1,720,956 research outputs found
Kiprah KH. Abu Dardiri (1895-1967) Dalam Perkembangan Muhammadiyah di Daerah Banyumas: Perkembangan Muhammadiyah di Kabupaten Banyumas, Riwayat Hidup KH. Abu Dardiri, Kiprah KH. Abu Dardiri Dalam Perkembangan Muhammadiyah di Daerah Banyumas
No full textThis study aims to explain related to the Gait of KH. Abu Dardiri in the Development of Muhammadiyah in the Banyumas Region. The method used in studying the topics raised is the historical method based on heuristic stages, source criticism, interpretation, and historiography. In this article, the first point describes the development of Muhammadiyah in the Banyumas area, which consists of its initial establishment which lasted until 1940 and post-independence developments. In the next point explaining about KH. Abu Dardiri where he is a very influential figure in the history of the development of Muhammadiyah in the Banyumas area. He was Muhammadiyah consul for the Banyumas area before serving as Muhammadiyah consul he served as chairman of the Purbalingga branch of Muhammadiyah. Many of his actions have been felt to this day with various legacies and charitable efforts which are currently growing rapidly.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan terkait Kiprah KH. Abu Dardiri Dalam Perkembangan Muhammadiyah di Daerah Banyumas. Metode yang digunakan dalam mengkaji topik yang diangkat adalah metode historis yang berpatokan pada tahapan heuristik, kritik sumber, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Dalam artikel ini pada poin pertama menjelaskan tentang perkembangan Muhammadiyah di daerah Banyumas yang terdiri dari masa awal berdirinya yang berlangsung hingga 1940 dan perkembangan pasca kemerdekaan. Pada poin selanjutya menjelaskan tentang KH. Abu Dardiri yang dimana beliau merupakan tokoh yang sangat berpengaruh dalam sejarah perkembangan Muhammadiyah di daerah Banyumas. Ia adalah konsul Muhammadiyah untuk wilayah Banyumas sebelum menjabat sebagai konsul Muhammadiyah ia menjabat sebagai ketua Muhammadiyah cabang Purbalingga. Kiprah-kiprahnya banyak di rasakan hingga saat ini dengan berbagai peninggalan dan amal usaha yang saat ini sudah berkembang pesat
Pandangan Ahmadiyah Tentang Konsep “Khataman Nabiyyin”
Full text linkIn Islam, the concept of prophethood is basic and important because believing in the prophets and messengers of Allah is one part of the pillars of faith that Muslims must believe in. Ahmadiyah is an Islamic movement that has a unique style of interpretation, especially its concept of "khataman nabiyyin". This research uses a qualitative research method with the type of library research. Ahmadiyya is divided into two groups, namely Qodian and Lahore. The Ahmadiyah Qodian group believes that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a Prophet while the Lahore group only understands Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a reformer. In general, Ahmadiyah has a concept of prophecy where there are prophets who carry the Shari'a and prophets who do not bring the Shari'a, prophethood which does not bring new Shari'a may still continue throughout the ages. Ahmadiyah still believe in the Prophet Muhammad SAW as the last prophet who brought sharia. The Ahmadiyah view regarding the concept of "khataman nabiyyin" is understood as follows. The word "khatam" contains many meanings, including ring, stamp, seal. The sentence "khatamun nabiyyin" still carries a signal that there is still a gap in the existence of prophethood that may still be open after the Prophet Muhammad SAW
Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn (Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam): Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam
No full textThomas Kuhn is a philosopher and scientist who is unique in giving names to the terms he uses in his scientific models. Kuhn used the term "revolution", to represent a name for development in science which is a discourse in the sense of emphasizing alternatives such as politics. Thomas Kuhn's ideas are interesting for discussion among academics and the development of modern philosophy. This research is a type of library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as the data source. Kuhn's thinking was a rebellion against the positivism paradigm (as was also done by Karl Raimund Popper, Paul Feyerabend, or Stephen Toulmin). Kuhn's ideas were very radical and contributed greatly to post-positivism and postmodern epistemology with its pluralism of scientific paradigms. Thomas Kuhn's thought regarding the "Scientific Revolution" is the idea of a drastic change in knowledge, so that this process is said to be a breakthrough for the "history of science" itself. Starting from a paradigm that becomes a worldview for humans in viewing "knowledge" and is processed into knowledge ready to be tested and criticized. As time goes by, intellectual development among Muslims can borrow from Western civilization to advance Islamic sciences. Because Islam does not cover knowledge.Thomas Kuhn menjadi salah satu filsuf, ilmuan yang unik dalam memberikan nama bagi istilah yang ia gunakan dalam model keilmuannya. Kuhn memakai istilah “revolusi”, untuk memperesentasikan sebuah nama pengembangan dalam sains yang merupakan wacana dalam artian penekanan sebagai alternatif sebagaimana politik. Gagasan-gagasan Thomas Kuhn ini menarik untuk diperbincangan bagi kalangan akademisi dan perkembangan filsafat modern. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian pustaka (library research), yakni penelitian yang obyek kajiannya menggunakan data pustaka berupa buku-buku sebagai sumber datanya. Pemikiran Kuhn merupakan pemberontak terhadap paradigma positivisme (seperti yang dilakukan juga oleh Karl Raimund Popper, Paul Feyerabend, atau Stephen Toulmin). Gagasan Kuhn sangat radikal dan memberi sumbangan pemikiran dan pengaruh yang sangat besar bagi pos-positivisme dan epistemologi posmodern dengan pluralisme paradigma ilmiahnya. Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn mengenai “Revolusi Ilmiah” merupakan gagasan mengenai perubahan drastis dari suatu pengetahuan, sehingga proses tersebut dikatakan terobosan bagi “sejarah ilmu pengetahuan” itu sendiri. Dimulai dari paradigma yang menjadi worlview bagi manusia dalam memandang “pengetahuan” dan diolah menjadi pengetahuan siap uji dan di kritisi. Dengan berjalannya waktu perkembangan intelektual bagi kalangan muslim bisa meminjam dari peradaban Barat, untuk kemajuan ilmu-ilmu Islam. Sebab Islam tidak menuntup ilmu pengatahuan
Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn (Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam): Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam
No full textThomas Kuhn is a philosopher and scientist who is unique in giving names to the terms he uses in his scientific models. Kuhn used the term "revolution", to represent a name for development in science which is a discourse in the sense of emphasizing alternatives such as politics. Thomas Kuhn's ideas are interesting for discussion among academics and the development of modern philosophy. This research is a type of library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as the data source. Kuhn's thinking was a rebellion against the positivism paradigm (as was also done by Karl Raimund Popper, Paul Feyerabend, or Stephen Toulmin). Kuhn's ideas were very radical and contributed greatly to post-positivism and postmodern epistemology with its pluralism of scientific paradigms. Thomas Kuhn's thought regarding the "Scientific Revolution" is the idea of a drastic change in knowledge, so that this process is said to be a breakthrough for the "history of science" itself. Starting from a paradigm that becomes a worldview for humans in viewing "knowledge" and is processed into knowledge ready to be tested and criticized. As time goes by, intellectual development among Muslims can borrow from Western civilization to advance Islamic sciences. Because Islam does not cover knowledge.Thomas Kuhn menjadi salah satu filsuf, ilmuan yang unik dalam memberikan nama bagi istilah yang ia gunakan dalam model keilmuannya. Kuhn memakai istilah “revolusi”, untuk memperesentasikan sebuah nama pengembangan dalam sains yang merupakan wacana dalam artian penekanan sebagai alternatif sebagaimana politik. Gagasan-gagasan Thomas Kuhn ini menarik untuk diperbincangan bagi kalangan akademisi dan perkembangan filsafat modern. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian pustaka (library research), yakni penelitian yang obyek kajiannya menggunakan data pustaka berupa buku-buku sebagai sumber datanya. Pemikiran Kuhn merupakan pemberontak terhadap paradigma positivisme (seperti yang dilakukan juga oleh Karl Raimund Popper, Paul Feyerabend, atau Stephen Toulmin). Gagasan Kuhn sangat radikal dan memberi sumbangan pemikiran dan pengaruh yang sangat besar bagi pos-positivisme dan epistemologi posmodern dengan pluralisme paradigma ilmiahnya. Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn mengenai “Revolusi Ilmiah” merupakan gagasan mengenai perubahan drastis dari suatu pengetahuan, sehingga proses tersebut dikatakan terobosan bagi “sejarah ilmu pengetahuan” itu sendiri. Dimulai dari paradigma yang menjadi worlview bagi manusia dalam memandang “pengetahuan” dan diolah menjadi pengetahuan siap uji dan di kritisi. Dengan berjalannya waktu perkembangan intelektual bagi kalangan muslim bisa meminjam dari peradaban Barat, untuk kemajuan ilmu-ilmu Islam. Sebab Islam tidak menuntup ilmu pengatahuan
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
