11,520 research outputs found

    Zyklisches apparatives Bewegungstraining versus konventionelles Gangtraining in der Rehabilitation des hemiparetischen Ganges nach Schlaganfall: Eine Pilotstudie

    No full text
    Podubecka J, Scheer S, Theilig S, Wiederer R, Oberhoffer R, Nowak D. Zyklisches apparatives Bewegungstraining versus konventionelles Gangtraining in der Rehabilitation des hemiparetischen Ganges nach Schlaganfall: Eine Pilotstudie. Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie. 2011;79(07):411-418

    Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski's School. Historical-Literary Connections

    No full text
    Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski (31.03.1893, Goszcza – 19.04.1972, Warszawa), a literary scholar and historian, a teacher in secondary schools in Kielce and Warszawa. He did Polish Studies and his PhD in 1932 at the Jagiellonian University in the care of his promoter, Professor Ignacy Chrzanowski. During World War II he lectured at Kielce branch of Polish Studies of University of Western Lands. After the war he habilitated in Toruń on the basis of his monograph dedicated to priest Stanisław Konarski, afterwards, he took a job as a substitute for a Professor at Catholic University of Lublin and as an associate professor at University of Warsaw. His teaching and pedagogic service bore fruit in 1938 in the form of the Gold Cross of Merits. Post-war frameworks of reconstruction and the effort of the preservation from destruction of post-courtly collections from the position of the director of the National Museum in Kielce resulted in the Order of Polonia Restituta (1963). Finally, Nowak-Dłużewski’s research and development works met with recognition from the jury of the Włodzimierz Pietrzak Literary Award two times (1964, 1967). The memoir dedicated to Professor J. Nowak-Dłużewski develops from his student’s conviction about the perfection of his didactic and educational mission performed by him with devotion during the difficult times when Communism was on the rampage. We experienced Professor’s special care and foresight in the last decade of his life (1962-1972), when he resolved to “remake us into angels” by destining us for creative work in conditions close to monastic closure – in the team of a PhD seminary. A doubtless protagonist of the given text is our Master, Professor Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski. For this reason, the references include only articles and utterances of particular people with the intention of underlining our interpersonal master-pupils bond. To my mind, this aspect appears to excuse the author in the eyes of Colleagues as well as Readers

    Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski's School. Historical-Literary Connections

    No full text
    Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski (31 III 1893 - 19 IV 1972), historyk literatury, absolwent filologii polskiej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, uczeń i doktorant prof. Ignacego Chrzanowskiego, nauczyciel Gimnazjum Jana Zamoyskiego w Warszawie, a podczas II wojny światowej organizator i wykładowca filii kieleckiej Tajnego Uniwersytetu Ziem Zachodnich – po pięknych zasługach w powojennym ratowaniu bibliotek dworskich i dzieł sztuki współtworzył Muzeum Świętokrzyskie i Bibliotekę Wojewódzką w Kielcach. W 1951 r. habilitował się u prof. Konrada Górskiego w Toruniu, obejmując stanowisko zastępcy profesora KUL, a następnie od roku akad. 1956/57 – profesora nadzwyczajnego Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. W stolicy witali go bardzo serdecznie dawni jego uczniowie. „Kochał bardzo młodzież i dobrze ją rozumiał” – napisze potem z oddali emigracyjnej prof. Wiesław Strzałkowski, żołnierz PSZ na Zachodzie, lecz przede wszystkim poeta, z nabożeństwem dedykujący Profesorowi własne wiersze. W 1962 roku, gdy Nowak-Dłużewski, powołując seminarium doktoranckie, podjął „świętą wojnę” z ostracyzmem komunistycznym, garnęli się doń przybysze z całego kraju. Gdyby nie przyjął pomocy Instytutu Wydawniczego „PAX” ze strony przedwojennych uczniów, byłby jako badacz narażony na intelektualny niebyt. Dwukrotnie wzmocniły go Nagrody im. Włodzimierza Pietrzaka (1964, 1967). Czytelnikom dał się poznać odkrywczym opus vitae, 6-tomową syntezą „Okolicznościowa poezja polityczna w Polsce” (1963-1980). Wychował grono doktorów, ucząc ich wiary i nadziei, a także odporności na ciśnienie obcej ideologii. O tych niełatwych latach – i o wspólnym zwycięstwie – pisze jeden z nich.Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski (31.03.1893, Goszcza – 19.04.1972, Warszawa), a literary scholar and historian, a teacher in secondary schools in Kielce and Warszawa. He did Polish Studies and his PhD in 1932 at the Jagiellonian University in the care of his promoter, Professor Ignacy Chrzanowski. During World War II he lectured at Kielce branch of Polish Studies of University of Western Lands. After the war he habilitated in Toruń on the basis of his monograph dedicated to priest Stanisław Konarski, afterwards, he took a job as a substitute for a Professor at Catholic University of Lublin and as an associate professor at University of Warsaw. His teaching and pedagogic service bore fruit in 1938 in the form of the Gold Cross of Merits. Post-war frameworks of reconstruction and the effort of the preservation from destruction of post-courtly collections from the position of the director of the National Museum in Kielce resulted in the Order of Polonia Restituta (1963). Finally, Nowak-Dłużewski’s research and development works met with recognition from the jury of the Włodzimierz Pietrzak Literary Award two times (1964, 1967). The memoir dedicated to Professor J. Nowak-Dłużewski develops from his student’s conviction about the perfection of his didactic and educational mission performed by him with devotion during the difficult times when Communism was on the rampage. We experienced Professor’s special care and foresight in the last decade of his life (1962-1972), when he resolved to “remake us into angels” by destining us for creative work in conditions close to monastic closure – in the team of a PhD seminary. A doubtless protagonist of the given text is our Master, Professor Juliusz Nowak-Dłużewski. For this reason, the references include only articles and utterances of particular people with the intention of underlining our interpersonal master-pupils bond. To my mind, this aspect appears to excuse the author in the eyes of Colleagues as well as Readers

