22 research outputs found
Defny Holidin's Quick Files
No full textThe Quick Files feature was discontinued and it’s files were migrated into this Project on March 11, 2022. The file URL’s will still resolve properly, and the Quick Files logs are available in the Project’s Recent Activity
Ken M. P. Setiawan / Dirk Tomsa: Politics in Contemporary Indonesia: Institutional Change, Policy Challenges, and Democratic Decline
Get PDFPersistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies
Get PDFPromising industrial profiles of Southeast Asian emerging economies have met their developmental limits in the face of the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. However, following the crisis, they have not been successful in upscaling the technological competitiveness of their industries. By applying the national innovation system approach originally developed in advanced western economies as an institutional mechanism of policy innovation in light of developmentalism, I seek to explain these persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia. My qualitative research examines literature discussing policy coordination mechanisms in innovation policies and policy documents containing coordination mechanisms involving firms, universities, and government agencies; then, how these issues implicate innovation policies in the two countries. I employ a comparative institutional analysis between them focusing on institutional characteristics of the national innovation systems, specifically their institutional obstacles occurring within development paths amidst prevailing political environments. I suggest that persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia result from systemic failures of achieving developmental aims regardless of their politico-administrative regimes. Existing institutional frameworks of the national innovation systems, entrenched in the socio-economic prevalence of the two countries, have not fit the nations’ developmental aims pursued upon innovation upgrading
Non-Western Government System Reform and Conformance Deficit of Postmodernism
No full textA research in Universitaet Osnabrueck, conducted by using comparative institutional analysis of Indonesia and the Philippines, attempts to explain that the postmodernist approach to government system reform results in counterproductive consequences of the reform hence deteriorating democracy in countries under investigation. The research gets funded from Higher Education Commission (DIKTI) Republic of Indonesia
Reformasi birokrasi dalam transisi
No full textSecara umum, buku ini mengulas perkembangan, perubahan, dan warna-warni reformasi birokrasi di beberapa daerah di Indonesia. Reformasi birokrasi dalam konteks transisi dibahas dalam rangka penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dalam hal hubungan antara reformasi birokrasi dan inovasi sektor publik, praktik inovasi dalam kerangka hukum dan governance serta arah strategi inovasi yang berkesinambungan, serta regulasi dalam perkembangan inovasi di daerah. Secara khusus, buku ini menyajikan reformasi birokrasi dan inovasi dalam rangka memberikan pelayanan publik yang berhubungan erat dengan perkembangan masyarakat untuk menciptakan good governance di Indonesia
Non-Western Government System Reform and Conformance Deficit of Postmodernism
No full textA current research project held in Universität Osnabrück, Germany, under the supervision of apl. Prof. Dr. phil. Carmen Schmidt. The research gets supports from the Higher Education Commission, Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia, and the Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonsia (FIA UI), especially advancing the research undertaken by "Policy, Governance, and Administrative Reform (PGAR)" cluster chaired by Prof. Dr. rer. publ. Eko Prasojo. (2018-2019)
Ken M. P. Setiawan / Dirk Tomsa: Politics in Contemporary Indonesia: Institutional Change, Policy Challenges, and Democratic Decline
Get PDFFailing Supports of Transparency against Corruption in Business Permit Service in Indonesia
No full textRethinking Problematic Governance of Local Government in New Proliferated Regions and Their Impacts
No full textRegional proliferation is a policy to improve governance of local governments upon decentralization taken into effect since 2001 in Indonesia in order to get public services in touch to the locals as well as further increases of prosperity level, but it is not necessarily proven as the matter of fact. This article gives a try to critically rethinking problematic situation of governing new municipalities upon proliferation, taking cases from Singkawang City and Bandung Barat Regency, to confirm previous theories. The study uses positivism approach by employing combining qualitative and quantitative method of inquiries through in-depth interviews to various actors, statistical analysis of conditions in comparison between those at the time of proliferation and recent progress, as well as content analysis of important documents. It suggests that regional proliferation in two municipalities implies double-edged impacts; they are opportunities to grasp local development on one side but counterproductive results of much dependency and stagnancy in local service delivery on the other side
