1,720,958 research outputs found
Aplikasi Teori Isnad Cum Matn Harald Motzki Dalam Hadis Misoginis Penciptaan Perempuan
Harald Motzki is one of the orientalists who study the hadith objectively. One of Motzki's theories in studying hadith is isnad cum matn. This theory is a method in searching the history of hadith and combining aspects of isnad and matan as well as the Common Link theory which was popularized by Juynbol. In this article the author uses misogynistic traditions about the creation of women, bearing in mind that these traditions are often used as a reason to legitimize discrimination against women. The author found that misogynistic traditions about the creation of women were delivered by the Prophet himself, and at the same time, the Prophet also became the common link of these hadiths. In Mysoginy perspectives raditions or more specifically traditions that talk about the creation of women from ribs are also authentic from the Prophet and are delivered in two versions, namely the long version and the short version, which are then recorded in several hadith books
Hadis Dalam Pandangan Sarjana Barat: Telaah Atas Pemikiran G.H.A. Juynboll
AbstractThe study of hadith among Western scholars has developed quite significantly, especially after the appearance of Ignaz Goldziher with his work entitled Muhammedanische Studien. This development ultimately mapped the study of hadith in the West to become one-way. Western scholars have different thoughts from one another. Herbert Berg divides into three groups of Western scholars who study hadith based on their attitudes and thoughts, namely scepticism, sanguine, and middle ground. However, some experts in hadith studies only divide it into two groups, namely skeptics and non-skeptics. So, thus, there are differences of opinion regarding the position of some orientalists. For example, Juynboll was positioned by Herbert Berg in the middle ground group while other experts positioned him in the skeptical orientalist group. In order to explore this problem, the writer examines Juynboll's thoughts on the Prophet's hadith, especially in relation to the theory that is always embedded with his name, namely the common link theory. The author finds that Juynboll is not as skeptical as to his predecessors, who generalized the Prophet's hadith as questionable its authenticity. Juynboll still idealizes the existence of a hadith that can truly be accounted for its authenticity coming from the Prophet even though it is very small. That was why he was included by Herbert Berg in the middle ground group. AbstrakKajian hadis di kalangan para sarjana Barat mengalami perkembangan yang cukup signifikan terutama setelah munculnya Ignaz Goldziher dengan karyanya berjudul Muhammedanische Studien. Perkembangan tersebut pada akhirnya memetakan kajian hadis di Barat menjadi tidak satu arah. Para sarjana Barat memiliki pemikiran yang berbeda antara satu dengan lainnya. Herbert Berg membagi kepada tiga kelompok sarjana Barat yang mengkaji hadis berdasarkan sikap dan pemikirannya yaitu scepticism, sanguine, dan middle ground. Akan tetapi, sementara pakar kajian hadis hanya membagi kepada dua kelompok yaitu skeptis dan non-skeptis. Sehingga, dengan demikian, terdapat perbedaan pendapat mengenai posisi sebagian orientalis. Misalnya, Juynboll diposisikan oleh Herbert Berg dalam kelompok middle ground sementara pakar lain memosisikannya pada kelompok orientalis skeptis. Untuk mendalami permasalahan tersebut penulis menelaah kembali pemikiran Juynboll terhadap hadis Nabi terutama terkait dengan teori yang selalu disematkan dengan namanya yaitu teori common link. Penulis menemukan bahwa Juynboll tidak se-skeptis pendahulunya yang menggeneralisasi hadis Nabi sebagai sesuatu yang diragukan autentisitasnya. Juynboll masih mengidealkan adanya hadis yang benar-benar dapat dipertanggungjawabkan keotentikannya berasal dari Nabi meskipun itu sedikit sekali. Itulah mengapa dia dimasukkan oleh Herbert Berg ke dalam kelompok middle ground. Kata Kunci:Common link, hadis, Juynboll
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Islam, HAM, dan Diskriminasi: Reinterpretasi Hadis-Hadis Kepemimpinan secara Kontekstual
This paper discusses one of the humanitarian problems that still often occurs today, discrimination. Discrimination is not only contrary to human rights but also contrary to the Islamic view which is raḥmah fī al-‘ālamīn. But, in fact, Islam is always suspected as a religion that teaches various forms of discriminatory treatment. The accusation is based on Islamic religious texts which narratively teach discrimination. I find that there are two hadiths that are discriminatory about electing leaders. The first hadith is about having to elect a leader from the Quraysh clan. The second hadith is about the prohibition for women to be a leader. Textually, these hadiths are quite problematic because they contain the narration of racial-ethnic discrimination and gender discrimination. Therefore, in this article, I attempt to reinterpret these hadiths by using a contextual approach by analyzing the language and socio-historical context. My conclusion is that these hadiths were stated by the Prophet Muhammad in temporary cases. Substantially, these hadiths contain the significances that are relevant today
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
