1,738,038 research outputs found

    Author Author 2021

    No full text
    https://scholarlycommons.baptisthealth.net/author-author-archive-files/1309/thumbnail.jp

    1309

    No full text

    1309

    No full text

    1309 Peoria

    No full text
    1309 South Peoria Stree

    UMNH:Mamm:1309

    No full text
    UMNH:Mamm:1309 Voucher Specimen Study Ski

    Figs. 1309 –1314. Tupigea spp. 1309–1312. T in New World Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): A Revision At Generic Level

    No full text
    Figs. 1309 –1314. Tupigea spp. 1309–1312. T. altiventer (Keyserling), female holotype. 1309 1310. Habitus, lateral and dorsal views. 1311. Prosoma, frontal view. 1312. Epigynum, frontal (slightly ventral) view. 1313–1314. T. iguassuensis (Mello-Leitão), female lectotype. 1313. Epigynum, ventral view. 1314. Epigynum, dorsal view. Scale lines: 0.5 mm (1309–1311), 0.2 mm (1312–1314).Published as part of HUBER, BERNHARD A., 2000, New World Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): A Revision At Generic Level, pp. 1-348 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2000 (254) on page 326, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090(2000)2542.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/535082

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    ASB 1309 MICROBIOLOGY , PARASITOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY

    No full text
    ASB 1309 MICROBIOLOGY , PARASITOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOG

    RAAPRAPPORT 1309

    No full text
    onderzoeksrappor
    corecore