1,721,129 research outputs found
Utero-cervical angle to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a review of literature
No full textBACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the predictive role of the uterocervical angle (UCA) in spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). . METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed including all studies reporting the association between UCA and sPTB. Searches were performed with the use of a combination of keywords: "cervical length," "uterocervical angle," and "preterm birth" from inception of each database to March 2022. The statistical evaluations were carried out using the Comprehensive Meta -Analysis version 3 (Biostat Inc. USA). RESULTS: Sixteen studies all conducted on the second trimester UCA as well as its association with sPTB were included in this study. In all studies the measurements of cervical length (CL) and UCA were performer in the second trimester, except in one that in the third trimester. In most studies the CL is greater than 30 mm and the UCA is greater than 110 degrees. In seven studies women with symptoms were considered while in 8 studies the women were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: It is too early for it to reach a firm conclusion on UCA utilization in clinical settings. A higher UCA measurement (greater than 150 degrees) is an important risk factor for deliveries before 37 weeks' gestation. It provides a higher diagnostic performance in high risk patients than the CL measurement. However, the most relevant ultrasound parameter for the prediction of delivery within the next few data in women with preterm delivery remains the cervical length. There is a need to consider both markers and create protocols so that the values obtained with UCA and those with CL can make a real contribution to decisions to be made rather than using only CL. ( Cite this article as: Giorno A, Mari S, Rispoli EM, Cipullo LM, Manzo L, Saccone G, et al. Utero-cervical angle to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a review of literature. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2024 May 21. DOI: 10.23736/ S2724 -606X.24.05433-2
3H-spiperone labels sigma receptors, not dopamine D2 receptors, in rat and human lymphocytes
No full text3H-Spiperone binds to dopamine D2 receptors in striatum and, under the assumption that it labels the same receptors in lymphocytes, this binding site has been suggested as a biological marker for schizophrenia. Recent studies, however, have raised questions about the existence of dopamine receptor changes in drug-free schizophrenic patients, as well as on the presence and/or dopaminergic nature of lymphocytic 3H-spiperone binding sites. In the present study we have conducted an investigation of the binding of 3H-spiperone to rat and human lymphocytes. We found that 3H-spiperone binds in a specific, saturable and reversible manner to a site in lymphocytes; however, its dissociation constant Kd (9 nM) is about 40-fold higher than in striatum. An extensive investigation of the 3H-spiperone sites indicated that their pharmacological profile was not that of a dopamine D2 site, but rather that of sigma receptors, a novel class of non-dopaminergic, non-opioid receptors which bind with high affinity antipsychotic drugs. Sigma receptors were also identified in lymphocytes using the specific ligand 3H-DTG (1,3-di-o-tolyl-guanidine), whose binding characteristics were comparable to those of sigma receptors in rat brain. Receptor density and the pharmacological profile of 3H-spiperone and 3H-DTG were similar. Both compounds also labelled a higher number of sites in B cells than in T cells and a good correlation was found between the lymphocytic binding of both ligands in a group of 58 people. These findings indicate that sigma receptors are present in lymphocytes and suggest that 3H-spiperone binding in these cells occurs to sigma sites and not to dopamine D2 sites
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
