149 research outputs found
NOUN MORPHOLOGY IN SLOVNICA SERBSKO-ILIRSKOGA JEZIKA BY ANDRIJA BARIĆ
No full textOvaj rad analizira morfologiju imenica u do sada neobrađenoj gramatici serbsko-ilirskoga
jezika Andrije Barića iz 1861. godine. Rad obrađuje povijesni kontekst u kojem nastaje
gramatika, opisuje gramatike i stanje jezika u doba Andrije Barića te donosi prikaz gramatike
kroz opis svih poglavlja. Opisuje se morfologija imenica kroz razradu svih sklonidbi kako bi se
prikazalo kojim se gramatičarima Barić priklanja. Na samom se kraju analizira morfologija
imenica te se prilikom analize osvrće na gramatike triju gramatičara, Vjekoslava Babukića,
Andrije Stazića i Ivana Danila, koji su prethodili autoru.This paper analyses the morphology of nouns in a grammar of the Serbian-Illyrian language
by Andrija Barić from 1861, which has not been analysed yet. The paper deals with the
historical context in which grammar was created, describes grammars and the state of the
language in the time of Andrija Barić, and provides an overview of grammar through the
description of all chapters. The morphology of nouns is described through the elaboration of
all inclinations in order to show which grammarians Barić looked up to. At the very end, the
morphology of nouns is analysed, and the analysis is builds on the grammars of three
grammarians, Vjekoslav Babukić, Andrija Stazić and Ivan Danilo, who preceded the author
NOUN MORPHOLOGY IN SLOVNICA SERBSKO-ILIRSKOGA JEZIKA BY ANDRIJA BARIĆ
No full textOvaj rad analizira morfologiju imenica u do sada neobrađenoj gramatici serbsko-ilirskoga
jezika Andrije Barića iz 1861. godine. Rad obrađuje povijesni kontekst u kojem nastaje
gramatika, opisuje gramatike i stanje jezika u doba Andrije Barića te donosi prikaz gramatike
kroz opis svih poglavlja. Opisuje se morfologija imenica kroz razradu svih sklonidbi kako bi se
prikazalo kojim se gramatičarima Barić priklanja. Na samom se kraju analizira morfologija
imenica te se prilikom analize osvrće na gramatike triju gramatičara, Vjekoslava Babukića,
Andrije Stazića i Ivana Danila, koji su prethodili autoru.This paper analyses the morphology of nouns in a grammar of the Serbian-Illyrian language
by Andrija Barić from 1861, which has not been analysed yet. The paper deals with the
historical context in which grammar was created, describes grammars and the state of the
language in the time of Andrija Barić, and provides an overview of grammar through the
description of all chapters. The morphology of nouns is described through the elaboration of
all inclinations in order to show which grammarians Barić looked up to. At the very end, the
morphology of nouns is analysed, and the analysis is builds on the grammars of three
grammarians, Vjekoslav Babukić, Andrija Stazić and Ivan Danilo, who preceded the author
ANDRIJA ŽIVKOVIĆ (1886. – 1957.) I SVETOZAR RITIG (1873. – 1961.) – NOVE SPOZNAJE U SVJETLU ŽIVKOVIĆEVA DNEVNIKA
Get PDFThe author of this article reveals some up to now unknown facts about Svetozar Ritig and his relation with Andrija Živković. On the basis of Andrija Živković’s Diary, which is preserved as a manuscript and kept in the Archives of Theological Faculty in Zagreb, one can find out more about social circles, activities and life of Andrija Živković and Svetozar Ritig. Namely, as it is clear from the Diary, Ritig was highly educated and he surrounded himself with many artists and intellectuals of his time. Moreover, from some notes in the
Diary one could think that Ritig often frequented Živković in order to discuss with him some of his life choices. Both of them were determined to help society and to do well through the offices they held.Ovaj rad donosi dosad nepoznate činjenice povezane uz osobu Svetozara Ritiga te njegovo poznanstvo s Andrijom Živkovićem. Na temelju Dnevnika Andrije Živkovića, sačuvanog u rukopisu u Arhivu Katoličkoga bogoslovnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, temeljitije se upoznajemo s društvom i događajima iz života kako Andrije Živkovića tako i Svetozara Ritiga. Svetozar Ritig je bio čovjek dobrog obrazovanja i širokoga duha te je oko sebe okupljao umjetnike i
intelektualce svoga vremena ili drugim riječima elitno društvo, kako navodi i Andrija Živković u Dnevniku. S obzirom na nekoliko zapisanih bilježaka iz Živkovićeva Dnevnika, mogli bismo reći da je Svetozar Ritig kod njega dolazio kako bi mu se u nekim životnim situacijama povjeravao. Obojica su se trudila svojim nastojanjima činiti dobro, ovisno o službama koje su obavljali
Contribution for the Bio-bibliography of Mons. Dr. Andrija Živković
Get PDFU radu se tematizira život i rad hrvatskog svećenika mons. dr. Andrije
Živkovića. Autor razmatra njegovo teoloπko i znanstveno djelovanje te
