33 research outputs found
Kesesatan sunni syiah: respon atas polemik di Harian Republika
No full textBuku ini menanggapi tuduhan dan fitnah buruk yang selalu dialamatkan kepada Syiah dan pengikutnya.Penulisnya dalam pengantar menerangkan bahwa ia mencoba merespon permasalahan yang disalahpahami selama ini oleh orang-orang yang tidak mengerti mazhab Syiah. Babul Ulum dengan piawai menguraikan masalah dan menyajikan jawaban-jawaban serta kesalahan penyimpulan dari orang-orang terlibat dalam polemik Sunni-Syiah dan fatwa penyesatan di Republika . Bagian lain buku ini juga berisi tanggapan untuk kesalahan -kesalahan informasi dalam Majalah Gontor edisi Maret 2012 yang menguraikan tentang Syiah dan gerakannya di Indonesia. Babu Ulum menilai Majalah Gontor tidak profesional dan lemah dalam pengambilan sumber. Karena narasumber yang diambil tidak asli dari orang Syiah, tetapi dari para pembenci Syiah
Merajut ukhuwah memahami syi ah : memuat catatan untuk Hidayat Nur Wahid/ Ulum
No full text175 hal.; 21 cm
Merajut ukhuwah memahami syi ah : memuat catatan untuk Hidayat Nur Wahid/ Ulum
No full text175 hal.; 21 cm
An Examination of the Role of the Companions in Early Hadith Forgery
No full textThe role that the Prophet\u27s companions played in the campaign to fake hadiths is investigated in this article. There are two competing opinions regarding the genesis of the appearance of fake hadith, while both agree that political factors are the fundamental trigger. According to the first opinion, since the beginning of Islam, there have been incorrect hadith. The first group of Muslims, the Companions of the Prophet, are the ones who are at fault. The majority of Western Revisionist academics, led by Goldziher and Schacht, agree with this viewpoint; non-mainstream Islamic scholars, such Ahmad Amin and Abu Rayyah, endorse it. On the other hand, mainstream Islamic scholars, led by Muhammad Mustafa Azami, disagree, citing the Companions’ justification (‘adalah al-sahabah). This article attempts to evaluate the arguments using the abductive method. Opinions that correspond to the data are taken, which are contrary to the rejection. It follows that the view that the Companions were complicit in the hadith’s falsification is the one that is more grounded in scientific evidence. Conversely, the viewpoints that dispute it are founded solely on the widely accepted Companions’ conception of justice, which is better described as dogma than actual scientific knowledge
The Companions Redefining Criteria and Reconsidering ‘Adâla Critique From Qur’an and Hadith
No full textThe theory of ‘adâlah al-ṣaḥâbah which is adobted by mainstream hadith experts should be critized. This inseparable from several facts tha are presented to us. Several facts assumed to support the companions justice. Such as companion’s loyalty, obedience, and readiness to sacriface for the prophet. However, we are also confronted with facts which demonstrate their disobedience to the prophet. Arguments ready to sacrifice to defend the prophet contradict other facts that show their efforts to avoid even fleeing from the battlefield. However, how to explain a contradiction like this is a problem that hadith experts have left to float and gave birth to a never-ending debate. This paper puspose to put an end this circular debate by applaying the concept of ‘adâlat al-râwi to the Companions. Using the historical critical method and content analysis, this paper tries to reexamine the concept of ‘adâlah al-ṣaḥâbah by tracing the origin of the word ṣa-ḥâ-bah in the Qur’an and Hadith. And then redifining the criteria of Companions which has implication to their integrity. The behavior of many of the Companions contradicted the instructions of the Qur’an dan Hadith and contrary to the principles of justice made by hadits expert. The concept of ‘adâlah al-ṣaḥâbah is more fitting to be called a dogma rather than a scientific theory because it is not slack in the face of historical analysi
The Problem of the Authenticity The Endless Debate Between Revisionist and Traditionalist New Perspectives
No full textThe authenticity of hadith is an endless debate between the western and Islamic worlds, mainly due to different points of view. The nonconformity arose because the study of the Islamic world focused on dogmatic ideological nuances, while western world studies adopted a more critical and academic methodology. The present study aimed to explore how these two opposing viewpoints assessed the hadith of the Prophet. The studies conducted by Goldziher and Schacht were selected as representatives of the Western world and those of Azami for Islam. Azami, a leading traditionalist Islamic scholar, had tried to counter both from an academic perspective. Furthermore, other Islamic scholars often reiterate the opinion of Azami when rejecting theses of Goldziher and Schacht. This study attempted to answer three main questions using the abductive method, namely, How do the Western and Islamic perspectives view the hadith of the Prophet? What argument was put forward by Azami for refuting the views of Goldziher? Why does Goldziher opinion continue to get stronger despite the numerous attack
Kesesatan Sunni-Syiah : Respon atas polemik republika
No full textBagi yang masih mengalami pubertas intelektual yang menganggap merasa paling benar dan memngganggap sesat yang lain maka perlu membaca buku agar memahami perbedaaan yang ada dengan lebih bijaksana. Perbedaan paham dan tafsir harus disikapi dengan lapang dada dan delam buku ini didiskusikan perbedaan anatara syaih dan sunni secara cerdas, dengan logika dengan berbagai rujukan yang ada
