8 research outputs found
Aktualisasi Checks And Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi
The 1945 Constitution as the constitution of the Indonesian state which adopts a distribution of power system accompanied by a mechanism of checks and balances between state institutions based on popular sovereignty. In this case, as the People\u27s Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court which have the authority related to the 1945 Constitution directly. Then it contains the research distinction that is the actual inherence of the authority of the People\u27s Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court institutions as the guardians of the constitution through a technical review of checks and balances. Therefore, to scientifically strengthen this legal research, a juridical-normative, philosophical and conceptual-critical approach is used. On that basis, it is considered that between the People\u27s Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court have actual significance of the checks and balances mechanism on their institutional authority as the guardian of the constitution. Therefore, it has implications for strengthening the institutional authority of the said state institution and realizing the order of legal civilization and democracy in the 1945 Constitution as the state constitution which is the central point of the administration of the Indonesian state as a democratic law state
LEGAL JUSTICE IN PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PRACTICE BETWEEN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The constitution is approved as a law capable of guaranteeing human rights and protection of the constitution and past coordination, as well as being the corpus of the administration of the rule of law entity itself. Regarding the state of Indonesia and the United States, if examined by these two countries, they have similarities in the form of republican government or presidential system of government. However, on the contrary, in the impeachment transition, the two countries appear to be dichotomous both formally and materially. Therefore, this scientific article discusses reviewing the impeachment provisions of the Presidents of the two countries who agree to develop agreements and principles in checks and balances in trying to actualize the value of the country\u27s legal justice. Therefore, in approving the discourse of research methods, descriptive-comparative methods are used with normative-philosophical and comparative-critical discussions. On that basis, this study discusses the practice of presidential impeachment in Indonesia to consider more legal justice, because it is through a legal process involving the Constitutional Court which implements practices in the United States that only involve the Senate and the House of Representatives which incidentally is a political institution. It considers the constitution in the basic law of the country
PEMIKIRAN IMAM AL-MAWARDI TENTANG POLITIK DAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA
The significance of the constitutional system of a legal state, including in Indonesia, is the existence of judicial authority. Imam al-Mawardi in the Book of al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭaniyyah has laid the basis for guiding practical values to exercise judicial power. The conceptual optimizations initiated in carrying out judicial power are improving the integrity of judges. The study in this study aims to find out and understand the political and legal dimensions of Imam al-Mawardi's perspective conceptually-constructively-analytically towards the judicial authorities in Indonesia. The theory used to analyze this study is state law theory, judicial theory, and the theory of interdetermination of politics and law. Whereas, in terms of methodology, descriptive-literal methods are used with philosophical, juridical, and political approaches. The results of the study show that Imam al-Mawardi in initiating the political and legal concepts of judicial power tended to aspects of strengthening judicial power. In the sense that judicial power has a quo status that must be accommodated for each state system. Whereas on the one hand, the judiciary in the state constitutional system has a connection with political and legal interdetermination. Then the conceptual implication of this research is that the judicial power in the country of Indonesia is contextually-accommodating in applying the concept initiated by Imam al-Mawardi on the political and legal dimensions of judicial power. On that basis, this research study can be used as a reference in the administration of judicial power in the State of Indonesia
Rekonstruksi Konseptual Peradilan sebagai Revitalisasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Indonesia as a legal state is the logical consequence of the crystallization of Indonesian history as a nation both historically and constitutionally. Hence, Indonesia should has accountable constitutional system in law enforcement as well as social prestige to increase public trust in the justice system in Indonesia. In this study, the researcher is more focus on the justice system as the law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the inclusion of imbalance authority in Indonesia judicial system; between the Constitutional Court authority and the Supreme Court in testing legislation. Thus, intended conceptual reconstruction is a form of actualization as well as recommendation on the justice system that must be integrated in the two judicial institutions authority. Therefore, this research is conducted methodically as literal-descriptive research by addressing relevant data literally
PENGARUH METODE LATIHAN SKIPPING ROPE TERHADAP HASIL LOMPAT JAUH GAYA JONGKOK PADA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 TAPUNG