organizacijski doprinos razvoju Katoličke crkve i pojedinih njezinih institucija
(Bogoslovskog fakulteta, Hrvatske bogoslovske akademije i dr.). Radi boljeg
poznavanja Živkovićeva raznovrsnoga i plodonosnog djelovanja donosi se izbor
iz njegove bibliografije.This article examines the life and work of the Croatian priest and theologian
Mons. Dr. Andrija Živković. Using a biographical framework, the author
shows his productive theological and other scholarly work as well as his organisational
contributions to the development of the Catholic Church and some
of its institutions (Faculty of Theology, Croatian Theological Academy and
similar). To become more familiar with the work of Živković, a selection of
works has been chosen from a bibliography of his works, which clearly witnesses
his exceptional knowledge and wide range of interests
Private letters of Antun Vrancic and Andrija Rapicije
Get PDFTema ovog rada su privatna pisma koja su razmijenili šibenski humanist Antun Vrančić (Antonius Verancius, 1504-1573) i tršćanski pravnik Andrija Rapicije (Andreas Rapicius, 1533-1573). Sačuvana su tri Antunova pisma iz 1558., 1559. i 1560. i dva Rapicijeva iz 1558. i 1560. godine. Svih pet pisama napisano je na latinskom jeziku. U radu će se napraviti kritičko izdanje pisama na temelju usporedbe rukopisa iz budimpeštanske knjižnice Széchényi i mađarskog izdanja Szalay-Wenzel iz 19. stoljeća. Osim toga, latinska će se pisma analizirati na razini jezika, te će se pokušati utvrditi jezične osobitosti u odnosu na klasični latinitet. Obratit će se posebna pažnja na morfologiju, sintaksu i leksik te će se nastojati utvrditi i eventualna razlika između Vrančića i Rapicija. Konačno, u uvodnim će se poglavljima dati osvrt na biografske podatke obaju autora te će se ukratko opisati književni i društvenopolitički kontekst toga vremena.This thesis outlines private letters exchanged by humanist Antun Vrancic (Antonius Verancius, 1504-1573) and Trieste lawyer Andrija Rapicije (Andreas Rapicius, 1533-1573). There are three Vrancic's letters from 1558, 1559 and 1560 and two of Rapicije from 1558 and 1560. All five letters were written in Latin. This thesis will make a critical edition of letters by comparing manuscripts from Budapest Széchenyi Library and the Hungarian edition of Szalay-Wenzel from the 19th century. In addition, the Latin letters will be analyzed at the level of language and will try to determine the linguistic features in comparison to the classical Latinity. Special attention will be pointed to morphology, syntax and vocabulary, and will seek to establish the possible differences between Vrancic and Rapicije. Finally, in the introductory chapters will give an overview of biographical information of both the author and will be summarized literary and socio-political context of the time
THE IRISH YEAR OF ANDRIJA ARTUKOVIĆ
Get PDFNa temelju prethodno nekorištenih izvora iz Državnoga arhiva u Dublinu u prilogu je prikazano kako je Andrija Artuković, visoki dužnosnik Nezavisne Države Hrvatske početkom 1947. u Švicarskoj zatražio vizu za odlazak u Irsku. Artuković se predstavljao kao “Alois Anich”. U prilogu je na temelju dokumenata irskoga Ministarstva vanjskih poslova i Ministarstva pravde prikazano kako je teklo izdavanje vize za Artukovića i njegovu obitelj, odnosno analizira se zašto su irske vlasti odobrile Artukoviću ulazak u njihovu zemlju i što ih je motiviralo pri toj odluci. Artuković je s obitelji ostao u Irskoj godinu dana, nakon čega je otputovao u Sjedinjene Američke Države.At the end of March 1947, Andrija Artuković, under the name of Prof. Alois Anich, and the Franciscan friar Dr. Louis Ivandich, as his companion and relative, applied for visas in the Irish embassy in Berne, Switzerland. Attached to their applications were two letters of recommendation from the General of the Franciscan Order of Switzerland, Dr. Seraphim Berchten, in which he praised Dr. Anich as an important supporter of the Catholic Church, on the run from the Communist regime in Yugoslavia and somebody who could provide the Irish government with valuable information about Yugoslavia. After a brief hesitation and in spite of a recommendation from a high ranking official in the Department of Justice not to grant visas to those two individuals, final approval arrived from the Department of External Affairs in May 1947. Ivandich, Anich and his family arrived in Ireland on the 15th July and stayed there for a year. After the expiry of their visas, Ivandich left for Canada, and the Artukovichs for the USA. Soon after that the real identity of Anich was revealed and he started his struggle to stay in the USA as a displaced person. This article analyzes the short-lived dilemma of the Irish administration prior issuing the visas and tries to answer the question of what motives lay behind it, i.e. were the visas granted with the full knowledge of the Artukovich’s identity, in spite of it, because of it, or absent it. The author concludes that there was no knowledge of Anich’s real identity so the visas were not granted out of any alleged “pro-Nazi” inclinations of the then Irish administration but rather because of “Catholic solidarity” and the strong anti-Communist sentiment that marked contemporary Irish politics and political culture
