Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology

Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology Repository
Not a member yet
    1453 research outputs found

    Assessment of the efficacy of platelet transfusion with post-transfusion corrected count increment(CCI)

    No full text
    [[abstract]]許多疾病都可能會造成血小板減少,而輸注血小板是面對這種併發症的主要處置方法。止血是血小板的重要生理功能,為了維持此功能必須要有足夠質量的血小板與凝血因子共同作用方可達成。血小板輸血後是否能有效地增加血小板數量是影響臨床治療成效的重要指標。利用校正後血小板增加數量(corrected count increment;CCI值)作為血小板的輸血療效評估是目前能得到較客觀及正確的重要參考指標。 在 2009年從4月至10月間, 我們收集47位輸注血小板的病患參與本研究,藉由探討病患輸注血小板的CCI值與各項因素間之相關性,其中包括性別、年齡、血小板成分、白血球過濾器、血型相容性、輸血反應以及不規則抗體,以了解台灣人輸注血小板之療效。我們收集輸注血小板後18至24小時的血小板數換算成CCI值,其結果以大於或等於 4,500 m2/μL判定成功的有效輸血.我們的研究結果顯示平均CCI值是6,777m2/μL (-52,903 m2/μL~119,653m2/μL)。在研究對象中有效輸血僅占了51.06%。然而,國人平均體表面積與外國人平均體表面積有明顯差異。因此,本研究結果建議應定義出適合國人之CCI參考值,以提升血小板輸注成效並節省醫療成本。 Many diseases may lead to thrombocytopenia, and platelet transfusion for this complication is the main treatment. Hemostasis is an important physiological function of platelet. To maintain this function, there must be enough quantity and quality of platelet to interact with coagulation factors. Whether platelet transfusion can effectively increase the quantity of platelet is an important indicator of the efficacy. Corrected count increment (CCI value) as the evaluation of efficacy of platelet transfusion, can be an objective and correct reference. From April to October in 2009, we included 47 patients with platelet transfusion in this study. We investigated the correlation between CCI value of post-transfusion and several factors, including gender, age, platelets component, WBC filtration, blood type compatibility, transfusion reaction, and irregular antibodies, to understand the efficacy of platelet transfusion in Taiwan. We analyzed platelets count after transfusion of 18 to 24 hours to calculate the CCI value. The outcome was whether or not a transfusion lead to a successful response, defined as a CCI greater or equal to 4,500 m2/μL. Our results showed that the mean value of CCI value is 6,777 m2/μL (-52,903 m2/μL~119,653 m2/μL). Effectiveness of platelet transfusion is only 51.06%. However, the average body surface area (BSA) of Taiwanese is different from other populations. Therefore, the results of this study conclude that the necessity of further study to define a reference value of CCI for Taiwanese to enhance the effectiveness of platelet transfusion and to save medical costs

    The development of detecting techniques of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae and X. oryzae pv. oryzae

