2,527 research outputs found
Whether Jung Was a Kantian?
Full text linkResearchers often talk about a powerful heuristic potential of the Kantian heritage, but sometimes they do not show concrete examples in defense of this opinion outside Kantianism and Neo- Kantianism. This article contains an attempt to demonstrate that on the example of how efficiently C.G. Jung used Kant’s ideas to construct the theoretical basis of analytical psychology in general and his conception of archetypes in particular, we can see the urgency of Kant’s heritage not only for his direct spiritual successors. In addition the question is discussed: why did Jung claim that epistemologically he took his stand on Kant
Whether Jung Was a Kantian?
No full textResearchers often talk about a powerful heuristic potential of the Kantian heritage, but sometimes they do not show concrete examples in defense of this opinion outside Kantianism and Neo- Kantianism. This article contains an attempt to demonstrate that on the example of how efficiently C.G. Jung used Kant’s ideas to construct the theoretical basis of analytical psychology in general and his conception of archetypes in particular, we can see the urgency of Kant’s heritage not only for his direct spiritual successors. In addition the question is discussed: why did Jung claim that epistemologically he took his stand on Kant
Alf Nilsen-Børsskog — The Author Chosen by the Language
Full text linkThis article discusses Alf Nilsen-Børsskog’s four-volume series of novels Elämän jatko [Continuation of life, 2004–2015], seen as the first literary works treating the Kven culture from a native perspective. Nilsen-Børsskog’s novels are analysed as constituting a “counterstory”, a term coined in the postcolonial cultural research paradigm to refer to self-representation. The Kvens have been considered a national minority in Norway since 1999, and their language has been an official minority language since 2005. The present author scrutinizes how Nilsen-Børsskog’s work differs from previous literary descriptions of this minority, often marked by the frequent use of stereotypes of the Kven language and culture
I. Kant and C.G. Jung on the prospects of Scientific Psychology
Full text linkThis study aims to show a similarity of Kant’s and Jung’s approaches to an issue of the possibility of scientific psychology, hence to explicate what they thought about the future of psychology. Therefore, the article contains heuristic material, which can contribute in a resolving of such methodological task as searching of promising directions to improve philosophical and scientific psychology. To achieve the aim the author attempts to clarify an entity of Kant’s and Jung’s objections against even the possibility of scientific psychology and to find out ways to overcome those objections in Kant’s and Jung’s works. The main methods were explication, reconstruction and comparative analysis of Kant’s and Jung’s views. As a result it was found, that Kant and Jung allocated one and the same obstacles, which, on their opinion, prevent psychology to become a science in the strict sense. They are: 1) coincidence of subject and object in psychology; 2) impossibility to apply quantitative mathematic methods in psychology; 3) pendency of the issue of psychophysical parallelism. However, Kant and Jung indicated ways to resolve formulated by them fundamental difficulties. All those ways lay through the searching a principle of interaction and connection between the psychic and the physical