Dr. Andrija Živković : a moral theologian in the context of his time
Get PDFDr. Andrija Živković, svestrani intelektualac svoga vremena koji se hrabro suočavao s različitim teološkim pitanjima i problemima, vrstan teolog, znanstvenik koji se nije povodio za trenutnim uspjesima, obilježio je svojim interdisciplinarnim načinom promišljanja teološko-crkveni i društveni život u Hrvatskoj u razdoblju od druge polovine 19. do prve polovine 20. stoljeća. Autorica ovim radom želi predstaviti zaokruženu preglednu studiju o Andriji Živkoviću na temelju bogate arhivske građe i koristeći se elementima istraživačke, interpretacijske, sintetičko-kritičke i narativne metode te donosi nove spoznaje o njegovu životu i znanstvenom radu. Znanstveni opus kao i bogati biografski podatci o tom velikanu povijesti moralno-teološke misli u Hrvata ne zaslužuju da ostanu zatvoreni u prostorijama arhivâ, već autorica želi da iziđu na svjetlo dana kako bi obogatili znanstvenu teološku misao. Andrija Živković bio je ne samo izniman znanstvenik svoga vremena nego je djelovao i kao svećenik, promicatelj vjerskog ujedinjenja i kršćanske kulture. Njegovo je djelovanje ostavilo duboke tragove ne samo na Katoličkome bogoslovnom fakultetu u Zagrebu, na kojem je i sam radio kao dugogodišnji profesor i pročelnik Katedre moralne teologije, nego i kod katoličke inteligencije i svećenstva. Da bi sadržaj rada bio što sustavniji, rad je podijeljen na tri poglavlja. U prvom poglavlju prikazuje se život i rad Andrije Živkovića. U drugom poglavlju autorica izborom tema iz fundamentalnog morala prikazuje teološku misao Andrije Živkovića, naglašavajući pritom rukopis Osnovnoga moralnog bogoslovlja iz 1948. godine. U trećem poglavlju autorica s upitnim prizvukom progovara o Andriji Živkoviću kao kritičaru društva ili socijalnom etičaruDr. Andrija Živković, a versatile intellectual of his time, who bravely confronted various theological issues and problems; an accomplished theologian, a scientist who did not pursue instant acclaim, who contributed to the interdisciplinary school of thought in theological-ecclesial and social life in Croatia in the period from the second half of the nineteenth century to fi rst half of the twentieth century. The author, through this work, has sought to present a broad synoptic study of Andrija Živković. Thus, on the basis of rich archival material, among which were found several hitherto unknown manuscripts (Osnovno moralno bogoslovlje[Basic moral theology], Kršćanske kreposti uopće, a bogoslovske i stožerne napose [Christian virtues in general, and theological and cardinal in particular], Friedrich Nietzsche kao protivnik kršćanskog morala [Friedrich Nietzsche as an opponent of Cristian morality], Razgovori o vjeri i nevjeri [A conversation on faith and disbelief], Razmatranja o etici i moralu [Considerations of ethics and morality]. Komunistički »moralˮ pred sudom fi lozofi je i znanosti [The communist »moralˮ before the court of philosophy and science], and Katolička društvena nauka [Catholic social doctrine]), and research methods, interpretative, synthetic-critical and narrative methods, fresh insights were gained into his life and scientifi c work. To make the content of this contributed presentation more systematic, this doctoral thesis is divided into three chapters. The fi rst chapter explores the life and work of Dr. Andrija Živković, regarding which based on hitherto unexplored archived materials we have arrived at new and important information on the life of this Catholic theologian. In this chapter of work the author reveals the personality of Andrija Živković, thereby positioning him in the context of his contemporary time period. Thanks to information that has remained recorded in the Personal diary of Professor Živković, we have glimpsed at the society in which he moved as well as the persons he encountered, and we have come to better understand his character traits. Homilije [Homilies] of Dr. Živković, which also remained among the heritage of archival material, represents a chronicle of a certain period while at the same time revealing his personality and thoughts. It speaks to us on the importance of personal faith in the life of the individual, of maintaining one’s relationship with God, and teaches us what kind of Christian to be in our