3 research outputs found
Rationale and study design for an individualized perioperative open lung ventilatory strategy (iPROVE): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
No full textBackground: Postoperative pulmonary and non-pulmonary complications are common problems that increase morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, even though the incidence has decreased with the increased use of protective lung ventilation strategies. Previous trials have focused on standard strategies in the intraoperative or postoperative period, but without personalizing these strategies to suit the needs of each individual patient and without considering both these periods as a global perioperative lung-protective approach. The trial presented here aims at comparing postoperative complications when using an individualized ventilatory management strategy in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods with those when using a standard protective ventilation strategy in patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Methods: This is a comparative, prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled, four-arm trial that will include 1012 patients with an intermediate or high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The patients will be divided into four groups: (1) individualized perioperative group: intra- and postoperative individualized strategy; (2) intraoperative individualized strategy + postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); (3) intraoperative standard ventilation + postoperative CPAP; (4) intra- and postoperative standard strategy (conventional strategy). The primary outcome is a composite analysis of postoperative complications. Discussion: The Individualized Perioperative Open-lung Ventilatory Strategy (iPROVE) is the first multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial to investigate whether an individualized perioperative approach prevents postoperative pulmonary complications.1,181,859Q2Q3SCI
Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries The International Surgical Outcomes Study group
No full textFunded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, by a
National Institute for Health Research Professorship held by
R.P., and sponsored by Queen Mary University of London
The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textThe ISOS study was funded through an unrestricted research
grant from Nestle Health Sciences. T.E.F.A. is supported by a
Medical Research Council/British Journal of Anaesthesia clinical
research training fellowship. B.B. is funded by a National
Research Foundation rating grant and an MRC (SA) selfinitiated
research grant. M.G. is a Chief Scientist Office (Scotland)
NHS Research Scheme Clinician. R.P. is a UK National
Institute for Health Research Professor
