E-Jurnal UIN (Universitas Islam Negeri) Alauddin Makassar
Not a member yet
19582 research outputs found
Sort by
Operational Phase–Resolved HIRARC Framework for Occupational Pesticide Risk Characterization and Mitigation
No full textThe use of pesticides in the agricultural sector plays a critical role in supporting food security; however, it simultaneously poses substantial risks to human health and the environment. This article aims to analyze occupational risks associated with pesticide use among farmers using the HIRARC (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Risk Control) framework. Through a structured literature review and synthesis of four case studies, the findings indicate that pesticide exposure generates physical, chemical, biological, and environmental hazards with risk levels ranging from moderate to very high. These risks are exacerbated by inadequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), limited occupational safety training, and substandard working conditions. The reviewed evidence demonstrates chronic health impacts, including decreased cholinesterase enzyme activity, elevated heavy metal concentrations in farmers’ biological samples, and high dermal exposure levels during pesticide mixing and loading activities. The analysis further identifies critical exposure nodes linked to specific work phases, underscoring the importance of activity-based risk characterization in informal agricultural settings. To address these challenges, this article proposes a field-activity-based HIRARC scenario as a practical analytical tool for systematic risk evaluation in small-scale and informal farming systems. Effective risk control requires a holistic intervention strategy encompassing safety education, improved access to certified PPE, regulatory reinforcement, and community-based as well as technology-supported approaches
University Museums as Library Partners in Transformation of Inclusive and Interdisciplinary Institution
No full textBackground: In the landscape of Indonesian Islamic Higher Education, the museums at UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh and UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang serve as pioneering institutional models. These repositories function as "learning laboratories," utilizing Object-Based Learning (OBL) to bridge the gap between historical artifacts and contemporary academic discourse.
Purpose: This study investigates the perceptions of museum managers and academics regarding the dual role of university museums: as internal pedagogical supports for campus life and as external instruments for community engagement and cultural diplomacy.
Methods: Adopting a qualitative comparative approach, data were gathered through in-depth interviews and direct field observations at both university sites. The analysis focused on the integration of museum resources into the "Tri Dharma" (Teaching, Research, and Community Service) framework of Indonesian higher education.
Findings: The study shows that these museums are very important for the intellectual lives of students and faculty and are also very important for reaching out to the community. However, despite their success in fostering cultural engagement, their potential is often hampered by a lack of formal institutional recognition and integrated management protocols.
Originality/Value: This research underscores the necessity for a robust legal and policy framework, facilitated by university leadership and the Ministry of Education, to formalize the status of university museums. Strengthening these institutional foundations is essential for the sustainable development of museum-based pedagogy within Indonesia’s State Islamic Universities
A Comparative Study of M-Estimation and S-Estimation in Robust Regression Models: A Case Study on Crime Rates in Indonesia
Get PDFRobust regression is a regression method used to handle outliers in statistical analysis. Robust regression consists of five estimation methods, namely M-estimation (Maximum Likelihood type), LMS estimation (Least Median of Squares), LTS estimation (Least Trimmed Squares), MM estimation (Method of Moments), and S-estimation (Scale). M-estimation is known for having the smallest variance among the estimators, with high efficiency reaching up to 95%, while S-estimation is based on the residual scale of M-estimation and is characterized by a high breakdown point of up to 50%. The 2022 crime rate data in Indonesia contains outliers. According to data from the Central Statistics Agency, there was a drastic increase in crime incidents in 2022, reaching 372,965 reported cases. Therefore, a comparison of robust regression estimation methods was conducted to obtain the best model that explains the factors influencing crime rates in Indonesia. This study employs robust regression using M-estimation and S-estimation with Tukey bisquare weighting. The dependent variable in this study is the number of crimes in Indonesia in 2022, while the independent variables include population density (x₁), open unemployment rate (x₂), number of poor people (x₃), mean years of schooling/MYS (x₄), and labor force participation rate/TPAK (x₅). The results indicate that S-estimation in robust regression provides the best performance among the methods analyzed