I. Kant and C.G. Jung on the prospects of Scientific Psychology
No full textThis study aims to show a similarity of Kant’s and Jung’s approaches to an issue of the possibility of scientific psychology, hence to explicate what they thought about the future of psychology. Therefore, the article contains heuristic material, which can contribute in a resolving of such methodological task as searching of promising directions to improve philosophical and scientific psychology. To achieve the aim the author attempts to clarify an entity of Kant’s and Jung’s objections against even the possibility of scientific psychology and to find out ways to overcome those objections in Kant’s and Jung’s works. The main methods were explication, reconstruction and comparative analysis of Kant’s and Jung’s views. As a result it was found, that Kant and Jung allocated one and the same obstacles, which, on their opinion, prevent psychology to become a science in the strict sense. They are: 1) coincidence of subject and object in psychology; 2) impossibility to apply quantitative mathematic methods in psychology; 3) pendency of the issue of psychophysical parallelism. However, Kant and Jung indicated ways to resolve formulated by them fundamental difficulties. All those ways lay through the searching a principle of interaction and connection between the psychic and the physical
LIBS and LA-SD-OES Analysis of Minor and Trace Elements in Steel Samples
No full textAuthor Valentin Ehrentraut, BScMasterarbeit Universität Linz 2022Arbeit nach Ablauf der Sperre auf den öffentlichen PCs in den Bibliotheken der JKU+Medizin abrufba
[1. Stammbuch Valentin Heider]
Full text link[1. STAMMBUCH VALENTIN HEIDER]
[1. Stammbuch Valentin Heider] ( - )
Cover ( - )
Beschreibung ([0]-[1])
Register über sämtliche hierinn sich befindliche Namen ([2]-[3])
Wolfgang Wilhelm, Pfalz-Neuburg, Pfalzgraf; Blatt 1 (0v 1r)
Friedrich Kasimir, Pfalz, Pfalzgraf; Blatt 2 (1v 2r)
August, Braunschweig-Lüneburg, Herzog; Blatt 5 (4v 5r)
Johann Casimir, Kleeburg, Pfalzgraf; Blatt 7 (6v 7r)
Roderich, Württemberg-Weiltingen, Herzog; Blatt 8 (7v 8r)
Oxenstierna, Johan Axelsson; Blatt 12 (12v 13r)
Adler Salvius, Johan; Blatt 13 (13v 14r)
Wratislaw von Mitrowitz, Wilhelm; Blatt 18 (18v 19r)
Philipp, Schaumburg-Lippe, Graf; Blatt 20 (19v 20r)
Friedrich Georg, Tübingen; Blatt 21, 1. Eintrag (20v 21r)
Georg Eberhard, Tübingen; Blatt 21, 2. Eintrag (20v 21r)
Crafft, N.; Blatt 22 (21v 22r)
Anton Heinrich, Oldenburg; Blatt 23r (22v 23r)
Castell, Wolfgang George von; Blatt 23v (23v 24r)
Solms-Braunfels, Wilhelm zu; Blatt 24r (23v 24r)
Polheim, Gottfried von; Blatt 24v (24v 25r)
Hohenlohe-Langenburg, Wolfgang Otto von; Blatt 25, 1. Eintrag (24v 25r)
Hohenlohe-Langenburg, Ludwig Kraft von; Blatt 25, 2. Eintrag (24v 25r)
Christian, Oldenburg, Graf; Blatt 26 (25v 26r)
Starhemberg, Paul Jacob von; Blatt 27 (26v 27r)
Pappenheim, Gottfried Heinrich zu; Blatt 28 (27v 28r)
Unbekannt, Blatt 31b (31b)
Starhemberg, Konrad Balthasar; Blatt 32 (31v 32r)
Zerotin, Johann von; Blatt 34 (33v 34r)
Zerotin, Bartholomäus von; Blatt 35 (34v 35r)
Dohna, Wladislaus von; Blatt 36 (35v 36r)
Waldstein, Zdenko von; Blatt 37 (36v 37r)
Dietrichstein, Wolfgang von; Blatt 38 (37v 38r)