world. Andrija Živković emphasized the value of church documents and encyclicals to make them more interesting during study, especially when considering one’s fellow priests in caring for their education. His ponderings on Christian culture have Christ as their basis, just as the foundation of European culture should also be. His special contribution to the society of his time is augmented by a rebuttal of the doctrine of ethical culture, which emphasizes man and his mind and construction of morality without God. Through his activities, Živković has spanned a longer time period than the magazine Bogoslovska smotra [Theological Review] with its multitude of presentations, reviews, sketches and scientifi c articles.
The second chapter of this doctoral thesis examines the theological thinking of Dr. Andrija Živković, regarding which the author states that, despite the immense effort invested by him in theology, he remained „trappedˮ in the framework of traditional theological thinking of the time in which he lived and was active. In his theological thinking Živković was a faithful follower of the Thomistic tradition, while also leaning on the original thinking of other church fathers and moral theologians who were of particular relevance in the time he lived and was active. Since his time was characterized by talk of morals without God, thoughts of the Christian giants (Augustine, Albert the Great, St. Thomas Aquinas, etc.) were entirely side-lined, and the press of the time killed the shame in man, infatuating him with false pride, all of which motivated him to reach for the thinking of great minds from the church tradition. Although he never digressed in his theological thinking from the scholastic tradition, Živković’s quality was in that he was very specifi c regarding moral issues, and sometimes very harsh in his judgements. He was never static in opinions, but developed his approach, which is also obvious from the fact that he never ran out of examples of man’s life, which he often entered as notes in the very body of his works, which also clearly emphasized his pastoral dimension. Živković’s special excellence lay in his close following of the events of his time not only regarding ideological currents among his contemporaries in society in general, but especially the theological currents within the Church. He expanded his thinking, not only referring to authors of his contemporary world’s area of discourse, but several. The main framework of this chapter of the thesis is based on the manuscript of Osnovno moralno bogoslovlje [Basic moral theology] of 1948, as compared with the printed edition from 1938, and (for the purpose of gaining the most objective insight into Živković’s theological thinking) in some places the author refers to the work Kristov zakon sv. I [Christ’s Holy Law I], by Bernhard Hӓring. The author deals with selected topics surrounding fundamental morality, attempting to demonstrate Živoković’s theological thinking as well as changes that he made to the aforementioned manuscript. When compiling the manuscript of Osnovno moralno bogoslovlje [Basic moral theology] Živković endeavoured to accept all criticisms offered by relevant theologians of his time on the published printed edition of 1938. It is for this reason that his manuscript gives great attention to the development of Croatian terminology. The novelty of that manuscript lies in the fact that the author introduced changes to the content and order of specifi c topics. So in the manuscript, unlike in the book, he positions his presentation on conscience ahead of his presentation about laws, and offers as his reason the fact that conscience is an inner or closer rule of action, and for that reason he fi rstly discusses conscience, and only then delves into laws that are an external or further rule. It is clear that Živković regards conscience as an inner rule of action, so he speaks about it as being God’s messenger in every man, but such an observation of conscience is due to the psychological perspective, which is especially outlined in the 1948 manuscript. Perhaps this kind of insight into conscience could entice us to conclude for a moment that Živković, in a certain sense, anticipated the doctrine of conscience of the Second Vatican Council. But this would be impossible, since the Council convened after Živković’s death. Rather, this is a case of a shift from a casuistic way of „theologising” through „general terms” and a movement toward „observation of man and his existence.” Conscience as an internal messenger is that which testifi es to every man about his actions, both external and especially those inside, it prompts one if an action is performed, but also if it is missed. This is conscience in psychological terms. As