9 research outputs found

    Design system of exchange dies for stamping small press 110 t machines to achieve SMED / Muhamad Hanafi Ghazali

    No full text
    Single Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED) is basically a methodology for systematic and radical reduction of setup times, with documented cases reductions from hours to less than ten minutes (single digit minutes). Consequently, they are widely used in industrial companies to manage exchange dies activity with cost effective, utilization of time, minimize manpower and equipment. This project presents an optimum design of SMED for Autokeen Sdn.Bhd to replace the current small press production lines exchange dies system. Several improvement steps are being applied throughout the project to measure the impact from redesigning the current system. The results from improvement are being compared to the current system in terms of downtime, and percentage of reduction

    Pergulatan Teologis antara Asy'ariyah dan Kaum Rasionalis: Studi atas Durrah al-Faraid Karya Syekh Nuruddin Ar-Raniri.

    No full text
    Durrah al-Faraid of Syekh Nuruddin Ar-Raniri contains Asy'ariyah theology and its attack toward classical theology like Mu'tazilah, Maturidiyah, Jabariyah, and Zaidiyah. Basically, this religius doctrine originates from three core doctrines: (1) follows al-Asy'ariyah and al-Maturidiyah teaching about 'agaid (theology); (2) follows one of four mazhab (Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi'i, and Hanbali) in fiqh (law); and (3) follows the teaching of Al-Junaid al-Baghdadi and Imam AL Ghazali in tasawwuf (Islamic mystic). The study on Durrah al-Faraid based on a long discussion between Asy'ariyah and Mu'tazilah (rasionalist group) about religious principles (ushul al-din), for one thing: (1)relation between idea and revelation, (2) free will, (3) relation between God's will(taqdir) and human effort, (4) attributes of God, and (5) God's justice. Thematic comparasion is needed mainly among Asy'ariyah, Mu'tazilah, and Maturidiyah because the are all believe in the One, Supreme God, but different interpretation in the attributes of God and His af'al. This book also explains how pagan and Islam believers are in the next world, heaven or hell as described in theory of Asy'ariyah, Mu'tazilah, and other theologies that are considered deviating from the truth

    Konsep Dakwah Nir-Radikalisme Perspektif Syaikh Ali Mahfudz: Konsep Dakwah Nir-Radikalisme Perspektif Syaikh Ali Mahfudz

    No full text
    Abtract: This paper aims to explore the concept of non-radicalism da’wah initiated by Ali Mahfudz. Although Ali Mahfudz did not explicitly say in his magnum opus, that the concept of da’wah refers to the method of non-radicalism da’wah, the author sees many indications that support the concept. In conducting research, the authors use qualitative-library research with content analysis methods. In analyzing the data, the writer uses the indicator of non-radicalism da’wah formulated by Yusuf al-Qaradawi. The results obtained in this paper are (1) the concept of non-radicalism da’wah embodied through three major conceptions, namely mauidzah (tadzkir and qissah), isryad, and khitabah in which there are explanatory explanations about the importance of gentleness, wisdom, grace, be patient, and always follow the way of the Prophet\u27s da’wah in the Koran which includes wisdom, mauidzah hasanah, and debate in the best way, (2) a preacher must balance between the use of revelation and reason, (3) in matters that are khilafiyah, Ali Mahfudz just explained it, without forcing the reader to be fanatical about one understanding, such as the law for someone who does not get da\u27wah based on the Muktazilah, Asy\u27ariyah, and al-Maturidiyah understandings, (4) permitting the use of israiliyyat as da’wah material, the use of takwil in interpreting the verse mutasyabihat, and the suggestion to refer the theologians (mutakallimin) in da’wah, (5) dynamism in his da’wah was allegedly caused by the transformation of religious experience from the Syafi\u27i school to the Hanafi school of thought. Keywords: Da’wah; Ali Mahfudz; Non-Radicalism ; Mu’idzah; Irsyad; Khitabah.   Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengeskplore konsep dakwah nir-radikalisme yang digagas oleh Ali Mahfudz. Meskipun secara eksplisit Ali Mahfudz tidak mengatakan di dalam magnum opusnya, bahwa konsep dakwahnya merujuk pada metode dakwah nir-radikalisme, penulis melihat banyak sekali indikasi yang mendukung konsep tersebut. Dalam melakukan penelitian, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif pustaka dengan metode analisis konten. Dalam menganalisa data, penulis menggunakan indikator dakwah nir-radikalisme yang dirumuskan oleh Yusuf al-Qardhawi. Adapun hasil yang didapatkan dalam tulisan ini adalah (1). Konsep dakwah nir-radikalisme terejawantahkan melalui tiga konsepsi besar, yakni mauidzah (tadzkir dan qissah), isryad, dan khitabah yang di dalamnya terdapat repitisi penjelasan tentang pentingnya lemah lembut, bijaksana, lapang dada, sabar, dan selalu mengikuti cara dakwah rasul di dalam Alquran yang meliputi hikmah, mauidzah hasanah, dan perdebatan dengan cara yang paling baik, (2). Seorang pendakwah harus menyeimbangkan antara penggunaan wahyu dan akal, (3). Dalam hal yang bersifat khilafiyah, Ali Mahfudz hanya sekedar memaparkan saja, tanpa memaksa pembaca untuk fanatik terhadap satu paham, seperti hukum bagi seseorang yang tidak mendapatkan dakwah yang didasarkan pada paham Muktazilah, Asy’ariyah, dan al-Maturidiyah, (4). Diperbolehkannya penggunaan israiliyyat sebagai materi dakwah, penggunaan takwil dalam memaknai ayat mutasyabihat, dan anjuran untuk merujuk para pakar teologi (mutakallimin) dalam berdakwah, (5). Kedinamisan beliau dalam berdakwah disinyalir disebabkan transformasi pengalaman keagamaan dari madzhab Syafi’i menuju madzhab Hanafi. Kata kunci: Dakwah Ali Mahfudz; nir-radikalisme; mu’idzah; irsyad; khitabah.   &nbsp

