343 research outputs found

    El neoplatonismo de Schelling

    No full text
    The author reflects on some perspective of the early, medium and last thought of Schelling, to show how a glance to its objective and historical entailment with the neoplatonic thought can clarify the structure of its philosophy. In the philosophy of Schelling (a figure of the philosophy who has determined “modernity”) the permanent importance of the neoplatonism is revealed

    Heuristic Schelling: economy of organized crime

    No full text
    This article proposes a reading of the armed conflict from an evolutionary design that takes into account the concept of private protection agencies in the works of Schelling. Their aim is to assess the dynamics of conflict and changes from its author's scientific output. A context of conflicts that includes new expressions of violence and the relative failure of the paramilitary reintegration involves using new analytical models (argumentation, game theory and inconsistent information). The recent evolution of emerging gangs and their expansion into areas that were paramilitary camps requires monitoring not only of the government and the authorities, but those investigating the conflict in the present tense. The author provides heuristic research support from Schelling’s theory of strategy, recent contributions to the relationship between organized crime and drug cartels.Colombia, Government, Civil War, Latin America, Security, Protection Agencies.

    Thomas C. Schelling et l’École française de sociologie de l’action collective

    No full text
    This article is based on a series of interviews that the author conducted with Thomas Schelling in 1998, 2004 and 2009. In the first part, the author presents what he considers to be the salient features of what he proposes to call the “French Sociology School of Collective Action (a mode of reasoning, a style of theorizing, an approach to empirical research). In the second part, the author uses excerpts from his interviews with Schelling to document the proximity of the theoretical and methodological framework of this school with a number of elements which also characterize Schelling’s approach to the study of negotiation and of social dynamics more generally, an approach which Schelling himself has labeled as “vicarious problem-solving”.Cet article est fondé sur une série d’entretiens menés par l’auteur avec Thomas Schelling en 1998, 2004 et 2009. Dans la première partie, l’auteur caractérise ce qu’il considère comme les traits saillants (un mode de raisonnement, un style de théorisation, un mode de recherche empirique…) de ce qu’il propose d’appeler « l’École française de sociologie de l’action collective ». Dans la deuxième partie, il utilise les extraits des entretiens menés avec Schelling pour documenter la proximité du cadre théorique et méthodologique de cette École avec nombre d’éléments qui caractérisent aussi l’approche de Schelling comme spécialiste de la négociation et analyste des dynamiques sociales, approche que Schelling lui-même a appelé « vicarious problem-solving »

    Discussing with Schelling: The C. A.Eschenmayer's Philosophy of Faith

    No full text
    This paper is devoted to the description and analysis of C. A. Eschenmayer’s philosophy of faith and of his discussion with F. W. J. Schelling. The author exposes the main ideas of Eschenmayer’s important work «Philosophy In Its Transition To The Non-Philosophy» (1803) in which he criticizes Schelling’s philosophy of the absolute identity pointing out the vagueness of the origin of multitude from the all-unity. At the material of Schelling’s answer («Philosophy and Religion», 1804) the author shows how Schelling begins to change his theoretical point of view. The world now is falling away from God. The paper deals also with their discussion of 1810–1812 around Schelling’s philosophy of liberty. Here Eschenmayer’s theology becomes completely apophatic. Owing to his incomprehension of the Schelling’s thought of those times and to his fi deism, his contradictions with Schelling become irreconciliable. But the both philosophers maintain friendly relations, it isn’t a case of Jacobi-Schelling controversy. Conclusions that may be drawn from the paper are following: (1) the philosophy of Eschenmayer is a particular case of the philosophy of feeling and faith which has a concrete historical nature. (2) The late «positive» Schelling’s philosophy can be considered as a successful «third way» between the unsteady rationalism and the theoretical deadlock of fi deism

    Dynamics of Network Formation Processes in the Co-Author Model

    No full text
    This article studies the dynamics in the formation processes of a mutual consent network in game theory setting: the Co-Author Model. In this article, a limited observation is applied and analytical results are derived. Then, 2 parameters are varied: the number of individuals in the network and the initial probability of the links in the network in its initial state. A simulation result shows a finding that is consistent with an analytical result for a state of equilibrium while it also shows different possible equilibria.Dynamics, Network, Game Theory, Model,Simulation, Equilibrium, Complexity