Reformasi dalam Bayang Kemunduran Demokrasi? Analisis Tahun Pertama Kepemimpinan Prabowo Subianto
Get PDFThis article examines the democratic backsliding in Indonesia by analysing the consolidation of execu-tive power during the first year of Prabowo Subianto’s administration. Using the democratic backslid-ing framework proposed by Haggard and Kaufman, this study focuses on three analytical dimensions: protection of freedoms, horizontal checks and balances, and elections. Using a qualitative process-tracing methodology, this article traces the institutional changes, elite strategies and legal interven-tions that have reshaped Indonesia’s democratic landscape. The findings indicate that democratic backsliding in Indonesia has not occurred through the dismantling of formal democratic institutions, but rather through the gradual repurposing of institutional functions to stabilise executive dominance while maintaining procedural legitimacy. This continuity across successive administrations suggests that Indonesia is moving toward a form of procedural democracy with declining substantive quality, highlighting the structural limitations of electoral competition in constraining executive power.Artikel ini menganalisis kemunduran demokrasi di Indonesia dengan mengkaji konsolidasi kekuasaan eksekutif periode tahun pertama pemerintahan Prabowo Subianto. Menggunakan kerangka kerja democratic backsliding yang diusulkan oleh Haggard dan Kaufman studi ini berfokus pada tiga dimensi analitis: perlindungan terhadap kebebasan (protection of freedoms), mekanisme pengawasan horizontal (horizontal checks and balances), dan pemilihan umum (elections). Dengan menggunakan metode penelusuran process tracing kualitatif, artikel ini menelusuri perubahan institusional, strategi elit dan intervensi hukum yang telah membentuk ulang lanskap demokrasi Indonesia. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kemunduran demokrasi di Indonesia tidak terjadi melalui pembongkaran institusi demokratis formal, melainkan melalui pengalihan fungsi institusi tersebut secara bertahap untuk menstabilkan dominasi eksekutif sambil mempertahankan legitimasi prosedural. Kelanjutan ini di seluruh pemerintahan menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah bergerak menuju bentuk demokrasi prosedural dengan kualitas substansial yang semakin menurun, menyoroti batasan struktural kompetisi pemilu dalam membatasi kekuasaan eksekutif
Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf: A Comparative Madhhab Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Contemporary Muslim Societies
Get PDFAlthough the Islamic legal tradition recognizes diversity of opinion (ikhtilāf) as an integral, legitimate aspect of juristic reasoning, contemporary Muslim societies often face tensions when interpretive differences intersect with competing religious and sociopolitical authorities. Existing studies on fiqh al-ikhtilāf have largely remained within normative and descriptive discussions of classical legal theory and rarely examine how juristic diversity operates in contemporary social contexts. This article addresses this gap by examining ikhtilāf through a socio-legal and comparative madhhab perspective. The study employs qualitative, library-based research, combining textual analysis of classical jurisprudential sources from major Sunni madhhabs with socio-legal interpretation to explore how differences in legal reasoning are constructed, negotiated, and applied in contemporary Muslim discourse. The findings indicate that juristic disagreement arises not only from technical differences in linguistic interpretation or methods of istinbāṭ (legal derivation) but also from varying epistemological frameworks among madhhabs and their interaction with evolving social contexts and authority structures. Comparative analysis shows that classical madhhab traditions historically accommodated legal pluralism within a structured jurisprudential framework. In contrast, contemporary contestations often emerge when interpretive authority becomes fragmented. This article contributes to the sociology of Islamic law by proposing an ethical-jurisprudential framework grounded in fiqh al-ikhtilāf. The framework integrates madhhab diversity, legal pluralism, and ethical principles (akhlāq al-karīmah) as mechanisms for managing disagreement constructively. By reframing juristic diversity as an institutionalized form of legal pluralism rather than a source of division, the study highlights its potential role in strengthening social cohesion within contemporary Muslim societies
Menimbang Kaidah Syādz dalam Kritik Hadis: Kerangka Konseptual dan Aplikasinya pada Sanad serta Matan: Kerangka Konseptual dan Aplikasinya Pada Sanad Serta Matan
No full textIn general, this study examines the shādhdh principle in ḥadīth criticism, emphasizing that assessing the validity of a report cannot rely solely on an isnād that appears sound, but must also involve detecting irregularities revealed through comparison across transmission routes (mu‘āraḍah/muqāranah) in both isnād and matn. The methodology employs an analytical–conceptual, library-based approach, tracing primary literature to map definitions, the foundations of application, and the distinctions of shādhdh in isnād and matn within the classical tradition of ḥadīth criticism and its relevance to contemporary discourse. The findings show: (1) shādhdh is understood as a narration transmitted by a trustworthy (thiqah) narrator that contradicts a stronger narration; (2) there are differences in formulation among al-Shāfiʿī, al-Ḥākim, and al-Khalīlī, yet scholars tend to privilege al-Shāfiʿī’s definition; and (3) identifying shādhdh in the isnād is carried out by compiling all chains, evaluating the reliability of narrators, and then determining maḥfūẓ versus shādhdh/marjūḥ, whereas shādhdh in the matn is established through muqāranah and by testing forms of “irregularity” such as maqlūb, mudraj, ziyādah, muḍṭarib, muṣaḥḥaf, and muḥarraf. The implications underscore the importance of comparative work across transmission lines to prevent the acceptance of reports that are “formally sound yet deviant,” while providing a methodological basis for more measured and responsible matn criticism in contemporary ḥadīth studies.Secara umum, penelitian ini membahas kaidah syādz dalam kritik hadis dengan menekankan bahwa penilaian validitas riwayat tidak cukup bertumpu pada tampilan sanad yang tampak sahih, tetapi juga pada deteksi kejanggalan yang muncul melalui perbandingan antarjalur periwayatan (mu‘āraḍah/muqaranah) pada sanad maupun matan. Metodologi yang digunakan ialah pendekatan analitis-konseptual berbasis studi pustaka, dengan menelusuri literatur primer untuk memetakan definisi, dasar penerapan, serta distingsi syādz pada sanad dan matan dalam tradisi kritik hadis klasik hingga relevansinya pada wacana kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) syādz dipahami sebagai riwayat perawi tsiqah yang menyelisihi riwayat yang lebih kuat; (2) terdapat perbedaan rumusan antara al-Syāfi‘ī, al-Ḥākim, dan al-Khalīlī, namun ulama cenderung menguatkan definisi al-Syāfi‘ī; serta (3) identifikasi syādz sanad dilakukan dengan menghimpun seluruh sanad, menilai kualitas perawi, lalu menetapkan mahfūẓ–syādz/marjūḥ, sedangkan syādz matan ditetapkan melalui muqaranah dan pengujian bentuk-bentuk “kejanggalan” seperti maqlūb, mudraj, ziyādah, muḍṭarib, muṣaḥḥaf, muḥarraf. Implikasi kajian menegaskan pentingnya kerja komparatif lintas jalur untuk mencegah penerimaan riwayat yang “formal-sahih namun menyimpang”, sekaligus memberi pijakan metodologis bagi kritik matan yang lebih terukur dan bertanggung jawab dalam studi hadis kontemporer
ANALISIS ENABLING FACTOR TERHADAP KEJADIAN DIARE PADA BALITA DI WILAYAH PUSKESMAS AIR PUTIH SAMARINDA
No full textDiarrhea is still a problem that always exists in society, especially toddlers because toddlers have immune systems that are still susceptible to diarrhea compared to adults. This study aims to analyze supporting factors, namely facilities and infrastructure for the incidence of toddler diarrhea in the Air Putih Samarinda Health Center work area. The method used is qualitative with the Action Research (AR) approach. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews with purposive sampling, observation, and documentation. The results of the study to 6 informants were given a pre-test intervention (X01) initial conditions on supporting factors including facilities and infrastructure, each informant had 1 informant who met the requirements and 5 informants who did not meet the requirements. Furthermore, the provision of (X) intervention/treatment which began with an explanation of the contents of the leaflet, then the leaflet was given to the informant. At the time of the post-test (X02) the final condition of the facilities and infrastructure in the 3 stages, showed changes related to facilities and infrastructure that met the requirements as many as 3 informants and some did not meet the requirements as many as 3 informants from the initial condition. It can be concluded that supporting factors, namely facilities and infrastructure, influence the incidence of diarrhea in the work area of the Air Putih Health Center, Samarinda City.Diarrhea is still a problem that always exists in society, especially toddlers because toddlers have immune systems that are still susceptible to diarrhea compared to adults. This study aims to analyze supporting factors, namely facilities and infrastructure for the incidence of toddler diarrhea in the Air Putih Samarinda Health Center work area. The method used is qualitative with the Action Research (AR) approach. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews with purposive sampling, observation, and documentation. The results of the study to 6 informants were given a pre-test intervention (X01) initial conditions on supporting factors including facilities and infrastructure, each informant had 1 informant who met the requirements and 5 informants who did not meet the requirements. Furthermore, the provision of (X) intervention/treatment which began with an explanation of the contents of the leaflet, then the leaflet was given to the informant. At the time of the post-test (X02) the final condition of the facilities and infrastructure in the 3 stages, showed changes related to facilities and infrastructure that met the requirements as many as 3 informants and some did not meet the requirements as many as 3 informants from the initial condition. It can be concluded that supporting factors, namely facilities and infrastructure, influence the incidence of diarrhea in the work area of the Air Putih Health Center, Samarinda City
The Transition of Indonesian Citizenship to Thai Citizenship from a Civil Law Perspective
Get PDFThe transition of citizenship from Indonesian citizenship to Thai citizenship represents a complex legal phenomenon involving the interaction of two different national legal systems with significant consequences in the civil law domain. Citizenship functions not only as a political status but also as a juridical bond that determines an individual’s personal law, legal capacity, property rights, family relations, and inheritance regime. This study aims to analyze the legal procedures governing the relinquishment of Indonesian citizenship and the acquisition of Thai citizenship, as well as to examine the civil law implications arising from such transition from a comparative legal perspective. The research employs normative legal methods with a functional comparative law approach, relying on statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature related to citizenship law, civil law, and private international law in Indonesia and Thailand. The findings indicate that Indonesian law emphasizes the formal and administrative aspects of citizenship loss, while Thai law focuses on selective naturalization requirements and substantive integration. This asymmetry creates potential procedural gaps during the transitional phase that may expose individuals to legal uncertainty and risks of temporary statelessness. Furthermore, the transition of citizenship results in a fundamental transformation of civil legal status, including the loss of nationality-based rights in Indonesia, particularly land ownership rights, and the simultaneous acquisition of full civil rights under Thai law. The study concludes that citizenship transition constitutes a comprehensive legal transformation affecting the entire framework of civil rights and obligations rather than merely a change of nationality. Strengthening procedural synchronization, legal awareness, and cross-border administrative coordination is therefore essential to ensure legal certainty, protection of individual rights, and prevention of statelessness during the citizenship transition process
Siyasah Syariah dan Keadilan Ekologis
