6,860 research outputs found
La politica etno-confessionale zarista nel Regno di Polonia : la questione uniate di Cholm come esempio di nation-building russo (1831-1912)
Цель настоящей работы – проанализировать на примере «Холмского вопроса» русский национализм и политику руссификации, проведенную царской властью на западных окраинах империи в 19-начале 20 вв. Под «Холмским вопросом» подразумевается политика русской власти в 1831-1912 гг., нацеленная на воссоединение с Православной Церковью паствы последней «греко-католической» или «униатской» епархии в Империи в восточных губерниях Царства Польского. «Холмский вопрос» представляет собой интересный пример сложностей и противоречий между центром и периферией империи, неопределенности понятия «русской национальности», ее места и роли в многонациональной империи, а также трудности баланса между светской и церковной (как православной, так католической и греко-католической) властями на протяжении всей имперской истории.Celem niniejszej pracy jest analiza rosyjskiego nacjonalizmu i carskiej polityki rusyfikacyjnej w zachodnich kresach imperium, szczególnie na przykładzie „sprawy chełmskiej" w XIX i na początku XX wieku. Chełmszczyzna, znajdująca się w granicach Królestwa Polskiego i zamieszkana głównie przez Rusinów (Ukraińców i Białorusinów) była siedzibą ostatniej diecezji greckokatolickiej (unickiej) w imperium rosyjskim. Rosyjski rząd oraz władze kościelne dążyły do rusyfikacji mieszkańców i „ponownego zjednoczenia‖ unickiej eparchii z prawosławiem. ―Sprawa chełmska‖ stanowi interesujące case study, które umożliwia nam zarysowanie pewnych aspektów w skomplikowanych i wewnętrznie sprzecznych relacjach między centrum i peryferią imperium. Daje również zrozumieć jak niejednoznaczne było samo pojęcie „narodu rosyjskiego", jak widziano jego rolę wśród innych narodów imperium, a wreszcie jak próbowano zachować równowagę między władzą świecką i duchową zarówno Cerkwi prawosławnej jak i Kościołów greckokatolickiego i rzymskokatolickiego.This study aims to provide an analysis of Russian nationalism and of the policies of Russification implemented by the tsarist authorities in the western periphery of Russian empire from the nineteenth century to the beginning of the twentieth. The primary focus will be the "Kholm question" in the Kingdom of Poland, in which Russian civil and ecclesiastical authorities became involved in the Russification of the population. In addition, the Russian state aimed to convert the resident Ukrainian (or, as they were officially called, "Little Russian") and Byelorussian adherents of the last Greek-Catholic eparchy of the empire to Orthodoxy. The Kholm question represents an interesting case study, which enables us to outline certain aspects of the complex and contradictory relationship between the centre and the periphery of the empire, as well as the different and contrasting understandings of the place of Russian nationality and its relationship with the other nationalities. Finally, this study sheds light on the difficult balance between the Russian State and the Orthodox Church, Catholic and Greek-Catholic Churches.Lo studio intende fornire un contributo all'analisi del nazionalismo russo e delle politiche di russificazione promosse dall'autorità zarista nelle periferie occidentali dell'Impero nel corso del XIX-inizio XX secolo con riferimento ad un caso specifico, la russificazione "etno-confessionale" della regione di Chełm/Cholm. Questo territorio, situato nei governatorati orientali del Regno di Polonia e abitato prevalentemente da "piccoli russi" (ucraini) e bielorussi, fu sede dell'ultima diocesi greco-cattolica (uniate) dell'Impero russo. La "questione uniate" di Cholm costituisce un significativo esempio dell'estrema complessità e contraddittorietà delle dinamiche tra il centro e la periferia dell'Impero, dei diversi modi di intendere il ruolo all'interno della cornice imperiale della nazione russa e il suo rapporto con le altre nazionalità, nonché del problematico equilibrio tra il potere civile e le istituzioni religiose: le Chiese ortodossa, greco-cattolica e cattolica romana
[Poesia] Três poemas de Alberto Secama
Three poems by Alberto Secama. About the author: Alberto Secama is an Angolan poet who has poems published on many websites and on facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Xungurra/abouthttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-rio-kwanza-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-zong-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/coluna-africa-em-verso-o-sol-la-fora-por-alberto-secamaTres poemas de Alberto Secama. Sobre el autor: Alberto Secama es un poeta angoleño que tiene poemas publicados en varios sitios y en el facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Xungurra/abouthttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-rio-kwanza-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-zong-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/coluna-africa-em-verso-o-sol-la-fora-por-alberto-secamaTrês poemas de Alberto Secama. Sobre o autor: Alberto Secama é um poeta angolano que possui poemas publicados em vários sites e no facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Xungurra/abouthttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-rio-kwanza-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/africa-em-verso-zong-por-alberto-secamahttp://www.pordentrodaafrica.com/cultura/coluna-africa-em-verso-o-sol-la-fora-por-alberto-secam
Orizzonti mantovani. Spunti e dinamiche paesaggistiche ne L'Illustrissimo di Alberto Cantoni
In the literary production of Alberto Cantoni, short story writer and novelist between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the novel L'Illustrissimo is highly important both because it is the last publication of the author, from Pomponesco, a small town a few kilometers south of Mantua, both because it summarizes in a single text the different nuances and different directions that his writing has taken over the course of his literary career, also due to a writing and processing time that embraces the entire span of years of his career itself. In the foreground, in addition to the numerous and brilliant characters, one of the protagonists is the Mantuan landscape which, not a simple background, becomes a true literary parameter which in different and significant ways affects the purposes and mechanisms of the novel
Plenary Session: Luis Alberto Urrea
a) Plenary Session: Luis Alberto Urrea, Mexican American Chicago Writer
Luis Alberto Urrea is a 2005 Pulitzer Prize finalist for non-fiction and member of the Latino Literature Hall of Fame. He is a prolific and acclaimed writer who has used his dual-culture life border experiences to explore the complex and interconnected Mexican-US American reality. The critically acclaimed and best-selling Mexican-born author of 13 books, Urrea has won numerous awards for his poetry, fiction and essays.
