18,126 research outputs found
Bergera macrophylla F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full textBergera macrophylla (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314671-1 Fig. 9 Murraya kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) C.C.Huang var. macrophylla C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 16 (2): 85 (Huang 1978). – Murraya macrophylla (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, Guihaia 40 (2): 272 (Mou et al. 2020). – Type: CHINA • Guangxi, Daxin, Xialei, Bitun; Z.J. Li 3198; holotype: IBK[IBK00191042] image! • Longzhou, Kejia, Longshan; X.F. Deng 10571; syntype: IBK[IBK00191043] image! • Longzhou, Jinlong, Banbi; H.Q. Li 40099; syntype: IBK[IBK00191044] image!. Etymology The specific epithet refers to the large leaves. Material examined CHINA • Guangxi Province; P. X. Tan 57677; GXMI! • Napo, Pingmeng; 26 Sep. 2016; F. J. Mou 543, 544; SWFC! • 25 Nov. 2016; F. J. Mou 550; SWFC! • 8 Dec. 2017; F. J. Mou 624, 625; SWFC! • Baidu, Nonghua; 19 Oct. 1977; D. Fang 3-15482; GXMI! • 17 Oct. 1990; D. Fang et al. 0885; GXMI! • Nongbu; 22 Jul. 2013; D.X. Nong et al. 451026130722029 LY; GXMG!, GXMI! • 27 Nov. 2013; X. Y. Huang et al. 51026131127023 LY; GXMG! • Nonglong; 15 Oct. 2014; B. Y. Huang et al. 451026141015067 LY; GXMG! • Jingxi, Tunpan; 14 Oct. 2014; Y. D. Peng et al. 451025141014005 LY; GXMG! • Longzhou, Kejia, Longshan; 30 Oct. 1959; X. F. Deng 10571; IBK! • Jinlong, Banbi; Oct. 1958; H. Q. Li 40099; IBK! • Daxin; 20 Nov. 1956; Z. J. Li 3198; IBK! • Xialei; 7 Dec. 2017; F. J. Mou 618, 619; SWFC!. Description Shrub, high up to 2 m. Compound leaves are 12–46 cm long; rachis rather thin, ca 28 cm long; leaflets 3–9, alternate; chartaceous, leaflets blades 7–18 × 4–10 cm, glabrous, inequilateral, pointed at the base, abruptly acuminate at the tip, very slightly denticulate, with few oil glands; lateral veins, 6–9 pairs, prominent on lower surface; petiolules cylindric, glabrous, 3–4 mm long; petiole cylindric, glabrous. Cymes are terminal, with a few small white flowers, much shorter than the leaves; pedicels longer than flowers, with 2 small bracts at the base or lower third. Flower buds are long, 6 × 2.5 cm, yellow-green, fragrant; calyxes 4-connate, indistinct, very shortly ciliate sepal with a big oil gland; petals 5, lanceolate, 4–6 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, glabrous, a few oil glands. Stamens are 10, 4 mm long; filaments dilated and pubescent upper; anthers attached by the back, oval, with a few hairs. Disks are extremely short. Ovaries are cylindric, warty, glabrous, and distinctly constricted at ca ⅓ from the apex; styles longer than ovaries, with elongated styles, and pubescent lower; stigmas inconspicuous. Berries are oval, diameter 5–10 mm, glabrous, with glands, and red when ripe, containing 1-2 seeds. Phenology Flowering between June and July, while fruiting from August to December. Distribution and habitat China, SW Guangxi (Longzhou, Daxin, Jingxi, and Napo); Vietnam. Growing in forestry of limestone hill or valley forests between alt. 550 and 1400 m. Remarks The species Bergera macrophylla shares few similarities of flowers with B. kwangsiensis, but both are so different in many morphological characteristics (Mou et al. 2020). However, the taxon is more similar to B. glabra from Vietnam in leaf morphological characteristics, and different having fewer oil glands in the mesophyll, smaller cymes, fewer flowers and fruits.Published as part of Mou, Feng-Juan & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860 on pages 165-166, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, http://zenodo.org/record/768937
