6,676 research outputs found
Canções e cores da nação brasileira: uma análise historiográfica das obras de Rodrigues de Carvalho (1903-1937)
No full textIntitulada Canções e cores da nação brasileira: Uma análise historiográfica das obras de Rodrigues de Carvalho (1903-1937), esta dissertação propõe discutir como o José Rodrigues de Carvalho (1867-1936) se insere meio ao processo de formação da nação brasileira, tomando como objeto de análise as obras Cancioneiro do Norte (1903) e Aspectos da influência africana na formação social do Brasil (1937), do já referido autor. Neste sentido, mediante as reflexões acerca do folclore e do regionalismo nordestino serão abordadas, através do viés da Cultura Histórica, como as concepções históricas relativas às ideias de nação , raça , miscigenação e cultura permeiam o discurso de Carvalho, evidenciando também as práticas culturais do cotidiano em voga observadas pelo autor, sobretudo, atentando para como foram produzidas as representações sobre os portugueses, índios e africanos elaboradas por ele. Não obstante, apesar desta pesquisa ter como principal guia a análise das obras de Rodrigues de Carvalho, pretende-se apresentar no presente estudo o lugar social do autor, considerando sua trajetória intelectual, profissional e engajamento na política paraibana; ao perpassar por agremiações literárias, academias de letras e institutos históricos na virada do século XIX para o século XX, no propósito de compreender como foi estabelecido o seu vínculo de sociabilidade nesses espaços em meio a outros intelectuais.Entitled Canções e cores da nação brasileira: Uma análise historiográfica das obras de Rodrigues de Carvalho (1903-1937), this paper proposes to discuss in which way José Rodrigues de Carvalho (1867-1936) is inserted through the Brazilian nation formation process, taking as object of analysis the works Cancioneiro do Norte (1903) and e Aspectos da influência africana na formação social do Brasil (1937), both from the aforementioned author. In this sense, over the reflections on folklore and Northeastern regionalism will be addressed over the standpoint of Historical Culture, as the historical conceptions related to the ideas of "nation", "race", "miscegenation" and "Culture" integrate Carvalho's speech, also highlighting the daily practices observed by the author, specially, noticing how were produced the representations of the Portuguese, Indians and Africans developed by him. Nevertheless, despite this research has as a main aim the analysis of the works of Rodrigues de Carvalho, it is intended to present in this study the social place of the author, considering his intellectual and professional journey and political engagement of Paraiba; running through literary associations, academies and historical institutions at the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century, in order to comprehend how his bond was established in this space among other intellectuals
Cyrtotylus catarinenses Carvalho 1989
No full textCyrtotylus catarinenses Carvalho, 1989 Cyrtotylus catarinenses Carvalho,1989:448-450,figs.12-16. Holotype: ♂, glued to pinned paper; Brasilien [Brazil], Nova Teutonia, 27°11′O [S], 52°23′L [W], 300-500 m. XII.1949, Fritz Plaumann col. Remarks: According to the original description,the holotype was collected in Alchornea sidifolia (Euphorbiaceae).Published as part of Carrenho, Renan, Rodrigues, Higor D. D., Lima, Adriana Carneiro de & Schwertner, Cristiano F., 2020, Type specimens of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) housed in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1-16 in Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60 on page 3, DOI: 10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.17, http://zenodo.org/record/461488
Microvelia quieta Drake & Carvalho 1954
