1,720,956 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Normativitas dan Historisitas sebagai Cara Pandang dalam Memahami Sejarah Islam
Abstract: The study of normative and historical views has become a widely discussed topic among Muslim scholars, particularly in Indonesia. Fazlur Rahman and Amin Abdullah are two key figures in the development of these views, emphasizing the importance of reinterpreting religious teachings in the context of the times to clarify issues of human religiosity. This article aims to discuss the influence of these views in Islamic history and underscore the significance of historical analysis for understanding the diverse Muslim population. The library research method was used to collect, read, record, and analyze sources. The study revealed that many scholars of Islamic history still adopt a normative view, despite the need for a historicity view to comprehend Islamic history based on factual data, given the diverse Muslim population worldwide. With the rapid advancement of technology and science, rigid normative views are increasingly being replaced by flexible historical views, which contextualize events in their era.Abstrak: Pandangan normatif dan historis menjadi topik kajian hangat yang saat ini banyak diperbincangkan oleh para cendekiawan muslim di berbagai negara, termasuk Indonesia. Sosok Fazlur Rahman dan Amin Abdullah menjadi dua tokoh sentral dalam perkembangan kedua pandangan tersebut. Kedua tokoh ini menekankan pentingnya reinterpretasi ajaran agama sesuai dengan konteks zaman, sehingga akan membantu memperjelas persoalan religiositas manusia. Artikel ini berfokus untuk membahas pengaruh pandangan normatif dan kesejarahan dalam sejarah Islam, serta menekankan pentingnya kesejarahan sebagai cara memahami umat Islam yang begitu plural. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang penulis gunakan sebagai langkah dalam mengumpulkan sumber-sumber pustaka, membaca, mencatat, dan menganalisis sumber-sumber yang telah diperoleh. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak peneliti sejarah, khususnya dalam lingkup sejarah Islam, yang menggunakan pandangan normatif. Padahal, dengan pluralitas umat Islam di seluruh dunia, pandangan historisitas lebih dibutuhkan sebagai cara memahami sejarah Islam sesuai dengan fakta dan data yang ada. Namun dalam perkembangannya di tengah pesatnya kemajuan teknologi dan ilmu pengetahuan, pandangan normatif yang lebih kaku semakin ditinggalkan, dan digantikan oleh pandangan sejarah yang lebih fleksibel dan dapat menjelaskan suatu peristiwa sesuai dengan konteks zamannya
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
POLARISASI MASYARAKAT ARAB-HADRAMI DI SURAKARTA, 1914-1950
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap fenomena polarisasi yang terjadi pada masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta pada periode 1914-1950 serta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Pokok permasalahan dalam penelitian ini ada tiga, yaitu: (1) faktor terjadinya polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta, 1914-1950; (2) bentuk terjadinya polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta, 1914-1950; (3) dampak terjadinya polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta, 1914-1950. Selain itu penelitian ini juga ingin melihat bagaimana polarisasi yang terjadi pada masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta akan menjadi salah satu sebab bagaimana masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di wilayah tersebut kemudian mengintegrasikan diri ke dalam masyarakat Indonesia secara umum.
Penelitian ini mengenai sejarah sosial yang berkaitan dengan polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta dengan pendekatan sosiologis. Konsep-konsep yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini ialah: polarisasi, konflik, dan integrasi sosial. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti menggunakan teori Polarisasi Sosial untuk melihat perpecahan atau perbedaan yang tajam antara kelompok-kelompok sosial dalam masyarakat, sehingga kelompok-kelompok tersebut saling terisolasi dan mengalami konflik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian sejarah dengan empat tahapan, yaitu: pengumpulan sumber, kritik, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ada dua, yaitu: sumber primer dan sekunder. Sumber primer yang digunakan meliputi Volkstelling 1930 Deel VII, Chineezen En Andere Vreemde Oosterlingen in Nederlandsch-Indie, Koempoelan Toelisan dengan Gerakan al-Irsjad, Verslag Tahoenan 1935-1936 Al Irsyad, Sikep dan Toedjoean Al-Irsjad, serta surat kabar sezaman seperti: Pewarta Arab, Hadramaut, Matahari, Al-Ma'arif, ad-Dahna, Al-Bashir, Insaf, Al-Wivac, Pembela Islam, Lembaga Baroe, dan Aliran Baroe. Sedangkan sumber sekunder berasal dari buku, jurnal, dan artikel ilmiah lainnya yang relevan dengan topik penelitian.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: faktor terjadinya polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta, 1914-1950 terjadi karena tiga hal, yaitu: Fatwa Solo, perbedaan pandangan tentang gelar dan tradisi, dan orientasi terhadap tanah air. Sementara bentuk-bentuk polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta antara tahun 1914-1950 terbentuk melalui tiga hal, yaitu: organisasi sosial, pendidikan, dan surat kabar. Hasil lainnya terkait dampak yang terjadi terkait dengan dampak polarisasi masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta, 1914-1950 terwujud ke dalam dua hal, yaitu: mencari organisasi persatuan masyarakat Arab-Hadrami di Surakarta dan pengintegrasian masyarakat Arab-Hadrami Surakarta menjadi Indonesia
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
