. 53. Akamatsu Norimura (1277-1350). In: Dictionnaire historique du Japon, volume 1, 1963. Lettre A. p. 17
- …