    Zakon krzyżacki w Prusach i Inflantach. Podziały administracyjne i kościelne w XIII–XVI wieku, pod red. R. Czai i A. Radzimińskiego, oprac: M. Arszyński, M. Biskup, R. Czaja, B. Jähnig, K. Militzer, Z. H. Nowak, A. Radzimiński, J. Tandecki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 2013, ss. 573.

    No full text
    Omówienie publikacji: Zakon krzyżacki w Prusach i Inflantach. Podziały administracyjne i kościelne w XIII–XVI wieku, pod red. R. Czai i A. Radzimińskiego, oprac: M. Arszyński, M. Biskup, R. Czaja, B. Jähnig, K. Militzer, Z. H. Nowak, A. Radzimiński, J. Tandecki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 2013, ss. 573

    Transnational Socioeconomic Protest Database. Version March 2024

    No full text
    Please cite as: Erne R and Nowak J (2024). Transnational Socioeconomic Protest Database. ERC Project ‘European Unions’, UCD, Dublin. Version March 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10197/26247 We described the methodology of the database in: Erne R and Nowak J (2025). Transnational socioeconomic protest in Europe since 1997. European Journal of Industrial Relations. DOI: 10.1177/09596801251359526 We used Version March 2024 (see Excel file below) in Erne and Nowak (2025) quoted above, which covers transnational socioeconomic protest actions that have been recorded by our labour movement-related sources between 1997 and 2020. Version March 2024 also contains additional clarifications and a few minor corrections of earlier Versions of the database. We used Version June 2023 (see Excel file below) in Erne R, Stan S, Golden D, Szabó I and Maccarrone V (2024) Politicising Commodification.Cambridge University Press. Version June 2023 also includes transnational socioeconomic protest actions recorded by labour-related sources 1993-1996 and 2021-2023.European Commission Horizon 2020European Research CouncilHigher Education AuthorityEuropean Trade Union Institute2025-07-07 JG: newer version March2026 added as .xlsx file at author's request 2025-07-25 JG: Original bitstream removed at author's reques

    "To be on the side of tapping for a just cause.” Wojciech Kass’s reflections on poetry