Bergera kwangsiensis F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full textBergera kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314675-1 Fig. 8 Clausena kwangsiensis C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 8 (1): 90 (Huang 1959). – Murraya kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 16 (2): 85 (Huang 1978). – Type: CHINA • Guangxi, Baise, Baiguoshan; alt. 830 m; R.C. Ching 7667; holotype: PE[00022500] image!; isotype: NAS[NAS00404843] image!. Etymology The specific epithet is derived from the type locality, Guangxi in China. Material examined CHINA • Guangxib Province; 5 Sep. 1928; R. C. Ching 7667; NAS image! • 1958; Nanning Institute of traditional Chinese Medicine 11744; GXMG! • 1960; Nanning Institute of traditional Chinese Medicine 11758; GXMG! • 1964; Y.X. Gan 68238; GXMG! • 8 Jun. 1983; J. Y. Luo & J. X. Ling 76250; GXMI! • 17 Dec. 1985; L. Ou & A. N. Mo 000748; GXMI! • 25 Sep. 1990; D. Fang & L. Zeng 169; GXMI! • Shanglin, Mushan; 9 Jun. 2014; J. B. Teng et al. 450125140609023 LY; GXMG! • Long’an, Chengxiang; 19 Jan. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130119033 LY; IBK! • 9 Nov. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130119033 LY; GXMG! • 25 Jun. 2014; Long’an General Expedition 450123140625098 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Nanwei; 3 Dec. 2012; Long’an General Expedition 450123121203008 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Dujie; 6 Nov. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130116012 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • 27 Jun. 2014; Long’an General Expedition 450123140627072 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Pinshan, Longhushan; 24 Jul. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130724004 LY; IBK! • Longhushan; 13 Oct. 1981; Expedition 11321; GXMG! • 11 May 2008; Guangxi Expedition of Chinese Plant Combination 0162; IBK! • Xinguang; 12 Nov. 2011; J. C. Yang & Y. B. Liao LH 1316; IBK! • Yali; 22 Nov. 2011; J. C. Yang & Y. B. Liao LH 1765; IBK! • Wuming; 23 Jun. 1955; Guangxi Team 528; PE image! • 16 Dec. 1991; B. S. Huang 22767; GXMI! • Tengxiang; Jun. 1970; S. Q. He s.n.; IBK! • Taiping; 29 Jan. 1975; J. J. Wang 6578; GXMI! • 21 Jul. 1985; Q. Li 166; SYS! • 14 Nov. 1985; Q. Li 173; SYS! • Chengxiang; 12 Decembr 2013; J. B. Teng et al. 450122131212004 LY; GXMG! • Ningwu; 14 Jul. 2010; K. J. Yan 22707; GXMI! • 19 Nov. 2014; J. B. Teng et al. 450122141119007 LY; GXMG! • Yongning; 26 Jul. 1958; S. Q. Zhong A62018; KUN!, IBK! • 16 Sep. 1964; J. Q. Ge & Y. Wang 17638; GXMI! • Dingtun; 20 Jul. 1985; Q. Li 167; SYS! • Chongzuo, Heping; 13 Nov. 1997; D. R. Liang & B. S. Huang 02570; GXMI! • Ningming; 14 Dec. 1977; G.D. Guo 15489; HITBC! • Nongrui; 29 Apr. 1980; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 11881; IBK! • 26 Jul. 2011; Y. S. Huang & Y. B. Liao NM1369; IBK! • 30 May 2013; B. Y. Huang et al. 451422130530024 LY; GXMG! • Tuolong; 8 Dec. 2012; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422121208075 LY; GXMG! • Tingliang; 2 Nov. 2013; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422131102031 LY; GXMG! • Chengzhong; 26 Dec. 2012; B. Y. Huang et al. 451422141226027 LY; GXMG! • 4 Nov. 2013; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422131104016 LY; GXMG! • Longzhou, Jinlong; 3 Jul. 1960; C. J. Liang 21533; GXMI! • Shangjin; 31 Oct. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 20565; GXMI! • 17 Aug. 1989; K. J. Yan & W. Y. Rao 76364; GXMI! • Nonggang, Nonghu; 24 Sep. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 10310; IBK! • Shida; 5 Oct. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 10790; IBK! • Pingxiang, Xiashi; 21 Dec. 1959; X. F. Deng 10670; IBK! • Xiangshui; 8 Jun. 1979; Investigation team of Longzhou Medical Institute 0024; GXMI! • 14 Jun. 1979; Investigation team of Longzhou Medical Institute 0264; GXMI! • 30 Dec. 1986; Y. P. Tao 80172; GXMI! • Daxin, Taiping, Anmin; 21 Jun. 1977; Y. Z. Zhang Da-127; GXMI! • Longlin; 15 Apr. 1979; S. Q. Lin & M. F. Qin 2132; IBK! • Youjiang, Banshui; 18 Jul. 2014; Youjiang General Expedition 451002140718024 LY; GXMG! • Jinxi, Kuiwei, Dezhou; 11 Oct. 2013; X. Y. Huang et al. 451025131011014 LY; GXMG! • Napo Dingye; 20 Jun. 2010; Y. F. Huang & J. Huang HYF0165; GXMG! • Yunnan Province, Funing, Bo’ai; 21 Oct. 1958; H. T. Tsai 8813; KUN! • Guichao; 4 Mar. 2007; F. J. Mou 75, 77; IBSC! • Guichao; 20 Jul. 2007; F. J. Mou 140; IBSC! • 19 Sep. 2016; F. J. Mou 528; SWFC! • Wenshan, Xishan; 14 Oct. 1958; H. T. Tsai 8444; KUN! • Mengla, Menglun, cultivated; 3 Feb. 2007; F. J. Mou 41, 42; IBSC!. Description Shrub, 1–2 m tall. Leaves are 3–11-foliolate, 3–10 × 2.5–6.5 cm; rachises and petiolules covered with soft hairs; leaflet blades alternate, ovate-oblong, coriaceous, dispersively oil-glandular, dark green and shining adaxially and yellowish green abaxially, lower surface covered densely with white soft hairs abaxially, apex obtuse to rounded, margin crenulate; petiolules 2–3 mm. Inflorescences are terminal. Flowers are 5-merous, ellipsoid in bud; sepals broadly ovate, ca 1 mm; petals ca 4 mm, dispersing oil glands. Stamens are 10; filaments flat and widening down; filaments and anthers ciliate. Ovaries are oblong, as long as styles; stigmas not prominent. Fruits are globose, ca 1 cm in diam., and red when ripe. Phenology Flowering between June and July, while fruiting from October to November. Distribution and habitat China: Guangxi (Longzhou, Ningming, Wuming, Yongning, Fushui, and Baise), Yunnan (Wenshan and Funing); Vietnam: Quỳ Chau. Growing in the shrub or forestry of limestone areas, alt. 100–800 (1400) m. Remarks The leaves and fruits of this species have a strong, pleasant scent.Published as part of Mou, Feng-Juan & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860 on pages 163-165, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, http://zenodo.org/record/768937
Bergera microphylla F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full textBergera microphylla (Merr. & Chun) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314676-1 Fig. 10 Clausena microphylla Merr. & Chun, Sunyatsenia 2: 251, fig. 27 (Merrill & Chun 1935). – Murraya microphylla (Merr. & Chun) Swingle, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 32 (1): 26 (Swingle 1942). – Type: CHINA • Hainan, Xincun (Sun Chue); 21 Jul. 1932; N.K. Chun & C.L. Tso 43323; lectotype: IBSC[0409335]!; isolectotypes: IBSC[0409328, 0001859, 0409330]!, IBK[IBK00108120]!, SYS[SYS00095204]!, K[K000736100] image!, P[MNHN-P-P06638005] image!, B[B100296006] image!,A[A00044115] image!, US [US 00101714] image!, NY[NY00399952] image!. Designated here. Etymology The specific epithet refers to the small leaflets. Material examined CHINA • Hainan Province, Lingshui; 21 Jul. 1932; N. K. Chun & C. L. Tso 43323; IBCS!, IBK!, SYS!, K image!, P image!, B image!, A image!, US image!, NY image! • 16 Oct. 1935; K. Z. Hou 73825; IBSC! • 11 May 1983; Nanwanling; G. A. Fu 3570; IBSC! • 11 Sep. 1986; Q. Li 265; SYS! • Dongfang (Gan’en); 20 Aug. 1936; X. Q. Liu 27726; IBK!, IBSC!, PE image! • Changjiang; 25 Apr. 1975; G. A. Fu 0502; IBSC!, SZ image! • Ledong, Jianfengling; 11 May 1964; H. S. Lin 269; IBSC! • Sanya; 24 Jun. 1933; K. Z. Hou 70882; IBSC!, PE image!, NAS image!, SZ image! • 4 Jul. 1933; X. R. Liang 61885; IBK!, IBSC!, KUN!, PE image! • Z. Huang 32740; IBK!, IBSC! • 30 Aug. 1933; Z. Huang 33795; IBK!, IBSC! • Jul. 1964; P. Y. Huang 386; SYS! • 17 Oct. 1984; Q. Li 156; SYS! • 8 Sep. 1986; Q. Li 248; SYS! • 1 Aug. 1987; Q. Li 248; SYS! • Wanning; 8 Apr. 1984; Z. X. Li et al. 1786; IBSC! • 28 May 1988; Z.X. Li et al. 4690; IBSC! • 2008; F. J. Mou 163; IBSC! • 19 Sep. 2016; F. J. Mou 528; SWFC! • Guangdong Province, Xuwen; D. Liang et al. WP136; IBSC!. Description Shrubs or small trees, up to 6 m. Branches are glabrous; branchlets with a dispersed white pubescence. Leaves 11–21-foliolate; petiolules extremely short; petiole and rachis with scattered white pubescence of short curved hairs; leaflet blades suborbicular to ovate to elliptic, 3–20 × 3–6 mm, glabrous, base usually inequilateral, margin crenate, and apex rounded to obtuse. Inflorescences are terminal, 10–30-flowered. Flower buds are 4–5 × 2.5 mm; flowers 5-merous, white, and fragrant; sepals ovate-elliptic, ca 1 mm, persistent in fruits; petals in bud 4–5 mm scattered with large and very dark oil glands. Stamens are as long as the pistil, with linear subulate filaments. Disks are very short. Pistils 4 mm long; ovaries 1.2–1.5 mm long, 0.9–1 mm wide, 1- or 2-loculed, and with 1 or 2 large oil glands at the top of the locule; styles 3 × 0.4–0.5 mm; stigmas subcapitate, 0.7–0.9 mm diam. with a few small oil glands. Fruits are ellipsoid to ovoid-ellipsoid, up to 1 cm. Phenology Flowering between April and May, while fruiting from July to October. Distribution and habitat China: Hainan (Sanya, Lingshui, Wanning, Changjiang, Ledong, and Dongfang). Growing in thickets on the sand near beach. Remarks This species is very close to B. koenigii on some flower and fruit morphological traits, but with much smaller leaflets.Published as part of Mou, Feng-Juan & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860 on pages 166-168, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, http://zenodo.org/record/768937