    Get PDF
    [[abstract]]Xanthomonas屬為革蘭氏陰細菌且是世界重要植物病原菌之一,可造成許多農業損失。其中火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌及水稻白葉枯病菌會感染許多台灣地區之經濟作物,為能早期鑑定出火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌及水稻白葉枯病菌,本研究利用gyrB、virD4、rpoD及Lytic eznyme等序列並結合PCR開發快速之檢測技術。研究中將火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌、水稻白葉枯病菌、檬果細菌性黑斑病菌、茄科細菌性斑點病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及柑桔潰瘍病菌基因體中之gyrB、virD4、rpoD及Lytic eznyme等序列進行核酸選殖,利用生物資訊進行多序列比對顯示序列間之差異性,並進一步利用火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌及水稻白葉枯病菌之序列差異處設計專一性引子組搭配聚合酶連鎖反應技術進行引子組之鑑定。在偵測火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌方面,分別使用XAD-virD4、XAD-gyrB及XAD-LE等3組專一性引子組,其PCR檢測之專一性皆為100%,其中XAD-gyrB引子組可偵測之敏感度介於40pg與4pg之DNA濃度或103cfu與102cfu之間,而XAD-virD4引子組可偵測之敏感度介於2pg與200fg之DNA濃度或102cfu與101cfu之間,至於XAD-LE引子組其偵測之敏感度介於30pg與3pg 之DNA濃度或102cfu與101cfu之間。在偵測水稻白葉枯病菌方面,分別使用XOO-gyrB及XOO-rpoD等2組專一性引子組,其PCR檢測之專一性皆為100%;其中XOO-gyrB引子組可偵測之敏感度介於30pg與3pgDNA濃度或102cfu與101cfu之間,而XOO-rpoD引子組可偵測之敏感度介於40pg與4pg之DNA濃度或103cfu與102cfu之間。此外,研究中利用多引子組PCR(Multiplex PCR)之技術來偵測火鶴花細菌性葉枯病或水稻白葉枯病菌。以引子組XAD-virD4、XAD-gyrB及XAD-LE之組合用於偵測火鶴花細菌性葉枯病;引子組XOO-gyrB及XOO-rpoD之組合用於偵測水稻白葉枯病菌,其結果顯示引子組之組合專一性皆為100%。因此可知,PCR及多引子組PCR為可使用及可靠之偵測技術,可用於篩選及偵測火鶴花細菌性葉枯病菌及水稻白葉枯病菌之診斷工具。 Xanthomonas is a Gram-negative bacterium and one of the most important phytopathogenic bacteria in the world, which causes many agricultural loss. As Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad) and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) affected many economic plants in Taiwan. In order to identify Xad and Xoo at the early stage of infection, we plan to develop a rapid detecting technique based on the DNA sequences of gyrB、virD4、rpoD and Lytic enzyme. We cloned several DNA fragments from different species of Xad、Xoo、Xcm、Xav、Xcc and Xac, and the bioinformatics analysis of Multiple Sequences Alignment displayed the diversity sequences. The specific primer-pairs were designed for the PCR identification of Xad and Xoo by the diversity sequences. On the detection of Xad, the PCR detection results of XAD-gyrB、XAD-virD4 and XAD-LE revealed the specificity will be 100%. The sensitivity of XAD-gyrB the will be 40 pg-4 pg DNA or 103 cfu-102 cfu. The sensitivity of XAD-virD4 will be 2 pg-200 fg DNA or 102-101 cfu. The sensitivity of XAD-LE will be 30 pg-3 pg DNA or 102 cfu-101 cfu. On the detection of Xoo, the PCR detection results of XOO-gyrB、XOO-rpoD the specificity will be 100%. The sensitivity of XOO-gyrB the sensitivity will be 30 pg-3 pg DNA or 102 cfu-101 cfu. The sensitivity of XOO-rpoD the sensitivity will be 40 pg-4 pg DNA or 103 cfu-102 cfu. Moreover, we used Multiplex-PCR method to detect Xad or xoo. The combination of XAD-virD4、XAD-gyrB and XAD-LE was used to detect Xad and the combination XOO-gyrB and XOO-virD4 was used to detect Xoo. The results revealed the specificity of these combinations will be 100% for detection. Accordingly, the PCR and multiplex PCR are useful and reliable methods for the detection. This technique could be a diagnostic tool for screening and monitoring of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad) and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo)