Polheim, Ferdinand Ehrenfried von; Blatt 39 (39v 40r)
Kunig gen. von Mohr, P.; Blatt 40 (39v 40r)
Metzsch, Friedrich von; Blatt 42 (41v 42r)
Friesen, Heinrich von; Blatt 45 (44v 45r)
Helmstatt, Bleickard von; Blatt 58 (57v 58r)
Rabenstein, Wolfgang Hieronymus von; Blatt 59r (58v 59r)
Lützow, Conrad von; Blatt 59v (59v 60r)
Stubick, Matthias; Blatt 60 (59v 60r)
Hainhofer, Philipp; Blatt 64 (63v 64r)
Unbekannt, Blatt 65 (66v 67r)
Unbekannt, Blatt 67r (66v 67r)
Sebottendorff, Johann Abraham von; Blatt 67v (67v 68r)
Bock, Joachim; Blatt 68 (67v 68r)
Bock, Johann Abraham; Blatt 69 (68v 69r)
Zeämann, Georg; Blatt 78 (77v 78r)
Thumm, Theodor; Blatt 79 (78v 79r)
Reihing, Jacob; Blatt 80 (79v 80r)
Albizzi, Antonio; Blatt 81 (80v 81r)
Melander, Otto; Blatt 85 (84v 85r)
Varenbüler, Constantin; Blatt 86 (85v 86r)
Funck, Johann Ulrich; Blatt 87 (86v 87r)
Remus, Georg; Blatt 88 (87v 88r)
Gruterus, Janus; Blatt 89 (88v 89r)
Halbritter, Johann; Blatt 93 (92v 93r)
Grotius, Hugo; Blatt 94 (93v 94r)
Godefroy, Denis; Blatt 95 (94v 95r)
Meier, Justus; Blatt 96r (95v 96r)
Richel, Bartholomäus; Blatt 96v (96v 97r)
Besold, Christoph; Blatt 97r (96v 97r)
Besold, Johann Georg; Blatt 97v (97v 98r)
Monnet, Aymond; Blatt 98 (97v 98r)
Jaquotus, Blasius; Blatt 99 (98v 99r)
Riolan, Jean; Blatt 100 (99v 100r)
Remus, Abrahamus; Blatt 101 (100v 101r)
Leuber, Johann; Blatt 102 (101v 102r)
Mérille, Edmond; Blatt 103v (103v 104r)
Braudlacht, Georg; Blatt 106 (105v 106r)
Oelhafen von Schöllenbach, Johann Christoph; Blatt 107 (106v 107r)
Heher, Georg; Blatt 107b (107b)
Fridenreich, Zacharias; Blatt 108 (107v 108r)
Dinner, Andreas; Blatt 112v (112v 113r)
Cludius, Philipp Sigismund; Blatt 113 (112v 113r)
Magirus, David; Blatt 114 (113v 114r)
Engelbrecht, Arnold; Blatt 115 (114v 115r)
Vom Rhein, Paul; Blatt 116 (115v 116r)
Rhumel, Johann Conrad; Blatt 117r (116v 117r)
Giwansky, Johann; Blatt 117v (117v 118r)
Masan, Caspar Simon de; Blatt 120 (119v 120r)
Erhard, Melchior; Blatt 121 (120v 121r)
Rösel, Johannes; Blatt 122 (121v 122r)
Simonius, Wilhelm; Blatt 123r (122v 123r)
Kienlin, Georg Wilhelm; Blatt 123v (123v 124r)
Ebner, Johann Jacob; Blatt 125 (124v 125r)
Haslinger, Adam Bernhard; Blatt 126 (125v 126r)
Pistorius, Jeremias; Blatt 127 (126v 127r)
Unbekannt, Blatt 128 (127v 128r)
Friedland, Paul; Blatt 129r (128v 129r)
Kiechel, Matthias; Blatt 129v (129v 130r)
Welser, Christoph Friedrich; Blatt 130r (129v 130r)
Welser, Wolfgang Leonhard; Blatt 130v (130v 131r)
Besserer, Georg Friedrich; Blatt 131r (130v 131r)
Welser, Sebald; Blatt 131v (131v 132r)
Marquart, Johann; Blatt 133r (132v 133r)
Pöpping, Johann; Blatt 133v (133v 134r)
Harsdörfer, Christoph Andreas; Blatt 134v (134v 135r)
Tucher, Sebald; Blatt 135 (134v 135r)
Gugel, Christoph August; Blatt 137 (136v 137r)
Frid, Johann Ulrich; Blatt 138 (137v 138r)
Fabricius Hildanus, Wilhelm; Blatt 139 (138v 139r)
Holzschuher, Sigismund Gabriel; Blatt 140 (139v 140r)
Lerchenfelder, Christoph Emmeram; Blatt 141 (140v 141r)
Schlüsselfelder, Willibald; Blatt 142r (141v 142r)
Camerarius, Joachim; Blatt 142v (142v 144r)
Wettstein, Johann Rudolf; Blatt 144 (142v 144r)
Neidhart, Christoph; Blatt 146v-147 (146v 147r)
Clevain, Joachim; Blatt 148v (148v 149r)
Mannlich, Johann Melchior; Blatt 149,1 (148v 149r)
Mannlich, Johann Anton; Blatt 149,2 (148v 149r)
Ulstett, Johann; Blatt 150,1 (149v 150r)
Ulstett, David; Blatt 150,2 (149v 150r)
