1,720,966 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Online/offline or composition of sigma protocols
Full text linkProofs of partial knowledge allow a prover to prove knowledge of witnesses for k out of n instances of NP languages. Cramer, Schoenmakers and Damgård [10] provided an efficient construction of a 3-round public-coin witness-indistinguishable (k, n)-proof of partial knowledge for any NP language, by cleverly combining n executions of Σ-protocols for that language. This transform assumes that all n instances are fully specified before the proof starts, and thus directly rules out the possibility of choosing some of the instances after the first round. Very recently, Ciampi et al. [6] provided an improved transform where one of the instances can be specified in the last round. They focus on (1, 2)-proofs of partial knowledge with the additional feature that one instance is defined in the last round, and could be adaptively chosen by the verifier. They left as an open question the existence of an efficient (1, 2)-proof of partial knowledge where no instance is known in the first round. More in general, they left open the question of constructing an efficient (k, n)-proof of partial knowledge where knowledge of all n instances can be postponed. Indeed, this property is achieved only by inefficient constructions requiring NP reductions [19]. In this paper we focus on the question of achieving adaptive-input proofs of partial knowledge. We provide through a transform the first efficient construction of a 3-round public-coin witness-indistinguishable (k, n)-proof of partial knowledge where all instances can be decided in the third round. Our construction enjoys adaptive-input witness indistinguishability. Additionally, the proof of knowledge property remains also if the adversarial prover selects instances adaptively at last round as long as our transform is applied to a proof of knowledge belonging to the widely used class of proofs of knowledge described in [9,21]. Since knowledge of instances and witnesses is not needed before the last round, we have that the first round can be precomputed and in the online/offline setting our performance is similar to the one of [10]. Our new transform relies on the DDH assumption (in contrast to the transforms of [6,10] that are unconditional)
Secure computation under network and physical attacks
Full text link2011 - 2012This thesis proposes several protocols for achieving secure com-
putation under concurrent and physical attacks. Secure computation
allows many parties to compute a joint function of their inputs, while
keeping the privacy of their input preserved. It is required that the pri-
vacy one party's input is preserved even if other parties participating
in the protocol collude or deviate from the protocol.
In this thesis we focus on concurrent and physical attacks, where
adversarial parties try to break the privacy of honest parties by ex-
ploiting the network connection or physical weaknesses of the honest
parties' machine.
In the rst part of the thesis we discuss how to construct proto-
cols that are Universally Composable (UC for short) based on physical
setup assumptions. We explore the use of Physically Uncloneable Func-
tions (PUFs) as setup assumption for achieving UC-secure computa-
tions. PUF are physical noisy source of randomness. The use of PUFs
in the UC-framework has been proposed already in [14]. However, this
work assumes that all PUFs in the system are trusted. This means
that, each party has to trust the PUFs generated by the other parties.
In this thesis we focus on reducing the trust involved in the use of such
PUFs and we introduce the Malicious PUFs model in which only PUFs
generated by honest parties are assumed to be trusted. Thus the secu-
rity of each party relies on its own PUF only and holds regardless of the
goodness of the PUFs generated/used by the adversary. We are able to
show that, under this more realistic assumption, one can achieve UC-
secure computation, under computational assumptions. Moreover, we
show how to achieve unconditional UC-secure commitments with (ma-
licious) PUFs and with stateless tamper-proof hardware tokens. We
discuss our contribution on this matter in Part I. These results are
contained in papers [80] and [28].
In the second part of the thesis we focus on the concurrent setting,
and we investigate on protocols achieving round optimality and black-
box access to a cryptographic primitive. We study two fundamental
functionalities: commitment scheme and zero knowledge, and we focus
on some of the round-optimal constructions and lower bounds con-
cerning both functionalities. We nd that such constructions present
subtle issues. Hence, we provide new protocols that actually achieve
the security guarantee promised by previous results.
Concerning physical attacks, we consider adversaries able to re-
set the machine of the honest party. In a reset attack a machine is
forced to run a protocol several times using the same randomness. In
this thesis we provide the rst construction of a witness indistinguish-
able argument system that is simultaneous resettable and argument of
knowledge. We discuss about this contribution in Part III, which is the
content of the paper. [edited by Author]XI n.s
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
