1,720,962 research outputs found
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENULISAN KLAUSULA BAKU DALAM LEAFLET PROPERTY MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penulisan Klausula Baku dalam Leaflet Property Menurut Undang-Undang
Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen merupakan suatu pencantuman klausula baku
yang terdapat dalam Leaflet Property dan telah melanggar dari ketentuan Pasal 18 UUPK tentang
Larangan Pencantuman Klausula Baku yaitu Pasal 18 ayat (l) huruf c, yang isinya menyatakan,
bahwa pelaku usaha berhak menolak penyerahan kembali uang yang dibayarkan atas barang dan/atau
jasa yang dibeli oleh konsumen", Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf g, yang isinya menyatakan, "tunduknya konsumen
kepada peraturan yang berupa aturan baru, tambahan, lanjutan, dan/atau pengubahan lanjutan yang
dibuat sepihak oleh periaku usaha dalam masa konsumen memanfaatkan jasa yang dibelinya", dan
Pasal 18 ayat (2), yang isinya, "pelaku usaha dilarang mencantumkan klausula baku yang letak atau
bentuknya sulit terlihat atau tidak dapat dibaca secara jelas, atau yang pengungkapannya sulit dimengerti."
Sanksi Hukum terhadap Penulisan Klausula Baku dalam Leaflet Property Menurut Undang- Undang Nomor 8
Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dapat dilihat dalam pasal 62 ayat (l) Undang-Undang Perlindungan
Konsumen yang isinya, "pelaku uiaha yang melanggar ketentuan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 18 dipidana
dengan pidana penjara paling lama 5 (lima) tahun penjara atau pidana denda paling banyak Rp. 2.000.000.000,00
(dua miliar rupiah).
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CASHLESS ZONE AS A STRATEGY TO PREVENT CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA
There are many ways to solve the problem of corruption in Indonesia. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the corruption prevention strategy by implementing Cashless Zone culture as one of the alternatives to prevent corruption in Indonesia, in addition to enforcing control functions over budget planning and its execution, establishing honesty, and building leadership role-model.</jats:p
Strengthening Indonesia's Cabinet System: Embracing the Zaken Cabinet
Objective: This study aims to explore the evolution of Indonesia's cabinet system and argues for the adoption of the "Zaken Cabinet" model, emphasizing its potential to enhance governance effectiveness and address contemporary challenges. The objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the Zaken Cabinet and its applicability to the Indonesian context.
Theoretical Framework: The research is grounded in historical and contemporary contexts, comparing Indonesia's current cabinet system with the Zaken Cabinet model, which is characterized by technocratic, non-partisan, and expertise-driven attributes. The theoretical framework examines how such a model can bridge governance gaps and contribute to efficient decision-making, policy implementation, and administrative performance.
Method: This study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing historical analysis, comparative assessment, and policy evaluation. Data is collected through literature review, document analysis, and expert interviews. The research focuses on the merits and demerits of the Zaken Cabinet model and its potential phased adoption in Indonesia.
Result and Conclusion: The analysis reveals that adopting the Zaken Cabinet model in Indonesia could significantly enhance governance efficiency. While there are challenges in implementing this model, its benefits, such as non-partisanship and expertise-driven decision-making, outweigh the drawbacks. In conclusion, embracing the Zaken Cabinet can reinforce Indonesia's cabinet system, leading to more effective governance and sustainable development.
Originality/Value: This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on governance in Indonesia by proposing the adoption of the Zaken Cabinet model as a novel approach. The study's value lies in its potential to address contemporary challenges, strengthen decision-making, and improve administrative performance in the country's evolving governance landscape
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
URGENSI PEMBATASAN KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DI INDONESIA
Kompetensi Absolute dari peradilan tata usaha negara adalah untuk memeriksa, mengadili
dan memutuskan sengketa yang timbul dalam bidang tata usaha negara antara seseorang
atau badan hukum perdata dengan badan atau pejabat tata usaha negara akibat dikeluarkannya
suatu keputusan tata usaha negara termasuk sengketa kepegawaian dan tidak dikeluarkannya
suatu keputusan yang dimohonkan seseorang sampai batas waktu yang ditentukan dalam suatu
peraturan perundang-undangan sedangkan hal itu telah merupakan kewajiban badan atau Pejabat
Tata Usaha Negara yang bersangkutan. Model ideal konsep pembatasan ruang lingkup kompetensi
Absolut PTUN di masa yang akan datang adalah dengan langsung melakukan Pembatasan Kompetensi
Absolut TUN secara langsung yaitu pembatasan yang tidak memungkinkan sama sekali bagi PTUN
untuk memeriksa dan memutus sengketa tersebut
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
ANTI-BULLYING AMBASSADOR PROGRAM FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PALEMBANG TO REALIZE \u27ASTA CITA OF THE PRABOWO GIBRAN ADMINISTRATION’
Children\u27s rights are threatened by school bullying, which also affects their mental health and academic success. Existing laws have not been so effective about protecting children from bullying. This is a study of the legal protection of children from the bullying of the "Anti-Bullying Ambassador Selection" program in the City of Palembang using both normative and empirical approaches. The first approach is normative analysis, which reviews the Indonesian legal framework, particularly in Law No. 35 of 2014, on Child Protection. It also examines Permendikbud No. 82 of 2015, which mandate schools to prevent violence and ensure safe learning environments. This empirical study has a survey sample of 385 students from 19 participating program schools. High awareness of bullying is already seen (99.5%), yet a prevalence of verbal (91.4%) and social bullying (53.2%). Students report significant psychological effects but also testify strong trust on peer-led interventions, with 91.7% willing to rely on ambassadors. Additionally, economic-wise, the program could contribute positively to the country. Findings confirm that peer-based initiatives complement existing regulations, institutionalize participation, and align with the Asta Cita vision for a safe and inclusive educational environment
- …