No full textMicrovelia quieta Drake & Carvalho, 1954 (Figs 88, 90) Geographical distribution: Brazil (Drake & Carvalho 1954). Distribution in Brazil: AL*, MG (Drake & Carvalho 1954; Nieser & Melo 1997; Goulart et al. 2002; Vianna & Melo 2003), MT (Dias-Silva et al. 2013), SE*. Material examined: BRAZIL • Alagoas • 1 male; Murici, EEM; -9.220460, -35.870290; 28 Apr. 2018; C.F.B. Floriano, J.M.S. Rodrigues & O.M. Magalhães col.; CEIOC 81237. • 1 male; Murici, EEM, Vale Socorró, riacho sem nome em área de dendê; -9.238639, -35.864861; alt. 206 m; 22 May 2019; J.M.S. Rodrigues, W. Sousa & F.F.F. Moreira col.; CEIOC 81238. • 2 males; Quebrangulo, RBPT, rio; -9.256560, -36.431130; 04 Jul. 2018; C.F.B. Floriano, J.M.S. Rodrigues & J.F. Barbosa col.; CEIOC 81230. • 1 female; same data, except: rio; -9.256560, - 36.431130; CEIOC 81234. • 3 males, 3 females; same data, except: nascente no mato; -9.254140, -36.429690; 05 Jul. 2018; CEIOC 81231. • 1 male, same data, except: poça; -9.253750, -36.430720; 05 Jul. 2018; CEIOC 81232. • 1 female; same data, except: rio; -9.253750, -36.430720; 05 Jul. 2018; CEIOC 81233. • 5 males, 3 females; same data, except: nascente; -9.254510, -36.430710; 05 Jul. 2018; CEIOC 81236. • Sergipe • 1 male; Pirambu, RBSI; - 10.714850, -36.822830; 01 May 2018; C.F.B. Floriano, J.M.S. Rodrigues & O.M. Magalhães col.; CEIOC 81235.Published as part of Rodrigues, Juliana Mourão Dos Santos, Nery, Leticia, Rodrigues, Higor D. D. & Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo, 2021, Survey of the semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) from Alagoas and Sergipe, Northeast Brazil, pp. 103-159 in Zootaxa 4958 (1) on page 137, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/469324
Saileria sulina Carvalho 1989
No full textSaileria sulina Carvalho, 1989 Saileria sulina Carvalho, 1989: 457-459, figs. 43-46. Holotype: ♂, glued to pinned paper; Brasilien [Brazil], Nova Teutonia, 27°11′S, 52°23′W, 300-500 m. XII.1949, Fritz Plaumann col. Paratype: 1♀, glued to pinned paper; same data as holotype. Remarks: According to the original publication,the holotype was collected in Alchornea sidifolia (Euphorbiaceae).Published as part of Carrenho, Renan, Rodrigues, Higor D. D., Lima, Adriana Carneiro de & Schwertner, Cristiano F., 2020, Type specimens of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) housed in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1-16 in Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60 on page 4, DOI: 10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.17, http://zenodo.org/record/461488
Eimeria psittacarae Tucunduva & Rodrigues & Carvalho & Berto 2018, n. sp.
No full textEimeria psittacarae Tucunduva and Berto n. sp. Type host: White-eyed parakeet Psittacara leucophthalmus (Müller, 1776) (Aves: Psittaciformes: Psittacidae). Type locality: Sector of Fauna of the Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos (22°29'43"S, 43°04'25"W), Southeastern Brazil. Type-material: Photosyntypes, line drawing, and oocysts in 70% ethanol are deposited at the Museu de Zoologia at the Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, under accession number MZURPTZ2017004. Phototypes and line drawings are also deposited and available (http://r1.ufrrj.br/labicoc/ colecao.html) in the Parasitology Collection of the Laboratório de Biologia de Coccídios, at UFRRJ, under repository number P-84/2017. Photographs of the type-host specimen (symbiotype) are deposited in the same collection. Site of infection: Unknown. Prevalence: One of 8 (12.5%). Sporulation: Exogenous. All oocysts were passed in the feces unsporulated and were fully sporulated by day 7 in K2Cr2O7 solution at room temperature. Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the generic name of the type host. Description (Figs 1; 2A–D). Oocyst (n = 19) ellipsoidal, 29–39 × 22–28 (34.8 × 24.3); length/width (L/W) ratio 1.3–1.5 (1.4). Wall bilayered, delicate, 1.61.9 (1.7) thick, outer layer smooth, c.2/3 of total thickness. Micropyle inconspicuous, but easily perceptible when there is an invagination of the inner layer, 5–8 (6.0) wide. Oocyst residuum absent, but 1 or 2 rounded polar granules are present, 2–3 (2.3). Sporocyst elongate ellipsoidal, 18–20 × 9–10 (19.2 × 9.7); L/W ratio 1.9–2.1 (2.1). Stieda body present, knob-like, 1.0 high × 2.0 wide. Sub-Stieda body present, rounded, sometimes homogeneous with the Stieda body, 1.0 high × 2.0 wide. Para-Stieda body absent. Sporocyst residuum present, as a distinctly sub-spherical body consisting of numerous small granules that appear to be membranebounded, 6–7 (6.6). Sporozoites vermiform, with single posterior refractile body and a nucleus. Remarks: Eimeria psittacarae is different from other coccidian species of Psittaciformes of the New World on several aspects (Table 1). It is the only one to have a micropyle (Fig. 2A, B). In addition, although the oocyst measurements are similar to Eimeria