1,721,004 research outputs found
Entrevista Professor Bruno Groppo
No primeiro semestre de 2016, o Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da UFRGS recebeu a visita do professor Bruno Groppo, vinculado à Université de Paris I – Centre d’Histoire Sociale du XXe Siècle. O professor ministrou a aula inaugural do ano letivo de 2016 e ofereceu uma disciplina eletiva ao corpo discente do PPG, intitulada “Memória, supressão, esquecimento dos passados traumáticos: uma comparação entre Alemanha e Rússia”. Atualmente, Groppo desenvolve pesquisas relacionadas à história e memória, enfocando particularmente as memórias coletivas e institucionais constituídas em torno das experiências do nazismo e do stalinismo. A Revista Aedos realizou entrevista com o professor na ocasião de sua passagem pelo PPG. Dentre os pontos debatidos, a trajetória de Groppo, metodologia da história e os diálogos e diferenças entre história e memória
Bruno Groppo et C. Riccamboni , La Gauche et «56» en Italie et en France, 1987
Leduc Victor. Bruno Groppo et C. Riccamboni , La Gauche et «56» en Italie et en France, 1987. In: Raison présente, n°87, 3e trimestre 1988. Actualité du rationalisme. pp. 163-164
Michel Dreyfus, Bruno Groppo, Claudio Ingerflom, Roland Lew, Claude Pennetier, Bernard Pudal et Serge Wolikow (dir.) Le siècle des communismes
Cœuré Sophie. Michel Dreyfus, Bruno Groppo, Claudio Ingerflom, Roland Lew, Claude Pennetier, Bernard Pudal et Serge Wolikow (dir.) Le siècle des communismes. In: Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 57ᵉ année, N. 4, 2002. pp. 1101-1102
Le Siècle des Communismes, sous la direction de Michel Dreyfus, Bruno Groppo, Claudio Sergio Ingerflom, Roland Lew, Claude Pennetier, Bernard Pudal, Serge Wolikow, Paris 2000, 542 S.
Le Siede des Communismes, sous la direction de Michel Dreyfus, Bruno Groppo, Claudio Sergio Ingerflom, Roland Lew, Claude Pennetier, Bernard Pudal, Serge Wolikow, Paris 2000, 542 S
Filippo Focardi, Bruno Groppo (éd.), L’Europa e le sue memorie. Politiche e culture del ricordo dopo il 1989
O tema da memória tornou-se, nas últimas duas décadas, num eixo particularmente instigador de debates públicos, sobretudo em sociedades atravessadas por um passado recente marcado pela violência e a guerra, e de produções académicas que analisam criticamente as apropriações e silenciamentos do passado no presente. Com organização de Filippo Focardi e Bruno Groppo, o livro L’Europa e le sue memorie. Politiche e culture del ricordo dopo il 1989 dá mais um relevante contributo nesse sentido. Tra..
Ein jüdisch-amerikanischer Gewerkschafter in Hitlers Berlin. Catherine Collomp/Bruno Groppo (Hg.): An American in Hitler’s Berlin. Abraham Plotkin’s Diary, 1932–1933, Urbana u. a.: University of Illinois Press 2009
Catherine Collomp/Bruno Groppo (Hg.): An American in Hitler’s Berlin. Abraham Plotkin’s Diary, 1932–1933, Urbana u. a.: University of Illinois Press 2009
Memory politics and oblivion politics in Central and Eastern Europe after the end of communist political systems
Las memorias del comunismo en Europa central y oriental están en el centro del artículo de Bruno Groppo, quien presenta un panorama general de las políticas de la memoria desarrolladas después del fin de los sistemas políticos comunistas. Diferentes de un país a otros, éstos siguen presentando, sin embargo, características comunes, que evocan, en ciertos aspectos, a las memorias elaboradas en muchos países europeos después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Se construye, como entonces, el mito de una sociedad víctima inocente, por un lado, y resistente, por el otro. El pasado comunista es visto enteramente en términos negativos, como un periodo de violencia y de terror, y el comunismo se encuentra, en cierto modo, externalizado, es decir presentado como un sistema político carente de raíces en la sociedad, impuesto desde el exterior y sostenido en el poder, exclusivamente, por la fuerza. La responsabilidad de todo es atribuida por completo a la Unión Soviética, así como en 1945 la Alemania nazi era, unánimemente, considerada la responsable exclusiva de todos los males de la guerra mundial recién terminada. Al mito de la víctima inocente se une el de una sociedad casi, totalmente, resistente, que desde el inicio luchó tenaz y heroicamente en contra del comunismo. En las interpretaciones del pasado que están en la base de las políticas de la memoria postcomunista no encuentran lugar aquellos aspectos que contradicen o no están plenamente conformes con la imagen que éstas intentan transmitir. Por ejemplo, el tema del consenso, más o menos amplio, de cual se beneficiaron los regímenes comunistas, es raramente evocado. Lo mismo sucede con otros temas embarazosos, como la participación de sectores de la población, en algunos países, en la persecución y exterminio de los judíos. En suma, las memorias públicas del comunismo son a menudo construidas sobre una distorsión de la realidad histórica.The memories of communism in Central and Eastern Europe are in the center of the article by Bruno Groppo, who presents an overview of the politics of memory developed after the end of Communist political systems. Different from one country to another, they still present, however, common characteristics, evoking, in certain aspects, the memories produced in many European countries after the Second World War. Is built, as then, the myth of a society victim innocent, on the one hand, and resistant, on the other. The communist past is seen entirely in negative terms, as a period of violence and terror, and communism, in a way, externalized, that is, presented as a political system lacking roots in society, imposed from outside and held in power, exclusively, by force. The responsibility for everything is entirely to the Soviet Union; just as in 1945 Nazi Germany was unanimously considered the exclusive responsible for all the ills of the recently ended world war. The myth of the innocent victim joins that of a society almost, totally, resistant, that from the beginning fought tenaciously and heroically against communism. In the interpretations of the past that are at the base of the politics of memory post-Communist memory do not find those aspects that contradict or are not fully in accordance with the image that they are trying to convey. For example, the issue of consensus, more or less broad, which benefited the Communist regimes, is rarely evoked. The same happens with other embarrassing topics, such as the participation of sectors of the population, in some countries, in the persecution and extermination of Jews. In sum, the public memories of communism are often built on a distortion of historical reality.Fil: Groppo, Bruno. Centre d'Histoire Sociale du xxe Siècle (Université de Paris i Panthéon Sorbonne) - Universidad de Padua
Territoires et militants communistes
" Territoires et militants communistes : approches plurielles et comparées " 9 rue Malher 75004 Métro Saint-Paul Animé par Bernard Pudal, Claude Pennetier, Bruno Groppo, Jacques Girault Programme provisoire L'
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