Bergera tetramera F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full text<i>Bergera tetramera</i> (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. <p>urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314674-1</p> <p>Fig. 13</p> <p> <i>Murraya tetramera</i> C.C.Huang, <i>Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica</i> 8 (1): 102, pl. 13 (Huang 1959). – <b>Type</b>: CHINA • Yunnan, Mangshi (Luxi); <i>H. T. Tsai 57277</i>; lectotype: PE [00022518] image!; isolectotypes: PE [00022517] image!, IBSC [0409247]!, NAS [NAS00071351] image!. <b>Designated here</b>.</p> Etymology <p>The specific epithet refers to the 4-merous flowers.</p> Material examined <p> CHINA • Yunnan Province; 1933; <i>H. T. Tsai 57277</i>; NAS image!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57287</i>; KUN!, SWFC!, NAS image!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57525</i>; KUN!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57453</i>; KUN! • 20 Oct. 1933; <i>H. T. Tsai 56249</i>; KUN!, NAS image! • 23 May 1940; <i>C. W. Wang 89515</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, PE image! • Yanshan; 26 Oct. 1932; <i>H. T. Tsai 51453</i>; NAS image!, PE image! • 19 Sep. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83565</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, PE image! • <i>83595</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, WUK image!, PE image! • 24 Oct. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83520</i>; KUN!, WUK image!, PE image! • 30 Oct. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83555</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Bayao; 6 Nov. 1939; <i>Q. W. Wang 84818</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Xinghua; 5 Nov. 1958; <i>H. T. Tsai 589112</i>; KUN! • 18 Jun. 1964; <i>S. Z. Wang 775</i>; KUN! • 2 Oct. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 547</i>; SWFC! • Malipo; 20 Feb. 1940; <i>C. W. Wang 86992</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Tingting; 23 Sep. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 11965</i>; KUN!; PE image!, A image! • 22 Nov. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 13555</i>; KUN! A image! • Tungting; 18 Nov. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 13367</i>; KUN! A image! • Xichou, Yaobang; 27 Dec. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 86068</i>, <i>86094</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Fadou; 16 Nov. 1960; <i>Q. A. Wu 90</i>; KUN! • 3 Jun. 1964; <i>S. Z. Wang 650</i>; KUN! • 14 Dec. 1964; <i>Q. A. Wu 10013</i>, <i>Z. W. Lin 685</i>; KUN! • 8 Oct. 2011; <i>Q. R. Liu & S. Y. Meng 2011-10-122</i>; BNU image! • Nanchang; 10 May 1959; <i>Q. A. Wu 5093</i>; KUN! • Mengla, Yiwu; 9 Sep. 1959; <i>S. J. Pei 10092</i>; KUN! • Mengyuan; 21 Jun. 1973; <i>P. Z. Zhu 8650</i>; HITBC!; IBSC! • 31 May 1982; <i>Expedition 32673</i>; HITBC! • 9 Dec. 1982; <i>Expedition 34392</i>; HITBC! • Jinghong, Jinuo; 1 Jun. 1961; <i>Y. H. Li 3309</i>; HITBC! • 7 Dec. 1961; <i>Y. H. Li 3716</i>; HITBC! • 31 Jul. 1977; <i>G.D. Tao 15722</i>; HITBC!, PE image! • Menghai; 20 Apr. 1959; <i>Z. D. Wang 57991</i>; KUN! • Jianshui; 16 Mar. 1941; <i>S. E. Liu 018293</i>; PE image! • Ning’er, Dehua; 28 Jan. 1991; <i>G. D. Tao 44127</i>; HITBC! • Mengzi; <i>A. Henry 9651 D</i>; L image!, LE image! • <i>A. Henry 9651</i>; LE image! • 27 Nov. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 558</i>; SWFC! • Mile, Xi’er, Nuozu; 29 May 1990; <i>Investigation group of plant resources in Mile County 400</i>; KUN! • Shilin, Naigu; 30 Oct. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 548</i>; SWFC! • Eshan, Chahe; Jan. 1979; <i>Yüxi Plant Expedition s.n.</i>; KUN! • 17 Dec. 2012; <i>J. Cai et al. 12 CS5744</i>; KUN! • Yimen; 6 Agu. 2018; <i>F. J. Mou 640-2</i>; SWFC! • Lanping; 19 Sep. 1964; <i>S. G. Wu 8980</i>; KUN! • 5 Nov. 2006; <i>T. Zhang et al. SCSB-B-000208</i>; KUN! • Weixi; 6 May 1960; <i>Anonymous 8658</i>; KUN! • Fugong, Pihe; 30 May 1978; <i>Bijiang Expedition 0252</i>; KUN! • Fugong, Pihe; 2 Feb. 2017; <i>F. J. Mou 562</i>; SWFC! • Guizhou Province, Anlong; 20 May 1960; <i>Z. S. Zhang & Y. T. Zhang 3703</i>; IBK! • 20 May 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 3730</i>; IBSC! • 12 Mar. 2009; <i>F. J. Mou 233</i>; IBSC! • Longshan; 9 Jun. 1960; <i>Z. S. Zhang 3183</i>; IBSC!, HGAS image! • 12 Jun. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition</i> 4346; IBSC! • 23 Jun. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition</i> 5758; IBSC! • Pingle; 23 Apr. 2014; <i>C. Y. Deng 522328140423700 LY</i>; GZTM image! • Xishui; 10 Apr. 2003; <i>C. W. Wu 1153</i>; PE image! • 9 May 2003; <i>1192</i>; PE image! • Renhuai; 16 Apr. 2003; <i>X. L. Wang & M. T. An 2130</i>; PE image! • 14 May 2003; <i>X. L. Wang 2166</i>; PE image! • Xingyi; 7 Aug. 1959; <i>Anshun Expedition 867</i>; KUN! <i>•</i> <i>869</i>; HGAS image! • 26 Jul. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 6547</i>; IBK!, IBSC!, NAS image! • Xingren; 4 Dec. 1980; <i>C. Z. Dang 80526</i>; HGAS image! • Libo; 8 May 1981; <i>M. Z. Yang 810258</i>; HGAS image! • Wangmo; 23 Apr. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 1221</i>; IBSC! • 8 Nov. 1986; <i>Longtan Expedition 00751</i>; IBK! • Zhenfeng; 8 Oct. 1982; <i>D. J. Liu 622</i>; HGAS image! • 23 Oct. 1982; <i>D. J. Liu 847</i>, <i>848</i>; HGAS image! • Huishui, Heping; 16 Oct. 2010; <i>F. L. Zou ZouFL0155</i>; KUN!.</p> Description <p>Small trees, 3–7 m high. Branches, leaves pedicel and peduncle covered sparsely with hairs, becoming glabrous later; strongly fragrant. Leaves are 5–11-foliolate; leaflet blades narrowly lanceolate, 2–5 × 0.8–2.0 cm, usually yellow-green, becoming dark brownish-black and oil glands slightly swelling when dry, slightly asymmetrical or symmetrical at the base, and apex acuminate; petiolules 2–4 mm, reddish usually. Inflorescences are terminal cymes. Flowers are white; 4-merous; sepals ovate, less than 1 mm, connate at base; petals white, oblong, 4–5 mm, and revolute when open. Stamens are 8, alternate with long and short, filaments ca 4 mm long and slim. Ovaries are ellipsoid, ca 1 mm; styles ca 2 mm long. Fruits are reddish, globose, 1.0– 1.2 cm in diam., with many oil glands, brown after drying, 1–3-seeded. Seed coats are membranous and smooth.</p> Phenology <p>Flowering between March and April, while fruiting from July to August.</p> Distribution and habitat <p>China: W Guangxi (Baise and Debao), SW Guizhou (Anlong), Yunnan (Yanshan, Funing, Wenshan, Xichou, Malipo, Jinghong, Mengla, Menghai, Ninger, Menglian, Eshan, Yuanyang, Yuanjiang, Mengzi, Jianshui, Mile, Weixi, Lanping, Fugong, and Mangshi). Often growing at the sunny top of limestone hills.</p> Remarks <p> Morphologically, this species is relative to <i>B. euchrestifolia</i>, but the plants are characterized with heavier smell and flowers are 4-merous stably. Two species have different distributions.</p>Published as part of <i>Mou, Feng-Juan, Hu, Xiu, Ha, Bui Thu & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860</i> on pages 171-173, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7689375">http://zenodo.org/record/7689375</a>
Bergera euchrestifolia F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full text<i>Bergera euchrestifolia</i> (Hayata) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. <p>urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314669-1</p> <p>Fig. 5</p> <p> <i>Murraya euchrestifolia</i> Hayata, <i>Icones</i> <i>Plantarum Formosanarum</i> 6: 11 (Hayata 1916). <i>–</i> <i>Clausena euchrestifolia</i> (Hayata) Kaneh., <i>Formosa Trees</i>: 97 (Kanehira 1917). <i>–</i> <i>Chalcas euchrestifolia</i> (Hayata) Tanaka, <i>Journal of the Society of Tropical Agriculture</i> 1: 32 (Tanaka 1929). – <b>Type</b>: CHINA • Taiwan (Formosa), Nantou (Nantocho Bikei); 15 Jan. 1914; <i>T. Ito s.n.</i>; holotype: TI[TI00011285] image!.</p> Etymology <p>The specific epithet refers to the glabrous leaves.