Get PDFNickel mining in Central Halmahera has generated significant ecological impacts, raising fundamental questions regarding ecological justice from the perspective of Siyasah Syariah. This study aims to analyze the compatibility of Indonesia’s nickel downstreaming policy with the principles of Siyasah Syariah and Maqasid al-Shariah in realizing ecological justice. Employing a qualitative approach with normative–juridical analysis, this research integrates the theoretical framework of Siyasah Syariah with empirical data on the environmental impacts of nickel mining. The findings indicate that nickel mining activities in the region have resulted in the degradation of 299 watersheds, deforestation of approximately 27,900 hectares of forest cover, and various forms of environmental pollution, which constitute violations of the principles of hifz al-nafs (protection of life) and hifz al-nasl (protection of progeny) within Maqasid al-Shariah. Although the nickel downstreaming policy has produced short-term economic benefits, it does not fully conform to the principle of maslahah in Siyasah Syariah, as it overlooks distributive justice and ecological sustainability. This study recommends a reformulation of mining policies grounded in Maqasid al-Shariah to promote sustainable ecological justice.Pertambangan nikel di Halmahera Tengah telah menimbulkan dampak ekologis yang signifikan, memunculkan pertanyaan mendasar tentang keadilan ekologis dalam perspektif siyasah syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesesuaian kebijakan hilirisasi nikel dengan prinsip-prinsip siyasah syariah dan maqasid syariah dalam mewujudkan keadilan ekologis. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis normatif-yuridis, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan konsep siyasah syariah dengan data empiris dampak tambang nikel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aktivitas pertambangan nikel di wilayah ini telah menyebabkan kerusakan 299 daerah aliran sungai, deforestasi 27.900 hektar tutupan hutan, dan pencemaran lingkungan yang melanggar prinsip hifz al-nafs dan hifz al-nasl dalam maqasid syariah. Kebijakan hilirisasi nikel, meski memberikan manfaat ekonomi jangka pendek, tidak sepenuhnya sejalan dengan prinsip maslahah dalam siyasah syariah karena mengabaikan keadilan distributif dan keberlanjutan ekologis. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan reformulasi kebijakan pertambangan berbasis maqasid syariah untuk mewujudkan keadilan ekologis yang berkelanjutan
Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Kesesuaian Harga di Toserba Karang Langit Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Harga dalam Islam
No full textThis study examines the effect of price suitability on customer satisfaction in the retail sector, with Islamic price justice as a mediating variable. Grounded in expectation–disconfirmation theory and Islamic economic principles, this research employs a quantitative explanatory approach using survey data collected from 60 customers of Toserba Karang Langit. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that price suitability has a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction and significantly influences perceptions of Islamic price justice. Furthermore, Islamic price justice, reflected through fairness (al-‘adl), transparency (bayān), and the avoidance of deception (tadlīs) and uncertainty (gharar), has a significant positive effect on customer satisfaction and partially mediates the relationship between price suitability and satisfaction. These findings demonstrate that customer satisfaction in Muslim consumer markets is shaped not only by economic considerations but also by ethical and religious evaluations. This study contributes to the empirical development of Islamic business and marketing literature by operationalizing Islamic price justice as a measurable construct and highlighting its strategic role in ethical pricing practices within the retail sector.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kesesuaian harga terhadap kepuasan pelanggan pada sektor ritel dengan keadilan harga Islam sebagai variabel mediasi. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada teori expectation–disconfirmation dan prinsip ekonomi Islam. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif explanatory dengan data survei yang dikumpulkan dari 60 pelanggan Toserba Karang Langit. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesesuaian harga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan serta berpengaruh signifikan terhadap persepsi keadilan harga Islam. Selanjutnya, keadilan harga Islam—yang tercermin melalui prinsip keadilan (al-‘adl), transparansi (bayān), serta penghindaran praktik penipuan (tadlīs) dan ketidakjelasan (gharar)—berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan serta memediasi secara parsial hubungan antara kesesuaian harga dan kepuasan pelanggan. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa kepuasan pelanggan dalam pasar konsumen Muslim tidak hanya ditentukan oleh pertimbangan ekonomi, tetapi juga oleh evaluasi etis dan religius. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi empiris terhadap pengembangan kajian bisnis dan pemasaran Islam melalui pengukuran keadilan harga Islam secara terintegrasi dalam konteks ritel