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya hasil lompat jauh gaya jongkok yang dilakukan peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Tapung padahal, lompat jauh ini merupakan cabang olahraga atletik tertua di dunia. Untuk memperbaiki hasil lompat jauh peserta didik diberikan sebuah latihan dengan metode skipping rope, dengan cara pelaksanaan peserta didik melakukan gerakan skipping rope selama satu menit kemudian istirahat satu menit dan kembali melakukan skipping rope selama satu menit. Metode penelitian ini adalah ekperimen dengan desain one group pretest and posttest design, teknik pengambilan data secara random sampling. Pengukuran yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini adalah dengan lompat jauh gaya jongkok sebanyak 3x dan lompatan terjauh yang diambil sebagai nilai akhir. Hasil penelitian ini menggunakan uji Wilcoxon test, paired Sampel T-test. Hasil penelitian berdasarkan output statistik “Test Statistics†diketahui Asymp.Sig (2-tailed) bernilai 0,000. Karena 0,000 lebih kecil dari 0,05 maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa “terdapat perbedaan signifikan skor pretest dengan skor posttestâ€. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini ada pengaruh yang signifikan antara metode latihan skipping rope dengan hasil lompat jauh gaya jongkok peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Tapung
AKTUALITAS URUSAN KEISTIMEWAAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA DALAM PERSPEKTIF MAQASID ASY-SYARIʻAH
Pemerintahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta sebagai wilayah sub-ordinat
ketatanegaraan Indonesia yang keberadaannya berpijak dari sejarah berdirinya
Kasultanan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat berdasarkan Perjanjian Giyanti tahun
1755. Dalam perkembangannya, pemerintahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
berproses dari tipe pemerintahan tradisional menjadi pemerintahan modern yang
dilegalisasi oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan
Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Undang-undang a quo memuat legal affirmative
yang berpijak pada artikulasi hukum atas sistem demokrasi sebagai entry point
urusan keistimewaan Yogyakarta yang mencakup urusan tentang Gubernur
dan/atau Wakil Gubernur (pengisian jabatan an sich), kelembagaan pemerintahan,
kebudayaan, pertanahan, serta tata ruang. Kendatipun demikian, sistem demokrasi
pemerintahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam undang-undang a quo memuat
watak individualistik; alih-alih universal, karenanya justru menguatkan soft
democracy yang berimplikasi pada nir-konstruksi substantif demokrasi sehingga
pelaksanaan urusan keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta kurang
mengakomodasi kemaslahatan. Ihwal tersebut adalah cerminan ambiguitas
normatif (geschidj van normen) atas sistem demokrasi yang melegitimasi urusan
keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Berkaitan dengan penelitian ini, oleh karenanya secara metodologis tesis ini
adalah penelitian hukum normatif-doktrinal dalam spektrum social-legal disertai
aspek pendekatan yuridis-normatif; pendekatan perundang-undangan dan
konseptual. Dalam teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan teknik studi
kepustakaan disertai teknik snowball. Adapun ihwal metode analisis penelitian
menggunakan basis metode IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclution),
sehingga metode analisisnya mencakup metode analisis konten, disertai teknik
deskriptif hukum.
Berdasarkan muatan permasalahan akademik dalam tesis ini, adalah penting
untuk menelaah aktualitas urusan keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
dalam perspektif maqasid asy-syariʻah. Karenanya peneliti berupaya melakukan
telaah atas urusan keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam kerangka
otonomi khusus; rekonstruksi sistem demokrasi dalam kerangka hikmat
kebijaksanaan Pancasila melalui peninjauan konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang
Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar
Republik Indonesia an sich. Konsep demokrasi yang dihasilkan dalam peninjauan
konstitusionalitas mengarah kepada muatan maqasid asy-syariʻah cum-rechtsidee
dalam sistem demokrasi urusan keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa maqasid asy-syariʻah dalam sistem
demokrasi pada dasarnya termuat di dalam urusan keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa
Yogyakarta sepanjang sistem demokrasi a la Yogyakarta adalah demokrasi
komunalistik berbasis hikmat kebijaksanaan disertai nilai local wisdom
The Communal Democracy of Yogyakarta Special Region’s Government on the Islamic Law Eclecticism Perspective
Law Number 13 of the Year 2012 on Yogyakarta Special Region’s privileges containing a legal affirmative democracy system leads to the weakening of democracy and has implications for non-substantive democracy. It furthermore reflects the normative ambiguity of the democratic system which legitimizes Yogyakarta’s privileged affairs. Therefore, this research aims to analyze Yogyakarta’s privileged affairs based on Islamic Law Eclecticism by reconstructing the democratic system in Law Number 13. Using the normative-doctrinal method accompanied by statutory and conceptual approaches, this research used the content analysis method and legal descriptive techniques. This research shows that the democratic system of DIY is crystallized and simultaneously presented in the form of the Trilogy of Yogyakarta Democratic Principles. Those consist of ngencengke oyot, ngencengke pang, and njagani godhong lan kembang. Based on this, the reconstruction of the democratic system of Yogyakarta’s privilege affairs leads to communal democracy as a form of revitalizing its privilege affairs. Besides, that trilogy, based on Islamic Law Eclecticisms, refers to the interconnection of maqâṣid al-syarī’ah cum-rechtsidee and al-‘urf. The reconstruction of the democratic system in Law Number 13 potentially revitalizes Yogyakarta’s privileged affairs by making local wisdom its core value
A Narrative Pharmacological Review of Buprenorphine: A Unique Opioid for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
Provide enhanced digital features for this article
This Figshare page contains a Summary Slide. If you are an author of this publication and
would like to provide additional enhanced digital features for your article
then please contact [email protected].
The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase
visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to
ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are
marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been
reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside.
Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide
complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures
that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its
origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.
Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:
• Slide decks
• Videos and animations
• Audio abstracts
• Audio slides</p