</p> Material examined <p> CHINA • Sichuan Province, Junlian; 19 Jun. 1977; <i>Anonymous 60</i>; SM image! • Xingwen; 2 Sep. 1977; <i>Xingwen Expedition 77-626</i>; SM image! • Hunan Province, Xinning, cultivated; 19 Jun. 1986; <i>General Expedition 393</i>; PE image! • 29 Aug. 1986; cultivated; <i>Collection group 1032</i>; PE image! • Guangxi Province, Yülin; 12 May 1959; <i>Y. K. Li 403794</i>; IBK! • 13 Dec. 1959; <i>S. Q. Zhong A63016</i>; IBK! • Tianyang; 15 May 1964; <i>Z. Z. Chen 54073</i>; IBK! • 14 Nov. 2016; <i>Tianyang Collection 451021161114008 LY</i>; GXMG! • Longzhou; 21 Oct. 1959; <i>D. A. Huang 61775</i>; IBK! • Longlin; 4 Jun. 1977; <i>Longlin Expedition 3-0965</i>; GXMI! • 15 Apr. 1979; <i>M. F. Qin & S. Q. Lin 02123</i>; IBK! • 8 Nov. 1980; <i>J. Y. Liang & M. F. Qin K0321</i>; IBK! • 22 Sep. 1983; <i>J. Y. Liang K1272</i>; IBK! • Yacha; 1985; <i>Z. R. Xu DH4240</i>; IBSC! • 26 Jun. 2017; <i>F. J. Mou 508</i>; SWFC! • Xincheng; 10 Nov. 1979; <i>S. Q. Lin 00337</i>; IBK! • 5 May 1983; <i>C. Z. Gao & G. M. Lan 61260</i>; GXMI! • 4 Sep. 1984; <i>C. Z. Gao & G. M. Lan 61284</i>; GXMI! • Rongxian; 20 Oct. 1975; <i>Rongxian Expidition 75</i>; GXMI! • <i>S. Y. Tian & Y. M. Li 75</i>; GXMI! • Bobai; 20 Apr. 1979; <i>Bobai Medical Research Institute 18803</i>; GXMI! • Jingxi; 3 May 2008; <i>W. B. Xu & Y. X. Zhu B0629</i>; IBK! • 29 May 2009; <i>W. B. Xu et al. 09605</i>; IBK! • 25 Sep. 2010; <i>Y. S. Huang et al. LYJX0731</i>; IBK! • 7 Jun. 2011; <i>Y. S. Huang & D.X. Nong Y0687</i>; IBK! • 15 Apr. 2012; <i>Y. S. Huang Y1236</i>; IBK! • Dizhou; 19 Oct. 2011; <i>L. Y. Yü et al. YLYJX323</i>; GXMG! • 11 Dec. 2012; <i>D.X. Nong et al. 451025121211022 LY</i>; GXMG! • Guwen; 22 Oct. 2011; <i>D. C. Nong et al. YLYJX371</i>; GXMG! • Napo; 24 Jun. 2010; <i>Y. F. Huang & Y. D. Peng HYF0456</i>; GXMG! • 31 May 2011; <i>Y. F. Huang & Y. F. Huang HYF0994</i>; GXMG! • 8 May 2014; <i>Z. Z. Lan et al. 451025140508007 LY</i>; GXMG! • Anning; <i>Y. D. Peng 451025141011019 LY</i>; GXMG! • Pingmeng; 25 May 2015; <i>D.X. Nong et al. 451026150525015 LY</i>, <i>451026150525032 LY</i>; GXMG! • 30 Sep. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 544</i>; SWFC! • Baidu; 18 May 1977; <i>Z. S. Lin 3-50823</i>; GXMI! • 22 Jun. 2015; <i>F. J. Mou 499</i>; SWFC! • 26 Dec. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 553</i>; SWFC! • Liujiang; 20 Jun. 2010; <i>W. B. Xu & Y. S. Huang 10863</i>; IBK! • Guoba; 21 Nov. 1935; <i>X. P. Gao 56101</i>; IBK!, IBSC! • 3 Jun. 2006; Baisheng; <i>H. N. Qin et al. 603030</i>; IBK! • 19 Aug. 2009; <i>W. B. Xu et al. 091192</i>; IBK! • Yaohuangshan; 9 Dec. 2017; <i>F. J. Mou 632</i>; SWFC! • Longhe; 18 Aug. 2010; <i>Y. F. Huang & Y. F. Huang HYF0707</i>; GXMG! • <i>Y. F. Huang & G. M. Luo 79835</i>; GXMI! • Huanjiang; 15 Nov. 2007; <i>F. Ye & T. Ding 0108016</i>; IBK! • Xianan; 29 Apr. 2013; <i>Huanjiang General Expedition 451226130429001 LY</i>; IBK!, GXMG! • 30 Apr. 2013; <i>Huanjiang General Expedition 451226130430022 LY</i>; IBK!, GXMG! • Chuanshan; 29 May 2013; <i>Huanjiang General Expedition 451226130529015 LY</i>; IBK!, GXMG! • Long’an; 23 Oct. 1981; <i>X. H. Lu 11603</i>; GXMG! • 19 Sep. 1990; <i>C. C. Huang & D. R. Liang 00951</i>; GXMI! • 3 Sep. 2011; <i>J. C. Yang LH0584</i>; IBK! • Longhushan; 13 Jul. 2014; <i>Long’an General Expedition 50123140713014 LY</i>; GXMG! • Dingjiashan; 3 Sep. 2011; <i>J. C. Yang et al. LH0590</i>; IBK! • Xinguang; 15 Sep. 2011; <i>J. C. Yang et al. LH0911</i>; IBK! • Jiaxiufeng; 2 Jul. 2012; <i>J. C. Yang & Y. B. Liao LH 2415</i>; IBK! • Debao, Ma’ai; 12 May 2016; <i>Debao General Expedition 451024160512012 LY</i>; GXMG! • Lingyun; 12 Dec. 2012; <i>Lingyun General Expedition 451027121212004</i>; GXMI!, GXMG! • 29 Apr. 2013; <i>Lingyun Expedition 451027130429062</i>; GXMG!, GXMI! • 6 Jun. 2013; <i>Lingyun Expedition 451027130606006</i>; GXMG!, GXMI! • Sicheng; 7 Jun. 2013; <i>Lingyun Expedition 451027130607004</i>; 12Aug. 2013; <i>451027130812020</i>; GXMG!, GXMI! • Luocheng; 28 Apr. 2013; <i>Luocheng General Expedition 451225130428027 LY</i>; GXMG! • Tianlin, Langping; 30 Nov. 2013; <i>Tianlin General Expedition 451029121130043</i>; GXMI! • Fusui; 25 Apr. 2015; <i>D.X. Ning & Y. S. Huang 451421150425042 LY</i>; GXMG! • Changping; 11 Sep. 2015; <i>D.X. Nong et al. 451421150911079 LY</i>; GXMG! • Shanwei; 27 May 2016; <i>D.X. Nong et al. 451421160527015 LY</i>; GXMG! • Quli; 9 Sep. 2015; <i>D.X. Nong et al. 451421150909028 LY</i>; GXMG! • Fangcheng; 26 Dec. 1943; <i>S. Q Chen 4193</i>; IBSC! • Guangdong Province, Zhuhai; 5 Nov. 1973; <i>Yue 73 3022</i>; IBSC! • Taiwan; Oct. 1929; <i>S. Saito 7670</i>; L image! • May 1934; <i>J. L. Gressitt 98</i>; U image! • Nantou (Nantocho Bikei); 15 Jan. 1914; <i>T. Ito s.n.</i>; TI image! • Wushe; 18 Jan. 1924; <i>S. Sasaki s.n.