    Un relámpago en la noche : interpretación de la relación entre temporalidad, amor y tiempo en F. W. J. Schelling

    No full text
    First, the article distinguishes, in Schelling´s philosophy, successivity and extaticoriginary temporality, and contends that the latter can be conceived as co-temporalization. Secondly, an analysis of loveis advanced as an experience in which co-temporalization is consummated, and it is shown how in the erotic pathos, through an empathic movement of overdetermination, the ecstases are sublated as such and “condensed" in an instant of eternity. Finally, the author differentiates temporality and the real-actual time that Schelling conceives as the continuity of discontinuous temporalities. Special attention is payed to the importance of Schelling´s thought for the current discussion on time.Fil: Garrido-Maturano, Ángel E.. Universidad Nacional del Nordest

    Moi absolu et substance unique. Réflexions sur le spinozisme du jeune Schelling

    No full text
    Entgegen dem Urteil Heideggers, es sei geradezu eine paradigmatische Fehlbeurteilung, daß Schellings Zeitgenossen diesen für einen Spinozisten erklärt hätten, werden die eigenen Äußerungen des jungen Schelling, er arbeite an einer Ethik à la Spinoza, er sei Spinozist geworden, als Indikatoren für eine intensive Spinoza-Rezeption gerade in den frühen Werken Schellings, insbesondere in Vom Ich, genommen. Als Voraussetzung dafür zeigt sich eine durch Jacobi vorbereitete Umdeutung des Spinoza, dessen Philosophie so neben der Fichtes zu grundlegender Bedeutung für die Systembildung des jungen Schelling gelangt.According to Heidegger, Schelling’s contemporaries committed an ’exemplary error’ — so to speak — in affirming that he was a Spinozist. The author takes issue with this appraisal. The young Schelling’s very own words which speak of his work on a Spinoza-type ’Ethic’, and ’indicate’ that he had become a Spinozist prove the thoroughness of his study of Spinoza’s works, the influence of which clearly emerges in Schelling’s own early work, notably in Vom Ich. It would appear that Jacobi opened the way for Schelling by initiating a new departure in the interpretation of Spinoza. Spinoza’s philosophy thus assumes, along with that of Fichte, a primordial rôle in the genesis of the young Schelling’s system.Selon Heidegger, les contemporains de Schelling auraient commis une erreur d’interprétation exemplaire, pour ainsi dire, en déclarant que celui-ci était spinoziste. L’auteur s’inscrit contre ce jugement : les propres termes du jeune Schelling, disant qu’il travaille à une Ethique à la Spinoza, qu’il est devenu spinoziste, témoignent d’une lecture approfondie de Spinoza, dont on voit l’influence précisément dans les œuvres de jeunesse de Schelling, en particulier dans Vom Ich. Il apparaît que c’est Jacobi qui a ouvert la voie à Schelling, en amorçant un tournant dans l’interprétation de Spinoza. La philosophie de Spinoza prend ainsi, à côté de celle de Fichte, une importance fondamentale dans la genèse du système chez le jeune Schelling.Según Heidegger, los contemporáneos de Schelling habrían cometido un error de interpretación ejemplar — puede decirse así — al declarar que éste fue espinosista. El autor se opone a este juicio : las mismas palabras del joven Schelling, diciendo que trabaja en una Etica a la Spinoza, que ya se voívió espinosista, muestran una lectura profunda de Spinoza, cuya influencia se evidencia precisamente en las obras de juventud de Schelling, en particular en Vom Ich. Resulta que fue Jacobi quien le trazó el camino a Schelling, dando un nuevo giro a la interpretación de Spinoza. La filosofía de Spinoza adquiere así, ai lado de la de Fichte, una importancia fundamental en la génesis del sistema en el joven Schelling.Lucas Hans-Christian. Moi absolu et substance unique. Réflexions sur le spinozisme du jeune Schelling. In: Cahiers de Fontenay, n°36-38, 1985. Spinoza entre Lumières et romantisme. pp. 87-102

