1,720,967 research outputs found
El vals del sistema político mexicano: Entre el presidencialismo hegemónico y la cohabitación plural: José luis prado maillard
No full textDe la clasificación que hace el Derecho Constitucional, modelo parlamentario, modelo presidencial o modelo semi presidencial, haremos un análisis de cada uno de ellos para precisar el diseño del sistema político mexicano, con la ayuda de la ingeniería constitucional comparada, para definir científicamente al sistema político mexicano. Para ello tendremos que estudiar el sistema político mexicano, dentro de la tipología de los sistemas políticos (I); para posteriormente explicar la variable en el ejercicio institucional del poder, vinculando el diseño constitucional con la práctica política de los partidos políticos
Las relaciones de los órganos del poder político en el nuevo contexto político mexicano
No full textThe declining of the hegemonic presidential rule that Mexico knew in their institutions
for 71 years was slow but effective. It is a gradual evolution that gives time to the power
and to their opponents to adapt their selves to the critic. They knew to critic and to be
critiqued peacefully. Progressively, the Mexican political system transforms since
hegemonic to plural, keeping in this way one important element of the democracy
before the posterior alternation in the political power organs.El declive del presidencialismo hegemónico que México conoció en el seno de sus instituciones durante 71 años fue lento, pero efectivo. Se trata de una evolución paulatina que permitió tanto al poder como a sus oponentes adaptarse a la crítica. Aprendieron en efecto a criticar y a ser criticados de manera pacífica. De manera progresiva el sistema político mexicano se transforma de hegemónico en plural, reuniendo así un elemento importante de la democracia, siguiendo posteriormente la alternancia en los órganos del poder político
El control de constitucionalidad del instituto de la cosa juzgada por medio del recurso de amparo
Get PDFLas relaciones de los órganos del poder político en el nuevo contexto político mexicano
Get PDFThe declining of the hegemonic presidential rule that Mexico knew in their institutions
for 71 years was slow but effective. It is a gradual evolution that gives time to the power
and to their opponents to adapt their selves to the critic. They knew to critic and to be
critiqued peacefully. Progressively, the Mexican political system transforms since
hegemonic to plural, keeping in this way one important element of the democracy
before the posterior alternation in the political power organs.El declive del presidencialismo hegemónico que México conoció en el seno de sus instituciones durante 71 años fue lento, pero efectivo. Se trata de una evolución paulatina que permitió tanto al poder como a sus oponentes adaptarse a la crítica. Aprendieron en efecto a criticar y a ser criticados de manera pacífica. De manera progresiva el sistema político mexicano se transforma de hegemónico en plural, reuniendo así un elemento importante de la democracia, siguiendo posteriormente la alternancia en los órganos del poder político
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