judgement, evaluation or knowledge on the moral virtue of each one’s intended or performed act, conscience dictates whether any action is good or not. This is conscience from a moral perspective, and it is the topic of moral theology, as Živković pointed out in his manuscript. Živković probes deeper in the manuscript into the human person, thereby shifting slightly from a purely objective observation and pursuing a more personal observation of what transpires within a man. From such a form of observation of the human person we arrive at the area of virtue, because a virtuous man can correctly judge on certain things in life. In the latter claim is also the most important emphasis in relation to Živković’s progress in the manuscript regarding the book Osnovno moralno bogoslovlje [Basic moral theology], the author points out. Thus from the area of the morality of duties there arises the morality of virtue. Prof. Živković approaches the question of belief and unbelief, which was as relevant in the past as it is today, in his manuscript entitled Razgovori o vjeri i nevjeri [Conversations on belief and unbelief]. Suvremena razmatranja [Modern considerations], in which he places emphasis on an observation of the ideology of communism regarding the question of faith. Despite the fact that Andrija Živković in his theological thinking adhered to the line of Thomism, and was unable to emancipate himself from the „entrapment” of his time, he was relentless in developing his character, his research, and his thinking, and as a consequence he exposed himself to innovation. His openness toward the new is especially manifested to us in the third chapter of the doctoral thesis, in which the author discusses Andrija Živković as a critic of society or social ethicist. Considering the period in which Živković was active, the author presents the relationship between church and state under the guise of political questions. Then, in the ensuing sub-chapters, ideologies that prevailed in society are discussed, namely capitalism, communism, socialism of that time, with each presented as they pertain to economic development. As to political issues, and views on the state of society at that time, Andrija Živković has left these for us in his manuscript Naši putevi [Our paths], regarding which it is stated that he wrote the same as a „supporter of the Catholic movement as it ruled at the time.ˮ Živković wrote a great deal on social subjects of his time, and the society in which he lived. The most credible evidence of this is the manuscript Katolička društvena nauka [Catholic social doctrine], which remained part of his legacy and which is also the most relevant indicator of discourse on the development of social thought. In the works of Dr. Živković the impact on offi cial church documents is clearly visible, especially the encyclicals Rerum novarum of Pope Leo XIII, and Quadragesimo anno of Pope Pius XI, which informed the development of his Catholic social thinking, as clearly shown by the author. By studying the social teachings of the Church, Christians gradually arrive at their beliefs, thus granting them the capability in specifi c cases to make a stand toward the judgement of their conscience. The vision of society given to us by Prof. Živković endeavours to strengthen people’s faith in Christ. Thus the Christian, as presented in his works, would be a fi ghter for faith and a man always having the objective of truth as his priority, despite all ideological trends in which he fi nds himself. The priority for Andrija Živković was the promotion of general good both in life and in work. When discussing social subjects we draw special attention to Živković’s discussion on social virtues, regarding which we emphasize his onus on the personalistic dimension, because all social virtues are a refl ection of our actions in accordance with the will of God. Ultimately the author suggests that the social issue is not, for Dr. Živković, an economic one, and how it cannot be limited to outward ownership, because this inevitably raises the question of the spiritual or the question of faith with all the diffi culties of conducting one’s moral life both within and outside the social community. Christians must develop the social dimension in their lives, as Živković emphasized, so that love of neighbour can be as fruitful as possible. Christ the Lord above all loved mankind, and in doing so left an example to follow. Therefore, we will certainly do no wrong if we repeat Živković’s words, that we cannot be passive Christians or „so-called Christians.ˮ Considering the rich scientifi c work that Andrija Živković failed to disclose during his life, we can say that this man, a Croatian priest and theologian, ploughed a deep furrow rooted on the Christian faith in the history of moral theolog