    Conflict of law and the methodology of Tarjīẖ : a study in Islamic legal theory

    No full text
    Islamic law never achieved unity but expressed itself in, at least, four surviving schools. More interestingly, contemporary Muslim communities are still divided among themselves on a number of issues related to their laws. This work describes how problem of legal conflicts have been tackled by Muslim jurists. It is an attempt to examine closely the phenomenon of conflict in Islamic law from the standpoint of usūl-al-fiqh or Islamic legal theory. In fact, much is heard nowadays of the contradiction in the body of Islamic law. Whilst in contrast, little is presented in terms of the methodology of removing this conflict. The present work therefore, attempts to redress this balance. The emphasis of the work will be concerned primarily with tarjīh methodology ; how to give preference to one piece of evidence or argument over the other when they conflict. Nevertheless, considerable concern is given to investigating the background to the conflict of law in the Shari'ah. This study of a neglected area in Islamic legal scholarship will be an important source of reference to students, both practising and theoretical jurists or to anyone who merely wishes to increase his knowledge of legal themes, particularly legal conflict. The very aim of the work is to argue that conflict is a natural and unavoidable consequence of legal study because legal conflict is only conflicting principles and arguments adduced by both the classical and modern jurists to reach what is actually intended by God in the target case. Therefore, conflicts are inevitable in most of the cases in fiqh owing to the variety of principles set out to deal with one piece of legal evidence, let alone with all the pieces of legal evidence in question. Tarjīh is therefore, an important and workable instrument in the re-examination of these conflicts and in arriving at the most accurate principle for establishing the law for as long as this is possible. It is hoped that the discovery of new facts and the increase of knowledge which results from the broadening and deepening of the research will positively contribute to the process of unification of Islamic law

    Constructing the Architectonics and Formulating the Articulation of Islamic Governance: A Discursive Attempt in Islamic Epistemology

    No full text
    International institutions have promoted a ‘good governance’ agenda as an archetypal model to achieve development for underdeveloped and developing countries. However, closer scrutiny can trace the root of this agenda back to the hegemonic nature of modernity that proposes a specific meta-narrative upon others, as part of Eurocentrism. Many, however, have criticized this Eurocentric paradigm, since the non-Western communities with their own constructed version of ‘good’ in governance have also proven their ability to develop and prosper in the present or in the past. Thus, the cultural and value-laden nature of such vernacular concepts provides the rationale for the existence and practice of other paradigms. In line with this argument, Islam, with its long history of governance and richness of its values can be considered as another alternative, which should be thoroughly examined to disclose and depict its conceptualization and paradigm of ‘good governance’. The aim of this research, thus, is to explore and analyze the Islamic axioms, foundation principles and values underpinning the field of governance in an attempt to construct the architectonics of a new systemic and dynamic theory and formulate the articulation of ‘Islamic governance’. This discursive and abstract, rather than being an empirical exercise, assumes to produce a ‘good governance’ framework within its own formulation through a value-shaped dynamic model according to maqÉÎid al-SharÊÑah (higher objective of SharÊÑah) by going beyond the narrow remit of classical and contemporary discussions produced on the topic, which propose a certain institutional model of governance based on the classical juristic (fiqh) method. In this new dynamic paradigm, a discourse-oriented approach is taken to establish the philosophical foundation of the model by deriving it from Islamic ontology, which is then articulated using the Islamic epistemological sources to develop and formulate the discursive foundations of this new theoretical framework. A deductive method is applied to the ontological sources and epistemological principles to explain the architectonics of this new theory, which are represented by the constructed axioms, which later help to articulate the working mechanism of the proposed ‘Islamic good governance’ framework through a specifically formulated typology to function as an alternative conceptualization of ‘good governance’. This study, through an exclusive analytical discursive approach, finds that Islam as one of the major religions in the contemporary world with the claim of promising the underpinning principles and philosophical foundations of worldly affairs and institutions through a micro method of producing homoIslamicus could contribute towards development of societies by establishing a unique model of governance from its explicit ontological worldview through a directed descriptive epistemology. Thus, the research on governance in this study does not only focus on the positivistic materialist components such as institutions or mechanisms or growth per se, but it encompasses the value-laden holistic nature of human life in accordance with the Islamic worldview as an important contribution. In doing so, it formulates the ‘good governance’ in Islam in relation to the conceptualized ‘ihsani social capital’, which constitutes the main thrust of the constructed model. Nonetheless, this generative (non-cumulative) paradigm of looking into the governance issue should be viewed as an incomplete certainty as production of the continuous ijtihad (reasoning) progression will continue to reveal ways through which its working mechanism can be expanded along with potential developments in its philosophical formation
    corecore