1,721,145 research outputs found

    Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and their first-degree relatives: Potential clinical value

    Full text link
    Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) have been described as specific markers in Crohn's disease and their healthy first-degree relatives. 171 patients with Crohn's disease, their 105 first-degree relatives, 145 patients with ulcerative colitis and 101 first-degree relatives of patients with ulcerative colitis, 50 patients with infectious enterocolitis and 100 healthy controls were tested for ASCA employing the ELISA technique. When compared with the healthy controls (p < 0.0001) and patients with infectious enterocolitis (p < 0.0001) the prevalence of ASCA was significantly increased in patients with Crohn's disease and their first-degree relatives (p < 0.01). Further significant differences concerning the frequency of ASCA within the different groups of our study population were not observed. In particular, ASCA were not found in increased prevalence in infectious enterocolitis. These observations are compatible with a role of ASCA as a marker of genetic predisposition to Crohn's disease. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

    Review article: infliximab for Crohn's disease treatment - shifting therapeutic strategies after 10 years of clinical experience

    No full text
    P>Background Crohn's disease is a progressive condition, with most patients developing a penetrating or stricturing complication over time. A decade ago, treatment goals consisted of immediate symptomatic control. The introduction of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, however, has changed the way patients with Crohn's disease are treated. Over 10 years of clinical data and experience have demonstrated these therapies to be highly effective in Crohn's disease. Aim To provide clinicians guidance on optimising treatment with anti-TNF therapies in Crohn's disease by introducing an evidence- and personal opinion-based treatment algorithm using infliximab initial anti-TNF therapy. Methods Scientific literature was reviewed using MEDLINE to evaluate data on clinical trials with infliximab in luminal and fistulising Crohn's disease. Results The data from several landmark infliximab trials have changed clinical practice and led to a readjustment of treatment goals in Crohn's disease, allowing patients to achieve more than just symptomatic relief including sustained steroid-free remission. Infliximab induces complete mucosal healing and reduces the rates of hospitalisation and surgery. Based on disease-related risk factors, a treatment algorithm for infliximab is delineated in favour of a rapid step-up approach in patients at high risk for a disabling course of disease. Conclusion Adopting the suggested treatment algorithm for infliximab into clinical routine is aimed to optimise outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease

    Clinical presentation of Crohn's disease. Association between familial disease, smoking, disease phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations and need for surgery

    No full text
    Background/Aims: Recent molecular data suggest that genetic factors may underlie the disease heterogeneity observed in Crohn's disease (CD). It was also suggested that familial inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a homogenous subgroup, phenotypically different from sporadic disease. Our aim was to determine the clinical presentation in a large CD population. Methodology: 564 CD patients (m/f: 278/286, age: 37.4 (SD 12.7) yrs, duration: 8.4 (7.1) yrs) were included. Disease phenotype was determined according to Vienna classification. Familial disease, extraintestinal manifestations (EIM), need for surgery and smoking habits were also analyzed. Results: Familial IBD was present in 73 (12.9%) patients. Age at onset and presence of EIMs was associated with familial disease. Penetrating (44.6% vs. = 10yrs. In a logistic regression model female gender, colonic/ileocolonic location, smoking and familial IBD were independent risk factors for EIMs, while ileal and non-inflammatory disease increased the risk for resections. Smoking was also associated with frequent relapses. Conclusions: Familial IBD was associated with the presence of EIMs, while ileal involvement and noninflammatory behavior independently increased the risk for surgery. Since penetrating and extensive disease was more frequent in patients with longer disease duration our data support a possible change in location and behavior during the course of disease

    6-thioguanine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: A critical appraisal by a European 6-TG working party

    Full text link
    Recently, the suggestion to use 6-thioguanine (6-TG) as an alternative thiopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been discarded due to reports about possible (hepato) toxicity. During meetings arranged in Vienna and Prague in 2004, European experts applying 6-TG further on in IBD patients presented data on safety and efficacy of 6-TG. After thorough evaluation of its risk-benefit ratio, the group consented that 6-TG may still be considered as a rescue drug in stringently defined indications in IBD, albeit restricted to a clinical research setting. As a potential indication for administering 6-TG, we delineated the requirement for maintenance therapy as well as intolerance and/or resistance to aminosalicylates, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate and infliximab. Furthermore, indications are preferred in which surgery is thought to be inappropriate. The standard 6-TG dosage should not exceed 25 mg daily. Routine laboratory controls are mandatory in short intervals. Liver biopsies should be performed after 6-12 months, three years and then three-yearly accompanied by gastroduodenoscopy, to monitor for potential hepatotoxicity, including nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Treatment with 6-TG must be discontinued in case of overt or histologically proven hepatotoxicity. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

    Defining Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Current and Future Directions

    No full text
    Although most treatment algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) begin with classifying patients according to disease severity, no formal validated or consensus definitions of mild, moderate, or severe IBD currently exist. There are 3 main domains relevant to the evaluation of disease severity in IBD: impact of the disease on the patient, disease burden, and disease course. These measures are not mutually exclusive and the correlations and interactions between them are not necessarily proportionate. A comprehensive literature search was performed regarding current definitions of disease severity in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and the ability to categorize disease severity in a particular patient. Although numerous assessment tools for symptoms, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, fatigue, endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and histology (in ulcerative colitis) were identified, few have validated thresholds for categorizing disease activity or severity. Moving forward, we propose a preliminary set of criteria that could be used to classify IBD disease severity. These are grouped by the 3 domains of disease severity: impact of the disease on the patient (clinical symptoms, quality of life, fatigue, and disability) measurable inflammatory burden (C-reactive protein, mucosal lesions, upper gastrointestinal involvement, and disease extent), and disease course (including structural damage, history/extension of intestinal resection, perianal disease, number of flares, and extraintestinal manifestations). We further suggest that a disease severity classification should be developed and validated by an international group to develop a pragmatic means of identifying patients with severe disease. This is increasingly important to guide current therapeutic strategies for IBD and to develop treatment algorithms for clinical practice

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore