1,720,967 research outputs found

    Teori dasar fiqih muamalah

    Get PDF

    Dialektika Social Entrepreneurship dan Fiqih Sosial

    No full text
    This paper aims to find out dialectics social entrepreneurship and social fiqh. Social entrepreneurship is a concept that combines social empowerment and entrepreneurship. Social Fiqh is fiqh that able to dialogue with development era. This study include in field research that uses qualitative research methods. The results of this study indicate that social entrepreneurship is in accordance with the concept of fiqh social that has five things (al-dharuriyyat al-khamsah). First, social entrepreneurship according to hifdz al-din (religion maintain). Second, hifdz al-aql (mind maintain). Third, hifdz al-nafs (soul maintain). Fourth, hifdz al-mal (wealth maintain). Fifth, hifdz al-nasl (generation maintain), also hifdz al-bi’ah (environtment maintain

    Implementasi fatwa DSN MUI no. 44/DSN-MUI/VIII/2004 tentang pembiayaan ijarah multi jasa di PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta

    Get PDF
    Ijarah Multi Jasa merupakan salah satu produk pembiayaan konsumtif di PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta. Sejak diluncurkan pada 2007, produk ini membantu dalam penyediaan manfaat jasa untuk nasabah. Nasabah yang ingin mengajukan pembiayaan dalam bidang jasa tetapi tidak dapat direalisasikan dalam pembiayaan ijarah maupun murabahah, maka dapat menggunakan Ijarah Multi Jasa. Bank syariah sebagai pihak penyedia jasa atau penyedia dana mendapatkan upah (ujrah) dari nasabah. Upah (ujrah) tersebut merupakan kesepakatan yang dibuat antara pihak bank syariah dan nasabah di awal pembiayaan. Dalam implementasinya, pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa berpedoman pada fatwa DSN MUI NO. 44/DSN-MUI/VIII/2004 Tentang Pembiayaan Multi Jasa. Dalam fatwa tersebut disebutkan bahwa pembiayaan multi jasa dapat diaplikasikan menggunakan dua akad, yaitu akad ijarah dan akad kafalah. Sehingga ketika menggunakan akad ijarah maka dikenal dengan nama Ijarah Multi Jasa. Dalam fatwa tersebut juga dikemukakan aplikasi penentuan upah (ujrah) dan jenis akad yang diperbolehkan dalam pembiayaan multi jasa. Dengan melihat implementasi fatwa DSN MUI terhadap pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa di PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta, maka patut diteliti, pertama implementasi pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa di PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta. Kedua, implementasi fatwa DSN MUI pada praktek pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa. Dalam menelusuri, menjelaskan dan menyimpulkan pembahasan dalam skripsi ini, penyusun menempuh metode jenis penelitian lapangan (Field Research). Untuk mendapatkan informasi secara akurat, actual dan terpercaya. Sedangkan data-data diperoleh melalui dokumentasi, observasi dan wawancara yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Dalam penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa di PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta tidak sesuai dengan fatwa DSN MUI NO. 44/DSN-MUI/VIII/2004. Kesimpulan tersebut dikarenakan ada beberapa ketentuan dalam fatwa DSN MUI yang tidak diikuti oleh PT BPR Syariah Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta. Adapun beberapa hal yang tidak diikuti adalah, pertama,objek pada pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa tidak jelas. Kedua, penentuan upah (ujrah) yang tidak sesuai fatwa. Ketiga, ketidak tepatan dalam penggunaan akad dalam Pembiayaan Ijarah Multi Jasa

    Social entrepreneurship dalam perspektif fiqih sosial : studi analisis program social entrepreneurship di Dompet Dhuafa

    Get PDF
    Social entrepreneurship merupakan konsep yang menggabungkan pemberdayaan sosial dan ilmu kewirausahaan. Konsep ini bisa menjadi alternatif dalam mengurangi permasalahan sosial maupun ekonomi yang ada di masyarakat Indonesia. Dompet Dhuafa sebagai salah satu Lembaga Amil Zakat (LAZ) menggunakan konsep ini untuk salah satu program penyaluran dana zakat, infaq dan shadaqah. Penulis telah mengkaji program social entrepreneurship di Dompet Dhuafa dalam persepektif fiqh sosial dengan rumusan masalah, Pertama, Mengapa Dompet Dhuafa memilih konsep social entrepreneurship dalam salah satu program penyaluran dana zakat, infaq, dan shadaqoh? Kedua, Bagaimana dampak program social entrepreneurship Dompet Dhuafa terhadap masyarakat? Ketiga, Bagaimana program social entrepreneurship di Dompet Dhuafa dalam perspektif fiqih sosial? Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian lapangan (field research) yang menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Dalam melakukan analisis penulis menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, social entrepreneurship dipilih menjadi salah satu konsep untuk program penyaluran dana zakat,infaq dan shadaqah di Dompet Dhufa. Kedua, program social entrepreneurship di Dompet Dhuafa memberikan dampak terhadap masyarakat penerima manfaat. Ketiga, program social entrepreneurship di Dompet Dhuafa Sesuai dengan ontologis, epistimologis dan tujuan fiqih sosial yang mementingkan timbulnya maslahah atau kesejahteraan dalam masyarakat

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore