5,045 research outputs found
Justice and Charity: Positive duties and the right of necessity in Pablo Gilabert
This article considers Pablo Gilabert’s attempt to defend against libertarian critics his ambitious argument for basic positive duties of justice to the world’s destitute. The article notes that Gilabert’s argument – and particularly the vocabulary of perfect and imperfect duties that he adopts – has firm roots in the modern natural rights tradition. The article goes on to suggest, however, that Gilabert employs the phrase ‘imperfect duties’ in a manner that is in some tension with the tradition from which it is derived. Indeed, Gilabert’s novel deployment of the phrase contains a number of radical possibilities that are not pursued in his text. The article suggests that Gilabert would do better to break more decisively from a tradition that insists on the essential distinction between justice and charity.Cet article examine la tentative de Pablo Gilabert de défendre, contre la critique libertarienne, l’argument ambitieux selon lequel nous avons des devoirs positifs fondamentaux de justice envers les plus démunis du monde. L’article souligne le fait que l’argument de Gilabert — et particulièrement le vocabulaire des devoirs parfaits et imparfaits qu’il déploie — est profondément enraciné dans la tradition moderne du droit naturel. Cependant, la manière dont Gilabert utilise la formule « devoirs imparfaits » entre en tension avec la tradition dont elle est issue. En fait, l’usage novateur que Gilabert fait de cette formule recèle un certain nombre de possibilités radicales qui ne sont pas pleinement considérées dans son texte. L’article suggère que Gilabert ferait mieux de rompre plus nettement avec une tradition qui insiste sur la distinction essentielle entre justice et charité
Gilabert on the Feasibility of Global Justice
In this article, I discuss the analysis of the feasibility of global justice developed by Pablo Gilabert in his recent book From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Gilabert makes many valuable contributions to this topic and I agree with most of his analysis. However, I identify a distinction between strategic justification and moral justification that Gilabert neglects. I show how this distinction is useful in addressing objections to the feasibility of global justice. I also claim that Gilabert makes some problematic assumptions concerning the way in which global justice is morally demanding.Dans cet article, je traite de l’analyse de la faisabilité de la justice mondiale élaborée par Pablo Gilabert dans son récent ouvrage, From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Les contributions de Gilabert sur cette question sont nombreuses et précieuses, et je suis en grande partie d’accord avec son analyse. J’identifie cependant une distinction, que Gilabert néglige, entre la justification stratégique et la justification morale. Je montre en quoi cette distinction est utile dans le traitement des objections relatives à la faisabilité de la justice mondiale. Je soutiens également que certaines des hypothèses émises par Gilabert quant à l’exigence morale propre à la justice mondiale sont problématiques
Individuo Social y Autonomía en Marx
18 ref.Fil: Gilabert, Pablo. Universidad Concordia de Montreal; CanadáIn this paper I Claim that we can find in Marx's social and political theory a radical ontological turn that separates him from the former perspectives of contractualism and Hegel. The Marxian nodal conception of the social individual involves a double relation of appropiation and critique respect those former perspectives. With contractualism, Marx affirms the notions of autonomy and equality, but against it, he denies an atomist and ahistorical approach. With Hegel, Marx's perspective involves a relationist, conflictivist and historicist approach, but against it, Marx criticizes teological organicism. By no means I say that this is the only thread in Marx's complex thought. This perspective coexist with other incompatible ones. But I think that not much attention has been given to the Marxian perspective of the social individual, and that its contemporary development could be of much help in explicative, normative and political contexts
Individuo social y autonomía en Marx
18 ref.Fil: Gilabert, Pablo. Universidad Concordia de Montreal; CanadáIn this paper I Claim that we can find in Marx's social and political theory a radical ontological turn that separates him from the former perspectives of contractualism and Hegel. The Marxian nodal conception of the social individual involves a double relation of appropiation and critique respect those former perspectives. With contractualism, Marx affirms the notions of autonomy and equality, but against it, he denies an atomist and ahistorical approach. With Hegel, Marx's perspective involves a relationist, conflictivist and historicist approach, but against it, Marx criticizes teological organicism. By no means I say that this is the only thread in Marx's complex thought. This perspective coexist with other incompatible ones. But I think that not much attention has been given to the Marxian perspective of the social individual, and that its contemporary development could be of much help in explicative, normative and political contexts
Iglesia de San Pablo del Monte: Tlaxcala
La construcción del templo de San Pablo del Monte se remonta al siglo XVI. En un primer momento estuvo dedicado a San Miguel Arcángel, y poco tiempo después fue brindado al apóstol San Pablo. El templo fungió como visita del convento franciscano de Puebla, junto con las poblaciones de San Miguel Tenancingo, San Francisco Papalotla y San Cosme Mazatecochco.</p
Indivisibility and Linkage Arguments: A Reply to Gilabert
This reply discusses Pablo Gilabert\u27s response to my article, Rethinking Indivisibility. It welcomes his distinction between conceptual, normative, epistemic, and causal forms of support from one right to another. It denies, however, that Rethinking Indivisibility downplayed linkage arguments for human rights (although it did call for careful evaluation of such arguments), and rejects Gilabert\u27s suggestion that we understand the indivisibility of two rights as two rights being highly useful to each other (interdependence) rather than as mutual indispensability. In the final section, I offer two new worries about the system-wide indivisibility of human rights
Diseño y fabricación de escaleras metálicas galvanizadas
Gilabert Jimenez, P. (2011). Diseño y fabricación de escaleras metálicas galvanizadas. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/15134.Archivo delegad
Palabra de Pablo: 100 años después
[ES] Documento que constituye una selección de textos sobre Pablo de la Torriente Brau, con ocasión del centenario de su nacimiento, recopilados por Víctor Casaus. En ella, se recorre, además, la vida del autor a través de los textos que le dedicaran los escritores cubanos desde su fallecimiento hasta nuestros días.[EN] Document that constitutes a selection of texts on Pablo de la Torriente Brau, on the occasion of the centenary of his birth, compiled by Víctor Casaus. In it, the life of the author is crossed, in addition, across the texts that him the Cuban writers were dedicating from his death to the present day
Neoliberalismo: críticas y resistencias. Entrevista a Juan Pablo Rodríguez
La siguiente entrevista aborda algunas de las principales motivaciones, ideas y conclusiones que dan forma a la investigación contenida en el libro Resisting neoliberal capitalism in Chile: the possibility of social critique (2020) de Juan Pablo Rodríguez. Se aborda, en primer lugar, su examen de distintas teorías críticas del neoliberalismo contemporáneo; a continuación, su análisis de las prácticas de crítica situada que llevan a cabo los movimientos sociales en Chile, en especial a partir de los casos del movimiento estudiantil y el movimiento de pobladores.
----
In this interview with Juan Pablo Rodríguez, author of Resisting neoliberal capitalism in Chile: the possibility of social critique (2020), we address the main ideas and motivations behind the book and the research on which the book is based. We first explore the analysis the author makes of different theoretical critiques of contemporary neoliberal capitalism, and then we talk about the practices of embodied critiques carried out by social movements in Chile, focusing on the cases of the student and the pobladores movements
- …