aratinga Upton and Wright, 1994 and Eimeria aestivae Hofstatter and Guaraldo, 2011, E. psittacarae differs from these two species in shape, number and shape of polar granules and in the details of the sporocyst residuum (Upton & Wright 1994, Hofstatter & Guaraldo, 2011).Published as part of Tucunduva, Priscila, Rodrigues, Mariana Borges, Carvalho, Raquel Batista Junger De & Berto, Bruno Pereira, 2018, Eimeria psittacarae n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eimeiriidae) from white-eyed parakeets Psittacara leucophthalmus (Müller, 1776) (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) kept for rehabilitation and reintroduction in the Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, Southeastern Brazil, pp. 164-170 in Zootaxa 4459 (1) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4459.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/145845
Pesquisa de subpopulações de linfócitos T em lesões perirradiculares de denters decíduos humanos
No full textTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em OdontologiaO objetivo deste estudo foi observar a presença de sub-populações de linfócitos T marcados em teste imuno-histoquímico com anticorpos anti-CD3, anti-CD4 e anti-CD8 em lesões perirradiculares de 10 molares decíduos. As células foram quantificadas através da análise dos cortes histológicos. Os resultados revelaram que a média de células positivas foi de 6,6% para CD3, 2,2% para CD8 e 0,05% para CD4. As amostras estavam relacionadas com lesões crônicas com o predomínio de LT CD8. Conclui-se que em lesão periapical de dentes decíduos há a presença de células da imunidade específica, caracterizando a necessidade de viabilizar precocemente uma conduta mais adequada para minimizar danos para saúde do paciente infantil
Proposta curricular de Santa Catarina: o fazer e o dizer da Secretaria de Estado da Educação
No full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia Política.Esta dissertação contempla a recuperação, análise e interpretação das relações que se estabeleceram na trajetória da Proposta Curricular de Santa Catarina, desde o pensar para a sua elaboração até este momento, dez anos após, e como vem acontecendo a sua aceitação e a sua implementação na prática pedagógica. Duas abordagens são discutidas. A primeira é em relação aos Governos e como eles trataram, via Secretaria de Estado da Educação, a Proposta Curricular Catarinense. A segunda é em relação ao movimento docente, que na sua luta incessante pela dignidade profissional, não absorveu devidamente o conteúdo teórico-filosófico da Proposta Curricular de Santa Catarina, em sua prática na sala de aula. O enfoque maior é dado ao capítulo que pesquisa o fazer e o dizer da Secretaria de Estado da Educação, com referência à proposta oficial de currículo. É feita toda uma discussão teórica, transitando por diversos autores da Educação (da teoria histórico-crítica, neomarxistas e pós-estruturalistas) e da Sociologia da Educação (conflitualistas, principalmente), e privilegiando categorias como, por exemplo, a contradição e a práxis. O referencial teórico desta dissertação baseia-se no Materialismo Dialético. Assim, objetiva suscitar reflexões, análises e discussões sobre Educação, escola e currículo, e, mais direta e especificamente, sobre a postura da Secretaria de Estado da Educação: se há coerência entre sua prática e sua teoria, perpassando por sua relação com o professorado
LEVANTAMENTO de reconhecimento de baixa intensidade dos solos do município de Alcinópolis: zoneamento agroecológico do estado do Mato Grosso do Sul.
No full textEquipe técnica: Ênio Fraga da Silva; Maurício Rizzato Coelho; Silvio Barge Bhering; Waldir de Carvalho Júnior; Nilson Rendeiro Pereira; Mário Luiz Diamante Áglio; Carlos Henrique Lemos Lopes; José Soares; Renata S. Rodrigues; Natália Cristina L. e Silva
LEVANTAMENTO de reconhecimento de baixa intensidade dos solos do município de Corumbá e Ladário: zoneamento agroecológico do estado do Mato Grosso do Sul.
No full textNilson Rendeiro Pereira; Fernando Cézar Saraiva do Amaral; Humberto Gonçalves dos Santos; Silvio Barge Bhering; Waldir de Carvalho Júnior; César da Silva Chagas; Mário Luiz Diamante Áglio; Carlos Henrique Lemos Lopes; Renata S. Rodrigues; Natália Cristina L. e Silva
Cnemidophorus confusionibus Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher, 2011, sp. nov.