Jungl, Johann Jacob; Blatt 151 (150v 151r)
Engelcke, Adrian; Blatt 152r (151v 152r)
Schnerrer, Jacob; Blatt 152v (152v 154r)
Wick, Johann Christoph; Blatt 154 (152v 154r)
Sollingh, Eberhard; Blatt 158v (158v 159r)
Jung, Johann Friedrich; Blatt 159 (158v 159r)
Fuell, Johann; Blatt 160 (159v 160r)
Bernegger, Matthias; Blatt 161 (160v 161r)
Hüls, Christoph Achatz; Blatt 169v (169v 170r)
Forstner, Christoph von; Blatt 170r (169v 170r)
Roberthin, Robert; Blatt 170v (170v 171r)
Labes, Christian; Blatt 171v (171v 172r)
Degelin, Matthias; Blatt 172r (171v 172r)
Schlegel, Paul Marquard; Blatt 172v (172v 173r)
Frese, Hieronymus; Blatt 173 (172v 173r)
Rihel, Josias; Blatt 178r (177v 178r)
Scholl, Johann Wolfgang; Blatt 178v (178v 179r)
Röderer, Abraham; Blatt 179 (178v 179r)
Dannhauer, Johann Conrad; Blatt 181 (180v 181r)
Heygius, Peter; Blatt 182 (181v 182r)
Hoffmann, Anton; Blatt 184 (183v 184r)
Schütze, Nicolaus; Blatt 186 (185v 186r)
Treder, Johann Jacob; Blatt 187r (186v 187r)
Dorne, Hieronymus von; Blatt 187v (187v 188r)
Heuchelin, Dietrich; Blatt 190 (189v 190r)
Imlin, Jeremias; Blatt 191v (191v 192r)
Canal, Bernhard; Blatt 192 (191v 192r)
Harnisch, David; Blatt 193 (192v 193r)
Walther, Georg Christoph; Blatt 194v (194v 195r)
Burger, Hieronymus; Blatt 195r (194v 195r)
Paix, Johann Christoph; Blatt 195v (195v 196r)
Schröder, Johann; Blatt 196r (195v 196r)
Platz, Hieronymus; Blatt 196v (196v 197r)
Stampeel, Thomas; Blatt 198v (198v 199r)
Heher, Markus Friedrich; Blatt 199 (198v 199r)
Schlebusch, Johannes; Blatt 201 (200v 201r)
Rössler, Heinrich; Blatt 202r (201v 202r)
Becht, Friedrich; Blatt 202v (202v 203r)
Gast, Abraham; Blatt 203r (202v 203r)
Friese, Ludwig; Blatt 203v (203v 204r)
Marstaller, Georg Hieronymus; Blatt 205 (204v 205r)
Walliser, Christoph Thomas; Blatt 206 (205v 206r)
Oelhaf, Joachim; Blatt 208 (207v 208r)
Unbekannt, Blatt 209v (209v 210r)
Hönig, Andreas; Blatt 210r (209v 210r)
Krüger, Stephan; Blatt 210v (210v 211r
QBF Programming with the Modeling Language Bule
Full text linkWe introduce Bule, a modeling language for problems from the complexity class PSPACE via quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) - that is, propositional formulas in which the variables are existentially or universally quantified. Bule allows the user to write a high-level representation of the problem in a natural, rule-based language, that is inspired by stratified Datalog. We implemented a tool of the same name that converts the high-level representation into DIMACS format and thus provides an interface to aribtrary QBF solvers, so that the modeled problems can also be solved. We analyze the complexity-theoretic properties of our modeling language, provide a library for common modeling patterns, and evaluate our language and tool on several examples
Johann Siegmund Valentin Popowitsch (Janez Žiga Valentin Popovič), Vocabula Austriaca et Stiriaca 1-2 (Frankfurt am Main 2004)
