179 research outputs found
Research on motions as dealt with in Dutch Parliament 2009-2011
No full textThis dataset contains the data used in the following articles:
- Popping, Roel (2013). "Coding issues in cognitive mapping of games." Open Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 16-23, doi: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31003
- Goeree, Mariska & Popping, Roel (2014). “Types of motions as proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives.” Quality and Quantity, 48 (6): 3253-3269, doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9954-x.
- Popping, Roel & Wittek, Rafael (2015). “Success and failure of parliamentary motions - A social dilemma approach.” PLoS ONE, 10 (8): e0133510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133510.
The articles use motions as have been proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives (De Tweede Kamer van de Staten Generaal). The first and last study use data based on a stratified random sample drawn from all motions that have been proposed between September 2009 and February 2010 or between September 2010 and February 2011. The second study uses only motions about two specific issues, so this is a restriction. However the motions have to cover two governments Balkenende IV (February 22, 2007 until October 14, 2010, which means including caretaker period) and Rutte I (October 14, 2010 until April 23, 2012, this excludes the caretaker period). For this reason the time period is slightly different
supplemental_table – Supplemental material for On the social construction of democracy: Modal rhetoric in former East & West German journalists’ post-reunification editorials
No full textSupplemental material, supplemental_table for On the social construction of democracy: Modal rhetoric in former East & West German journalists’ post-reunification editorials by Carl W Roberts, Cornelia Zuell, and Roel Popping in Journalism</p
Research on motions as dealt with in Dutch Parliament 2009-2011
No full textThis dataset contains the data used in the following articles:- Popping, Roel (2013). "Coding issues in cognitive mapping of games." Open Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 16-23, doi: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31003- Goeree, Mariska & Popping, Roel (2014). “Types of motions as proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives.” Quality and Quantity, 48 (6): 3253-3269, doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9954-x.- Popping, Roel & Wittek, Rafael (2015). “Success and failure of parliamentary motions - A social dilemma approach.” PLoS ONE, 10 (8): e0133510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133510.The articles use motions as have been proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives (De Tweede Kamer van de Staten Generaal). The first and last study use data based on a stratified random sample drawn from all motions that have been proposed between September 2009 and February 2010 or between September 2010 and February 2011. The second study uses only motions about two specific issues, so this is a restriction. However the motions have to cover two governments Balkenende IV (February 22, 2007 until October 14, 2010, which means including caretaker period) and Rutte I (October 14, 2010 until April 23, 2012, this excludes the caretaker period). For this reason the time period is slightly different.</p
Research on motions as dealt with in Dutch Parliament 2009-2011
No full textThis dataset contains the data used in the following articles:
- Popping, Roel (2013). "Coding issues in cognitive mapping of games." Open Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 16-23, doi: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31003
- Goeree, Mariska & Popping, Roel (2014). “Types of motions as proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives.” Quality and Quantity, 48 (6): 3253-3269, doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9954-x.
- Popping, Roel & Wittek, Rafael (2015). “Success and failure of parliamentary motions - A social dilemma approach.” PLoS ONE, 10 (8): e0133510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133510.
The articles use motions as have been proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives (De Tweede Kamer van de Staten Generaal). The first and last study use data based on a stratified random sample drawn from all motions that have been proposed between September 2009 and February 2010 or between September 2010 and February 2011. The second study uses only motions about two specific issues, so this is a restriction. However the motions have to cover two governments Balkenende IV (February 22, 2007 until October 14, 2010, which means including caretaker period) and Rutte I (October 14, 2010 until April 23, 2012, this excludes the caretaker period). For this reason the time period is slightly different
Research on motions as dealt with in Dutch Parliament 2009-2011
No full textThis dataset contains the data used in the following articles: - Popping, Roel (2013). "Coding issues in cognitive mapping of games." Open Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 16-23, doi: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31003 - Goeree, Mariska & Popping, Roel (2014). “Types of motions as proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives.” Quality and Quantity, 48 (6): 3253-3269, doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9954-x. - Popping, Roel & Wittek, Rafael (2015). “Success and failure of parliamentary motions - A social dilemma approach.” PLoS ONE, 10 (8): e0133510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133510. The articles use motions as have been proposed in the Dutch House of Representatives (De Tweede Kamer van de Staten Generaal). The first and last study use data based on a stratified random sample drawn from all motions that have been proposed between September 2009 and February 2010 or between September 2010 and February 2011. The second study uses only motions about two specific issues, so this is a restriction. However the motions have to cover two governments Balkenende IV (February 22, 2007 until October 14, 2010, which means including caretaker period) and Rutte I (October 14, 2010 until April 23, 2012, this excludes the caretaker period). For this reason the time period is slightly different
A scheme for the study of discussions in the social media
Get PDFIn case one wants to study discussions in the social media one needs a template for doing this. The discussions can range from comments on some event to developing a deliberative democracy. This template, or scoring system, should give insight in developments in the substance of the discussion, but it should also allow considering the development of the structure of the discussion. In this text a template is proposed that covers both questions. The information that is collected by using the template might be useful in the context of (new) policy making; it can also be used to study opinions
- …