    PCR techniques for identification of phytopathogenic bacteria in Xanthomonas

    No full text
    目錄 中文摘要…………………………………………………………… I 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… Ⅱ 壹、前人研究……………………………………………………… 1 貳、材料與方法…………………………………………………… 1 一、 供試菌株之來源、培養與保存……………………………… 11 二、 抗體之製備………………………..………………………… 11 三、 供試菌株染色體DNA之純化……………………………… 11 四、 共通性引子組之設計……………………………………… 11 五、 聚合酵素連鎖反應(polymerase chain reaction PCR)… 12 六、 PCR產物之純化…………………………………………… 12 七、 PCR產物與質體之接合作用……………………………… 12 八、 核酸轉型作用……………………………………………… 13 九、 DNA定序與引子組設計…………………………………… 13 十、 單一引子組之專一性子檢測……………………………… 14 十一、 單一引子組之敏感度分析……………………………… 14 十二、 多引子組之專一性子檢測……………………………… 15 十三、 IgG抗體的純化………………………………………… 16 十四、 磁珠結合抗體之操作………………………………… 16 十五、 免疫磁珠之病原細菌分離法…………………………… 17 參、結果…………………………………………………………… 18 一、 XAC、XCC及XAV菌株之ITS核酸定序與分析………… 18 (一) XAC菌株之ITS核酸定序與分析……………………… 18 (二) XCC菌株之ITS核酸定序與分析……………………… 18 (三) XAV菌株之ITS核酸定序與分析……………………… 19 (四) XAC、XCC及XAV之ITS核酸定序與分析…………… 19 二、 XAC、XCC及XAV菌株Lytic enzyme核酸定序與分析 20 三、 單一引子組之專一性分析……………………………… 21 (一) ITS單一引子組之專一性檢測…………………………… 21 1. XCC之專一性檢測……………………………………… 21 2. XAC之專一性檢測……...……………………………… 21 3. XAV之專一性檢測……………………………………… 22 (二) LE單一引子組之專一性檢測…………………… 22 1. XCC之專一性檢測………………………………………... 22 2. XAC之專一性檢測………………...……………………… 22 3. XAV之專一性檢測………………………………………... 23 四、 專一性引子之偵測敏感度分析………………………… 23 (一) XCC專一性引子之偵測敏感度…………………………… 23 1. 引子組XCC-ITS-F/ Xan-16S-R之PCR敏感度分析…...… 23 2. 引子組XCC-LE2-F/ XCC-LE2-R之PCR敏感度分析…… 23 3. 引子組XCC-LE4-F/ Xan-Lytic-R之PCR敏感度分析........ 23 (二) XAC專一性引子之偵測敏感度…………………………… 24 1. 引子組XAC-ITS-F/ XAC-ITS-R之敏感度分析….……… 24 2. 引子組Xan-Lytic-F/ XAC-LE4-R之敏感度分析……….... 24 (三) XAV專一性引子偵測敏感度分析………………………… 24 1. 引子組XAV-ITS-F/ Xan-16S-R之敏感度分析….……….. 24 2. 引子組XAV-LE4-F/ Xan-Lytic-R之敏感度分析.……….. 25 五、 Multiplex PCR在檢測上之應用………………………… 25 (一) 雙引子組對單一DNA之檢測…………………………… 25 (二) 多引子組對單一DNA之檢測…………………………… 25 (三) 單一引子組對多種DNA之檢測………………………… 25 (四) 三引子組對單一DNA之檢測…………………………… 26 (五) 三引子組對三種DNA之檢測…………………………… 26 六、 免疫磁株分離細菌之效果分析…………………………… 27 肆、討論…………………………………………………………… 28 伍、參考文獻……………………………………………………… 33 陸、圖表…………………………………………………………… 39 柒、附錄…………………………………………………………… 69 參考文獻 王惠亮及鄭安秀。 2001。瓜類細菌性果斑病菌血清偵測技術之研發。植物病理學會刊 10:129-138。 王仕賢及謝明憲。2005。甘藍台灣農家要覽。豐年出版社p363-366。 吳雅芳、陳紹崇及鄭安秀。2005。十字花科蔬菜黑腐病病原細菌血清偵測技術之研發。台南區農業改良場研究彙報46:10-19。 吳雅芳、陳紹崇、黃淑惠及鄭安秀。2007。台灣首次報導引起十字花科蔬菜細菌性斑點病之Xanthomonas campestris pv. raphani。植物病理學會刊 16:87-90。 吳文川、鄭安秀、王玉如及胡建國。1995。柑桔潰瘍病及其病菌。臺灣柑桔之研究與發展研討會專刊p.221-243。臺灣省農業試驗所編印。 李永安。2002。Xanthomonas屬病原菌及甘蔗流膠病之診斷鑑定技術。 植物重要防檢疫疫病診斷鑑定技術研習會專刊。135-159。 林貝珊及林長平。2002。火鶴細菌性葉枯病病原菌PCR引子之研究與應用。植物病理學會刊 11:97-106。 林俊義。1981。台灣十字花科黑腐病之研究。植保會刊 23:158-168。 姚國山及曾國欽。2005。兩種植物萃取液對茄科植物細菌性斑點病病原菌(Xanthomonas axonopodis)之生長抑制效果。明道學術論壇,1(1):105-114。 孫守恭。1991。植物病理學原理。藝軒圖書出版社。 陳哲民。1994。甘藍黑腐病、根瘤病的防治。花蓮區農業專訊 7: 22-23。 陳任芳、楊大吉。2005。番椒重要病蟲害防治技術。花蓮區農業專訊 53:7-13。 陳昭鑑。2003。以核醣體核酸基因內轉錄區序列及寡核甘酸微矩陣晶片鑑定臨床致病性鏈球菌。國立成功大學醫事技術學系碩士論文。 陳怡蘭。2003。台灣東部地區荖葉荖花細菌性角斑病之研究。國立高雄師範大學生物科學研究所碩士論文。 許秀惠、安寶貞。1995。台灣農家要覽農作篇(三),第182-183頁。葉瑩編。 許秀惠、申屠萱、林俊義。2006。細菌性葉斑病Pseudomonas cichorii專一性引子之開發。植物病理學會刊 15:275-285。 許淑瑩、徐世典、曾國欽、黃秀珍。1998。台灣茄科植物細菌性斑點病菌之變異性及歸類。中華民國植物病理學會八十七年年會論文。 許秀惠、黃秋雄。1991。火鶴花之細菌性葉枯病。