803 research outputs found
Rezension zu Martin Reulecke: Caroline Schlegel-Schelling. Rezeptionsgeschichte und Bibliographie
No full textTheresa Brehm rezensiert Martin Reuleckes „Caroline Schlegel-Schelling. Rezeptionsgeschichte und Bibliographie“ (Königshausen & Neumann 2018)
Strategic behavior in Schelling dynamics: A new result and experimental evidence
No full textIn this paper we experimentally test Schelling’s (1971) segregation model and confirm the striking result of segregation. In addition, we extend Schelling’s model theoretically by adding strategic behavior and moving costs. We obtain a unique subgame perfect equilibrium in which rational agents facing moving costs may find it optimal not to move (anticipating other participants’ movements). This equilibrium is far for full segregation. We run experiments for this extended Schelling model. We find that the percentage of strategic players dramatically increases with the cost of moving and that the degree of segregation depends on the distribution of rational subjects.Subgame perfect equilibrium, segregation, experimental games
[Stammbuch Daniel Schelling]
No full text[STAMMBUCH DANIEL SCHELLING]
[Stammbuch Daniel Schelling] ( - )
Cover ( - )
Beschreibung ( - )
Register über sämtliche hierinn befindliche Nahmen. ( - )
Ludwig; Blatt 1 (1r)
Illustration (1v)
Brahe, Per; Blatt 2 (2r)
Gemmingen, Philipp von; Blatt 3 (3r)
Tschernembl, Johann Georg von; Blatt 4 (3v-4r)
Gemmingen, Johann Sigmund von; Blatt 5 (5r)
Weitolshausen genannt Schrautenbach, Wolf Johann von; Blatt 8 (8r)
Runge, Johann Joachim von; Blatt 9 (8v-9r)
Steinhardt von Dewitz, Melchior; Blatt 10 (9v-10r)
Wanning, Eberhard von; Blatt 11 (11r)
Schad, Daniel; Blatt 13 (12v-13r)
Roth von Holzschwang, Leo; Blatt 13,2 (13v-14r)
Krafft, Johannes; Blatt 14 (13v-14r)
Nebelkrae, Heinrich; Blatt 15 (15r)
Otthera, Nicolaus von; Blatt 16,1 (16ar)
Liebenthal, Christian; Blatt 16,2 (16br)
Winckelmann, Johannes; Blatt 17 (17r)
Mentzer, Balthasar; Blatt 18 (17v-18r)
Kitzel, Johann; Blatt 19 (18v-19r)
Breidenbach, Johannes; Blatt 20 (19v-20r)
Stephani, Samuel; Blatt 21 (20v-21r)
Dieterich, Conrad; Blatt 25 (24v-25r)
Hafenreffer, Matthias; Blatt 27 (26v-27r)
Krafft, Leo; Blatt 28 (27v-28r)
Gisenius, Johannes; Blatt 29 (28v-29r)
Feurborn, Justus; Blatt 29,2 (29v-30r)
Schleicher, Hieronymus; Blatt 30,2 (30v-31r)
Oliva, Marcellus; Blatt 31 (30v-31r)
Scheibler, Christoph; Blatt 32 (31v-32r)
Zeämann, Georg; Blatt 34 (33v-34r)
Hunnius, Helfrich Ulrich; Blatt 38 (38r)
Horst, Gregor; Blatt 43 (43r)
Goclenius, Rudolph; Blatt 44 (44v-45r)
Besold, Christoph; Blatt 45 (44v-45r)
Hartmann, Johann; Blatt 49,2 (49a-49r)
Combach, Johann; Blatt 49 (49a-49r)
Mislenta, Coelestinus; Blatt 50 (49v-50r)
Tettelbach, Heinrich; Blatt 51 (50v-51r)
Klein, Eberhard; Blatt 52 (51v-52r)
