1,721,230 research outputs found
Barnes (Jonathan). The Presocratic Philosophers. Vol. I : Thales to Zeno, Vol. II : Empedocles to Democritus
No full textDruet Pierre-Philippe. Barnes (Jonathan). The Presocratic Philosophers. Vol. I : Thales to Zeno, Vol. II : Empedocles to Democritus. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 58, fasc. 2, 1980. Histoire (depuis l'Antiquité) - Geschiedenis (sedert de Oudheid) pp. 439-440
Barnes (Jonathan). The Presocratic Philosophers. Vol. I : Thales to Zeno, Vol. II : Empedocles to Democritus
No full textDruet Pierre-Philippe. Barnes (Jonathan). The Presocratic Philosophers. Vol. I : Thales to Zeno, Vol. II : Empedocles to Democritus. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 58, fasc. 2, 1980. Histoire (depuis l'Antiquité) - Geschiedenis (sedert de Oudheid) pp. 439-440
« “My favourite sort of rain”: Drizzle and Downpour in the Fiction of Julian Barnes, Jonathan Coe and Graham Swift. »
No full textInternational audienceCet article s’intéresse à la manière dont les romanciers britanniques contemporains Julian Barnes, Jonathan Coe et Graham Swift inscrivent le motif de la pluie dans leurs ouvrages. Outre les modalités comiques, les écrivains développent le topos de la pluie en tant que synecdoque de l’Angleterre ou de l’anglicité, ou bien corrélat objectif pour refléter une humeur morose ou nostalgique. Barnes, Coe et Swift dépassent toutefois ces usages conventionnels pour adopter une posture toute postmoderniste : conscients du symbolisme éculé de la pluie, ils l’exploitent de façon ironique, signalant par là-même au lecteur leur familiarité avec les clichés littéraires qu’ils déploient pour mieux les subvertir. Par ce biais, les écrivains réinvestissent le motif de la pluie pour mieux exprimer sur un mode détourné la vulnérabilité ou la peine de certains personnages
“My favourite sort of rain”: Drizzle and Downpour in the Fiction of Julian Barnes, Jonathan Coe and Graham Swift
No full textInternational audienceCet article s’intéresse à la manière dont les romanciers britanniques contemporains Julian Barnes, Jonathan Coe et Graham Swift inscrivent le motif de la pluie dans leurs ouvrages. Outre les modalités comiques, les écrivains développent le topos de la pluie en tant que synecdoque de l’Angleterre ou de l’anglicité, ou bien corrélat objectif pour refléter une humeur morose ou nostalgique. Barnes, Coe et Swift dépassent toutefois ces usages conventionnels pour adopter une posture toute postmoderniste : conscients du symbolisme éculé de la pluie, ils l’exploitent de façon ironique, signalant par là-même au lecteur leur familiarité avec les clichés littéraires qu’ils déploient pour mieux les subvertir. Par ce biais, les écrivains réinvestissent le motif de la pluie pour mieux exprimer sur un mode détourné la vulnérabilité ou la peine de certains personnages
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