</i>; TAI image! • Fenhuangku; Dec. 1978; <i>H. N. Yang 1641</i>; L image!, TAI image! • 2 Dec. 1995; <i>K. C. Yang 4603</i>; HAST image! • Hsinyi; Jan. 1993; <i>M. H. Chen et al. 5</i>; L image!, HAST image! • Shuili; 13 Nov. 1994; <i>C. I. Peng 16044</i>; HAST image! • 20 Sep. 1995; <i>L. H. Wu et al. 80</i>; PE image!, HAST image! • Ren’ai; 24 Dec. 1995; <i>S. M. Liu 311</i>; HAST image! • 31 Jan. 1996; <i>C. H. Chen 1573</i>; HAST image! • 10 Nov. 2011; <i>K. F. Chung 1937</i>; HAST image! • Liukuei; Dec. 1961; <i>J. M. Chao 670</i>; L image! • Pingdong; 7 Nov. 1916; <i>E. Matuds s.n.</i>; TAI image! • Gaoxiong; 18 Dec. 1961; <i>J. M. Chao 670</i>; TAI image! • <i>T. C. Huang et al. 13892</i>; TAI image! • 29 Jan. 1989; <i>J. C. Wang 5255</i>; HAST image! • 22 Jan. 1991; <i>J. C. Wang 6508</i>; HAST image! • Sanmin; 13 May 2000; <i>S. C. Liu 430</i>; HAST image! • Maolin; 7 May 1995; <i>J. C. Wang 9591</i>; HAST image! • 29 Jun. 1995; <i>J. C. Wang 9678</i>; HAST image! • Taoyuan; May 1994; <i>C. M. Wang W 801</i>; L, HAST image! • 19 May 1992; <i>C. C. Wang 1015</i>; HAST image! • Puxin; 1 Jan. 1965; <i>M. T. Kao 3130</i>; TAI image! • Hualian, Zhuoxi; 26 Sep. 1995; <i>L. Y. Lin 9</i>; HAST image! • 27 Sep. 1995; <i>L. Y. Lin 36</i>; HAST image! • 9 Aug. 2008; <i>P. F. Lu 16683</i>; HAST image! • Taidong, Hongye; 26 Feb. 1987; <i>M. T. Kao 10413</i>; TAI image! • Yanping; 17 May 1995; <i>S. C. Hsiao 1228</i>; HAST image! • Jinfeng; 3 Nov. 2002; <i>S. C. Liu 891</i>; HAST image! • Miaoli; 15 Nov. 2002; <i>C. H. Yu 394</i>; HAST image! • Dahu; <i>Y. Simada 2540 A</i>; HAST image! • Jiayi; 8 Dec. 1988; <i>K. C. Yang 3537</i>; TAI image! • 3 Jul. 1991; <i>J. C. Wang 7004</i>; HAST image! • Taizhong; 17 Oct. 2013; <i>K. F. Chung 2123</i>; HAST image!.</p> <p> MYANMAR • Pegu; <i>S. Kurz 1021</i>; E image!.</p> <p> PHILIPPINES • Luzon; Dec. 1915; <i>A.D. E. Elmer 14806</i>; L image! • Batangas; Aug. 1917; M. <i>Ramos 1919</i>; L image!.</p> Description <p>Shrubs or trees, 1.5– 7 m. Branchlets slender, glabrous to slightly pubescent; oil glands swell after drying. Leaves are 5–9-foliolate; rachis fine, puberulent; leaflets ovate to elliptic or rarely lanceolate or obovate, 5–8 × 2–4 cm, nearly glabrous, shiny above even after drying, the lower surface of the midrib is slightly puberulent, margin entire, apex mucronate to acuminate; petiolules ca 3 mm long. Cymes are terminal, many-flowered; flower buds small, ca 4 × 1.4 mm, black dotting few on the upper half. Flowers are 4- or 5-merous; sepals pale yellowish-green, ovate, 0.6–1.5 mm; petals bovate-elliptic, 3–5 mm long, ca 2 mm broad. Stamens are 8 or 10, one shorter after the other, longer ones ca 4.5 mm, nearly as long as the petals when fully expanded; filaments linear, flat, gradually narrowed and acutely pointed; anthers small, roundish, slightly cordate, ca 2–3 mm in diam. Ovaries are pale yellowish-green, oval, constricted at the base toward the broad end; styles cylindric, terete, and often slightly curved; stigmas obscure, altogether ca 3.5 mm long. Berries are red to dark red, globose, 1.0– 1.5 cm in diam., smooth, rather sparingly large pellucid-dotted, 1- or 2-seeded. Seeds are glabrous and crimson-red when mature.</p> Phenology <p>Flowering between July and August, while fruiting from November to December.</p> Distribution and habitat <p>China: Guangxi (Jingxi, Baise, Debao, Napo, Longlin, Huanjiang, Lingyun, Luocheng, Liujiang, Xincheng, Rongxian, Tianyang, Longzhou, Yulin, and Fangcheng), Guizhou (Anlong, Xingyi, Wangmo, Libo Renhuai, Xishui, Luodian, Zhenfeng, and Xingren), Sichuan (Xinglian and Junlian), Guangdong (Ruyang, Fengkai, and Nan’ao), Hainan (Changjiang), Taiwan (Taoyuan, Nantou, Hualian, Pingdong, Taidong, Jiayi, and Gaoxiong). The species grows in open and well drained forests and thickets, along streams, about alt. 500–1400 m.</p> Remarks <p> This plant most closely resembles <i>Bergera crenulata</i> and <i>B. tetramera</i> in appearance, but the calyx lobes are acutely triangular, and the leaflets are not so oblique, lacking crenulation. In this respect, it approaches <i>B. koenigii</i> more closely, although the number of leaflets is fewer and the leaflets are larger and glabrous. It differs from both species in having a smaller flower, an obscure stigma, and a slightly constricted ovary.</p>Published as part of <i>Mou, Feng-Juan, Hu, Xiu, Ha, Bui Thu & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860</i> on pages 155-158, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7689375">http://zenodo.org/record/7689375</a>