Jungermann, Ludwig; Blatt 54 (53v-54r)
Steuber, Johannes; Blatt 55 (54v-55r)
Bachmann, Conrad; Blatt 56 (55v-56r)
Mylius, Philipp; Blatt 57,2 (57v-58r)
Krebs, Philipp; Blatt 58 (57v-58r)
Helwig, Martin; Blatt 58,2 (58v-59r)
Beckeler, David; Blatt 59 (58v-59r)
Huber, Peter; Blatt 60 (59v-60r)
Bischoff, Ludwig; Blatt 61 (60v-61r)
Matthias, Konrad; Blatt 62 (61v-62r)
Kerner, Balthasar; Blatt 63,1 (62v-63r)
Sitzlin, Nicodemus; Blatt 63,2 (62v-63r)
Meckel, Johann; Blatt 64 (63v-64r)
Hebenstreit, Johann Baptist; Blatt 65,1 (64v-65r)
Ebel, Johann Philipp; Blatt 65,2 (64v-65r)
Merk, Johann Konrad; Blatt 67 (66v-67r)
Wehe, Simpert; Blatt 68 (67v-68r)
Klunz, Johann Peter; Blatt 69 (68v-69r)
Tonner, Johann Heinrich; Blatt 70 (69v-70r)
Wagner, Johann; Blatt 71 (70v-71r)
Schelling, Ulrich Friedrich; Blatt 72 (71v-72r)
Ehinger von Balzheim, Johann Rudolph; Blatt 74 (73v-74r)
Ehinger von Balzheim, Hans Friedrich; Blatt 74,2 (74v-75r)
Bollinger, Johann Gottlieb; Blatt 78 (78v-79r)
Eglin, Raphael; Blatt 80 (79v-80r)
Ebel, Kaspar; Blatt 83 (82v-83r)
Fingerlin, Johann; Blatt 88 (87v-88r)
Fingerlin, Christoph; Blatt 89 (88v-89r)
Küchel, Lorenz Walter; Blatt 91 (90v-91r)
Kalckbrenner, Johann; Blatt 91,2 (91v-92r)
Schad, Alphons; Blatt 93 (92v-93r)
Stumpf, Johann Ludwig; Blatt 94 (93v-94r)
Hunnius, Aegidius; Blatt 95 (94v-95r)
Lotichius, Johann; Blatt 95,2 (95v-96r)
Werner, Balthasar; Blatt 96 (95v-96r)
Cramer, Johann Jacob; Blatt 96,2 (96v-97r)
Schmidt, Ulrich; Blatt 98 (97v-98r)
Unseld, Johann Carl; Blatt 99 (98v-99r)
Fischer, Johann Rudolph; Blatt 100 (99v-100r)
Saxo, Johann; Blatt 101 (100v-101r)
Steuber, Valentin; Blatt 103 (102v-103r)
Bender, Michael; Blatt 103,2 (103v-104r)
Höfel, Johann; Blatt 104 (103v-104r)
Müller, Jacob; Blatt 105 (104v-105r)
Ebel, Reinhard; Blatt 106,2 (106v-107r)
Ebel, Heinrich; Blatt 107 (106v-107r)
Dinner, Wolfgang Conrad; Blatt 107,2 (107v-108r)
Sattler, Johann Bartholomäus; Blatt 108 (107v-108r)
Eberken, Johann; Blatt 109 (108v-109r)
Kirchbach, Peter; Blatt 110 (109v-110r)
Piscator, Heinrich; Blatt 112 (111v-112r)
Kalckbrenner, Johann; Blatt 112,2 (112v)
Peithmann, Ludolph; Blatt 113 (113r)
Reincke, Otto; Blatt 114 (113v-114r)
Baumann, Johann Nicolaus; Blatt 116 (115v-116r)
Ostend, Johann Christoph; Blatt 117 (116v-117r)
Köler, Philipp; Blatt 118 (117v-118r)
Edel, Samuel; Blatt 119 (118v-119r)
Stephani, Jacob; Blatt 119,2 (119v-120r)
Seher, Reinhold; Blatt 120 (119v-120r)
Balhorn, Johann; Blatt 120,2 (120v-121r)
Huber, Johann Martin; Blatt 121 (120v-121r)
Wilhelm, Hieronymus; Blatt 121,2 (121v-122r)
Stavanger, Michael; Blatt 122 (121v-122r)
Römeling, Conrad; Blatt 123 (122v-123r)
Dieterich, Helwig; Blatt 124 (123v-124r)
Wilhelm, Sylvester; Blatt 125 (125r)
Ruhel, Johann Adolph; Blatt 126 (125v-126r)
Hepp, Zacharias; Blatt 127 (126v-127r)
Henckel, Otto; Blatt 128 (127v-128r)
