1,721,053 research outputs found
Budaya Indonesia Menyongsong Era 2000.
No full textHimpunan ceramah Sarasehan Budaya Nasional Era 2000 oleh DR. Ki Supriyoko, M.Pd - Yayasan Ki Hadjar Deawantara
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
PERBEDAAN PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN BERMAIN DAN KELOMPOK UMUR TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN GERAK DASAR
Full text linkABSTRAK
AGUS SUPRIYOKO. A.120809001. Perbedaan Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran
Bermain Dan Kelompok Umur Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Gerak Dasar
(Eksperimen Perbedaan Pengaruh Pembelajaran Bermain Individual Games Dan
groups Games Pada Siswa Putra Usia 6,1 – 7,0 Tahun Dan 7,1 – 8,0 Tahun SD
Muhammadiyah Program Khusus Surakarta). Tesis. Program Pascasarjana UNS
Surakarta, Januari 2011.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui : (1) Perbedaan pengaruh
pendekatan pembelajaran bermain antara individual games dan groups games pada
kelompok umur 6,1 – 7,0 tahun dan kelompok umur 7,1 – 8,0 tahun terhadap
peningkatan kemampuan gerak dasar. (2) Perbedaan pengaruh peningkatan
kemampuan gerak dasar anatara kelompok umur 6,1 – 7,0 tahun dan 7,1 – 8,0 tahun.
(3) Pengaruh interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran bermain dan kelompok umur
terhadap peningkatan kemampuan gerak dasar.
Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode eksperimen yang melibatkan tiga variabel,
yaitu variabel independent (pendekatan pembelajaran), variabel atributif (kelompok
umur) dan variabel dependent (kemampuan gerak dasar). Penelitian menggunakan
rancangan faktorial 2x2. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa putra Sekolah Dasar
Muhammadiyah Program Khusus Surakarta tahun pelajaran 2010/2011 yang berumur
antara 6 – 8 tahun. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 40 siswa, ditentukan dengan purposive
random sampling dengan cara undian. Tes dan pengukuran untuk menaksir
kemampuan gerak dasar anak adalah (test of general motor ability) terdiri atas : 1)
Standing Broad Jump, 2) Shot-put, 3) Body weight, (Barry L. Jhonson & Jack K.
Nelson.1969 :118-119). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini
adalah Analisis Varians (ANAVA) dua jalur yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Rentang
Newman Keuls pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05.
Penelitian menyimpulkan : (1) Ada perbedaan pengaruh pendekatan
pembelajaran bermain yang bermakna antara individual games dan groups games
terhadap peningkatan kemampuan gerak dasar (Fhitung =
6,56
> Ftabel = 4.11).
Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran bermain groups games lebih baik daripada
individual games, dengan rata-rata peningkatan masing-masing yaitu 2,63 dan 2,07.
(2) Ada perbedaan pengaruh kemampuan gerak dasar yang bermakna antara siswa
usia 6,1 – 7,0 tahun dan siswa usia 7,1 – 8,0 tahun (Fhitung = 5,22 > Ftabel = 4.11).
Peningkatan kemampuan gerak dasar pada siswa usia 7,1 – 8,0 tahun lebih baik
daripada siswa usia 6,1 – 7,0 tahun, dengan rata-rata peningkatan masing-masing yaitu
2,52 dan 2,15. (3) Terdapat pengaruh interaksi yang bermakna antara pendekatan
pembelajaran bermain dan usia terhadap kemampuan gerak dasar. (Fhitung = 16,79 >
Ftabel = 4.11). a). Siswa usia 6,1 – 7,0 tahun lebih cocok jika diberikan pendekatan
pembelajaran bermain individual games. b). Siswa usia 7,1 – 8,0 tahun lebih cocok
jika diberikan pendekatan pembelajaran bermain groups games.
Kata kunci : pendekatan pembelajaran bermain, kelompok umur, kemampuan gerak dasar.
ABSTRACT
Agus Supriyoko. A. 120809001. The Difference of play learning approach and Age
Group Effects on the Improvement of Basic Motor Ability (An Experiment on the
Effect of play learning approach between Individual and Group Games in the Male
Students in 6,01-7,00 and 7,01-8,00 Years Age in the Special Program of SD
Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Thesis. Postgraduate Program of Surakarta Sebelas Maret
University, January 2011.
This research aims to find out : (1) The difference of play learning approach
between individual and groups games effect in 6,01-7,00 and 7,01-8,00 years groups
on the improvement of Basic Motor Ability. (2) The difference of Basic Motor Ability
effect between the 6,01-7,00 years students and 7,01-8,00 years student. (3) In
addition, it also aims to find out the interaction between play learning approach type
and age group on the improvement of basic movement.
The study was carried out using experimental method involving three
variables: independent variable (play learning approach), attributive variable (age
group) and dependent variable (Basic Motor Ability). The research design used was a
2x2 factorial design. The population of research was the male students of Special
Program SD Muhammadiyah Surakarta in the school year of 2010/2011 in 6-8 year
age. The sample taken in this research consisted of 40 students. The sampling
technique used was purposive random sampling with lottery method. Test and
measurement to estimate the student’s Basic Motor Ability included: test of general
motor ability consisting of: 1) Standing broad jump, 2) Shot-put, 3) Body weight,
(Barry L. Johnson & Jack K. Nelson. 1969: 118-119). Technique of analyzing data
used in this research was a two-way Variance Analysis (ANAVA) followed by
Newman Keuls’ Range test at significance level α = 0.05.
The research concludes that: (1) there is a difference of play learning approach
between individual and group games effect on the Basic Motor Ability. ( Fstatistic = 6.56
> Ftable = 4.11). The effect of group games is better than individual game, with the
mean improvement of 2.63 and 2.07, respectively. (2) there is a significant difference
of Basic Motor Ability effect between the 6,01-7,00 years students and 7,01-8,00 years
students. (Fstatistic = 5.22 > Ftable = 4.11). The improvement of Basic Motor Ability in 7-
8 years students is better than that in 6-7 years students, with the mean improvement
of 2.52 and 2.15, respectively. (3) there is a significant interaction effect between the
game type and the age on the Basic Motor Ability. (Fstatistic = 16.79 > Ftable = 4.11). a)
The 6,01-7,00 years students are more appropriate to be given play learning approach
with individual game type. b) The 7,01-8,00 years students are more appropriate to be
given play learning approach with group games type.
Key word : play learning approach, age group, basic motor abilit
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
