1,079 research outputs found
Compresenze. Corpi, azioni e spazi ibridi nella città contemporanea - La Mostra
No full textQuesta mostra raccoglie l'esito di una call, lanciata nell'autunno del 2016. L'invito, rivolto a studiosi, progettisti, fotografi e artisti in diversi ambiti, è di indagare le molteplici manifestazioni delle forme di abitare la città e costruire gli spazi urbani che sollecitano l’incontro tra corpi, comportamenti, spazi, tempi e culture differenti. La mostra espone i contributi selezionati, con una ricca varietà di casi e di riflessioni, rivolti sia a pratiche informali sia a progetti autoriali, a edifici e spazi aperti, esperienze didattiche, di ricerca teorica o applicata. Si tratta di risposte differenti ad alcune domande ricorrenti: quali sono le dinamiche spaziali in corso nelle nostre città capaci di accogliere ed esprimere forme di compresenza? Quali cronologie richiedono o descrivono? Quali gli strumenti, le attitudini e le competenze necessarie per progettare ambiti di compresenza? Quali sono i luoghi privilegiati per sperimentare azioni, pratiche e progetti di compresenza?
La mostra presenta i contributi di:
Alessandro Acerbi, Erica Agnelli, Gabriele Ajò, Roberto Apa, Valeria Barchiesi, Elissa Juhnke, Susana Alves, Stefanos Antoniadis, Monia Arduini, Maria Argenti, Simona Barsotti, Chiara Basile, Nico Bazzoli, Antonio Borgogni, Gianluca Burgio, Cinzia Capalbo, Claudio Carbone, Max Catena, Daniele Calisi, Maria Grazia Cianci, Marica Ciccarelli, Stefano Bigiotti, Luisa Cuttini, Sara D’Abate, Fabrizio D’Angelo, Mattia Darò, Brecht De Vleeschauwer, Simone Digennaro, Elena Dorato, Nathalie Eldan, Maurizio Francesco Errigo, Claudia Espierrez, Milena Farina, Romeo Farinella, Gautier+Conquet Architecture, Francesca Geremia, Martina Germanà, Andrea Gibson, GruppoTorto, Julia Jamrozik, Coryn Kempster, Valeria Lattante, Emmanuelle Lenel, Linaria, Eloy Llevat Soy, Valeria Lollobattista, Francesco Luciani, Alberto Marzo, Maria Paola Marciano, Chiara Meucci, Clara Musacchio, Azzurra Muzzonigro, Liberi Nantes, Giulia Annalinda Neglia, Marco Neri, Pia Nilsson, Nuovo Cinema 500, Fausta Occhipinti, Davide Onorati, Caterina Padoa Schioppa, Vincenzo Pagliuca, Elisabetta Pallottino, Valerio Perna, Marco Pietrolucci, Maria Pone, Paola Porretta, Michelangelo Pugliese, Greta Rauleac, Paola Ricciardi, Emilia Rosmini, Cristina Sciarrone, Caterina Selva, Luigi Siviero, Caterina Spadoni, Stellepolari, Maria Cristina Tullio, Daniele Vazquez, Clara Vila, Valeria Volpe, Daniel Zwangsleitner.
In mostra, inoltre, i contributi di: Federica Andreoni, Francesco Careri, Matilde Cassani, Fabio Di Carlo, Giulio Giovannoni, Jacopo Leveratto, Giovanni Longobardi, Gabriele Rossi
Dijavol, hetman i car: nevidomyj tekst pro Mazepu
No full textAnalysis of the manifest written by Stefan Jaworski for the anathema of Hetman Ivan Mazepa. The text has been found and published by the author of the article
Status of Ukrainian Hetman in the period of Mazepa under Kolomatsky articles of 25 July 1687
No full textЗдійснюється аналіз проблеми врегулювання статусу Гетьмана згідно Коломацьких статей 1687 р. Також, автор аналізує проблему розмежування повноважень між владними інституціями в Гетьманщині й патронуючими інституціями Російського царства.The work deals with the analysis of the problem of resolving the status of Hetman, according to Kolomak articles 1687. Also, the author analyzes the problem of differentiation of powers between power institutions of the Hetmanate and patronage institutions of the Russian Kingdom
Hetman Żółkiewski i rok 1610 w tradycji romantycznej
No full textThe author looks into the reasons behind the infrequent mention of Hetman Żółkiewski and the Polish victory over Russia in 1610. To this end he analyses Russian (e.g. by Pushkin) and Polish texts (e.g. by Niemcewicz, Lelewel, Krasiński, Mickiewicz) which contain references to the so-called period of Great Sorrow. It is interesting to note that, compared to the strong presence of the Polish-Russian War of 1605–1612 in the Russian culture, Polish Romantics made scant references to these events. The explanation for this state of affairs seems to be the historiosophical strategy adopted by the Polish Romantics which required that one’s own country’s military achievements be ignored or made less relevant. The author also reconstructs the evolution of attitudes toward Hetman Żółkiewski in the Polish historical and literary tradition from the 17th to the 20th century.The author looks into the reasons behind the infrequent mention of Hetman Żółkiewski and the Polish victory over Russia in 1610. To this end he analyses Russian (e.g. by Pushkin) and Polish texts (e.g. by Niemcewicz, Lelewel, Krasiński, Mickiewicz) which contain references to the so-called period of Great Sorrow. It is interesting to note that, compared to the strong presence of the Polish-Russian War of 1605–1612 in the Russian culture, Polish Romantics made scant references to these events. The explanation for this state of affairs seems to be the historiosophical strategy adopted by the Polish Romantics which required that one’s own country’s military achievements be ignored or made less relevant. The author also reconstructs the evolution of attitudes toward Hetman Żółkiewski in the Polish historical and literary tradition from the 17th to the 20th century
