48 research outputs found
Nabi Musa Menampar Malaikat Maut: Jalan Tengah Polemik Hadis Musykil
Hadith which tells the story of the Prophet Musa slapping the angel of death invites polemic among the scholars. There is a group that can accept it with various explanations, there are also those who consider death is unacceptable even though the sanad is valid. Therefore this hadith is included as an improbable hadith.
This paper tries to find a way out of the polemic. In this discussion, the author can accept opinions that reject this Hadith if the flow of understanding can be accounted for. However, the author can also accept opinions that accept it if the flow of understanding can be accounted for. An important part that must be revealed immediately in this hadith is the certainty whether or not Moses knew that what came to him was the grim reaper. If an explanation of this has been obtained, of course, we are easier to determine the attitude of accepting or rejecting this hadith. But certainty is difficult to obtain because the text of this hadith does not explicitly inform it. So what must be done now is tawaqquf
PROBLEM SUBJEKTIFITAS DALAM TAFSIR BI AL-MA’TSUR, TAFSIR BI AL-RA’YI, DAN TAFSIR BI AL-ISYARAH
Subjektivitas adalah salah satu faktor penyebab terjadinya kesalahan dalam penafsiran. Untuk menghasilkan penafsiran yang benar, sang penafsir harus membuang jauh-jauh unsur subjektif dirinya. Pertanyaannya, mungkinkah dalam proses penafsiran sang penafsir dapat membuang unsur subjektif dirinya? Bukankah dalam proses penafsiran, unsur subjektif sang penafsir tidak bisa dilepaskan dari diri sang penafsir itu sendiri? Jika demikian halnya, bagaimana mengatasi dilema subjektivitas (yang menjadi penyebab kesalahan, di satu sisi, dan menjadi unsur tak terpisahkan, di sisi lain) ini dalam penafsiran? Untuk menjawab dilema ini, satu hal perlu ditegaskan, subjektivitas penafsir pasti ada dalam proses penafsiran, namun tidak semua subjektivitas itu menjadi penyebab kesalahan. Subjektivitas yang menjadi penyebab kesalahan adalah subjektivitas yang tidak lagi menghiraukan rambu-rambu penafsiran yang sudah digariskan para ahli tafsir, subjektivitas yang berusaha menaklukkan nash di bawah kepentingan pribadi atau mazhabnya. Namun, jika subjektivitasnya masih mengikuti kaidah-kaidah penafsiran yang disepakati para ulama tafsir disertai niat ijtihad mencari kebenaran, maka subjektivitas macam ini adalah subjektivitas yang dibenarkan. Â Kata kunci: subjektifitas penafsir, dilema subjektifitas, subjektifitas penyebab kesalahan dan subjektifitas yang dibenarkan
DILEMA TRADISI DAN MODERNITAS TELAAH ATAS “KRITIK NALAR ARAB” MUHAMMAD ABID AL-JABIRI
Al-Jabiri denominated his interpretation project of the Arabic tradition as the Arabic reasoning critique (naqd al-aql al-arabi). The project began from his concern over the present reality of the Arab and Islamic world which arguably is still underdeveloped and his desire to present a new thought methodology as a tool to get out of the slump and awaken to the preferred reality.
Al-Jabiri differentiated two traditions, one that refers to the tadwin of Islam as part of Islamic-Arabic tradition and the other referring to and departing from the European Renaissance (modernity). The gap between "what was there" (the traditions of our past) and "what is here" (Western civilization) is growing wide and steep.
This condition, according to him, made most of us miss the romanticism of our past, but at the same time there is a desire to break away with that tradition. This is the condition that has spawned "a Split Consciousness" of the Arab society, torn between subjective and objective factors, between the ideological burdens and the objective historical reality which is increasingly far from the ideal progress of modern civilization.
In the context of modern-contemporary Arab thought, the tendency of literal-textualist thought, (read: tendency of traditionalism) can in fact be referred — though partly —to the framework bayani reasoning system, as well as other trends in favor of modernity based on burhani reasoning system as something that comes from the outside, that goes through the translation process in the tadwin period.
