1,720,962 research outputs found
Negara dan Alquran di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Tafsir Tematik Kementerian Agama Islam
Full text linkThis article discusses scientific interpretation of the Quran by ministry, done by of religious the researcher. This qualitative study discusses how the interpreters selected by the ministry interpret verses about the creation of human. This article finds that they interpret the verses of the Quran, using scientific sources and logic to explain them which are related to sains
Problematika Jilbab dalam Perspektif Quraish Shihab
Full text linkThis paper attempt to explain how Quraish Shihab’s argument on veil. In his books entitled Jilbab, the controversy emerges among Muslim in Indonesia. I argue that Quraish Shihab’s argument of veiling is based on Muslim scholars along classical period until now. There is no prohibition or suggestion specifically about the rule of veil. Quraish Shihab position himself as Muslim scholar who expose the whole argument that he believes its true.  
Reinforce Nationality Through Religious Local Tradition (Case Study of Malam Tirakatan in Yogyakarta)
Full text linkCelebrating of IndependenceDay became a part of symbol of honour from the citizenship for their country. In many places freedom is celebrated, including in Indonesia. The celebration is an annual event organized by goverment and citizen, both formal and informal. Formally, the goverment of Indonesia from local level to the centre celebrate this day by flag ceremony on the seventeent of August. Somehow in non-formal, citizen commemorate this day by various manner such aspanjatpinang contest etc. One form of celebration in Indonesia to celebrate the independence day is called “malam tirakatan†or “malam pitulasanâ€, especially in the area of Yogyakarta. Malam tirakatan is kind of acculturation from Moslem local tradition.This paper describe aboutmalam tirakatanas an acculturation between religious local traditions with a sense of nationalism. I use the method of triangulation for collect data which are participant observation, deep interview and documentation. The location of this research is focused on two different places, first in Dukuh the village of Bantul district and second in Ngaseman village, a part of village of Kulon Progo district. From this research known that Indonesian Moslems reinforce their nationality by their religious local tradition
KEBERANJAKAN FATWA DARI LEGAL OPINION MENJADI LEGAL BINDING: (Studi Kasus Fatwa DSN MUI Tentang Perbankan Syariah)
Full text linkThe basic concept of fatwa in its position of binding law is legal opinion in Indonesia. But in certain cases fatwa has a legal binding which is must be obeyed by people. This article demonstrate how fatwa has a legal binding in the context of Indonesia. The objects of research specifically is banking sharia act in which it is said Islamic economy activities must be appropriate with the fatwa of national sharia council. As concluding remark, this article show the development of fatwa from legal opinion to legal binding through the constitution as represent by sharia banking act.  
ORMAS ISLAM DI JAWA BARAT DAN PERGERAKANNYA; Studi Kasus Persis dan PUI
No full textMakalah ini berupaya untuk memaparkan sejarah dua organisasi Islam di Jawa Barat; Persis (Persatuan Islam) dan PUI (Persatuan Umat Islam), dan dampaknya terhadap konstruksi sosial, terutama dalam hal pendidikan Islam. Keduanya telah memainkan peran penting dalam aktivitas sosial, terutama dalam konteks da'wah Islam dan pendidikan. Signifikansi dari karya ini terletak pada temuannya bahwa sebuah pergeseran telah muncul baik di bidang praktik maupun konsep doktrinal dalam wacana Islam di Jawa Barat, sejak kemunculan Persis dan PUI. Artikel ini membangun sebuah opini bahwa kemunculan keduanya telah menandai modernisasi pemikiran umat Islam di Jawa Barat. Secara praktis, masyarakat Sunda yang menganut Islam tradisional pada akhirnya terpinggirkan dari daerah perkotaan ke pedalaman.Kata kunci: PUI, Persis, Jawa Barat, Peralihan Tradisi
Kompatibilitas Regulasi Akad dan Implementasinya pada Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia; Kasus Bank Muamalat
Full text linkThis Article examines the concept of Islamic agreement in Islamic banking on its regulation and implementation. The product of Bank Muamalat is the example for analyzed. Eventually, how compatible were the ideas and concepts of Islamic Agreement with Islamic Banking in Indonesia is one important question to be answered. I argue that Islamic Banking in Indonesia still has many problems for applying tightly the regulation of Islamic agreement in the basic of act (UUD) and the fatwa of Sharia National Council (DSN)
Fatwa Sesat Syiah dan Legitimasi Kekerasan
No full textAbstract
Recently, Shi’a-Sunni’s controversy in Indonesia increase dramatically as occurring as geo-political clash in the Middle East, particularly between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The culmination of Indonesian Shi’a’s conflict is assigned by expulsion several communities from their home and village. Afterward, that’s discrimination is legitimated by the book of MUI entitled Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi’ah di Indonesia. This article aims to review the book’s contents by using linguistic philosophy in form of Stephen Toulmin’s theory of argumentation. Stephen Toulmin is professor of Linguistic Philosophy Studies at Cambridge University. He develops six concepts for examine argumentation namely data, claim, warrants, backing, qualifier and rebuttal. Dialectically, its six concepts is related each other to form an argumentation. A good argumentation, as Toulmin’s opinion, is arranged from factual and objective data, supported by strong warrants and backing, truthful qualifier, and can defend from rebuttal. As one of result, this research shows that the correlation between data and claim in MUI’s book categorized as unilateral fact that produces negative issues and impacts to discriminative action for Shi’a community.