植保會刊33:421。 黃德昌。1988。台灣十字花科黑腐病防治研究近況。蔬菜品種改良研討會:29-43。 黃德昌。1990。十字花科蔬菜黑腐病化學防治之研究 台東區農業改 良場研究彙報4:141-155。 黃秀珍、張治安、林元春、朱木貴、林信成、徐世典。1997。利用聚合酵素連鎖 反應鑑定檬果黑斑病菌。植物病理學會刊 6:1-9。 張蕙芳 。2000。柑桔潰瘍病原菌引起柑桔類植物水漬狀病徵基因之分析。國立臺灣大學植物學研究所碩士論文 賴映糸。2006。文旦、白柚潰瘍病之病原特性及果實流膠之部分理化與抑菌性質。屏東科技大學植物保護系所碩士論文。 Bradbury, J. F. 1984. Genus Xanthomonas. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Krieg, N. R., and Holt, J. G. eds.) 8th ed. vol.1 pp. 199-209. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore. Cubero, J., and Graham, J. H. 2002. Genetic relationship among worldwide strains of Xanthomonas causing canker in citrus species and design of new primers for Their Identification by PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68:1257–1264. Darrasse, A., Priou, S., Kotoujansky, A., and Bertheau, Y. 1994. PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism of a pel gene as a tool to identify Erwinia carotovora in relation to potato diseases. Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 60:1437-1443. Hsu, S. T., and Tzeng, K. C. 1979. Occurrence of bacterial blight of bean in Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. 21: 244-246. Jenkins, C. L., and Starr, M. P. 1982. The brominated aryl-polyene (xanthomonadin) pigments of Xanthomonas juglandis protect against photobiological damage. Current Microbiology 7:323-6. Hartung, J. S., Daniel, J. F., and Pruvost, O. P. 1993. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri by the polymerase chain reaction method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:1143-1148. Jin, K. S., Kang, I. B., Ko, K. I., Lee, E. S., Heo, J. Y., Kang, Y. K., and Kim, B. K. 2001. Detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri on Citrus Fruits Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Plant Pathol. J. 17 : 62-66. Kabadjova, P., Dousset, X., Cam, V. L., and Prevost, H. 2002. Differentiation of closely related carnobacterium food isolates based on 16S-23S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer region polymorphism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5358-5366. Leite, R. P. Jr, Jones, J. B., Somodi, G. V., and Stall, R. E. 1995. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria associated with pepper and tomato seeds by DNA amplification. Plant Dis. 79:917-922. Lee, Y. A., Liu, Y. H., and Liu, H. L. 2004. First report of bacterial leaf blight of coriander caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. coriandri in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 88:910. Lee, Y. A., Chen, K. P., and Chang, Y. C. 2005. First report of bacterial leaf blight of white flowered calla lily caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. zantedeschiae in Taiwan. Plant Pathol. 54:239. Lee, Y. A., Wu, P. C., and Liu, H. L. 2006. First report of bacterial leaf spot of poinsettia caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. poinsettiicola in Taiwan. Plant Pathol. (in press). Lin, H. C., Hsu, S. T., Huang, A. S., and Tzeng, K. C. 2005. Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Novel Strains of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri Which Induce Atypical Symptoms on Citrus Leaves in Taiwan. Plant Pathology Bulletin. 14:227-238. Mullane, N. R., Murray, J., Drudy, D., Prentice, N., Whyte, P., Wall, g. P., Parton, A., and Fanning, S. 2006. Detection of Enterobacter sakazakii in Dried Infant Milk Formula by Cationic-Magnetic-Bead Capture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6325-6330. Olsvik, Ø., Popovic T., Skjerve, E. K., Cudjoe, S., Hornes, E., Ugelstad, J., and Uhlen, M. 1994. magnetic separation techniques in diagnostic microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:43-54. Ozdemir Zahide. 2005. Development of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Concurrent Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Plant Pathology Journal. 2:133-137. Pyle, B. H., Broadaway, S. C., and Mcfeters, G. A. 1999. Sensitive Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food and water by immunomagnetic separation and solid-phase laser cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1966-1972. Park, Y. J., Lee, B. M., Jang H. H., Lee, G. B., and Park, D. S. 2004. Sensitive and specific detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris by PCR using speciesspecific primers based on hrpF gene sequences. Microbiological Research. 159:419-423. Park, D. S., Shim, J. K., Kim, J.s., Lim, C. k., Shrestha, R.,Hahn, J. H., and Kim, H. G. 2009. Sensitive andspec ificdetection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria by PCR using pathovar-specific primers based on rhs family gene sequences. Microbiological Research. 164:36-42. Park, D. S., Hyun, J. W., Park, Y. J., Kim, J. S., Kang, H. W., Hahn, J. H. and Go, S. J. 2006. Sensitive and specific detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri by PCR using pathovar specific primers based on hrpW gene sequences. Microbiological Research. 161:145-149. Sharman, M., Thomas, J. E., and Dietzgen, R. G. 2000. Development of a multiplex immunocapture PCR with colourimetric detection for viruses of banana. J. Virol. Methods 89:75-88. Schaad, N. W., and Stall, R. E. 1988. Xanthomonas. In Laboratory Guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. 2nd ed. (Schaad, N. W. ed.). pp. 81-94. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul. Minnesota. Teycheney, P. Y., Acina, I., Lockhart, B. E. L., and Candresse, T. 2007. Detection of Banana mild virus and Banana virus X by polyvalent degenerate oligonucleotide RT-PCR (PDO-RT-PCR). J. Virol. Methods 142:41-49. Vauterin, L., Hoste, B., Yang, P., Alvarez, A., Kersters, K., and Swings, J. 1993. Taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. In Xanthomonas (Swings, J. G., and Civerolo, E. L. eds). pp. 157-192. Chapman & Hall Inc. Boundary Row, London. Vauterin, L., Hoste, B., Kersters, K. and Swings, J. 1995. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 45: 472-489. Williams, P.H. 1980. Black rot: a continuing threat to world crucifers. Plant Disease. 