1,720,954 research outputs found
Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Paul Feyerabend dan Muhammad Iqbal
Get PDFArtikel ini bertujuan untuk melakukan studi komparatif antara pemikiran dua tokoh besar, yaitu Paul Feyerabend dan Muhammad Iqbal, dalam konteks pemikiran filosofisnya. Feyerabend, seorang filsuf ilmu dari Austria, dikenal karena pluralisme metodologisnya yang radikal dan pandangannya terhadap anarkisme ilmiah. Di sisi lain, Muhammad Iqbal, seorang cendekiawan Muslim dari India, terkenal karena konsepnya tentang "khudi" atau konsep diri yang diperbaharui dalam pemikiran Islam modern. Dalam artikel ini, kedua pemikiran akan dieksplorasi secara terperinci, dengan fokus pada persamaan dan perbedaan dalam pendekatan mereka terhadap kebebasan pemikiran serta implikasi pemikiran mereka dalam pengembangan pengetahuan dan praktek ilmiah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan corak studi pustaka yang dilakukan melalui tahapan analisis data deskriptif-interpretatif dengan dimulai dari penggambaran secara keseluruhan pemikiran kedua tokoh kemudian diambil pemahaman yang koheren terkait persamaan dan perbedaan pemikiran keduanya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keduanya menekankan pentingnya kebebasan berpikir dan menentang otoritas yang menghalangi perkembangan pengetahuan. Feyerabend, dengan konsep pluralisme metodologisnya, menyoroti bahwa tidak ada satu metode ilmiah yang benar, sementara Iqbal, melalui konsep Khudi, menekankan pentingnya kebebasan berpikir dalam mencapai potensi manusia yang penuh. Meskipun memiliki persamaan ini, Feyerabend dan Iqbal memiliki perbedaan dalam konteks budaya dan pendekatan filosofis. Feyerabend menempatkan penekanan pada keragaman epistemologis dan penolakan terhadap otoritas ilmiah, sementara Iqbal memadukan prinsip-prinsip Islam dengan gagasan-gagasan filosofis Barat untuk menciptakan pemikiran Islam yang modern. Implikasi dari dari pemikiran mereka adalah pentingnya mengakui keragaman pandangan filosofis dan budaya serta mengutamakan pendekatan inklusifitas terhadap sains dan agama dalam praktik ilmiah modern
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
ETIKA AKSI MASSA TAN MALAKA PERSPEKTIF UTILITARIANISME JOHN STUART MILL
No full textTan Malaka is known as a revolutionary figure with incisive political ideas,
but the ethical dimension of his thinking is often overlooked. Most academic studies
tend to focus on biographical aspects and political strategy, leaving a discursive
void regarding the moral foundations that underpin his radical ideas, particularly in
his work Aksi Massa (1926). Yet, amidst the contemporary phenomenon of mass
action, which often leads to chaos and social loss, Tan Malaka's ethical thinking is
highly relevant. This thesis aims to reconstruct Tan Malaka's ethical concept of
mass action and analyze it through the lens of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism to
understand the moral legitimacy of a resistance movement.
This research is a qualitative study that employs a documentary analysis as
a data collection technique. The literature used is Tan Malaka's original work,
particularly Aksi Massa (Mass Action), which serves as the primary source, along
with various other supporting works. The data analysis process was carried out
systematically following the Miles & Huberman interactive model, which includes
three stages: data collection to identify essential ethical ideas, data presentation in
an interpretive narrative, and drawing conclusions that are repeatedly verified. This
analysis is analyzed using Kees Bertens' ethical concepts (as a value system, code
of conduct, and moral philosophy) and the basic principles of John Stuart Mill's
utilitarianism.
The results show that, from Mill's utilitarian perspective, Tan Malaka's mass
action gained strong ethical legitimacy because it was oriented towards the
utilitarian calculation of "the greatest happiness for the greatest number." Mass
action was seen as an indispensable instrument for ending systemic suffering, such
as poverty, ignorance, and tyranny caused by colonialism. Furthermore, Tan
Malaka's vision of independence was grounded in Mill's concept of Higher
Pleasure, where the struggle was not merely for physical satisfaction but also for
the restoration of human dignity and intellectual freedom. Furthermore, Tan
Malaka's emphasis on organizational discipline was justified within a utilitarian
calculus to minimize unnecessary damage compared to sporadic movements.
However, this analysis also uncovered theoretical tensions: radical methods such as
the nationalization of assets and the abolition of classes were considered
problematic from Mill's theory of justice, as they potentially violated individual
rights and minority property rights for the sake of collective interests, which in the
long run could threaten legal stability and civil liberties. Theoretically, this research
contributes to enriching the treasury of ethical philosophy in Indonesia and
solidifying Tan Malaka's position as a moral philosopher. Practically, this thesis
provides ethical guidance for social movements focused on justice and humanity,
rather than mere anarchy
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