Spangenberg, Sebastian; Blatt 128,2 (128v-129r)
Bake, Heinrich; Blatt 129 (128v-129r)
Fabricius, Johann Heinrich; Blatt 129,2 (129v-130r)
Fabricius, Georg; Blatt 130 (129v-130r)
Wirtnitzer, Jacob; Blatt 131 (130v-131r)
Lehlin, Johann Georg; Blatt 132,2 (132v-133r)
Brodhag, Bernhard; Blatt 133,2 (133v-134r)
Seemann, Caspar; Blatt 134 (133v-134r)
Cuen, Johannes; Blatt 135 (134v-135r)
Gebhard, Israel Ludwig; Blatt 136 (135v-136r)
Vetter, Johannes M.; Blatt 136 (135v-136r)
Krech, Georg; Blatt 136,2 (136v-137r)
Altvatter, Johann Sebastian; Blatt 137 (136v-137r)
Hertel, Christoph; Blatt 137,2 (137v-138r)
Stumpf, Hans Jakob; Blatt 138 (137v-138r)
Stammler, Albrecht; Blatt 138,2 (138v
Hegel and Deleuze: immanence and otherness
No full textThe thesis critically analyses the dominant foundationalist tendency of modern philosophy, with special reference to the sophisticated antifoundationalist critiques of foundationalism formulated by G.W.F. Hegel and Gilles Deleuze.
It begins by outlining a general methodological aspect of foundationalism, regarding the necessity of radical self-critique in philosophy, which directly connects contemporary thought with Cartesianism, via classical German philosophy.
In the philosophies of Kant, Fichte and Schelling, this self-critical project is transformed: they undertake to show that reason can, by examining itself, give an account of experience that is systematic, or consistent with itself. However, each of these thinkers fails to accomplish this, and indeed, the commitment to a priori foundations is itself undermined in Schelling's work; where a philosophical crisis of meaning (a 'trauma of reason', philosophical nihilism) emerges.
Deleuze and Hegel's contrasting critiques of foundationalism, and their positive reconstructions of the standpoint of philosophy, are then interpreted as non-foundationalist attempts to overcome this internal crisis of foundationalist thought as inadvertently exposed by Schelling. Both criticise certain subjective presuppositions common to foundationalist philosophies, which they consider constitute a dogmatic 'image' of philosophy, a kind of transcendental illusion that is the guiding force behind foundationalism. Both also aim to replace this with a genuinely philosophical image.
The thesis provides an original historical contextualisation of Deleuze's thought in relation to German Idealism, and Schelling in particular, with whom, it is argued, Deleuze has much in common. Deleuze's conception of pure difference is treated in this regard as a kind of 'absolute knowledge'. This contextualisation also allows the sometimes crudely understood antipathy between Hegel and Deleuze to be addressed in a more penetrating fashion, which shows that they have more in common in terms of their critical orientation than is usually supposed.
The thesis concludes with a critical comparison of these thinkers, which argues that, although both succeed in their own terms, in relation to a criterion of self-consistency, Hegel's philosophy offers a more satisfactory treatment of the ontological and historical conditions of philosophical activity
El fundamento en Dios y la fundación de la historia del Ser: sobre el rol de Schelling en el pensar ontohistórico de Martin Heidegger
No full textEn esta ponencia se tematizará la influencia de la diferenciación de Schelling entre fundamento y existencia en Dios con respecto a la concepción heideggeriana en torno a la fundación de la historia del Ser. Para ello nos concentraremos en la lección sostenida por Heidegger en el semestre de verano de 1936 sobre el tratado de la libertad, así como en el cuarto ensamble (Fuge) de los Aportes a la filosofía titulado “La fundación”. Mi intención es mostrar cómo la dimensión metahistórica de la historia del Ser en cuanto pregunta por el origen, esto es, por la fundación de la historia del ser, se basa en la apropiación heideggeriana de la concepción de Schelling sobre el fundamento en cuanto naturaleza en Dios, convirtiéndose ello además en el “núcleo central” del pensar ontohistórico heideggeriano. En este sentido se tomará también en consideración el concepto de tiempo que procede de la diferenciación de Schelling entre fundamento y existencia, el cual ejerce un influjo determinante en la concepción metahistórica del tiempo de Heidegger.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tec
El neoplatonismo de Schelling
No full textThe author reflects on some perspective of the early, medium and last thought of Schelling, to show how a glance to its objective and historical entailment with the neoplatonic thought can clarify the structure of its philosophy. In the philosophy of Schelling (a figure of the philosophy who has determined “modernity”) the permanent importance of the neoplatonism is revealed
The Political Theology of Schelling
No full textThis book rigorously examines the theologico-political works of Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, setting his thought against Hegel's and showing how he prepared the way for the post-metaphysical philosophy of Martin Heidegger, Franz Rosenzweig and Jacques Derrida.</p
El concepto de tiempo de Hegel y Schelling en los Seminarios de 1927-1928 de Heidegger.
No full textThe aim is to show the process of Hegel and Schelling ́s interpretation of concept of time on Martin Heidegger ́s seminars of 1927-1928. First, I explain the Heidegger ́s confrontation of Hegel before and after of Being and Time. Then, is analyzed the first Heidegger ́s confrontation with Schelling in 1927-1928. At the end, is concludes with the basics elements that the young Heidegger takes up from Hegel-Schelling ́s concept of time.El objetivo es mostrar la interpretación del concepto de tiempo de Hegel y Schelling en los seminarios de 1927-1928 de Martin Heidegger. Primero se explica la confrontación que Heidegger realiza de Hegel antes y después de Ser y tiempo. Después, se analiza la primera confrontación con Schelling en 1927-1928. Y al final se concluye con los elementos centrales que el joven Heidegger retoma del concepto de tiempo de Hegel y Schelling
Seminare : Hegel, Schelling /
No full text"Manuskripte, Protokolle und Mitschriften zu Seminaren von 1927 bis 1957. Herausgegeben von Peter Trawny"--Title page verso.Includes bibliographical references.Aristoteles-Hegel-Seminar, SS [i.e. Sommersemester] 1927 -- Schelling, Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit, WS [i.e. Wintersemester] 1927/28 -- Hegel, "Rechtsphilosophie", WS 1934/35 -- Schelling und der deutsche Idealismus, 1941-1943 -- Zu Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes, SS 1942 -- Zu Hegel, Logik des Wesens, WS 1955/56 -- Gespräch von der Sache des Denkens mit Hegel, WS 1956/57
Heuristic Schelling: economy of organized crime
No full textThis article proposes a reading of the armed conflict from an evolutionary design that takes into account the concept of private protection agencies in the works of Schelling. Their aim is to assess the dynamics of conflict and changes from its author's scientific output. A context of conflicts that includes new expressions of violence and the relative failure of the paramilitary reintegration involves using new analytical models (argumentation, game theory and inconsistent information). The recent evolution of emerging gangs and their expansion into areas that were paramilitary camps requires monitoring not only of the government and the authorities, but those investigating the conflict in the present tense. The author provides heuristic research support from Schelling’s theory of strategy, recent contributions to the relationship between organized crime and drug cartels.Colombia, Government, Civil War, Latin America, Security, Protection Agencies.
- …