The ethos of the Polish hetman as presented in domestic theoretical treatises from the 16th century
No full textThe author of this text proves that it is possible to reconstruct the hetman ethos on the basis of a group of sources such as works on topics related to the military. The form of the ethos is also justified by extra-source materials, which may be regarded as confirmation of its real value in research into the moral issues of the Polish nobility in the 16th century. The author submits this proposal for further discussion and possible revision. It is recommended to carry out in-depth research into the hetman ethos where other types of sources are employed, which may prove to be no less authoritative. The knowledge of the hetman ethos, also as an example of research into the world of values and the moral side of human activity in history, can be used in assessing the moral-ethical aspect of other social groups or professions, not necessarily related to the military. However, scholarly endeavours based on an analysis of all kinds of activities of Polish commanders in the First Republic using the hetman ethos will prove extremely important. In the course of the research, the emergence of new interpretations and assessments of issues may be expected, issues which to this day remain incomprehensible or seem to have been exhausted by research
New Approaches to the Search for Hetman Ivan Mazepa’s True Likeness
No full textСтаття представляє авторський підхід до вирішення проблеми відтворення образу гетьмана І.Мазепи. В основі дослідження лежать результати криміналістичної експертизи фотокопій автентичних та достовірних портретів гетьмана, а також результати історико-порівняльного аналізу описів зовнішності І.Мазепи з візуальними джерелами.The article proposes a novel approach to the solution of problems related to the iconography of hetman I. Mazepa. The author draws on the results of forensic examinations of photocopies of authentic portraits of the hetman and on comparative analysis of descriptions of I. Mazepa’s appearance with visual sources
The Konotop Campaign of 1672 to “Elect a Hetman”
No full textThe article was submitted on 26.05.2020.Анализируются причины, приведшие к смещению и аресту левобережного гетмана Д. И. Игнатовича (Многогрешного) в ночь с 12 на 13 марта 1672 г., а также обстоятельства избрания новым гетманом И. С. Самойловича. Автор детально разбирает все сообщения о связях Игнатовича с П. Д. Дорошенко, о его намерении объявить мятеж и перейти в подданство турецкого султана, для чего Д. И. Игнатович начал сбор войск и заранее вывез в безопасное место свое имущество. Подробно описываются усилия российского правительства по удержанию гетмана в царском подданстве и отсутствие планов по его смене. Узнав об измене и аресте Д. И. Игнатовича представителями казацкой старшины, в Москве поддержали заговорщиков и провели суд над бывшим гетманом, приговорившем его к ссылке в Сибирь. Несмотря на опасения о возможных казацких выступлениях в поддержку Д. И. Игнатовича, смена гетмана произошла бескровно и без каких-либо серьезных волнений, что подтверждает отсутствие поддержки его лично и проводившейся им политики. На его место на Конотопской раде 17 июня 1672 г. был избран 30‑летний И. С. Самойлович, который не имел серьезной опоры среди старшины и казачества и был зависим от поддержки царских властей и казацких элит. Подписанные на выборной раде Конотопские статьи повторяли условия предыдущих Глуховских статей 1669 г. и предоставляли Гетманщине права широкой автономии при минимальном царском военно-административном присутствии. Практически единственным дополнением была просьба к царским властям выступать арбитром в возможных спорах между гетманом и казацкой старшиной. Для демонстрации силовой поддержки царского кандидата к месту проведения выборной рады была отправлена армия кн. Г. Г. Ромодановского, а на границах Гетманщины были дополнительно развернуты войска.This article analyses the reasons for Hetman D. Ignatowich (Mnogogreshniy)’s dismissal and arrest on the night of 13 March 1672 and the election of I. Samoylowich as the new hetman. The author provides a detailed description of all the reports regarding Ignatowich’s communications with Hetman Doroshenko and his plans to launch a mutiny against the tsar and become subject of the Turkish sultan, which made Ignatowich start mobilising troops and transport his property to a safe place in advance. Additionally, the author describes the effort taken by the Russian government to keep the hetman under their rule and lack of plans to dismiss him. After the information about Ignatowich’s treason and arrest by representatives of the Cossack starshina (officership) reached Moscow, the latter supported the plotters and tried the former hetman in a court of law, sentencing him to exile in Siberia. Even though there were fears of Cossack uprisings to support Ignatowich, the appointment of a new hetman was bloodless and was not followed by any serious uprisings, which testifies to the lack of support towards him personally or the policy he carried out. On 17 June 1672, the 