No full textCnemidophorus confusionibus sp. nov. (Fig. 2, 3) Holotype. MZUSP 100193 (field number MRT 4629), adult male, from Toca da Cabocla (8 5528 " S, 43 2658 " W), Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusões, Caracol municipality, state of Piauí, Brazil, elevation 450 m, collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues and Felipe Curcio on 7 october 2000. Paratypes. MZUSP 100187, 100188, 100190, 100191 (field numbers respectively MRT 4547,4548, 4565, 4572), Canto Verde (8 5025 " S, 43 2350 " W), collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues, and Felipe Curcio, from 28–30 september 2000; MZUSP 100189, 100203 (field MRT 4559, 4925), Morrinhos (8 5738 " S, 43 2650 " W), collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues and Felipe Curcio, from 29.ix– 1.x. 2010; MZUSP 100192, 100194, 100195, 100198, 100202, 100204, 1000205 (field MRT 4587, 4635,4636, 4700, 4919,4940, 4948), Toca da Cabocla (8 5528 " S, 43 2658 " W), collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues, and Felipe Curcio from 30.ix- 8 -x. 2000; MZUSP 100196, 100197, 100199, 100201, Ôlho D’Água da Santa (9 1310 " S, 43 2927 " W), collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues, and Felipe Curcio from 4–6 october 2000; MZUSP 100200 (field 4919), Lagoa do Jac (8 4037 " S, 43 2909 " W), collected by Hussam Zaher, Miguel T. Rodrigues and Felipe Curcio on 5 october 2000. All localities from Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusões, Caracol Municipality, state of Piauí, Brazil. Diagnosis. A species of the ocellifer group with granules in the supraorbital semicircles, and no anal spurs in males. Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from all the other members of the ocellifer group by color pattern and a high number of lamellae on the fourth toe. In addition, differs from C. jalapensis by having 18–20 (x= 17.5) femoral pores (11– 16, x= 13.3 in C. jalapensis), 22–28 (x= 24.9) scales around tail (19–26, x= 22.7), 29–35 (x= 30.4) lamellae on the fourth toe (26–28, x= 27), lateral spots present (absent), paravertebral stripes absent (present), gular region and ventrolateral aspect of head immaculate (lime-green), and larger body size (smaller body size, SVL= 53.45 mm). Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from C. mumbuca by having 29–35 (x= 30.4) lamellae on the fourth toe (24–32, x= 27.4 in C. mumbuca), paravertebral stripes absent (present), dorsolateral stripes incomplete and extending from behind the nape region to the first one-third of the tail (dorsolateral stripes, incomplete, extending from behind supraciliary region), one dark brown lateral band, (dorsolateral and lateral band, ochre), a longitudinal row of bright yellow spots on lower flank (bluish white spots, only males). Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from C. ocellifer by having 18–20 (x= 17.5) femoral pores (14–17, x= 16 femoral pores in C. ocellifer), 188–211 (x= 201,6) dorsal scales (172–188, x= 181), paravertebral stripes absent (present), dorsolateral stripes extending from behind nape region to first one-third of tail (dorsolateral stripes extending from behind supraciliary region), 2–3 lateral spots only in the axial region (lateral spots present, from fore to hind limbs), and dorsal surface of hindlimb without freckling (dorsal surface of hindlimb with black freckling). Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from C. nativo by having 18–20 (x= 17.5) femoral pores (24–26, x= 24 in C. nativo), 27–29 (x= 28.2) ventral rows (29–32, x= 30.8), nostril opens usually in the suture between anterior and posterior nasal plates (nostril opens in the anterior nasal plate), second subocular contacts fifth and sixth supralabials ventrally (contacts fourth, fifth, and sixth supralabials ventrally), mid-dorsal stripe absent (present and with a posteriorly ondulating margin), ventral surface of the head, body, and tail predominantly immaculate (light blue), and bixesual (only females). Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from C. littoralis and C. abaetensis by having 18–20 (x= 17.5) femoral pores (29– 34, x= 32.6 in C. littoralis and 27–31, x= 24 in C. abaetensis), 27–29 (x= 28.2) ventral scale rows (32– 38, x= 34.9 in C. littoralis and 30–35, x= 32 in C. abaetensis), 188–211 (x= 201.6) dorsal scales (168–191, x= 174.9 in C. littoralis and 210–240, x= 221.8 in C. abaetensis), 8 longitudinal ventral scale rows (8 a 10 in C. abaetensis and 10 in C. littoralis), 5 superciliaries (6 in both species), mid-dorsal stripe absent (present in both species), a brown tail (bright blue-green to emerald green in both species), stripe in the tail absent (present in both species). Cnemidophorus confusionibus differs from C. venetacaudus sp. nov. (see below) by having 18–20 (x= 17.5) femoral pores (34– 45, x= 38 femoral pores in C. venetacaudus), 27–29 (x= 28.2) transverse ventral scale rows (30–32, x= 31.2), 8 longitudinal ventral scale rows (10), 22–28 (x= 24.9) scales around tail (31–34, x= 31.7), 87–105 (x= 95) scales around midbody (114–129, x= 119.5), 188–211 (x= 201.6) dorsal scale rows (190–218, x= 204.8), 5 superciliaries (6), dorsal stripes present (absent), a lateral row of spots present (absent), and a smaller body size (large size, SVL= 83.3 mm). Description of holotype. Measurements: snout-vent-length 71.51 mm; trunk length 39.23 mm; head lenght 19.28 mm; head width 11.08 mm; head height 9.46 mm; tail length 156.93 mm; femur length 12.33 mm; tibia length 12.05 mm; foot length 25.82 mm; humers length 5.23 mm, and arm length 22.81 mm. Snout moderately pointed. Rostral large, wider than high, visible from above, separated from frontonasal by the midline contact between nasals. Anterior and posterior nasal in broad contact by an oblique suture. Nostril rounded, in lower part of suture. Frontonasal sub-hexagonal, as long as wide, contacting nasals and prefrontals. Prefrontals roughly trapezoidal, pentagonal, in broad and straight contact along midline, contacting laterally nasal, loreal and first supraocular. Frontal approximately pentagonal, longer than wide, wider anteriorly; contacting anteriorly part of the first supraocular, but separated from other supraoculars by a row of granules. Two frontoparietals, approximately pentagonal, wider than long and separated from supraoculars by a row of granules. Five parietals, external ones smaller; interparietal sub-pentagonal, longer and wider than others, bordered laterally by medial parietals. Occipital scales irregular and variable in size. Four supraoculars on each side, second and third largest, first in contact with loreal, prefrontal, and first supraciliary. Five supraciliaries on each side, first and second largest, others smaller, sub-equal; only first supraciliary in contact with first supraocular, all others separated from supraoculars by a row of granules. Loreal single, large, roughly pentagonal and as long as high, in contact with posterior nasal, prefrontal, first supraocular, first supraciliary, preocular, first subocular, and third and fourth supralabials. Preocular narrow, higher than wide, in contact with first subocular, loreal, and small scales in ocular region. Three suboculars on each side, anteriormost keeled, approximately pentagonal, in contact with fourth supralabial; second subocular keeled, longer than anterior one, approximately rectangular, in contact with fourth, fifth and sixth supralabials; third subocular smooth, approximately round. A continuous keel runs from preocular to second subocular. Eight supralabials on each side. Temporal region with irregular scales, central ones granular, ventrally enlarged. A supratemporal row with moderately large scales, decreasing in size posteriad. Ear opening large, eliptic, higher than wide with smooth margins. All dorsal and lateral head scales juxtaposed, smooth (except for keeled preoculars and suboculars). Symphysal as long as wide, anteriorly concave, posteriorly convex, in contact with first infralabials and postsymphysal, forming two wide angles. Postsymphysal single, pentagonal, in contact with first and second infralabials; followed by five pairs of enlarged chinshields on left side, six on right side. First pair of chinshields the largest, in broad contact along midline, in contact with second and third infralabials. The second, third and fourth pairs of chinshields separated from infralabials by a row of small granules. Five infralabials on each side; followed posteriorly by series of small scales extending to labial commissure; first infralabials the smallest. Scales between chinshields anteriorly elongated, granular, becoming gradually larger and rounded toward posterior margin os chinshields. Gular region divided in two areas: anterior one with irregularly shaped, enlarged, mostly rounded and juxtaposed scales, disposed in roughly transverse rows from first pair of chinshields, to an imaginary line uniting the lower margin of ear openings; anterior scales slightly elongate, increasing posteriorly in size and becoming rounded posteriorly. Posterior gular region with a patch of central enlarged granules disposed in transverse rows, laterally with smaller granules