Keywords: Indonesian Shi’a, Stephen Toulmin, Theory of Argument
Abstrak
Perdebatan mengenai Syiah di Indonesia meningkat seiring dengan meruncingnya kontestasi geopolitik di Timur Tengah, khususnya yang diwakili oleh Saudi Arabia dan Iran. Konflik Syiah di Indonesia mencapai puncaknya ditandai dengan pengusiran sebagian kelompok Syiah dari tempat tinggal dan kampung halamannya. Perbuatan diskriminatif atas komunitas Syiah itu kemudian mendapatkan legitimasi dengan terbit dan beredarnya buku atas nama MUI pusat yang berjudul Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi’ah di Indonesia. Artikel ini hendak meninjau ulang bangunan wacana dalam buku tersebut dengan perspektif filsafat linguistik, tepatnya menggunakan teori argumentasi yang digagas oleh Stephen Toulmin. Sebuah wacana argumentatif dapat disebut baik, menurut Toulmin, apabila data yang disajikan merupakan fakta bersifat objektif yang didukung oleh warrant dan backing yang kuat, jujur atas qualifier, serta dapat mempertahankan diri dari rebuttal. Salah satu kesimpulan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korelasi antara data dan claim dalam buku MUI tentang Syiah dikategorikan sebagai fakta sepihak yang melahirkan isu negatif dan dapat berimplikasi pada sikap diskriminatif terhadap komunitas syiah.
Kata Kunci: Syiah Indonesia, Stephen Toulmin, Teori Argumentasi
Fatwa Sesat Syiah dan Legitimasi Kekerasan (Menguji Buku Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi’ah di Indonesia dengan Teori Toulmin)
No full textRecently, Shi’a-Sunni’s controversy in Indonesia increase dramatically as occurring as geo-political clash in the Middle East, particularly between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The culmination of Indonesian Shi’a’s conflict is assigned by expulsion several communities from their home and village. Afterward, that’s discrimination is legitimated by the book of MUI entitled Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi’ah di Indonesia. This article aims to review the book’s contents by using linguistic philosophy in form of Stephen Toulmin’s theory of argumentation. Stephen Toulmin is professor of Linguistic Philosophy Studies at Cambridge University. He develops six concepts for examine argumentation namely data, claim, warrants, backing, qualifier and rebuttal. Dialectically, its six concepts is related each other to form an argumentation. A good argumentation, as Toulmin’s opinion, is arranged from factual and objective data, supported by strong warrants and backing, truthful qualifier, and can defend from rebuttal. As one of result, this research shows that the correlation between data and claim in MUI’s book categorized as unilateral fact that produces negative issues and impacts to discriminative action for Shi’a community. Perdebatan mengenai Syiah di Indonesia meningkat seiring dengan meruncingnya kontestasi geopolitik di Timur Tengah, khususnya yang diwakili oleh Saudi Arabia dan Iran. Konflik Syiah di Indonesia mencapai puncaknya ditandai dengan pengusiran sebagian kelompok Syiah dari tempat tinggal dan kampung halamannya. Perbuatan diskriminatif atas komunitas Syiah itu kemudian mendapatkan legitimasi dengan terbit dan beredarnya buku atas nama MUI pusat yang berjudul Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi’ah di Indonesia. Artikel ini hendak meninjau ulang bangunan wacana dalam buku tersebut dengan perspektif filsafat linguistik, tepatnya menggunakan teori argumentasi yang digagas oleh Stephen Toulmin. Sebuah wacana argumentatif dapat disebut baik, menurut Toulmin, apabila data yang disajikan merupakan fakta bersifat objektif yang didukung oleh warrant dan backing yang kuat, jujur atas qualifier, serta dapat mempertahankan diri dari rebuttal. Salah satu kesimpulan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korelasi antara data dan claim dalam buku MUI tentang Syiah dikategorikan sebagai fakta sepihak yang melahirkan isu negatif dan dapat berimplikasi pada sikap diskriminatif terhadap komunitas syiah.  
The Quran and Muslim Minority Scholar’s Perspective: A Comparative Study of Abdullah Saeed and Farid Esack
Full text linkThis article discusses an alternative perspective in understanding the content of the Qur’an i.e., the perspective of minority Muslim scholars. The object of this study is the thought of tafsir Abdullah Saeed and Farid Esack who are positioned as Muslim scholars of Western institutions living as a minority, how their views of the Qur’an and how they develop interpretive methodologies according to the context of the environment in which they live. This article shows that the construction of the thought of Abdullah Saeed and Farid Esack positioned as minority scholars can represent its own contemporary model of interpretation. Abdullah Saeed with the idea of contextual interpretation laid out three bases of interpretive methodology: hierarchical values, contextual meaning, and systematic contextual interpretation. The three bases of the methodology are used to see the extent to which verses on ethical law can be understood and practiced in contemporary contexts while remaining grounded in the substance of the values carried when they are derived. While Farid Esack with his idea of liberative exegesis tried to break conservatism in South Africa with three methodological foundations: progressive revelation, reception hermeneutics, and the liberation theology of the Qur’an. The foundation of this methodology was used as a basis for value and legitimacy in supporting the agenda of popular solidarity between Muslims and non-Muslims in South Africa to overthrow the apartheid regime
- …