30‑yearold Samoylowich was elected hetman at the Konotop Rada. He did not enjoy any support of the starshina or Cossacks in general and was dependent on the support of the tsarist authorities and Cossack elites. The conditions of the Konotop articles signed at the Rada were identical to the Glukhov articles from 1669 and provided the hetmanate with broad autonomy and a very limited tsarist military and administrative participation. The only addition was that the authorities were requested to arbitrate any possible disputes between the hetman and the Cossack starshina. In order to demonstrate the military support for the tsar’s candidate, the authorities sent Prince Romodanovsky’s army to the place where the Rada was to be held and deployed additional troops along the hetmanate’s borders
New Approaches to the Search for Hetman Ivan Mazepa’s True Likeness
No full textСтаття представляє авторський підхід до вирішення проблеми відтворення образу гетьмана І.Мазепи. В основі дослідження лежать результати криміналістичної експертизи фотокопій автентичних та достовірних портретів гетьмана, а також результати історико-порівняльного аналізу описів зовнішності І.Мазепи з візуальними джерелами.The article proposes a novel approach to the solution of problems related to the iconography of hetman I. Mazepa. The author draws on the results of forensic examinations of photocopies of authentic portraits of the hetman and on comparative analysis of descriptions of I. Mazepa’s appearance with visual sources
Four empires and an enlargement: States, Societies and individuals: transfiguring perspectives and images of Central and Eastern Europe
No full textThe relationship between states, societies, and individuals in Central and Eastern Europe has been characterised by periods of change and redefinition. The current political, economic, social and cultural climate necessitates a discussion of these issues, both past and present. It is this theme which the proposed publication intends to discuss using a selection of papers given at the 5 th
Annual Postgraduate Conference on Central and Eastern Europe held at the UCL School of Slavonic and East European
Studies (SSEES) in 2003. The papers represent work from young international scholars from Europe and North America writing on Central and Eastern Europe.
The book consists of seven papers and develops an interdisciplinary framework reflecting the range of topics discussed during the conference. It embraces the
regional breadth of Central and Eastern Europe containing analyses of Russia, the former Soviet Republics, Central Europe and South Eastern Europe. The papers chosen cover a variety of fields and adopt a corresponding range of approaches with a view to assessing from a multidisciplinary perspective the relationship between state, society and individuals.
The papers in the book have been ordered chronologically. The volume starts with an analysis by Julia Mannherz of social conflict in late imperial Russia and moves on
to Sergei Zhuk’s discussion of the Stundist movement in Ukraine. The third paper from Stefan Detchev is a discussion of the late-nineteenth-century politics of
commemoration surrounding the Bulgarian war of independence. The theme of the politics of commemoration is also present in Andrzej Michalczyk’s analysis of the
commemoration of the plebiscite in Silesia by Germans and Poles during the interwar period. Michalczyk examines how a shared event is commemorated and interpreted differently by the two national groups. The idea of common and shared histories is further developed by Rüdiger Ritter in his study of the history and the historiography of post-Communist Poland, Belarus and Lithuania. The move into the contemporary period is completed in the final two papers. The use of historical imagery for political
purposes is explored in Markus Wien’s study of the King Simeon II Party in Bulgaria as well as the way in which the historical image of the monarchy has been changed
for political purposes during the transition from communism to democracy. The final paper by Maria Aluchna continues the discussion of the process of transition by examining the economic transformation from a communist command economic system to a modern capitalist economy
Family of Hetman Demjan Ignatovich
No full textУ статті розглядаються питання, пов'язані з генеалогією гетьмана Д. Ігнатовича,
його соціальним походженням та родинними зв'язками. На наявному джерельному матеріалі встановлюється поіменний склад сім'ї володаря булави, визначається роль, яку
її представники відігравали у суспільно-політичному житті тодішнього українського
суспільства. Автором проаналізовано розгалуженість родинних зв'язків, матримоніальний чинник у політиці гетьмана.In the article questions connected with genealogy of hetman D.Ignatovich, his social origin
and related ties in general are considered. An attempt is made to establish the nominal composition
of the hetman’s family by available sources, and here the role that its representatives
played in the socio-political life of the then Ukrainian society. The author also tries to establish
how branched were the hetman’s family ties and how much the matrimonial component was
significant in his policy
- …