Review of the book How Fascism Works, by J. Stanley
No full textDr. Devin Z. Shaw (Douglas College) reviews the book How fascism works, by J. Stanley (2020).Final article published
Evidence for the decay B0→J/ψω and measurement of the relative branching fractions of meson decays to J/ψη and J/ψη′
No full textFirst evidence of the B 0 → J / ψ ω decay is found and the B s 0 → J / ψ η and B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ decays are studied using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 7 TeV. The branching fractions of these decays are measured relative to that of the B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0 decay:frac(B (B 0 → J / ψ ω), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 0.89 ± 0.19 (stat) - 0.13 + 0.07 (syst),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 14.0 ± 1.2 (stat) - 1.5 + 1.1 (syst) - 1.0 + 1.1 (frac(f d, f s)),frac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B 0 → J / ψ ρ 0)) = 12.7 ± 1.1 (stat) - 1.3 + 0.5 (syst) - 0.9 + 1.0 (frac(f d, f s)), where the last uncertainty is due to the knowledge of f d / f s, the ratio of b-quark hadronization factors that accounts for the different production rate of B 0 and B s 0 mesons. The ratio of the branching fractions of B s 0 → J / ψ η ′ and B s 0 → J / ψ η decays is measured to befrac(B (B s 0 → J / ψ η ′), B (B s 0 → J / ψ η)) = 0.90 ± 0.09 (stat) - 0.02 + 0.06 (syst)
Design of a High-Performance Catalyst for CO Oxidation: Au nanoparticles confined in Mesoporous aluminosilicate
No full textLyman break galaxies and the star formation rate of the Universe at z ~ 6
No full textWe determine the space density of UV-luminous starburst galaxies at z≈ 6 using deep HST ACS SDSS-i′ (F775W) and SDSS-z′ (F850LP) and VLT ISAAC J and Ks band imaging of the Chandra Deep Field South. We find eight galaxies and one star with (i′−z′) > 1.5 to a depth of z′AB= 25.6 (an 8σ detection in each of the 3 available ACS epochs). This corresponds to an unobscured star formation rate of ≈15 h−270 M⊙ yr−1 at z= 5.9, equivalent to L* for the Lyman-break population at z= 3–4 (ΩΛ= 0.7, ΩM= 0.3). We are sensitive to star-forming galaxies at 5.6 ≲z≲ 7.0 with an effective comoving volume of ≈1.8 × 105h−370 Mpc3 after accounting for incompleteness at the higher redshifts due to luminosity bias. This volume should encompass the primeval subgalactic-scale fragments of the progenitors of about a thousand L* galaxies at the current epoch. We determine a volume-averaged global star formation rate of (6.7 ± 2.7) × 10−4h70 M⊙ yr−1 Mpc−3 at z∼ 6 from rest-frame UV selected starbursts at the bright end of the luminosity function: this is a lower limit because of dust obscuration and galaxies below our sensitivity limit. This measurement shows that at z∼ 6 the star formation density at the bright end is a factor of ∼6 times less than that determined by Steidel et al. for a comparable sample of UV-selected galaxies at z= 3–4, and so extends our knowledge of the star formation history of the Universe to earlier times than previous work and into the epoch where reionization may have occurred
Measurement of the ratio of prompt χ c to J / ψ production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV
No full textThe prompt production of charmonium χ c and J / ψ states is studied in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of √s = 7 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The χ c and J / ψ mesons are identified through their decays χ c → J / ψ γ and J / ψ → μ + μ - using 36 pb - 1 of data collected by the LHCb detector in 2010. The ratio of the prompt production cross-sections for χ c and J / ψ, σ (χ c → J / ψ γ) / σ (J / ψ), is determined as a function of the J / ψ transverse momentum in the range 2 < p T J / ψ < 15 GeV / c. The results are in excellent agreement with next-to-leading order non-relativistic expectations and show a significant discrepancy compared with the colour singlet model prediction at leading order, especially in the low p T J / ψ region
- …
