1,722,289 research outputs found
Michael L. Austin, CAE
No full textMichael L. Austin, CAE, 1987https://researchexchange.iaao.org/presidents/1051/thumbnail.jp
Barrero, Tomás Andrés. “Aserción, expresión y acción. Una lectura de J. L. Austin.”
Full text linkBarrero, Tomás Andrés. “Aserción, expresión y acción. Una lectura de J. L. Austin.” Dianoia 60.74 (2015): 81-107
Marcel Duchamp and J. L. Austin: Readymades and Performative Utterances
Full text linkMarcel Duchamp and J. L. Austin: Readymades and Performative Utterance
Introduction à J. L. Austin, Le langage de la perception
No full textNouvelle traduction du texte de J. L. Austin, avec une nouvelle introductio
Introduction à J. L. Austin, Le langage de la perception
No full textNouvelle traduction du texte de J. L. Austin, avec une nouvelle introductio
J. L. Austin, How to do things with words
No full textDopp Joseph. J. L. Austin, How to do things with words. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Troisième série, tome 60, n°68, 1962. pp. 704-705
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Le tournant linguistique de J. L. Austin
No full textInternational audienceExamining “what we would say when” is the defining feature of the "linguistic phenomenology” defended by J. L Austin, which aims at insisting on the practical aspects of language neglected within the first phase of the “linguistic turn”. The famous notion of “speech act” is better understood if it is considered within the more general reflection on action engaged by Austin. The originality of his approach is to focus, from a linguistic point of view, not on verbs but on adverbs, in order to highlight the importance of a circumstantial description of facts. Such an approach goes against the central tenets of the “method of cases” promoted by some contemporary analytical philosophers.L’examen de « ce que nous dirions quand », qui caractérise la « phénoménologie linguistique » défendue par J. L Austin, insiste sur un aspect du langage négligé par la première phase du « tournant linguistique », à savoir son importance pratique. La notion d’ « acte de parole » doit être replacée au sein d’une réflexion plus globale sur l’action, centrée non sur l’analyse des verbes mais sur celles des adverbes afin de mettre en évidence l’importance d’une description circonstanciée des faits. Une telle approche va à l’encontre de la « méthode des cas » aujourd’hui promue par certains philosophes analytiques
John L. Austin: the role of rethoric in the periphery of philosophy
Full text linkThis paper analyses a variety of issues (biography, history, theory, methodology…) that throw light on the peculiarity of John L. Austin and his philosophy, as well as on the rejection generated against it. From all these aspects, this study intends to highlight the stylistic and discursive ones, especially the role of rhetoric, whit the aim to show that this author creates a performative prose in line with its intellectual content. In this way, Austin gives to his work a unique coherence between content and form
- …