The attraction between the two tendencies of tradition and modernity, according to Al-Jabiri, should be used as the realization of a new tadwin moment, with the new size, standard, and enlightenment, on a single principle: "modernization" (reform of thought, tahdits) requires the fulfillment of the prerequisites of "traditionalization" (back to tradition), and similarly "traditionalization" requires the fulfillment process of "modernization.
SYARI’AH DALAM KONTEKS NEGARA MODERN DI DUNIA ISLAM
Pada masa klasik, ketika konsep negara masih berdasarkan agama, penerapan syari’ah tidak terlalu mengundang masalah. Namun dalam konteks modern, ketika negara tidak lagi didasarkan atas suatu agama, penerapannya tidak bisa disamakan sepenuhnya dengan penerapannya dalam konteks klasik. Pengalaman menunjukkan bahwa penerapan syari’ah dalam konteks modern dengan paradigma klasik lebih banyak memunculkan madarat daripada manfaat. Ini adalah tantangan bagi penerapan syari’ah dalam konteks modern. Dalam menjawab tantangan ini, ada dua hal penting yang harus dilakukan. Pertama, mengetahui dan mengenali prinsip dasar penerapan syari’ah. Pertanyaan apa prinsip yang mendasari penerapan syari’ah harus dijawab terlebih dahulu sebelum melangkah pada upaya penerapan syari’ah. Kedua, menemukan dan merumuskan metodologi penerapan syari’ah yang tepat agar penerapannya benar-benar mendatangkan manfaat, bukan madarat, yang seluas-luasnya
HAM ISLAM DAN DUHAM PBB: Sebuah Ikhtiar Mencari Titik Temu
Meski secara umum memiliki kesamaan dengan Deklarasi Umum Hak
Asasi Manusia (DUHAM) Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa, konsep Hak Asasi Manusia
(HAM) dalam Deklarasi Kairo memiliki spesifikasi tertentu yang berbeda. DUHAM
bersumber dari paradigma Barat, sementara Deklarasi Kairo berbasis syariat. Dilihat
dari perspektif DUHAM, ada beberapa hal spesifik dalam HAM versi Dunia Islam yang
dinilai melanggar HAM. Dengan melakukan pemaknaan ulang terhadap beberapa
konsep Islam, tulisan ini menemukan adanya peluang agar Deklarasi Kairo dengan
DUHAM bisa berjalan beriringa
Ulama Bawean dan Jejaring Keilmuan Nusantara Abad XIX-XX
Akar tradisi keilmuan ulama Bawean terbentuk dari satu mata rantai dalam sebuah rangkaian sanad keilmuan ulama Nusantara alumni Haramayn. Berikut di antara nama-nama tokoh ulama generasi pulau Bawean yang mendapatkan perhatian khusus dalam kajian buku ini: K.H. Khatib Syahar (Pekalongan), Kyai Muhammad Amin (Sukaoneng), K.H. Muhammad Yasin (Kepuh Teluk), Kyai Abdurrahman Khalil (Teluk Dhelem), Kyai Hatmin (Laccar), Kyai Abu Bakar Asyik (Teluk Kalompang), dan Kyai Asyiq Mukri (Gelam). Meskipun tidak terlibat secara langsung dalam jaringan ulama Haramayn, mereka banyak menghabiskan waktunya meniti pesantren di tanah Jawa, sebagai penerus estafet intelektual dalam hubungan murid dan guru yang terus berlanjut dari satu generasi ke generasi berikutnya hingga mengembangkan tradisi keilmuan mereka di kampung halaman masing-masin
Search engine for books / Amierul Izzuddin Azman
Search engine is web-based software that searches for and identifies things in a collection that match the user's keywords or characters, and is mostly used to locate specific websites on the Internet. The basic idea of information retrieval (IR), as is well-known in the computer industry, is to search a given amount of data and retrieve those records that fulfil a set of criteria. For this project, it will be more on developing a search system that focus on the domain of books. Although many search engines available for book searching, most of them still have room for improvement. The reality to find books using search engine are quite challenging because, the users need to know the title of the book in order to retrieved relevant result from the search engine. Therefore, this project aims to propose a search engine that might produce better result by manipulating the indexing structure of the search engine. Software Development Life Cycle also known