1,721,193 research outputs found
“Extra-osseous osteochondroma-like soft tissue mass of the patello-femoral space.”
No full textF. OLIVA MD, A. Marconi, S. Fratoni, N. Maffulli, MD, PhD, FRCS, (Orth)
“Extra-osseous osteochondroma-like soft tissue mass of the patello-femoral space.” BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2006 Jul 15;7:57
Immunohistochemical localization of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Substance P in the rat knee cartilage at birth
No full textF. OLIVA MD, U. Tarantino MD, N. Maffulli MD, MS, PhD, FRCS(Orth) .
"Immunohistochemical localization of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Substance P in the rat knee cartilage at birth" Physiological Research 2005;55(5):549-556
“The Dynamic variable angle hip screw (D.M.S.) vs Gamma Nail in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures. A comparative prospective study.”
No full textU. Tarantino MD, F. OLIVA MD, A. Impagliazzo MD, A. Mattei MD, G. Cannata MD, G.F. Spurio Pompili MD, N. Maffulli MD, MS, PhD, FRCS(Orth).
“The Dynamic variable angle hip screw (D.M.S.) vs Gamma Nail in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures. A comparative prospective study.” Disability and Rehabilitation 2005; 27(18-19): 1157 - 116
Signal or noise, a statistical perspective
Full text linkComment in
Reply to Padulo et al.: Jymmin, an easy-to-implement musical workout approach. [Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014]
Comment on
Musical agency reduces perceived exertion during strenuous physical performance. [Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