Moderator: Dr. Héctor García, Loyola University Chicag
O duplo significado do sentir e do pensar nas obras de Alberto Caeiro e Descartes
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e Expressão. Programa de Pós-Graduação em LiteraturaA pretensão desta dissertação intitulada O duplo significado do sentir e do pensar nas obras de Alberto Caeiro e Descartes é investigar a relação entre o sentir e o puro pensar, usando como referência a poesia O Guardador de Rebanhos, de Alberto Caeiro, que apresenta de forma evidente o tema; e como este assunto é tratado nas Meditações Metafísicas de René Descartes, também de forma claramente visível. Podemos perceber em ambos os autores, uma diplopia, uma espécie de duplo olhar sobre a relação sentir e puro pensar. No primeiro capítulo vou falar sobre a tese do duplo olhar de Descartes, a respeito da relação sentir e puro pensar na leitura de Merleau-Ponty, salientando a visão de natureza. No segundo capítulo, parto da leitura das três primeiras Meditações Metafísicas para caracterizar a tensão que se pode verificar entre Descartes e Alberto Caeiro quando se referem ao puro pensar. O foco principal de Descartes, nas três primeiras Meditações, é o pensar puro, e neste ponto Alberto Caeiro critica o pensar puro. No terceiro capítulo, analisando as três últimas Meditações, percebe-se que há uma virada no pensamento de Descartes, no qual o autor inverte seu ponto de vista, aproximando-se da idéia de Alberto Caeiro. No quarto capítulo, mostrarei a leitura que outros autores fazem acerca do sentir e do pensar na obra de Alberto Caeiro, mostrando que assim como Descartes, este também ostenta uma diplopia, não do sentir, mas do pensar. The pretension of this work entitled O duplo significado do sentir e do pensar nas obras de Alberto Caeiro e Descartes is to investigate the relationship between the feeling and the pure thinking, using as reference the poetry O Guardador de Rebanhos, by Alberto Caeiro, that presents in an evident way this theme; and as this subject is treated in René Descartes' Metaphysical Meditations, also in a clearly visible way. It is possible to notice in both authors, the diplopy, a sort of double look about the relationship between feeling and pure thinking. The thesis about Descartes'double look regarding the relation of feeling and pure thinking, in Merleau-Ponty reading, pointing out the nature vision, will be treated in the first chapter. In the second chapter, I start from the reading of the first three Metaphysical Meditations to characterize the tension that can be verified between Descartes and Alberto Caeiro when they refer to the pure thinking. Descartes' main focus in the first three Meditations is pure thinking and, in this point, Alberto Caeiro criticizes pure thinking. In the third chapter, analyzing the last three Meditations, it is possible to notice that there is an alteration in Descartes' thought, in which the author inverts his point of view, approaching of Alberto Caeiro's idea. In the fourth chapter, I will show the reading that other authors do concerning feeling and thinking in Alberto Caeiro's work, showing that as well as Descartes, this also shows a diplopy, not of feeling, but of thinking
Lobbying for change as a new theory and practice of active citizenship: author interview with Alberto Alemanno
Do you believe that lobbying is a vehicle for representing the interests of some rather than all, meaning its actors can never be a force for good? Alberto Alemanno, author of Lobbying for Change: Find Your Voice to Create a Better Society, might convince you of the contrary. This interview with Barbara Aubin, LSE Public Affairs, reflects on the importance of engaging with our political representatives, holding them accountable and lobbying for the causes we deeply care about as fundamental elements of a healthy democracy
L'ipertensione portale da cirrosi epatica: eziologia, quadro clinico ed evoluzione naturale
- …