    Franz Brentano interprete di Schelling: alcuni documenti inediti

    No full text
    In this paper the author reconsider Schelling's analysis of Brentano. Brentano's Thou- ghts have been widely discussed, but some aspects of his teaching must be recon- sidered. In particular his criticism of Schelling needs a critical reconstruction. To evaluate this aspect is of particular interest a handwritten volume of 950 pp., entitled Geschichte der Philosophic (1866-67), recently discovered by myself in Graz and expressly attributed to Brentano, as well as Brentano's Nachlass. So it is possible to shed new lights on Brentano's main goal to stress the importance of the Aristotelian studies and on his conviction to profoundly re-consider the mediaeval interpretations of Aristotle. That was originated from his studies in Berlin (Trendelenburg), then in Miinster (Clemens and Schluter) as well as influenced by the Mainzer (Ketteler cultu- ral background, connected with a criticism that in Brentano became explicit against Hegel and Schelling, forcefully opposed to the historicist -systernatic thinking of the German Idealism

    Schelling, Freedom, and the Immanent Made Transcendent: From Philosophy of Nature to Environmental Ethics

    No full text
    This book offers a cutting-edge interpretation of the philosophy of F.W.J. Schelling by critically reconsidering the interpretations of some of his “successors.” It argues that Schelling’s philosophy should be read as an ontology of immanence, highlighting its relevance for ongoing debates on ethics and freedom. The book builds on a key notion from Schelling’s Philosophy of Revelation where he outlines the process through which transcendence must return to immanence in order to be grasped and understood. The author identifies Jaspers, Heidegger, and Deleuze as the main interpreters of Schelling’s philosophical activity, highlighting their relevance for subsequent Schelling scholarship. Heidegger and Jaspers refer to Schelling’s philosophy in negative terms, namely as an incomplete and unviable philosophical system, whereas Deleuze holds the immanent core of Schelling’s ontological discourse in high regard. The author’s analysis demonstrates that reading Schelling’s philosophy as an ontology of immanence not only avoids Heidegger’s and Jaspers’s criticisms but is also more fitting to Schelling’s original meaning. Accordingly, his reading allows us to fully grasp Schelling’s thought in all its strength and consistency: as a philosophy that avoids metaphysical abstractions and maintains the concreteness of concepts like God, nature, freedom by binding them to a solid and material account of Being. Finally, the author uses Schelling to propose an innovative reading of freedom as a matter of resistance, and of philosophy as an activity whose main purpose is that of seeking the actual extent and place of (human) life and freedom within nature. The author originally emphasises the relevance of these conclusions on contemporary debates in Postcolonial Critical Theory and Environmental Ethics. Schelling, Freedom, and the Immanent Made Transcendent. From Philosophy of Nature to Environmental Ethics will appeal to scholars and advanced students working in 19th-century Continental philosophy, German idealism, and Postcolonial Critical Theory and Environmental Ethics

    Aesthetics of Schelling: The Idea of Beauty in Bruno (1802)

    No full text
    La obra Bruno pertenece a la filosofía de la naturaleza de Schelling. Sin embargo está escrita en la época estética del autor, poco después del Sistema del Idealismo Trascendental, donde define la belleza como presencia de lo infinito en lo finito. Esta definición implica toda la naturaleza y el universo entero. La originalidad, relevancia y belleza de este diálogo ha pasado casi desapercibida. En este artículo analizamos las sorprendentes implicaciones estéticas contenidas en el texto.The Schelling’s work entitled «Bruno» it seems to be one among those that are devoted to the Philosophy of Nature of Schelling. However it is written during the aesthetic period of the author, short after the System of the Trascendental Idealism, when he defines beauty as the presence of the infinite in what is finite; and this definition implies nature and the universe. The originality, relevance and beauty of this dialog has been almost ignored. In this article the surprising aesthetically implications of this peculiar text are analyzed
    corecore