Bourek – Versatile Artist (Complete Author)
Get PDFZlatko Bourek je kipar, slikar, scenarist, scenograf, filmski animator, kazališni i filmski režiser, lutkar, primijenjeni umjetnik. Tim nevjerojatnim umjetničkim opusom fascinantno je izrazio kvalitete svog zavičaja: beskrajne ravnice Slavonije što se na horizontali horizonta sljubljuju sa svemirom, smirene tokove okupljališta, raskošne i raskalašene gozbe građana, životne sudbine Slavonaca ispunjene razdraganošću, strašću, ljubavlju i strahotama progona. Izrazio je to spontanim skicama, bogato koloriranim slikama, maštovitim skulpturama, virtuoznim crtežima animiranih filmova, grotesknim lutkama, originalnim kazališnim scenarijima, režijama filmova i kazališnih uprizorenja, reprezentativnim izložbama i uzoritim knjigama. Cjelovito valoriziran Bourekov opus, prezentiran sintezama i analizama artističkih segmenata opusa, zaslužan je trajni spomenik genijalnosti autora, životu Slavonije i hrvatskoj kreativnosti.Zlatko Bourek was a sculptor, a painter, a scriptwriter, a stage designer, a film animator, a theatre and film director, a puppeteer, and an artist who engaged in applied arts. In his incredible artistic oeuvre, he expressed with great fascination the qualities of his native country: endless Slavonian plains fusing on the horizontal line of the horizon with the universe; calm nature of the meeting places; luxurious and libertine feasts; life and fate of the Slavonians filled with joy, passion, love, and horrors of war persecution. He expressed all this with spontaneously drawn sketches, richly coloured paintings, imaginative sculptures, masterful drawings for animated films, grotesque puppets, original theatre scripts, directions of films and theatrical plays, representative exhibitions, and exemplary books. A complete validation of Bourek’s oeuvre, presented through syntheses and analyses of the artistic segments thereof, is a lasting monument to the genius of the author, the life in Slavonia, and the Croatian creativity
Father Andrija Marijić – the Nephew of the Priest Juraj Zubina
Get PDFU ovome se radu autor bavi velečasnim Andrijom Marijićem, sinovcem svećenika Jurja Zubine, koji je od pokojnoga strica, popa glagoljaša, naslijedio obilno imanje. Službovao je u crkvi sv. Šime i sv. Marije te također bio kanonikom kaptola zadarske katedrale. Bio je i “mansionarius” u katedrali. Ubirao je desetine u župi Blato i raspolagao većim bogatstvom. Vrijedno bi bilo tragati i dalje za podatcima o, bez sumnje, vrijednom svećeniku Andriji Marijiću, sinovcu Jurja Zubine, svećenika “hrvatske knjige”.On the basis of archival sources the author presents minute facts about the priest Andrina Marijić. Andrija’s father was Radoslav the brother of the priest Juraj Zubina. Juraj Zubina, the Glagolitic priest’s grandfather’s brother Peter was also a priest. This is proof that already in the Middle Ages it was a common practice that within certain families some of the children were chosen to enter the clergy and become priests. Andrija Marijić lived in the city of Zadar and served as priest in various churches. He was accepted as a good confessor. He had a solid grounding in material goods and on a number of occasions he showed special gratitude towards his uncle the late Juraj Zubina, the priest “of the Croatian book”. Like his grand-grandfather’s brother Peter and his uncle Juraj Zubina he made a solid income collecting tithes
CHOSEN LETTERS OF ANDRIJA TORKVAT BRLIĆ TO IVAN FILIPOVIĆ 1848-1863
Get PDFAutor objavljuje osam pisama hrvatskog političara Andrije Torkvata Brlića učitelju Ivanu Filipoviću iz razdoblja 1848.-1863. godine. U njima su sadržani neki značajni podaci za povijest hrvatskoga političkog pokreta 1848. godine, ali i osnova Brlićevih shvaćanja o revoluciji u Podunavlju, odnosa prema banu Jelačiću, njemačkom nacionalizmu i katoličanstvu u vrijeme reakcije pedesetih godina XIX. stoljeća te shvaćanja hrvatsko-srpskih odnosa nakon 1860. godine.The author publishes eight letters of the Croatian politician and publicist Andrija Torkvat Brlić to his teacher Ivan Filipović from the period 1848-1863. They contain some important information about the history of Croatian political movement in 1848 and the basis of Brlić'es understanding of the revolution in 1848 in the Danube region, the relationship towards ban Jelačić, German nationalism and Catholicism in the period of reaction in the 50-s of the XIX century. Letters from the 60-s are important for how Brlić understands Croatian politics at the time of the session of the Ban conference at the end of 1860 and for Croatian-Serbian relationships and their acceptance of the Karadžić thesis of common identity of the Serbs and the "štokavian" dialect community
- …