64:736-742. Wang, S. J., Chow, L. U. and Wu, M. J. 2002. Multiplex PCR for the Simultaneous Detection of the SEA, SEB, SEC, SED and SEE Genes of Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 10:164-169. Yang, B. Y., and Tseng , Y. H. 1988. Production of exopolysaccharide and levels of protease activity in pathogenic and non- pathogenic strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Bot. Bull. Academia Sinica. 29:93-99. Zaccardelli, M., Campanile, F., Spasiano, A., and Merighi, M. 2007. Detection and identification of the crucifer pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, by PCR amplification of the conserved Hrp/type III secretion system gene hrcC. Eur J Plant Pathol. 118:299-306.[[abstract]]Xanthomonas屬之植物病原細菌為革蘭氏陰性、呈桿狀,具有一條極生鞭毛,通常會引起植物之重要病害。其中柑橘潰瘍病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及茄科細菌性斑點病菌則為台灣地區常見之植物病原細菌,可引起許多經濟性蔬果之重要病害。為了能在早期鑑定出柑橘潰瘍病原細菌、十字花科黑腐病原細菌及茄科細菌性斑點病原細菌之感染,本研究利用internal transcribe spacer (ITS)與lytic enzyme序列結合PCR開發出快速之檢測技術,研究中將柑橘潰瘍病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及茄科細菌性斑點病菌基因體中之ITS與lytic enzyme 等DNA進行選殖,利用生物資訊進行多序列分析,顯示不同種之Xanthomonas間的DNA序列具有較多的變異。利用序列之差異性可設計出專一性引子,成功的檢測出柑橘潰瘍病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及茄科細菌性斑點病菌。在單一引子組PCR(Uniplex PCR)分析中能夠鑑定柑橘潰瘍病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及茄科細菌性斑點病菌之差異性。研究中也進一步開發出以多引子組PCR (Multiplex PCR)技術來鑑定柑橘潰瘍病菌、十字花科黑腐病菌及茄科細菌性斑點病菌。本研究中也利用免疫磁珠分離(IMS)搭配PCR技術來達到分離及鑑定病原細菌之目的,葉片上之柑橘潰瘍病原細菌在免疫磁珠PCR檢測時之敏感度則介於101與102 cfu之間。 Xanthomonas phytopathogenic bacteria were gram-negative, rod-shaped, polarly-flagellated bacteria which members caused serious plant diseases usually. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (XAC) , Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (XCC) and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria (XAV) affected many economic plants which included vegetables and fruits in Taiwan. In order to identify XAC、XCC and XAV at the early stage of infection, we planed to develop a rapid detecting technique based on specific sequences of the internal spacer regions (ITS) or lytic enzyme. In this study, we cloned several DNA fragments of ITS and lytic enzyme from XAC、XCC and XAV. The bioinformatics analysis by multiple sequences alignment showed the diversity exist in different species of XAC、XCC and XAV. We designed specific primers based on the sequence (ITS and lytic enzyme) divergence and developed the detective method successfully. The development of specific uniplex-PCRs could detect XAC、XCC and XAV. We designed new multiplex-PCRs, could detect XAC、XCC and XAV at the same PCR reaction. In this project, we intended to combine the immuno-magnetic beads separation technique with the specific PCR detecting method to isolate the bacteria. This technique could isolate XAC from leafs and the sensitivity of immuno-magnetic PCR was 101 – 102 cfu

    111

    full texts

    1,453

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology Repository
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