No full textThe Austrian dictionary composed by the Slovenian scho-lar Janez Žiga Valentin Popovič (1705-1774) in the third quarter of the 18th century was only published in 2004, and edited by Richard Reutner, who wrote an extensive introduction to it. The dictionary comprises many language-geographical data for the German language, excellent explanations and many comparisons with much information provided regarding Popovic's mother tongue. The author broad horizon is admirable, especially with regard to the German language area and the linguistic literature of that time.Avstrijski slovar, ki ga je v tretji četrtini 18. stoletja sestavil slovenski učenjak Janez Žiga Valentin Popovič (1705-1774), je izšel šele leta 2004 v uredništvu Richarda Reutnerja, kije k njemu napisal obsežen uvod. Slovar vsebuje mnogo jezikovnogeografskih podatkov za nemščino, odlične razlage in marsikaj primerjalnega, veliko pa se najde tudi v zvezi s Popovičevo materinščino. Občudovanja vredna je avtorjeva razgledanost predvsem po nemškem jezikoslovnem prostoru in po takratni jezikoslovni literaturi
Valentin N. Volóchinov: um filósofo da ciência da linguagem
Full text linkThis text address the work of Russian scholar Valentin N. Vološinov, author of the book Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. The objective is to demonstrate a set of characteristics that place Vološinov as a participant in the critique of science movement, which had its epicenter in Germany, between the years 1840 and 1900. To this end, in addition to a general reflection, which recovers the meaning of the term “criticism” most present in the academic environment of the time, this text considers two points of the much mentioned – and, apparently, somewhat misunderstood – opposition of the Russian thinker to the linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure, as this linguistics is presented in the Course in General Linguistics. Finally, by way of provocation, this text outlines a few words about the proximity between the epistemological works of Valentin N. Vološinov and Wilhelm Dilthey.Este texto aborda la obra del estudioso ruso Valentin N. Voloshinov, autor de la obra Marxismo y filosofía del lenguaje. El objetivo es demostrar un conjunto de características que sitúan a Voloshinov como participante del movimiento de crítica científica, que tuvo su epicentro en Alemania, entre los años 1840 y 1900. Para ello, además de una reflexión general, que recupera el significado del término “crítica” más presente en el ambiente académico de la época, se consideran dos puntos de la tan mencionada –y, aparentemente, algo incomprendida– oposición del pensador ruso a la lingüística de Ferdinand de Saussure, tal como se presenta esta última en el curso de lingüística general. Al final, a modo de provocación, se esbozan algunas palabras sobre la proximidad entre las obras epistemológicas de Valentin N. Voloshinov y Wilhelm Dilthey.O presente texto aborda o trabalho do estudioso russo Valentin N. Volóchinov, autor da obra Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem. O objetivo é demonstrar um conjunto de características que situam Volóchinov como um partícipe do movimento de crítica das ciências, o qual teve seu epicentro na Alemanha, entre os anos 1840 e 1900. Para isso, além de uma reflexão geral, que recupera a acepção do termo “crítica” mais presente no ambiente acadêmico da época, são considerados dois pontos da muito mencionada – e, ao que tudo indica, um tanto mal compreendido – oposição do pensador russo à linguística de Ferdinand de Saussure, tal como essa última é apresentada no Curso de linguística geral. Ao fim, a título de provocação, são esboçadas algumas palavras a respeito da proximidade entre os trabalhos epistemológicos de Valentin N. Volóchinov e Wilhelm Dilthey
- …