    No full text
    The author of this article undertakes a consideration of the poetic-essayist volume Tak. Trzy eseje o poezji (Yes. Three essays on poetry). The volume is a kind of continuation of the earlier works of Wojciech Kass, remaining in a strong relationship with metaphysics expressed in the poetic word. Among the reflections on Tak, there is no lack of points relating to the poet’s metatextual endeavours, his sensitivity to the word (which is at the same time a carrier of simplicity and sanctity), and the intertextual connections between the poet’s work and the rich Mediterranean literary tradition.JANUSZ NOWAK, dr, poeta, nauczyciel, krytyk literacki, folklorysta, dziennikarz i animator kultury. Wieloletni nauczyciel języka polskiego w Zespole Szkół Ogólnokształcących nr 1 w Raciborzu, były wykładowca w Instytucie Filologii Polskiej Uniwersytetu Opolskiego oraz w Państwowej Wyższej Szkole Zawodowej w Raciborzu; redagował „Almanach Prowincjonalny” oraz miesięcznik PWSZ w Raciborzu – „Eunomia”; współpracownik dwumiesięcznika „Topos”, na którego łamach opublikował szereg esejów i szkiców literackich poświęconych współczesnej poezji polskiej. Autor tomu poezji Biedny polski katolik czyta Życie Keitha Richardsa (Sopot 2017), książek z dziedziny folklorystyki i regionalistyki, m.in. Związki Raciborza z literaturą polską (Racibórz 1998), Legendy i podania dawnego Raciborza (Racibórz 2004), Świątobliwa Księżniczka i inne opowiadania: osiem zamyśleń nad raciborskimi legendami (Racibórz 2004), artykułów historycznoliterackich oraz folklorystycznych drukowanych m.in. w „Ruchu Literackim”, „Literaturze Ludowej”, „Polonistyce”.Dukaj J., Po piśmie, Kraków 2019.Hernas C., Barok, Warszawa 1976.Kass W., Tak. Trzy eseje o poezji, Gdynia 2018.Kochanowski J., Pieśni, oprac. L. Szczerbicka-Ślęk, Wrocław 1970.Kowalski R. ks., Święty Tomasz z Akwinu i słoma, „Niedziela” 2014, nr 4.Matywiecki P., O kościele bez Boga, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 1999, z. 4.Mszał rzymski, przekład polski i objaśnienia opracowali o.o. benedyktyni z opactwa tynieckiego, Poznań 1963.Nowak J., Rzecz i słowo: o tryptyku poetyckim Wojciecha Kassa, „Topos” 2018, nr 4.Ong W.J., Oralność i piśmienność, tłum. J. Japola, Warszawa 2011.Słownik poprawnej polszczyzny, Warszawa 1980, s. 773.22324

    Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: Does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency?

    No full text
    Theilig S, Podubecka J, Bösl K, Wiederer R, Nowak DA. Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: Does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency? Experimental Neurology. 2011;230(1):149-155

    Two planets on opposite sides of the radius gap transiting the nearby M dwarf LTT 3780

    No full text
    We present the discovery and characterisation of two transiting planets observed by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) orbiting the nearby ( d ⋆ ≈ 22 pc), bright ( J ≈ 9 mag) M3.5 dwarf LTT 3780 (TOI–732). We confirm both planets and their association with LTT 3780 via ground-based photometry and determine their masses using precise radial velocities measured with the CARMENES spectrograph. Precise stellar parameters determined from CARMENES high-resolution spectra confirm that LTT 3780 is a mid-M dwarf with an effective temperature of T eff = 3360 ± 51 K, a surface gravity of log g ⋆ = 4.81 ± 0.04 (cgs), and an iron abundance of [Fe/H] = 0.09 ± 0.16 dex, with an inferred mass of M ⋆ = 0.379 ± 0.016 M ⊙ and a radius of R ⋆ = 0.382 ± 0.012 R ⊙ . The ultra-short-period planet LTT 3780 b ( P b = 0.77 d) with a radius of 1.35 −0.06 +0.06 R ⊕ , a mass of 2.34 −0.23 +0.24 M ⊕ , and a bulk density of 5.24 −0.81 +0.94 g cm −3 joins the population of Earth-size planets with rocky, terrestrial composition. The outer planet, LTT 3780 c, with an orbital period of 12.25 d, radius of 2.42 −0.10 +0.10 R ⊕ , mass of 6.29 −0.61 +0.63 M ⊕ , and mean density of 2.45 −0.37 +0.44 g cm −3 belongs to the population of dense sub-Neptunes. With the two planets located on opposite sides of the radius gap, this planetary system is anexcellent target for testing planetary formation, evolution, and atmospheric models. In particular, LTT 3780 c is an ideal object for atmospheric studies with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)

    Hamilton's rule and its discontents

    No full text
    In an incendiary 2010 Nature article, M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita and E. O. Wilson present a savage critique of the best known and most widely used framework for the study of social evolution, W. D. Hamilton’s theory of kin selection. Over a hundred biologists have since rallied to the theory’s defence, but Nowak et al. maintain that their arguments ‘stand unrefuted’. Here I consider the most contentious claim Nowak et al. defend: that Hamilton’s rule, the core explanatory principle of kin selection theory, ‘almost never holds’. I first distinguish two versions of Hamilton’s rule in contemporary theory: a special version (HRS) that requires restrictive assumptions, and a general version (HRG) that does not. I then show that Nowak et al. are most charitably construed as arguing that HRS almost never holds, while HRG buys its generality at the expense of explanatory power. While their arguments against HRS are fairly uncontroversial, their arguments against HRG are more contentious, yet these have been largely overlooked in the ensuing furore. I consider the arguments for and against the explanatory value of HRG, with a view to assessing what exactly is at stake in the debate. I suggest that the debate hinges on issues concerning the causal interpretability of regression coefficients, and concerning the explanatory function Hamilton’s rule is intended to serve
    corecore