1,774,210 research outputs found

    P.C. Smith, Wandsworth, London. S.w

    No full text
    Picture of P.C. Smith Posin

    P.c. Skovgaard i et nordisk lys

    No full text
    Med utgångspunkt i utställningarna av skandinavisk konst i Stockholm 1850 och 1866 studeras hur den danske målaren P.C. Skovgaard mottogs av kritiken. Jämförelser görs med andra skandinaviska konstnärer</p

    Letter from P.C. Hetzler on Bible meetings

    Full text link
    Letter from P.C. Hetzler, District Superintendent of the American Bible Society, to Reverend Horace Lyman. He informs Reverend Lyman of his Bible meeting schedule and requests his assistance

    Interview With P.C. Hodgell

    Full text link
    P.C. Hodgell, author of God Stalk and Dark of the Moon, was one of the many authors who attended Mythcon XIX in Berkeley last summer. She was good enough to meet with the Mythic Circle writers\u27 roundtable and share some of her experiences with us. The following is transcribed from a low-quality tape; when it was possible to recognize a speaker’s voice I have identified them - others are noted as ct. Hope you enjoy it

    Ciccarello, P.C.

    No full text
    Centro Asturiano membership record of P.C. Ciccarello; Socio Number: 104733.https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/asturiano_membership/1846/thumbnail.jp

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore