1,720,975 research outputs found
ADA YANG MANIS DI TIMUR NUSANTARA? KOSMOPOLITANISME TANAMAN TEBU DALAM HISTORIOGRAFI INDONESIA
Full text linkThis paper tries to remind readers about the history of sugarcane in the archipelago and its transnationalization. This crop, which is actually endemic on Eastern Indonesia, was famous in the market world since Europeans "introduced" it to the archipelago, especially in Java. So, a simple questions, is the sugarcane originated from Indonesia? Where did it come from? To what extent this crop become cosmopolitan and what are the socio-ecological impacts in Indonesia? By using historical methods and a cosmopolitanism point of view, the author finds the fact that the mainland of Papua (Indonesia and New Guinea) had been domesticated sugarcane for thousand years Before Christ. Sugarcane was transnationalized to various parts of the world until it was brought back to the archipelago by European traders. Later, this crop became the largest funds contributor to the Dutch East Indies during the colonial period due to the massive development of the sugar industry in Java Tulisan ini mencoba untuk mengingatkan kembali para pembaca tentang sejarah tanaman tebu di Nusantara dan proses transnasionalisasinya. Tanaman yang sebenarnya endemik di Indonesia bagian Timur ini kemudian menjadi primadona di pasaran dunia sejak orang-orang Eropa “memperkenalkan” di Nusantara, khususnya di Jawa. Pertanyaan yang muncul, apakah tebu bukan tanaman asli Indonesia? Dari mana asal tanaman tersebut? Sejauh mana tanaman ini menjadi kosmopolit dan apa implikasinya terhadap kondisi sosio-ekologi di Indonesia? Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah dan sudut pandang kosmopolitanisme, penulis menemukan fakta bahwasanya daratan Papua (Indonesia dan New Guinea) sudah melakukan domestifikasi tebu sejak ribuan tahun sebelum Masehi. Tebu mengalami transnasionalisasi ke berbagai belahan dunia sampai kemudian dibawa kembali ke Nusantara oleh para pedagang Eropa. Tanaman ini kemudian menjadi penyumbang devisa terbesar untuk negara Hindia Belanda masa kolonial karena perkembangan industri gula yang masif di Jawa.This paper tries to remind readers about the history of sugarcane in the archipelago and its transnationalization. This crop, which is actually endemic on Eastern Indonesia, was famous in the market world since Europeans "introduced" it to the archipelago, especially in Java. So, a simple questions, is the sugarcane originated from Indonesia? Where did it come from? To what extent this crop become cosmopolitan and what are the socio-ecological impacts in Indonesia? By using historical methods and a cosmopolitanism point of view, the author finds the fact that the mainland of Papua (Indonesia and New Guinea) had been domesticated sugarcane for thousand years Before Christ. Sugarcane was transnationalized to various parts of the world until it was brought back to the archipelago by European traders. Later, this crop became the largest funds contributor to the Dutch East Indies during the colonial period due to the massive development of the sugar industry in Java.Tulisan ini mencoba untuk mengingatkan kembali para pembaca tentang sejarah tanaman tebu di Nusantara dan proses transnasionalisasinya. Tanaman yang sebenarnya endemik di Indonesia bagian Timur ini kemudian menjadi primadona di pasaran dunia sejak orang-orang Eropa “memperkenalkan” di Nusantara, khususnya di Jawa. Pertanyaan yang muncul, apakah tebu bukan tanaman asli Indonesia? Dari mana asal tanaman tersebut? Sejauh mana tanaman ini menjadi kosmopolit dan apa implikasinya terhadap kondisi sosio-ekologi di Indonesia? Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah dan sudut pandang kosmopolitanisme, penulis menemukan fakta bahwasanya daratan Papua (Indonesia dan New Guinea) sudah melakukan domestifikasi tebu sejak ribuan tahun sebelum Masehi. Tebu mengalami transnasionalisasi ke berbagai belahan dunia sampai kemudian dibawa kembali ke Nusantara oleh para pedagang Eropa. Tanaman ini kemudian menjadi penyumbang devisa terbesar untuk negara Hindia Belanda masa kolonial karena perkembangan industri gula yang masif di Jawa
Pokok Ngudud Keretek: Kebiasaan Ngudud Dan Munculnya Pabrik Keretek Di Kediri, Jawa Timur, 1970-An
No full textSmoking, cigarette, and keretek have already been addiction to Indonesian peoples,
especially in Kediri. Since the 1950s, Kediri has been recognized by its largest cigarette
factory, namely PT Gudang Garam. This study focuses on the linkages between ngudud
(smoking) and ?pabrik keretek? (micro-scale cigarette factory), and why ngudud is still
existed as a habit until nowadays. This research used historical method by perusing archives,
online reports, articles, books, and interviews. This study indicates that ngudud was affected
by Chinese immigrants who introduced keretek to Kediri since the second half of 20th century,
and it has a linkage to the emergence of ?pabrik keretek? on the next period. Ngudud, as a
habit, is still existed because keretek became more popular in 1970s and it has been used
for daily activities and religious rituals in Kediri
Di Balik yang Tersurat:Kontroversi Arsio Industrialisasi dan Polusi di Sidoarjo 1970-2000an
No full textAbstractThis study attempts to examine controversial contemporary archives of industrialization and pollution in Sidoarjo, East Java since 1970-2000. The diversity of contemporary archives makes the source of history increasingly interpreted freely in accordance with the ideology of the archivist and the soul of his time (zeitgeist). This makes historical sources an increasingly multi-interpretive object and the truth is non-absolute. This study uses historical methods by utilizing the sources of newspaper archives, online news and government archives. This study found a difference in perspective and clumsiness of news substance. Archives produced during the New Order tend to see the progress of the Sidoarjo region from the massive industrialization, and see the pollution only on the level of physical impact, not from the root of the problem. The post-New Order archive sees environmental issues critically as it mentions the government's involvement in the emergence of pollution (industry). IntisariKajian ini mencoba menelaah kontroversi arsip kontemporer mengenai industrialisasi dan polusi di Sidoarjo Jawa Timur sejak tahun 1970-2000an. Beragamnya arsip kontemporer membuat sumber sejarah semakin diinterpretasikan secara bebas sesuai dengan ideologi pembuat arsip dan jiwa zamannya (zeitgeist). Hal ini menjadikan sumber-sumber sejarah sebagai objek yang semakin multitafsir dan kebenarannya bersifat non-absolut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode sejarah dengan memanfaatkan sumber-sumber berupa arsip koran, berita online dan arsip pemerintahan. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya perbedaan perspektif dan kejanggalan substansi berita. Arsip yang diproduksi masa Orde Baru cenderung melihat kemajuan daerah Sidoarjo dari masifnya industrialisasi, dan melihat polusi hanya pada tataran dampak fisik, bukan dari akar permasalahannya. Arsip pasca Orde Baru lebih melihat permasalahan lingkungan secara kritis karena menyebutkan keterlibatan pemerintah terhadap munculnya polusi (industri). </jats:p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