and bordered posteriorly by antegular fold. Gular and antegular folds marked by diminute granules; two complete rows of enlarged mesoptychial scales between the two folds. Scales on nape and sides of neck granular, similar to dorsals. Dorsals and flank scales granular, rounded, smooth, sub-imbricate; 188 scales along a middorsal line from nape to base of tail; 87 scales around mid-body (excluding ventrals), 22 scales around tail. Ventral scales large, smooth, imbricated, wider than long, rectangular, in 27 transverse rows; 8 ventral scales in transverse rows across mid-body. Ventral scales separated from scales on flanks by a row of moderately enlarged scales. Preanal plate with three enlarged scales, one central and two posterior ones, all surrounded laterally by smaller flat scales. Preanal spurs absent. Sixteen femoral pores in a continuous row along each thigh, medially with a short gap; 8 on each side. Scales on base of tail rectangular, imbricated, smaller than ventrals, in transverse rows; keeled and slightly mucronated dorsally and laterally; ventrally smooth. Tail scales becoming gradually longer and narrower from the base to tip; subcaudal scales becoming keeled distally. Limbs with large, smooth, imbricate scales on dorsal aspect of upper arms, antero-dorsal aspect of forearms, antero-ventral aspect of thighs, and ventral aspect of lower legs; elsewhere scales small, granular. Upper arms with larger scales, disposed in longitudinal rows. Forearms with one row of enlarged scales, wider than long. Ventral part of thigh with three rows of enlarged flat scales decreasing in size proximally. Lower legs with two rows of enlarged, hexagonal scales, larger than those on ventral part of thigh. Ventral aspect of hands and feet granular; one enlarged tubercle at base of pollex. Sub-digital lamellae single; 17 under left and right fourth fingers; 30 under left fourth toe; and 29 on the right one. Color in preservative. Dorsal surface of head brown, brownish white laterally; labial and ventral regions immaculate white. Dorsal parts of body, tail, fore and hind limbs brownish green. Paraventral rows bluish white, rest of belly immaculate white. Ventral aspect of tail, fore and hind limbs brownish white. Stripes white. Color in life. Dorsal parts of body, limbs and tail light brown. A narrow dark brown lateral stripe with a series of two to three small irregularly spaced bright yellow ocelli, decreasing posteriorly in size and conspicuosity and extending from the suborbital level to the first third of the tail. Below it a narrower white stripe ventrally bordered by a dark brown color contacts the yellowish ventral color (Fig. 2). Lateral parts of head lighter than dorsum. Variation. Based on 18 paratypes. Head larger (14.74–19.28 mm; x= 17.07 mm), than wide (8.97–12.38 mm; x= 10.27 mm). Head height 7.71–10.41 mm (x= 8.87 mm). Snout-vent length 59.78–74.82 mm (x= 67.02 mm). Tail length 110–175 mm, (x= 150.48 mm), 2.13 times longer than SVL. Arm length 5.75–6.5 mm, (x= 6.11mm). Fore limb length 17.57–23.82 mm, (x= 21.17 mm). Tibia length 8.99–12.05 mm, (x= 10.81mm). Leg length 10.82– 13.43 mm, (x= 11.72 mm). Foot length 21.14–28.6 mm, (x= 24.51 mm). Hind limb 1.92 times longer than foot. Hind limb length 40.95–53.31 mm, (x= 47.03). There is no apparent sexual dichromatism in adult color pattern. A white dorsolateral stripe is present in MZUSP 100192, while the first, second, third and fourth pairs of chinshiels are separated from infralabials by a row of small granules in MZUSP 100203. Variation in other meristic characters is summarized in Table 1. Etymology. The specific name confusionibus derives from the Latin “confusionis” (confusion) + “bus” (from), and refers to the type locality (Serra das Confusões) where the new species is found. ciliar scales (SC); fourth finger lamellae (FFL): fourth toe lamellae (FTL); number of granules around midbody (SAM); num- ber of scales around tail (SAT); number of dorsal granules (D); longitudinal rows of enlarged scales in the dorsal part of arm (RH); longitudinal rows of ventral scales (VL); transverse rows of ventral scales (VT); total number of femoral pores (FP); enlarged scales in temporal region posterior to third subocular (EST); spurs in heel of males (HSPUR).Published as part of Arias, Federico, Carvalho, Celso Morato De, Rodrigues, Miguel Trefaut & Zaher, Hussam, 2011, Two new species of Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae) from the Caatinga, Northwest Brazil, pp. 37-54 in Zootaxa 2787 on pages 40-43, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27695
- …