as SDLC was used as the methodology in this project development. This project applies the vector space model for the matching process, because the chosen software library for this project which is Apache Lucene is using the vector space model as its foundation. In addition, the Bag-of-Words approach was used as the basis for the indexing module. The indexing process indexed the information of the books such as the book title, the author name, publisher, year published, pages count and synopsis of the book. The search engine's assessment criteria include recall and precision. In IR, recall and precision have long been used as standard evaluation criteria. Keenly, the results of this project prove that index files that contain more domain information can increase the relevancy of a search engin
HADIS GADIR KHUM DALAM PANDANGAN SYIAH DAN SUNNAH
Hadis Gadir Khum yang menjadi titik tolak perpisahan mazhab Sunni dan Syiah juga terdapat dalam kitab-kitab hadis utama kaum Sunni. Seperti kaum Syiah, para ulama Sunnah juga mengakui keabsahan derajat hadis-hadis tersebut. Bahkan hadis-hadis itu dianggap mutawatir. Namun demikian, antara kaum Syiah dan Sunni memiliki pemahaman yang berbeda terhadap hadis-hadis tersebut. Perbedaan terjadi dalam memahami kata mawlā. Sunni berpendapat bahwa kata itu bermakna pelindung/penolong, sementara Syiah berpendapat bahwa kata itu bermakna khalifah/pemimpin. Perbedaan pemahaman ini membawa kedua kelompok tersebut terlibat dalam pertengkaran sepanjang sejarah Islam. Namun demikian, banyak kalangan di Sunni dan Syiah yang berupaya membangun hubungan harmonis dengan mencari hal-hal yang sama di antara keduanya. Semata-mata untuk kepentingan ukhuwwah Islāmiyyah dan kejayaan umat Islam
PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGIS KAUM SALAFÎ: Studi atas Pemikiran Kalam Ibn Taymiyah
In the field of kalam (Islamic theology), some major themes, like attributes of Allah, will of Allah and human freedom, or Quran as words of Allah, have become debate topics between thought schools of kalam in Islam. Because of the complexity of those topics, the debate becomes eternal, without an agreed end. Among those thought schools of kalam in Islam involved in the debate is salaf school, held by Ibn Taymiyah. In his opinion, the school is the right one because it quite conforms to Quran and sunna. By way of thought (manhaj) of salaf school, Ibn Taymiyah also takes part in explaining those major themes in his works. In the case of the will of Allah and human freedom, for example, he doesn’t agree with the Qadarite school’s thought and the Jabarite school’s thought although in this he hasn’t yet stretched out a convincing explanation. This essay will analyze the way of thought (manhaj) of salaf school and Ibn Taymiyah’s opinion about those major themes, especially in his book Majmû‘ al-Fatâwâ
Pemikiran Ibn Taymīyah tentang Sharī‘ah sebagai Tujuan Tasawuf
Ibn Taymīyah rejects no all doctrines of Sufism although he criticizes some of them. He, for an instance, does firmly refuse altogether the doctrine of waḥdat al-wujūd and fanā’. Ibn Taymīyah has a unique concept of sufism, which differs from other concepts of Sufism promulgated by other sufis, especially those of Wujūdīyah proponents. Ibn Taymīyah’s concept of Sufism puts great emphasis on it appropriateness with stipulations of sharī‘ah. The compatibility of sharī‘ah and tasawuf has been the main feature of his model of Sufism. When other Sufis start their mystical journey from the stage of sharī‘ah, Ibn Taymīyah puts sharī‘ah as the final stages. To him sharī‘ah is the main goal of mystical journeys; tasawuf should be based on sharī‘ah and it also must end to sharī‘ah. Using al-Taftazānī’s perspective this study finds that the character of Ibn Taymīyah’s Sufism is Taṣawwuf Akhlāqī. This is so because he prefers to purify morality than such mystical experiences as waḥdat al-wujūd or fanā’ and the uses of symbols to reveal the mystical experiences
